Let's take a hard look at the concept of "states" in this country

ChairmanGonzalo

Active Member
Oct 6, 2016
306
49
33
The idea of an individual state having so much power within a sovereign country is insanely confusing. It boggles my mind that states like Texas are allowed to restrict abortion, that states like North Carolina or Alabama are allowed to pass laws restricting LGBTQ rights, or that individual states are allowed to make their own laws allowing assault rifles while banning a simple harmless weed from being smoked.

Personally, the only laws that local, non-federal governments should be allowed to make should be speed limits, road construction/repairs, and limited oversight over local taxes. All other laws, such as those regarding a woman's right to choose, should be the sole territory of the national government.

The idea of states themselves makes no sense. Why does each province of this country get to have it's own flag, its own "state anthem", it's own motto, and it's own constitution? This is basically just encouraging secession, regionalism, and state government overreach.

I believe that the idea of states should be abolished, and should be replaced with fifteen federal subdivisions of twenty million people each. Each subdivision would have two senators, and it's own local elected board of trustees to oversee local issues such as speed limits. Each would only be referred to by a letter of the alphabet (for example Federal Subdivision B or Federal Subdivision G), and would not have its own flag or constitution. This is to hammer in the fact that the federal government, not the state government, is in charge.

Once again, these districts would only be allowed to make laws regarding local issues, such as roads, building codes, or park funding. Important issues such as the minimum wage, the rights of LGBTQ individuals, the legalization of Marijuana, etc. would be made by the federal government and be the same nationwide.

I know that some of you will say "but the idea of states is in the constitution!" Yes it is. But the constitution is just a piece of paper which can be edited. The constitution in 1789 allowed slavery, treated people of color as subhumans, and banned women from voting. I believe the idea of having fifty sovereign states within our nation is another antiquated idea which needs to go the way of the horse and buggy.
 
So your problem is we aren't one big collective. Why are you so against people being who they are? Seriously. Why do YOU think you know whats better for everyone?
 
If it ain't broke don't fix it !

I like how different states experiment . And u have the ability to move to one that jives with you.

Plus the constitution keeps some base rights and rules the same everywhere.
 
Good idea....Quite a few nations are Unitary.. Unitary state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think the federal government should hold the main power in our country, but as you said the districts should also have some say in local issues like roads and parks.

The Constitution was designed to put the 'main power' in the hands of the federal government,

rightwing nonsense about the Founders notwithstanding.
 
The idea of an individual state having so much power within a sovereign country is insanely confusing. It boggles my mind that states like Texas are allowed to restrict abortion, that states like North Carolina or Alabama are allowed to pass laws restricting LGBTQ rights, or that individual states are allowed to make their own laws allowing assault rifles while banning a simple harmless weed from being smoked.

Personally, the only laws that local, non-federal governments should be allowed to make should be speed limits, road construction/repairs, and limited oversight over local taxes. All other laws, such as those regarding a woman's right to choose, should be the sole territory of the national government.

The idea of states themselves makes no sense. Why does each province of this country get to have it's own flag, its own "state anthem", it's own motto, and it's own constitution? This is basically just encouraging secession, regionalism, and state government overreach.

I believe that the idea of states should be abolished, and should be replaced with fifteen federal subdivisions of twenty million people each. Each subdivision would have two senators, and it's own local elected board of trustees to oversee local issues such as speed limits. Each would only be referred to by a letter of the alphabet (for example Federal Subdivision B or Federal Subdivision G), and would not have its own flag or constitution. This is to hammer in the fact that the federal government, not the state government, is in charge.

Once again, these districts would only be allowed to make laws regarding local issues, such as roads, building codes, or park funding. Important issues such as the minimum wage, the rights of LGBTQ individuals, the legalization of Marijuana, etc. would be made by the federal government and be the same nationwide.

I know that some of you will say "but the idea of states is in the constitution!" Yes it is. But the constitution is just a piece of paper which can be edited. The constitution in 1789 allowed slavery, treated people of color as subhumans, and banned women from voting. I believe the idea of having fifty sovereign states within our nation is another antiquated idea which needs to go the way of the horse and buggy.

You're a fucking idiot, the States formed the federal government, they have the power to alter the government at will via Article 5. It is the States who are the Ultimate Sovereigns, NOT THE FEDS.
 
The idea of an individual state having so much power within a sovereign country is insanely confusing. It boggles my mind that states like Texas are allowed to restrict abortion, that states like North Carolina or Alabama are allowed to pass laws restricting LGBTQ rights, or that individual states are allowed to make their own laws allowing assault rifles while banning a simple harmless weed from being smoked.

Personally, the only laws that local, non-federal governments should be allowed to make should be speed limits, road construction/repairs, and limited oversight over local taxes. All other laws, such as those regarding a woman's right to choose, should be the sole territory of the national government.

The idea of states themselves makes no sense. Why does each province of this country get to have it's own flag, its own "state anthem", it's own motto, and it's own constitution? This is basically just encouraging secession, regionalism, and state government overreach.

I believe that the idea of states should be abolished, and should be replaced with fifteen federal subdivisions of twenty million people each. Each subdivision would have two senators, and it's own local elected board of trustees to oversee local issues such as speed limits. Each would only be referred to by a letter of the alphabet (for example Federal Subdivision B or Federal Subdivision G), and would not have its own flag or constitution. This is to hammer in the fact that the federal government, not the state government, is in charge.

Once again, these districts would only be allowed to make laws regarding local issues, such as roads, building codes, or park funding. Important issues such as the minimum wage, the rights of LGBTQ individuals, the legalization of Marijuana, etc. would be made by the federal government and be the same nationwide.

I know that some of you will say "but the idea of states is in the constitution!" Yes it is. But the constitution is just a piece of paper which can be edited. The constitution in 1789 allowed slavery, treated people of color as subhumans, and banned women from voting. I believe the idea of having fifty sovereign states within our nation is another antiquated idea which needs to go the way of the horse and buggy.


thanks for sharing----now we know your opinion
 
Good idea....Quite a few nations are Unitary.. Unitary state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think the federal government should hold the main power in our country, but as you said the districts should also have some say in local issues like roads and parks.

The Constitution was designed to put the 'main power' in the hands of the federal government,

rightwing nonsense about the Founders notwithstanding.

The Constitution was designed to limit the power of the Federal government.
 
The idea of an individual state having so much power within a sovereign country is insanely confusing. It boggles my mind that states like Texas are allowed to restrict abortion, that states like North Carolina or Alabama are allowed to pass laws restricting LGBTQ rights, or that individual states are allowed to make their own laws allowing assault rifles while banning a simple harmless weed from being smoked.

Personally, the only laws that local, non-federal governments should be allowed to make should be speed limits, road construction/repairs, and limited oversight over local taxes. All other laws, such as those regarding a woman's right to choose, should be the sole territory of the national government.

The idea of states themselves makes no sense. Why does each province of this country get to have it's own flag, its own "state anthem", it's own motto, and it's own constitution? This is basically just encouraging secession, regionalism, and state government overreach.

I believe that the idea of states should be abolished, and should be replaced with fifteen federal subdivisions of twenty million people each. Each subdivision would have two senators, and it's own local elected board of trustees to oversee local issues such as speed limits. Each would only be referred to by a letter of the alphabet (for example Federal Subdivision B or Federal Subdivision G), and would not have its own flag or constitution. This is to hammer in the fact that the federal government, not the state government, is in charge.

Once again, these districts would only be allowed to make laws regarding local issues, such as roads, building codes, or park funding. Important issues such as the minimum wage, the rights of LGBTQ individuals, the legalization of Marijuana, etc. would be made by the federal government and be the same nationwide.

I know that some of you will say "but the idea of states is in the constitution!" Yes it is. But the constitution is just a piece of paper which can be edited. The constitution in 1789 allowed slavery, treated people of color as subhumans, and banned women from voting. I believe the idea of having fifty sovereign states within our nation is another antiquated idea which needs to go the way of the horse and buggy.


What you want is a fast track to everything you want and to feel that is good for everyone. All for the people, you think but thats how every shithole dictatorship was started. Once a centralized government has all the power it can never go back.
 
Good idea....Quite a few nations are Unitary.. Unitary state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think the federal government should hold the main power in our country, but as you said the districts should also have some say in local issues like roads and parks.

The Constitution was designed to put the 'main power' in the hands of the federal government,

rightwing nonsense about the Founders notwithstanding.

The Constitution was designed to limit the power of the Federal government.

It was designed to limit the power of the states even more. Compare the Constitution to the Articles of Confederation.
 
Let's take a hard look at the IP address of the OP-Spamming-Troll.
 
The idea of an individual state having so much power within a sovereign country is insanely confusing. It boggles my mind that states like Texas are allowed to restrict abortion, that states like North Carolina or Alabama are allowed to pass laws restricting LGBTQ rights, or that individual states are allowed to make their own laws allowing assault rifles while banning a simple harmless weed from being smoked.

Personally, the only laws that local, non-federal governments should be allowed to make should be speed limits, road construction/repairs, and limited oversight over local taxes. All other laws, such as those regarding a woman's right to choose, should be the sole territory of the national government.

The idea of states themselves makes no sense. Why does each province of this country get to have it's own flag, its own "state anthem", it's own motto, and it's own constitution? This is basically just encouraging secession, regionalism, and state government overreach.

I believe that the idea of states should be abolished, and should be replaced with fifteen federal subdivisions of twenty million people each. Each subdivision would have two senators, and it's own local elected board of trustees to oversee local issues such as speed limits. Each would only be referred to by a letter of the alphabet (for example Federal Subdivision B or Federal Subdivision G), and would not have its own flag or constitution. This is to hammer in the fact that the federal government, not the state government, is in charge.

Once again, these districts would only be allowed to make laws regarding local issues, such as roads, building codes, or park funding. Important issues such as the minimum wage, the rights of LGBTQ individuals, the legalization of Marijuana, etc. would be made by the federal government and be the same nationwide.

I know that some of you will say "but the idea of states is in the constitution!" Yes it is. But the constitution is just a piece of paper which can be edited. The constitution in 1789 allowed slavery, treated people of color as subhumans, and banned women from voting. I believe the idea of having fifty sovereign states within our nation is another antiquated idea which needs to go the way of the horse and buggy.

You're a fucking idiot, the States formed the federal government, they have the power to alter the government at will via Article 5. It is the States who are the Ultimate Sovereigns, NOT THE FEDS.

In an extremely technical way, you might be right, but in real life, the Federal Government is the Supreme power in this country.
 
Good idea....Quite a few nations are Unitary.. Unitary state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think the federal government should hold the main power in our country, but as you said the districts should also have some say in local issues like roads and parks.

The Constitution was designed to put the 'main power' in the hands of the federal government,

rightwing nonsense about the Founders notwithstanding.

The Constitution was designed to limit the power of the Federal government.

there was and has been endless bickering over that issue
 
The idea of an individual state having so much power within a sovereign country is insanely confusing. It boggles my mind that states like Texas are allowed to restrict abortion, that states like North Carolina or Alabama are allowed to pass laws restricting LGBTQ rights, or that individual states are allowed to make their own laws allowing assault rifles while banning a simple harmless weed from being smoked.

Personally, the only laws that local, non-federal governments should be allowed to make should be speed limits, road construction/repairs, and limited oversight over local taxes. All other laws, such as those regarding a woman's right to choose, should be the sole territory of the national government.

The idea of states themselves makes no sense. Why does each province of this country get to have it's own flag, its own "state anthem", it's own motto, and it's own constitution? This is basically just encouraging secession, regionalism, and state government overreach.

I believe that the idea of states should be abolished, and should be replaced with fifteen federal subdivisions of twenty million people each. Each subdivision would have two senators, and it's own local elected board of trustees to oversee local issues such as speed limits. Each would only be referred to by a letter of the alphabet (for example Federal Subdivision B or Federal Subdivision G), and would not have its own flag or constitution. This is to hammer in the fact that the federal government, not the state government, is in charge.

Once again, these districts would only be allowed to make laws regarding local issues, such as roads, building codes, or park funding. Important issues such as the minimum wage, the rights of LGBTQ individuals, the legalization of Marijuana, etc. would be made by the federal government and be the same nationwide.

I know that some of you will say "but the idea of states is in the constitution!" Yes it is. But the constitution is just a piece of paper which can be edited. The constitution in 1789 allowed slavery, treated people of color as subhumans, and banned women from voting. I believe the idea of having fifty sovereign states within our nation is another antiquated idea which needs to go the way of the horse and buggy.

You're a fucking idiot, the States formed the federal government, they have the power to alter the government at will via Article 5. It is the States who are the Ultimate Sovereigns, NOT THE FEDS.

In an extremely technical way, you might be right, but in real life, the Federal Government is the Supreme power in this country.

Only because of its constitutional violations, that needs to be changed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top