I was wondering when I'd see the first use of the twisted rationale, "everything trump does is supported by the people because a majority voted for him." I just saw it on another thread.
When people voted their pocketbooks with misdirected anger over inflation do you really think it was a tacit approval of trump seeking to bypass the "advise and consent" function the Senate traditionally performs and allow him to name cabinet appointees without confirmation hearings? Do you think they said to themselves before voting, "I'm completely on board with trump's violation of the law by not signing the ethics pledge he is required to sign."
I mean, you folks do realize a number of down ballot issues in various states saw voters oppose trump's position and oppose candidates he endorsed, right? You can't be so silly as to think frustration with inflation reflects support for his entire agenda, do you?
So they next time you have the urge to defend some reckless, illegal, unethical thing Don proposes by saying the majority is with him, resist the urge.
Voters Overwhelming Support Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation
theimmigrationhub.org