Let's see if we can nip this one in the bud.

[luiza]

I was wondering when I'd see the first use of the twisted rationale,

I suggest you first re-read your full OP .
My view is that it is an excellent example of convoluted mumbo jumbo .

You simply produce an isolated single premiss that is chosen to suit your pre-determined conclusion .

That is Cheating .

You then add injury to insult by a further attempt at Deceit .

You conflate something of the past --- mass illegal entry--- with something for the future , that could involve all legal newcomers -- a path way to citizenship .

Thoroughly Dishonest if deliberate .
Amateurish if unconsidered

 

[berg80]

News flash for you.

Exit polls get lied to, often.

Right. When your assumptions get challenged resort to a derivative of "fake news."

 

[Darkwind]

Right. When your assumptions get challenged resort to a derivative of "fake news."

My assumptions were never challenged.

If you actually were credible, you'd see that in the past 6 elections, exit polls, and truly, actual elections results, have differed greatly from what was assumed. Those assumptions were made on the basis if 'exit polling' which found not only bias by the organs of the Democrat party, but it was often wrong.

I've never held an assumption about exit polling because they have always been ignored on My part for the actual polls after the election.

What IS being challenged is your assumptions that the people actually didn't vote for Trump because of x or y, or z.

Now, if you have an actual line of contention about this election, state it without the use of unofficial rumormongering.

 

[marvin martian]

All the exit polls show the key factor in the election was inflation. Not social wedge issues like the trans debate, gun control, the environment, or abortion. On the last three issues the majority stands with Dems.

"All the exit polls..."

Lol

 

[berg80]

Now, if you have an actual line of contention about this election, state it without the use of unofficial rumormongering.

Already have.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

All the exit polls show the key factor in the election was inflation. Not social wedge issues like the trans debate, gun control, the environment, or abortion. On the last three issues the majority stands with Dems.

My goodness, please stop. You're embarrassing yourself. I hate to see you flailing and grasping so desperately. It hurts to watch.

 

[Darkwind]

Already have.

What you have done is give vent to your grief. Nothing valid in that except to you.

Have a nice day.

 

[1srelluc]

berg does not disappoint.

When a thread is so you have to take a moment to appreciate it.

 

[berg80]

My goodness, please stop. You're embarrassing yourself. I hate to see you flailing and grasping so desperately. It hurts to watch.

Presenting the facts isn't embarrassing. You failure to refute them is.

 

[berg80]

What you have done is give vent to your grief. Nothing valid in that except to you.

Have a nice day.

You are welcome to disagree with me. But one would hope you'd be able to substantiate the reason why. Maybe next time.

 

[Lesh]

I was wondering when I'd see the first use of the twisted rationale, "everything trump does is supported by the people because a majority voted for him." I just saw it on another thread.

When people voted their pocketbooks with misdirected anger over inflation do you really think it was a tacit approval of trump seeking to bypass the "advise and consent" function the Senate traditionally performs and allow him to name cabinet appointees without confirmation hearings? Do you think they said to themselves before voting, "I'm completely on board with trump's violation of the law by not signing the ethics pledge he is required to sign."

I mean, you folks do realize a number of down ballot issues in various states saw voters oppose trump's position and oppose candidates he endorsed, right? You can't be so silly as to think frustration with inflation reflects support for his entire agenda, do you?

So they next time you have the urge to defend some reckless, illegal, unethical thing Don proposes by saying the majority is with him, resist the urge.

Voters Overwhelming Support Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation​

The American Public Supports Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation - Immigration Hub

theimmigrationhub.org

Damn

 

[Independent thinker]

I was wondering when I'd see the first use of the twisted rationale, "everything trump does is supported by the people because a majority voted for him." I just saw it on another thread.

When people voted their pocketbooks with misdirected anger over inflation do you really think it was a tacit approval of trump seeking to bypass the "advise and consent" function the Senate traditionally performs and allow him to name cabinet appointees without confirmation hearings? Do you think they said to themselves before voting, "I'm completely on board with trump's violation of the law by not signing the ethics pledge he is required to sign."

I mean, you folks do realize a number of down ballot issues in various states saw voters oppose trump's position and oppose candidates he endorsed, right? You can't be so silly as to think frustration with inflation reflects support for his entire agenda, do you?

So they next time you have the urge to defend some reckless, illegal, unethical thing Don proposes by saying the majority is with him, resist the urge.

Voters Overwhelming Support Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation​

The American Public Supports Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation - Immigration Hub

theimmigrationhub.org

You are in full spin mode.

 

[jotathought]

I was wondering when I'd see the first use of the twisted rationale, "everything trump does is supported by the people because a majority voted for him." I just saw it on another thread.

When people voted their pocketbooks with misdirected anger over inflation do you really think it was a tacit approval of trump seeking to bypass the "advise and consent" function the Senate traditionally performs and allow him to name cabinet appointees without confirmation hearings? Do you think they said to themselves before voting, "I'm completely on board with trump's violation of the law by not signing the ethics pledge he is required to sign."

I mean, you folks do realize a number of down ballot issues in various states saw voters oppose trump's position and oppose candidates he endorsed, right? You can't be so silly as to think frustration with inflation reflects support for his entire agenda, do you?

So they next time you have the urge to defend some reckless, illegal, unethical thing Don proposes by saying the majority is with him, resist the urge.

Voters Overwhelming Support Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation​

The American Public Supports Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation - Immigration Hub

theimmigrationhub.org

Do you feel confident that a majority of low-information voters even understands what "Pathway to Citizenship" means? To put things into context, 66% don't know where Ukraine is on a map, 53% can't name the three branches of government, 26% can't name any of the protections in the First Amendment (~75% could only name Freedom of Speech), and 51% believe Facebook is required to permit individuals to freely express themselves.

 

[berg80]

You are in full spin mode.

I don't care what you believe, only what you can prove.

 

[berg80]

Do you feel confident that a majority of low-information voters even understands what "Pathway to Citizenship" means?

The exact details? Not likely. The basics? Yes.

 

[Independent thinker]

I don't care what you believe, only what you can prove.

And yet you are plastering cyberspace with your beliefs.

 

[marvin martian]

I don't care what you believe, only what you can prove.

You haven't proven anything, except that you're a loyal member of a dying cult.

 

[Concerned American]

I was wondering when I'd see the first use of the twisted rationale, "everything trump does is supported by the people because a majority voted for him." I just saw it on another thread.

When people voted their pocketbooks with misdirected anger over inflation do you really think it was a tacit approval of trump seeking to bypass the "advise and consent" function the Senate traditionally performs and allow him to name cabinet appointees without confirmation hearings? Do you think they said to themselves before voting, "I'm completely on board with trump's violation of the law by not signing the ethics pledge he is required to sign."

I mean, you folks do realize a number of down ballot issues in various states saw voters oppose trump's position and oppose candidates he endorsed, right? You can't be so silly as to think frustration with inflation reflects support for his entire agenda, do you?

So they next time you have the urge to defend some reckless, illegal, unethical thing Don proposes by saying the majority is with him, resist the urge.

Voters Overwhelming Support Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation​

The American Public Supports Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation - Immigration Hub

theimmigrationhub.org

312-226, red house and senate.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I was wondering when I'd see the first use of the twisted rationale, "everything trump does is supported by the people because a majority voted for him." I just saw it on another thread.

When people voted their pocketbooks with misdirected anger over inflation do you really think it was a tacit approval of trump seeking to bypass the "advise and consent" function the Senate traditionally performs and allow him to name cabinet appointees without confirmation hearings?

Yes.

Do you think they said to themselves before voting, "I'm completely on board with trump's violation of the law by not signing the ethics pledge he is required to sign."

No because that did not happen.

I mean, you folks do realize a number of down ballot issues in various states saw voters oppose trump's position and oppose candidates he endorsed, right? You can't be so silly as to think frustration with inflation reflects support for his entire agenda, do you?

It reflects willingness to accept his agenda as the alternative to the disaster that we had under Democrats. If your Party fail to recognize that basic fact, it will be in the minority until it withers away.

So they next time you have the urge to defend some reckless, illegal, unethical thing Don proposes by saying the majority is with him, resist the urge.

Voters Overwhelming Support Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation​

The American Public Supports Pathway To Citizenship Over Mass Deportation - Immigration Hub

theimmigrationhub.org

Then why did they not overwhelmingly vote in Democrats instead of overwhelmingly giving Republicans control of all three branches?

 

[berg80]

And yet you are plastering cyberspace with your beliefs.

And factual material that backs them up.