Let's hear from homosexuals about transsexuals

[Robert W]

Put two and two together. You support a monster.

Why was Epstein put in prison yet Trump was not? That nonsense that Trump did what Epstein did does not fly. Prove he did as Epstein did. Clinton was just as close.

 

[sealybobo]

Interesting, you simultaneously want the Church to insert itself into the public sphere as long as it's going after Orange Man, but you DON'T want it inserting itself into the public sphere if it means your boss can have a Bible on his desk and lead the company in prayer at the Thanksgiving Dinner.

I want the church to insert itself into the public sphere? Huh?

I want religion to be a taboo topic at work. God I wish you worked with a bunch of muslims so you could understand why.

Church is just one of the ways the rich control us.

 

[hadit]

I want the church to insert itself into the public sphere? Huh?

Yup, you lament that the Church does not sufficiently bow at the alter of Orange Man Bad. You want it speaking out against him.

I want religion to be a taboo topic at work. God I wish you worked with a bunch of muslims so you could understand why.

I've worked at several companies with a religiously diverse workforce and I don't recall having a problem with someone taking a religious holiday I did not. I've also worked with militant atheists and didn't ever feel the need for fisticuffs. I guess I'm just not as easily offended as you are.

Church is just one of the ways the rich control us.

Wow, the paranoia is strong in that one.

 

[sealybobo]

Yup, you lament that the Church does not sufficiently bow at the alter of Orange Man Bad. You want it speaking out against him.

I've worked at several companies with a religiously diverse workforce and I don't recall having a problem with someone taking a religious holiday I did not. I've also worked with militant atheists and didn't ever feel the need for fisticuffs. I guess I'm just not as easily offended as you are.

Wow, the paranoia is strong in that one.

I want the church to do whatever is in their hearts.

You don't recall because before the Supreme Court/Trump's ruling, you weren't allowed to bother people at work with your religious nonsense. Now it's encouraged?

And I doubt you work at a majority muslim company. I live near the Muslim Capital of America where Muslim's push the limits of the constitution. You can't make them do this because of their religion, or that because of their religion. They sue all the time. And most of the time they get their way because technically they are right. Same for gay marriage. You guys didn't want to allow gays to get married but that's so ******* unconstitutional. Did you care? No you did not.

If you worked on a team of 10 and 9 were muslims, you would see my point. But you don't. You work in a "diverse" workforce where people keep that shit to themselves.

 

[hadit]

I want the church to do whatever is in their hearts.

You don't recall because before the Supreme Court/Trump's ruling, you weren't allowed to bother people at work with your religious nonsense. Now it's encouraged?

And I doubt you work at a majority muslim company. I live near the Muslim Capital of America where Muslim's push the limits of the constitution. You can't make them do this because of their religion, or that because of their religion. They sue all the time. And most of the time they get their way because technically they are right. Same for gay marriage. You guys didn't want to allow gays to get married but that's so ******* unconstitutional. Did you care? No you did not.

If you worked on a team of 10 and 9 were muslims, you would see my point. But you don't. You work in a "diverse" workforce where people keep that shit to themselves.

Okay, okay, I get the point. You don't like to work with Muslims. You have an unfortunate tendency to completely misconstrue, twist, and violate clear language to portray something in ways that it simply does not. Which decision are you complaining about this time?

 

[Robert W]

Church is just one of the ways the rich control us.

Sounds as if you want the poor to control us.

 

[80zephyr]

Oh come on you don't know? Haven't heard? That's not Trump's drawing? Oh yes it is. What secrets was Trump talking about? What makes those two enigmas?

Did you see the drawing of a guy giving 3 10 year olds lollypops then the next drawing is that same guy with 3 18 year olds giving him sex/massages? In other words grooming little girls. Then remember when those 10 year olds walked by Trump on a hot mic that catches him saying "can you believe I'll be dating her in 10 years?"

Put two and two together. You support a monster.

 

[sealybobo]

Okay, okay, I get the point. You don't like to work with Muslims. You have an unfortunate tendency to completely misconstrue, twist, and violate clear language to portray something in ways that it simply does not. Which decision are you complaining about this time?

I'm sure if it was speech you don't like, you'd see it differently. I was just trying to make a point. When Muslims protest what Israel is doing, you shut it down. Call it anti semetic. Force universities to shut peaceful protests down.

 

[martybegan]

I'm sure if it was speech you don't like, you'd see it differently. I was just trying to make a point. When Muslims protest what Israel is doing, you shut it down. Call it anti semetic. Force universities to shut peaceful protests down.

Blocking jewish students paths and preventing them from accessing campuses is peaceful?

Judge rules for Jewish students, says UCLA can't allow them to be barred from accessing campus after protests

The complaint alleges the protesters created a “Jew Exclusion Zone” where in order to pass “a person had to make a statement pledging their allegiance to the activists’ view.” Those who complied with the protesters’ view were issued wristbands to allow them to pass through, the complaint says, which effectively barred Jewish students who supported Israel and denied them access to the heart of campus.

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Mark C. Scarsi sided with the three students and rebuked the school.

 

[sealybobo]

Blocking jewish students paths and preventing them from accessing campuses is peaceful?

Judge rules for Jewish students, says UCLA can't allow them to be barred from accessing campus after protests

Is your position that whites can't have white only clubs?

So Jews can't be excluded from groups?

If no Jews are allowed then they will be peaceful.

• Viral videos: Several videos of the incidents went viral, including one in which a Jewish student, Eli Tsives, claimed protesters formed a human barricade to block his path to class.

So no video of it happening. Just a video of him claiming it happened.

• "Jew Exclusion Zone" accusations: The encampment, set up on Royce Quad, was surrounded by barriers. Some accused protesters of creating a "Jew Exclusion Zone," where individuals were denied entry based on their faith or support for Israel.

BS
This is like Trump's shakedown of CBS/Paramount.
The settlement came after a Department of Justice investigation found UCLA was "deliberately indifferent" to the hostile environment created for Jewish students.

The truth: Some argued they were attempting to redirect pro-Israel or Zionist individuals to avoid conflict, while others claimed that Jewish students participated in the encampment itself.

Do you remember all the Jewish Americans who protested right away what Israel was doing? They knew Bibi would commit genocide.

 

[martybegan]

Is your position that whites can't have white only clubs?

So Jews can't be excluded from groups?

If no Jews are allowed then they will be peaceful.

• Viral videos: Several videos of the incidents went viral, including one in which a Jewish student, Eli Tsives, claimed protesters formed a human barricade to block his path to class.

So no video of it happening. Just a video of him claiming it happened.

• "Jew Exclusion Zone" accusations: The encampment, set up on Royce Quad, was surrounded by barriers. Some accused protesters of creating a "Jew Exclusion Zone," where individuals were denied entry based on their faith or support for Israel.

BS
This is like Trump's shakedown of CBS/Paramount.
The settlement came after a Department of Justice investigation found UCLA was "deliberately indifferent" to the hostile environment created for Jewish students.

The truth: Some argued they were attempting to redirect pro-Israel or Zionist individuals to avoid conflict, while others claimed that Jewish students participated in the encampment itself.

Do you remember all the Jewish Americans who protested right away what Israel was doing? They knew Bibi would commit genocide.

All those excuses for idiot "protesters" denying Students THEIR right to access campuses they are paying for.

Nice non-answer, you cheap dime store hack.

 

[sealybobo]

All those excuses for idiot "protesters" denying Students THEIR right to access campuses they are paying for.

Nice non-answer, you cheap dime store hack.

If blacks were having a BLM protest and told me not to go, I wouldn't be a JEW and sue the university. I'd thank them for caring about my safety. And I'm not an annoying Jew.

Although this was brilliant. Of course the Trump appointed judge sided with the Jews. Did you leave that out on purpose?

 

[martybegan]

If blacks were having a BLM protest and told me not to go, I wouldn't be a JEW and sue the university. I'd thank them for caring about my safety. And I'm not an annoying Jew.

Although this was brilliant. Of course the Trump appointed judge sided with the Jews. Did you leave that out on purpose?

Lazy anti-semitism on your part. It's simply pathetic.

They wanted to go to class, and the protesters stopped them. That isn't a peaceful protest.

 

[hadit]

I'm sure if it was speech you don't like, you'd see it differently. I was just trying to make a point. When Muslims protest what Israel is doing, you shut it down. Call it anti semetic. Force universities to shut peaceful protests down.

So, no actual SC decision making it mandatory for employers to preach at employees?

 

[sealybobo]

So, no actual SC decision making it mandatory for employers to preach at employees?

Oh is that the line for you? LOL.

**** this Supreme Court. They just ruled that the government can seize people based on their appearance, language, and type of work.

 

[hadit]

Oh is that the line for you? LOL.

**** this Supreme Court. They just ruled that the government can seize people based on their appearance, language, and type of work.

So this quote is meaningless, just the rantings of an unhinged hater?

"You don't recall because before the Supreme Court/Trump's ruling, you weren't allowed to bother people at work with your religious nonsense. Now it's encouraged?"

You'd think if there was a ruling that made you that mad, you'd be able to point it out, but hey, you do you.

 

[sealybobo]

So this quote is meaningless, just the rantings of an unhinged hater?

"You don't recall because before the Supreme Court/Trump's ruling, you weren't allowed to bother people at work with your religious nonsense. Now it's encouraged?"

You'd think if there was a ruling that made you that mad, you'd be able to point it out, but hey, you do you.

Under new guidance from the Trump administration, federal employees are allowed to engage in religious expression at work, including conversations about their faith and attempts to persuade colleagues to rethink their religious views.

• Recent Supreme Court rulings: The EO draws on recent Supreme Court decisions, including Groff v. Dejoy (2023), which made it more difficult for employers to deny religious accommodations.

 

[hadit]

Under new guidance from the Trump administration, federal employees are allowed to engage in religious expression at work, including conversations about their faith and attempts to persuade colleagues to rethink their religious views.

• Recent Supreme Court rulings: The EO draws on recent Supreme Court decisions, including Groff v. Dejoy (2023), which made it more difficult for employers to deny religious accommodations.

Okay, so you're upset about workers being able to speak more freely at work, NOT that they are encouraged to proselytize. And here I thought you were all about labor sticking it to management. AND, the EO drew from a SC decision that made it more difficult for employers to deny religious accommodations. The SC didn't encourage religious expression at work, completely unlike how you portrayed it. To hear you go on about it, you'd think they relaxed the restriction on wearing white after Labor Day, the cads.

Do you ever accurately portray anything? It's been a long time since I've seen you do that. I mean, you have yet to admit that Rittenhouse wasn't hunting black people that night.

 

[Invisibleflash]

Don't think that homosexuals are for transexuals. Why not? Let a homosexual explain it to you. Do you agree with the homosexual on this topic? Yes or no. Be clear should you dispute her.

Trannys are usually homosexuals. They are just super queers and go to more lengths for their queerness.

 

[Robert W]

Seems like Trump's pandering to the church is bringing church and state closer than ever. I hear you can now try to convert your co workers to your religion. What a joke.

You should have seen how FDR brought church and state together. He was a powerful speaker that urged all of America to pray to GOD.