Let's get one thing straight about Roy Moore

[Moonglow]

Prey


Just imagine the guy you work with talking about how he's been checking out some hawt piece of ass that goes to your local high school adding

"Hey bro, if theres grass on the field play ball....heh!"

(sleazy porn music in the background)

 

[JakeStarkey]

Defending Roy Moore places the far and alt right in very precarious positions politically.

 

[ColonelAngus]

If Moore broke the law, he should face the consequences.

 

[emilynghiem]

Prey


Just imagine the guy you work with talking about how he's been checking out some hawt piece of ass that goes to your local high school adding

"Hey bro, if theres grass on the field play ball....heh!"

Dear @CloseCaption
Maybe Roy Moore was just "'transaged"
A 15 year old boy born in a 32 year old body.

I am 51 but look 10-20 years younger.
And act anywhere from 7 to 17.
Except on days where I feel 60 billion years old!

So if gender is relative, why not age?

It's still wrong of him to coerce girls, especially those who were too young to consent.
That part is wrong regardless of age.

But as for judging him for being ATTRACTED to younger girls,
that's different from ACTING on an attraction in an abusive manner,
especially vulnerable people and isolating them in order to do that.

The attraction itself maybe for spiritual reasons, as I find with
homosexual or transgender conditions that are part of a spiritual process.
Whatever reasons these occur, I find that judging people for them doesn't
help resolve the issues or causes.

The law should apply to how people ACT or ABUSE others that violates
consent, rights and protections of others.
But judging people for their spiritual process and reasons for
being attracted to certain people requires other approaches instead of punitive
which doesn't help, but just makes it worse and harder to address if people are
too busy denying and hiding what they are experiencing and why.

 

[Political Junky]

Nobody believes Breibart except .... well, the usual idiots.

Data is data whether it comes from Breitbart or CNN.

But Breitbart has a much better track record for honesty, objectivity and reliability than CNN.

^^ What bullshit.

 

[hadit]

If Moore broke the law, he should face the consequences.

Of course, and if the accuser is lying, she should too.

 

[Lakhota]

Nobody believes Breibart except .... well, the usual idiots.

Data is data whether it comes from Breitbart or CNN.

But Breitbart has a much better track record for honesty, objectivity and reliability than CNN.

^^ What bullshit.

Amen! Breitbart was founded on lies and misinformation - hence, fake news!

 

[yiostheoy]

Prey


Just imagine the guy you work with talking about how he's been checking out some hawt piece of ass that goes to your local high school adding

"Hey bro, if theres grass on the field play ball....heh!"

Yup, the old man is a sicko.

Always has been a sicko.

 

[ColonelAngus]

If Moore broke the law, he should face the consequences.

Of course, and if the accuser is lying, she should too.

Absolutely.

 

[yiostheoy]

Prey


Just imagine the guy you work with talking about how he's been checking out some hawt piece of ass that goes to your local high school adding

"Hey bro, if theres grass on the field play ball....heh!"

Dear @CloseCaption
Maybe Roy Moore was just "'transaged"
A 15 year old boy born in a 32 year old body.

I am 51 but look 10-20 years younger.
And act anywhere from 7 to 17.
Except on days where I feel 60 billion years old!

So if gender is relative, why not age?

It's still wrong of him to coerce girls, especially those who were too young to consent.
That part is wrong regardless of age.

But as for judging him for being ATTRACTED to younger girls,
that's different from ACTING on an attraction in an abusive manner,
especially vulnerable people and isolating them in order to do that.

The attraction itself maybe for spiritual reasons, as I find with
homosexual or transgender conditions that are part of a spiritual process.
Whatever reasons these occur, I find that judging people for them doesn't
help resolve the issues or causes.

The law should apply to how people ACT or ABUSE others that violates
consent, rights and protections of others.
But judging people for their spiritual process and reasons for
being attracted to certain people requires other approaches instead of punitive
which doesn't help, but just makes it worse and harder to address if people are
too busy denying and hiding what they are experiencing and why.

I think the law is fairly clear ...

Anyone over 18 may not legally have relations with anyone under 18.

You gotta' draw the line somewhere.

 

[yiostheoy]

Yes, just imagine it. Because, of course, there is no evidence for it at this point so imagining is all we can do.

Testimony is evidence.

Perhaps you did not google the definition of evidence first.

There may be nothing more than he said she said, but as more girls chime-in that would constitute more evidence.

 

[yiostheoy]

In his entire life, Roy Moore only dated four teen aged girls. Right up until 1985 when he married his one and only wife.

This is a smear of the ugliest kind even for democrats who have no end of shit they will shovel.

Only 4 huh?

Only 1 is a state crime anywhere.

 

[yiostheoy]

You mean kinda like Clinton??

At least Slick Willy picked on fully grown skanks.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Prey


Just imagine the guy you work with talking about how he's been checking out some hawt piece of ass that goes to your local high school adding

"Hey bro, if theres grass on the field play ball....heh!"

Dear @CloseCaption
Maybe Roy Moore was just "'transaged"
A 15 year old boy born in a 32 year old body.

I am 51 but look 10-20 years younger.
And act anywhere from 7 to 17.
Except on days where I feel 60 billion years old!

So if gender is relative, why not age?

It's still wrong of him to coerce girls, especially those who were too young to consent.
That part is wrong regardless of age.

But as for judging him for being ATTRACTED to younger girls,
that's different from ACTING on an attraction in an abusive manner,
especially vulnerable people and isolating them in order to do that.

The attraction itself maybe for spiritual reasons, as I find with
homosexual or transgender conditions that are part of a spiritual process.
Whatever reasons these occur, I find that judging people for them doesn't
help resolve the issues or causes.

The law should apply to how people ACT or ABUSE others that violates
consent, rights and protections of others.
But judging people for their spiritual process and reasons for
being attracted to certain people requires other approaches instead of punitive
which doesn't help, but just makes it worse and harder to address if people are
too busy denying and hiding what they are experiencing and why.

I agree, go forth and tell everyone molesters aren't guilty if they feel young. Let that be your cause.

 

[miketx]

Prey


Just imagine the guy you work with talking about how he's been checking out some hawt piece of ass that goes to your local high school adding

"Hey bro, if theres grass on the field play ball....heh!"

Prove it liar.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Prey


Just imagine the guy you work with talking about how he's been checking out some hawt piece of ass that goes to your local high school adding

"Hey bro, if theres grass on the field play ball....heh!"

Dear @CloseCaption
Maybe Roy Moore was just "'transaged"
A 15 year old boy born in a 32 year old body.

I am 51 but look 10-20 years younger.
And act anywhere from 7 to 17.
Except on days where I feel 60 billion years old!

So if gender is relative, why not age?

It's still wrong of him to coerce girls, especially those who were too young to consent.
That part is wrong regardless of age.

But as for judging him for being ATTRACTED to younger girls,
that's different from ACTING on an attraction in an abusive manner,
especially vulnerable people and isolating them in order to do that.

The attraction itself maybe for spiritual reasons, as I find with
homosexual or transgender conditions that are part of a spiritual process.
Whatever reasons these occur, I find that judging people for them doesn't
help resolve the issues or causes.

The law should apply to how people ACT or ABUSE others that violates
consent, rights and protections of others.
But judging people for their spiritual process and reasons for
being attracted to certain people requires other approaches instead of punitive
which doesn't help, but just makes it worse and harder to address if people are
too busy denying and hiding what they are experiencing and why.

I think the law is fairly clear ...

Anyone over 18 may not legally have relations with anyone under 18.

You gotta' draw the line somewhere.

While I agree that should be the case, it is not.

Can we deal in facts?

Ages of consent in the United States - Wikipedia

Most State have an age of consent of 16. Some 17, a few 18.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If Moore broke the law, he should face the consequences.

The whole point is, he never broke any law. This is just smear, that's all.

 

[rightwinger]

What is Trump saying about Moore now?

He opposed him in the primaries in favor the more traditional candidate
Then he endorsed Moore

Now what will he do?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Prey


Just imagine the guy you work with talking about how he's been checking out some hawt piece of ass that goes to your local high school adding

"Hey bro, if theres grass on the field play ball....heh!"

Dear @CloseCaption
Maybe Roy Moore was just "'transaged"
A 15 year old boy born in a 32 year old body.

I am 51 but look 10-20 years younger.
And act anywhere from 7 to 17.
Except on days where I feel 60 billion years old!

So if gender is relative, why not age?

It's still wrong of him to coerce girls, especially those who were too young to consent.
That part is wrong regardless of age.

But as for judging him for being ATTRACTED to younger girls,
that's different from ACTING on an attraction in an abusive manner,
especially vulnerable people and isolating them in order to do that.

The attraction itself maybe for spiritual reasons, as I find with
homosexual or transgender conditions that are part of a spiritual process.
Whatever reasons these occur, I find that judging people for them doesn't
help resolve the issues or causes.

The law should apply to how people ACT or ABUSE others that violates
consent, rights and protections of others.
But judging people for their spiritual process and reasons for
being attracted to certain people requires other approaches instead of punitive
which doesn't help, but just makes it worse and harder to address if people are
too busy denying and hiding what they are experiencing and why.

I think the law is fairly clear ...

Anyone over 18 may not legally have relations with anyone under 18.

You gotta' draw the line somewhere.

While I agree that should be the case, it is not.

Can we deal in facts?

Ages of consent in the United States - Wikipedia

Most State have an age of consent of 16. Some 17, a few 18.

Since no one has accused Moore of having sexual relations with any of these girls, what's the relations you mean?

 

[emilynghiem]

Prey


Just imagine the guy you work with talking about how he's been checking out some hawt piece of ass that goes to your local high school adding

"Hey bro, if theres grass on the field play ball....heh!"

Dear @CloseCaption
Maybe Roy Moore was just "'transaged"
A 15 year old boy born in a 32 year old body.

I am 51 but look 10-20 years younger.
And act anywhere from 7 to 17.
Except on days where I feel 60 billion years old!

So if gender is relative, why not age?

It's still wrong of him to coerce girls, especially those who were too young to consent.
That part is wrong regardless of age.

But as for judging him for being ATTRACTED to younger girls,
that's different from ACTING on an attraction in an abusive manner,
especially vulnerable people and isolating them in order to do that.

The attraction itself maybe for spiritual reasons, as I find with
homosexual or transgender conditions that are part of a spiritual process.
Whatever reasons these occur, I find that judging people for them doesn't
help resolve the issues or causes.

The law should apply to how people ACT or ABUSE others that violates
consent, rights and protections of others.
But judging people for their spiritual process and reasons for
being attracted to certain people requires other approaches instead of punitive
which doesn't help, but just makes it worse and harder to address if people are
too busy denying and hiding what they are experiencing and why.

I agree, go forth and tell everyone molesters aren't guilty if they feel young. Let that be your cause.

Nope ClosedCaption read what I wrote again
it is still WRONG and unlawful to DO those ACTIONS.

But as for judging people spiritually for their attractions
that is outside govt jurisdiction.

You can hate someone and that is not illegal to be angry.
but it is against the law to commit hate crimes, murder, assault, death threats, etc.

Do you get the distinction I am making?

Between the action that is still against the law and still wrong.
Vs. judging the person for the reasons for having an attraction in the first place.