Let's face it: there's no good reason to deny the construction of the ballroom.

Of course dear. So the Magic Kenyan wasted taxpayer dollars on basketball courts never used.
In the interest of honesty, he never built anything. All they did was put up goals and mark the lines for basketball on an old tennis court. They lost the lines when they had to resurface the tennis court. Obama used the heck out of them because he throws like a girl but can shoot a basket like a ******!
 
In the interest of honesty, he never built anything. All they did was put up goals and mark the lines for basketball on an old tennis court. They lost the lines when they had to resurface the tennis court. Obama used the heck out of them because he throws like a girl but can shoot a basket like a ******!
So, it was just an appeal to the Magic Kenyan’s vanity.
 
What does Trump need a ballroom for?
He can’t dance anyway


1775938915393.gif
 
Building a structure is corruption now?

Democrats Denounce Trump’s Plan to Use Foreign Steel in White House Ballroom​

Democrats seized on a report that President Trump accepted a donation of foreign steel to be used in the White House ballroom, saying it showed disrespect toward American steel workers and raised questions about possible corruption.

The New York Times reported Wednesday that ArcelorMittal, a steel company with headquarters in Luxembourg, had arranged a large donation of steel produced in Europe to form the structure of the White House ballroom.

Mr. Trump publicly mentioned the donation, which he claimed was worth $37 million, last October without revealing the identity of the donor. Days after his remarks, the administration announced a tariff exemption that would benefit ArcelorMittal.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/10/us/politics/democrats-trump-steel-white-house-ballroom.html
 
Building a big, ugly Victorian ballroom for nobles in a place meant to serve the people seems in poor taste
The White House is not a public house. It is the executive's residence. Second, I suppose you would be more satisfied to leave a gaping hole in the WH grounds. SMH.
 

Democrats Denounce Trump’s Plan to Use Foreign Steel in White House Ballroom​

Democrats seized on a report that President Trump accepted a donation of foreign steel to be used in the White House ballroom, saying it showed disrespect toward American steel workers and raised questions about possible corruption.

The New York Times reported Wednesday that ArcelorMittal, a steel company with headquarters in Luxembourg, had arranged a large donation of steel produced in Europe to form the structure of the White House ballroom.

Mr. Trump publicly mentioned the donation, which he claimed was worth $37 million, last October without revealing the identity of the donor. Days after his remarks, the administration announced a tariff exemption that would benefit ArcelorMittal.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/10/us/politics/democrats-trump-steel-white-house-ballroom.html
In other news, construction is ahead of schedule and under budget.
 

Democrats Denounce Trump’s Plan to Use Foreign Steel in White House Ballroom​

Democrats seized on a report that President Trump accepted a donation of foreign steel to be used in the White House ballroom, saying it showed disrespect toward American steel workers and raised questions about possible corruption.

The New York Times reported Wednesday that ArcelorMittal, a steel company with headquarters in Luxembourg, had arranged a large donation of steel produced in Europe to form the structure of the White House ballroom.

Mr. Trump publicly mentioned the donation, which he claimed was worth $37 million, last October without revealing the identity of the donor. Days after his remarks, the administration announced a tariff exemption that would benefit ArcelorMittal.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/10/us/politics/democrats-trump-steel-white-house-ballroom.html
You cut and pasted this ciput and paste multiple times.

From you cut and paste….. again…..

Trump accepted a donation…..”
 
In other news, construction is ahead of schedule and under budget.
In more news, leftists are agonizing over their fears and insecurities.

Berg is stuttering as she’s spamming the same cut and paste multiple times across multiple threads.
 
15th post
To build the structure dumb ass.
Is there a publicly available audit of the donations so we know who gave money, what it's going to pay for, and what will happen to any money left over?

Remember the enormous budget for the inaugurations and how millions went unaccounted for? Of course you don't. You folks have no memory of such things.

What Happened to the Surplus Funds From Trump’s Inauguration?​


The Trump Vance Inaugural Committee reported taking in nearly $245.3 million and refunding a little more than $6 million in donations. In all, about 60% of the committee’s money came from more than 130 seven-figure donations, underscoring the outsize role of deep-pocketed interests in underwriting the glitzy events that swirl around inaugurations.

Sunday marked 90 days since the inauguration, the legal deadline for the inaugural committee to disclose its donations of $200 or more to federal regulators. But its report to the Federal Election Commission offers only a partial picture because it does not have to detail how it spent the money or what it intends to do with any leftover contributions.

An inaugural committee spokesperson did not respond to an inquiry Sunday about the spending and the size of leftover contributions.

 
Is there a publicly available audit of the donations so we know who gave money, what it's going to pay for, and what will happen to any money left over?

Remember the enormous budget for the inaugurations and how millions went unaccounted for? Of course you don't. You folks have no memory of such things.

What Happened to the Surplus Funds From Trump’s Inauguration?​


The Trump Vance Inaugural Committee reported taking in nearly $245.3 million and refunding a little more than $6 million in donations. In all, about 60% of the committee’s money came from more than 130 seven-figure donations, underscoring the outsize role of deep-pocketed interests in underwriting the glitzy events that swirl around inaugurations.

Sunday marked 90 days since the inauguration, the legal deadline for the inaugural committee to disclose its donations of $200 or more to federal regulators. But its report to the Federal Election Commission offers only a partial picture because it does not have to detail how it spent the money or what it intends to do with any leftover contributions.

An inaugural committee spokesperson did not respond to an inquiry Sunday about the spending and the size of leftover contributions.

You lost….
 
Back
Top Bottom