Leticia James... where is she saying she did not do it?

I think she's guilty, and should be easy to prove. It's just not one of those things you see being prosecuted, so I think that's her defense.

The prosecutors in the eastern district prosecutor's office saw no evidence that she is guilty. That is why they recommended no p-prosecution. Insta-prosecutor Halligan decided to obey her master Trump rather than the rule of law. She will likely be disbarred after this is over.
 
She had to present it to the grand jury and file the charges.

She signed her name at the bottom of the indictment.

If she’s not legally appointed, the case is dismissed.

ok, so if that happens, when congress is back in session, they confirm her and everything goes forward.

I think your forgetting the part that the grand jury found enough evidence that warranted an indictment. Why do you want that to go away? Would you if it were about trump?
 
ok, so if that happens, when congress is back in session, they confirm her and everything goes forward.

I think you’re forgetting the part that the grand jury found enough evidence that warranted an indictment. Why do you want that to go away? Would you if it were about trump?
For Comey, the statute of limitations has run out so the case can’t be refiled.

It’s an open question as to whether Halligan can get confirmed in the Senate.
 
For Comey, the statute of limitations has run out so the case can’t be refiled.

It’s an open question as to whether Halligan can get confirmed in the Senate.

Actually, the question is going to be if halligan is legally the interim US attorney. There is no law that specifically forbids trump from appointing her has interim attorney.

Again, you seem to be interested in having a legitimate accusation go away. Would you argue this point if this was against trump?
 
Actually, the question is going to be if halligan is legally the interim US attorney. There is no law that specifically forbids trump from appointing her has interim attorney.

Again, you seem to be interested in having a legitimate accusation go away. Would you argue this point if this was against trump?
Trump already appointed an interim US attorney. The clock ran out and he doesn’t get to keep appointing new ones.

US attorneys need to be confirmed by the Senate.
 
He was charged, not by Democrats, but by the people of the State of New York. That’s the difference between Americanism and MAGA fascism.
Where are Republicans in New York? Driving through?
 
Trump already appointed an interim US attorney. The clock ran out and he doesn’t get to keep appointing new ones.

US attorneys need to be confirmed by the Senate.

Sure and he fired that one then appointed another. I dont see any law specifically forbidding that
 
Sure and he fired that one then appointed another. I dont see any law specifically forbidding that
He doesn’t get to keep appointing new interim attorneys. That would allow him to completely circumvent senate confirmation. You do want the constitution to mean something, right?


 
He doesn’t get to keep appointing new interim attorneys. That would allow him to completely circumvent senate confirmation. You do want the constitution to mean something, right?


Not to deride you at all, but you are what happens when bigots post on this forum.
 
15th post
He doesn’t get to keep appointing new interim attorneys. That would allow him to completely circumvent senate confirmation. You do want the constitution to mean something, right?



Im not saying its valid, im saying its an argument they could use.
 
Where is her claim she did not commit fraud? Trace Galliger brings it up.

Who here wondered why suid has not said she did not do it? She has been charged with fraud. Not sued but charged in a court of law.

Felon Letty
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom