Leticia James... where is she saying she did not do it?

Where is her claim she did not commit fraud? Trace Galliger brings it up.

Who here wondered why suid has not said she did not do it? She has been charged with fraud. Not sued but charged in a court of law.

She doesn’t have to say anything. Welcome to America. You must be new here.
 
l think Lettie tried to claim her 5 unit rental was 4 unit which would result in more favorable loan terms because up to 4 units is considered a residential-income property per Fannie Mae. 5 units would be a commercial property with less favorable loan criteria.
~~~~~~>
There's more to the Federal fraud issue.
In earlier deals, James and her father were allegedly listed as “husband and wife” on mortgage applications, raising further questions.

 
Haha the irony of James talking about the weaponization of govt
Halligan’s indictment Thursday of New York Attorney General Letitia James on allegations of mortgage fraud came faster than even some of her allies were expecting. She presented the case without informing Attorney General Pam Bondi or Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, people familiar with the matter said.

Halligan “wanted to just get it done,” one of the people said. She is also likely to bring additional charges against James, the person said.

James, a Democrat who previously brought a civil fraud suit against Trump and his business, called the allegations baseless and said the prosecution was an obvious case of political retribution. Her lawyer didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment Saturday.

Halligan had been planning to present the allegations against James in Norfolk, Va., where the New York official’s property is located and where some thought the Justice Department would face a more favorable grand jury that would vote in support of an indictment. But logistically that wasn’t possible until next week, and Halligan didn’t want to wait. Instead, she moved forward in Alexandria, near where her office is located, unconcerned that a potentially less conservative pool of jurors might reject her, people familiar with her thinking said.


New York Attorney General Letitia James, in 2024.

New York Attorney General Letitia James, in 2024.© Bebeto Matthews/Associated Press
Justice Department spokesman Chad Gilmartin declined to comment on grand jury matters but said the agency is “united as one team in our mission to make America safe again.”

Bondi and Blanche knew generally that Halligan intended to seek an indictment of James at some point but were caught off guard by the timing, people familiar with those discussions said.


Halligan, 36, is at the forefront of the administration’s push to bring prosecutions that Trump has encouraged against his perceived foes. She has been leading the U.S. attorney’s office in eastern Virginia since Sept. 22, after Trump pushed out her predecessor, Erik Siebert, who also was a Trump administration appointee. Siebert and others in the office raised doubts that the evidence was strong enough to bring charges against either James or Comey. Halligan charged Comey a few days after she arrived, on allegations that he lied to Congress in testimony five years ago. Comey pleaded not guilty this week.

Halligan, one of Trump’s former personal lawyers who had never been a prosecutor, presented both cases by herself, with limited help from her Justice Department superiors and virtually none from other lawyers in her office wary of their new boss, people familiar with the matter said.
James Andrew

more

“Obtaining indictments by herself on short notice in two incredibly high-profile cases is impressive,” said John Fishwick, a former U.S. attorney in the Western District of Virginia. More surprising still, he said, was that she was able to obtain them in a highly politicized environment, in which grand juries in Washington, Los Angeles and elsewhere have recently rejected indictments related to Trump-imposed crackdowns on crime and protests.
more

In the Comey case, she has brought on out-of-district prosecutors from North Carolina.


Write to Sadie Gurman at sadie.gurman@wsj.com and Meridith McGraw at Meridith.McGraw@WSJ.com
 
~~~~~~>
There's more to the Federal fraud issue.
In earlier deals, James and her father were allegedly listed as “husband and wife” on mortgage applications, raising further questions.

Squabbling over thousands, while Trump steals billions. MAGA blinders!
 
A majority found probable cause in the evidence presented by Halligan.

It’s a long ways away from a conviction if it even gets to a trial. There’s plenty of motions to come about malicious or selective prosecution as well as whether Halligan even counts as a US attorney.

Yeah, but all of that doesnt change what a GJ found. They wouldn't have returned an indictment if there wasnt anything there.

Even if Halligan isnt legitimate, the GJ indictment doesnt go away.
 
Yeah, but all of that doesnt change what a GJ found. They wouldn't have returned an indictment if there wasnt anything there.

Even if Halligan isnt legitimate, the GJ indictment doesnt go away.
If Halligan is found to be illegitimately appointed, the case is dismissed.

So yes, the indictment goes away.
 
If Halligan is found to be illegitimately appointed, the case is dismissed.

So yes, the indictment goes away.

How do you figure? Halligan didnt indict her.
 
Squabbling over thousands, while Trump steals billions. MAGA blinders!
Squabbling over thousands? It's not about a certain amount of money, sir. Someone like her, the attorney general of New York, should have impeccable integrity. She should have scruples. She serves as the legal counsel for an entire district, her conduct should be above reproach, but isn't. But of course, this doesn't bother you.
 
15th post
Squabbling over thousands? It's not about a certain amount of money, sir. Someone like her, the attorney general of New York, should have impeccable integrity. She should have scruples. She serves as the legal counsel for an entire district, her conduct should be above reproach, but isn't. But of course, this doesn't bother you.
Don’t take that self-righteous tone! You’re the one defending an adjudicated sexual predator and felon, 34 times over. You apparently don’t care if the top law enforcement official in the country has any integrity. Any wonder the Trump DOJ can’t win a case? Real lawyers with legal ethics intact won’t work with him.
 
Don’t take that self-righteous tone! You’re the one defending an adjudicated sexual predator and felon, 34 times over. You apparently don’t care if the top law enforcement official in the country has any integrity. Any wonder the Trump DOJ can’t win a case? Real lawyers with legal ethics intact won’t work with him.
Dude, take your butthurt elsewhere. I am not American nor do I defend Trump. Although, I did notice that whenever the spot light is shone on one of the many rats on your side, you are quick to scream, "But but but...TRUMP"
 
Dude, take your butthurt elsewhere. I am not American nor do I defend Trump. Although, I did notice that whenever the spot light is shone on one of the many rats on your side, you are quick to scream, "But but but...TRUMP"
Then like MAGA says, we don’t care what you think.

 
Back
Top Bottom