Let me clear the air

We aren't imprisoning them. We are sending them home. You gonna compare that to the Gestapo? Wow.
Not specifically referring to them. If you have actionable evidence, great!

But if you're a guy like Abrego Garcia. You need to have actionable evidence. And so far what I've read and reviewed is not compelling enough.

It's about evidence. It's not about whether I agree with the sentiment.
 
Not specifically referring to them. If you have actionable evidence, great!

But if you're a guy like Abrego Garcia. You need to have actionable evidence. And so far what I've read and reviewed is not compelling enough.

It's about evidence. It's not about whether I agree with the sentiment.
He was a different case. He was sent to jail. I'm talking about siply sending them home.
 
Yes! Do send them home.

But do it with concrete evidence of their actions and affiliations. That's all I'm saying.
I don't understand. If they are not charged with anything, what actions or affiliations are we concerned about?
 
Apologies, but I'm not sure I understand your question.
If we deport them, they need no due process. They are not being charged with a crime, they are simply being sent home.
So what actions or affiliations are we concerned about?
 
If we deport them, they need no due process. They are not being charged with a crime, they are simply being sent home.
So what actions or affiliations are we concerned about?
What we're worried about is Trump goons snatching up political enemies and "deporting" them with no evidence that they should be deported. That's what due process is for. Otherwise, we're just doing it on a whim.
 
Last edited:
What we're worried about is Trump goons snatching up political enemies and "deporting" them with no evidence that they should be deported. That's what due process is for. Otherwise, we're just doing it on a whim.
When that happens, get back to me.
 
How do we know it's not happening now? (hint: due process)
If it was happening to American citizens we sure would be hearing about it. Hell, look at how much we hear about it when it happens to illegals.
 
If it was happening to American citizens we sure would be hearing about it. Hell, look at how much we hear about it when it happens to illegals.
The part you're not getting is that due process is how we determine whether they are here legally or not. Why is that so hard to understand?

I think too many of us were raised on "Dirty Harry" movies, and see laws protecting the rights of the accused as "technicalities" that let the bad guys walk. Due process is what prevent our leaders from "disappearing" people they don't like. Do you really think we should do away with it? Do you want liberals to have that kind of power when they takeover again?
 
The part you're not getting is that due process is how we determine whether they are here legally or not. Why is that so hard to understand?

I think too many of us were raised on "Dirty Harry" movies, and see laws protecting the rights of the accused as "technicalities" that let the bad guys walk. Due process is what prevent our leaders from "disappearing" people they don't like. Do you really think we should do away with it? Do you want liberals to have that kind of power when they takeover again?
What I understand is that the Democrats are the fault of this colossal mess. Doing it your way means things will go so slowly that they will never be kicked out.

Unacceptable.
 
What I understand is that the Democrats are the fault of this colossal mess. Doing it your way means things will go so slowly that they will never be kicked out.

Unacceptable.
Well, then I have to write you off as a fascist. Sorry. No temporary emergency is with throwing away our rights
 
You may have noticed me taking some leftist positions lately, but I am still a conservative. I just dropped the cult and the jingoism. I let Trump get in the way of my faith and my values, and it has put me on thin ice with a longtime friend. I'm not a leftist, I am taking a more classical liberal/libertarian stance now. I let years old stances creep back in and I am addressing that now.

Consider this my fair notice to you all.

-TK

(P.S. Yes, I'm a Metroid geek)
Please. You’re entitled to your point of view, whatever it is.

But don’t blame it on your “values.”and don’t blame it on any alleged “cult” or “jingoism.”

Just face facts. You’re wrong more often lately.
 
Please. You’re entitled to your point of view, whatever it is.

But don’t blame it on your “values.”and don’t blame it on any alleged “cult” or “jingoism.”

Just face facts. You’re wrong more often lately.
Your definition of "wrong" is influenced by your own biases.

My definition of "wrong" is presenting assertions that contradict clear facts and evidence.

I'm sorry you don't like it, but I'm not here to please anyone. I'm only doing it to prove to myself that my moral compass still works.
 
Your definition of "wrong" is influenced by your own biases.

My definition of "wrong" is presenting assertions that contradict clear facts and evidence.

I'm sorry you don't like it, but I'm not here to please anyone. I'm only doing it to prove to myself that my moral compass still works.
No. My definition of wrong is not the same as yours but only because yours are mistaken. Just because you view things in a particular light doesn’t make you right.

It’s not an issue of whether what you say is pleasing. It is instead an issue of whether what you say is factually well predicated. In your case, it’s not.

I’m sorry you have gotten lost along the way.

Your moral compass isn’t right just because you’re thought about things and changed your view.
 
Back
Top Bottom