Let get the truth about South Africa

[impuretrash]

'south africa' is very violent , probably one of the most violent places in the world . Farmers are tortured and murdered and most of them are White , descendants of good hard working people . Get rid of them and you just might starve IM2 .

They descended from rapists, murderers, and robbers. That's how they got the land. I won't be starving if they are removed from that stolen land

You might not be, but the South Africans will starve. The same thing happened when your buddy mugabe stole all the white farms in zimbabwe. That country was once the bread basket of Africa, now it can't even feed itself.

I doubt that anyone will starve. And really whites need to shut up about Mugabe. For 887 years Zimbabwe was doing quite fine. Whites decided to colonize a fully functioning nation and ruined it.

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

 

[Asclepias]

They descended from rapists, murderers, and robbers. That's how they got the land. I won't be starving if they are removed from that stolen land

You might not be, but the South Africans will starve. The same thing happened when your buddy mugabe stole all the white farms in zimbabwe. That country was once the bread basket of Africa, now it can't even feed itself.

I doubt that anyone will starve. And really whites need to shut up about Mugabe. For 887 years Zimbabwe was doing quite fine. Whites decided to colonize a fully functioning nation and ruined it.

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

Not sure how that changes that Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe?

 

[bgrouse]

You say this
But then you say this
If you can’t see the irony embedded in these remarks. After all, to deny that you have no racism to black people, and then to cut loose with a racist generalization about black people is the epitome of self-contradiction, then you’re probably not prepared to enter a dialogue about much of anything.
There are three kinds of white racist

1) White bigots - They hate blacks. They use the n-word. They have views that even most whites would regard as racist. What blacks would call being openly racist. Examples: The Klan, David Duke, the American history X type.

2) White implicit racists – They do not hate blacks. But they still think black people are messed up and whites are not. They see black people less moral and intelligent and more violent.

These are the the type who ACT RACIST - WHEN REQUIRED.

Why ? Because you do not want to become an outcast among white people, particularly the white people in your own family or at school or work

Because racism is bad and most whites are not bad people, most whites cannot be racist. So racism is dead.

Therefore something must be wrong with black people. (Crime stats, IQ, white inventor arguments)

3) Whites with integrity – These are whites are trying to unlearn their racism. Examples: John Brown, Tim Wise.

On USMB I would guess that:

• 10% are white bigots,
• 89% are white implicit racists
• 1% are whites with integrity.

Your racism is implicit that is, it's pretty much like the majority of white people.

Of course in small minds like yours, any criticism of you or blacks in general, is racist. LMFAO.

Get over yourself.

They are racists. They talk down to ****** and try to cause outrage because the superior white race keeps them all down.
Its pathetic how they think. Poor insecure twats :/

You refuse to understand that we have documented evidence supporting us,

So you have evidence you are inferior? No wonder you are so insecure :/

We have evidence of your racism. 241 years of it minimum from July 4, 1776 to right now.

You're being denied equal opportunity because you're a proven retard, not because you're black. Is that racist, too?

 

[bgrouse]

You might not be, but the South Africans will starve. The same thing happened when your buddy mugabe stole all the white farms in zimbabwe. That country was once the bread basket of Africa, now it can't even feed itself.

I doubt that anyone will starve. And really whites need to shut up about Mugabe. For 887 years Zimbabwe was doing quite fine. Whites decided to colonize a fully functioning nation and ruined it.

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

Not sure how that changes that Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe?

You're saying it wasn't a primitive shithole prior to his arrival?

 

[koshergrl]

I doubt that anyone will starve. And really whites need to shut up about Mugabe. For 887 years Zimbabwe was doing quite fine. Whites decided to colonize a fully functioning nation and ruined it.

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

Not sure how that changes that Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe?

You're saying it wasn't a primitive shithole prior to his arrival?

That salute is cultural appropriation! I demand reparations!

 

[IM2]

They descended from rapists, murderers, and robbers. That's how they got the land. I won't be starving if they are removed from that stolen land

You might not be, but the South Africans will starve. The same thing happened when your buddy mugabe stole all the white farms in zimbabwe. That country was once the bread basket of Africa, now it can't even feed itself.

I doubt that anyone will starve. And really whites need to shut up about Mugabe. For 887 years Zimbabwe was doing quite fine. Whites decided to colonize a fully functioning nation and ruined it.

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

I doubt that. Besides I don't think any European policy made the natives have more sex.

 

[IM2]

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

Not sure how that changes that Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe?

You're saying it wasn't a primitive shithole prior to his arrival?

That salute is cultural appropriation! I demand reparations!

You benefit most from affirmative action.

 

[IM2]

silly guy , hey , if 'Sud Africa' follows the same policies and practices as 'mugabes' he11hole' it only makes sense that there will be starvation . Hey , i can put up info comparing the 2 countries and info on 'zimbabwes' starvation but you'd only whine , cry and call names IM2 .

you 've been shown the issue of how whites like you have benefitted from racism and you've done nothing but cry and all names.

If we've benefited from "Racism" why the F*** should we want to be against "Racism" then?

Besides, if you mean by benefiting from "Colonialism" or "Slavery" which aren't necessarily racism.

Explain why Brazil didn't amount to all too much having been massive slavers, and also a colonial power.

The fact of the matter is had Brazil had a more intelligent, and productive work-force they would be just like the U.S.A.

This is a big part of the reason why I'm a race realist, I do in fact express concern over the Third-World condition being promoted by the Third-World mentality.

You are not a race realist, you are a racist. A dumb ass uneducated white racist.

LOL, So says the dumb-dumb who can't figure out basic elementary school concepts like Per-Capita, or Proportions.

What's wrong with being a White-racist?

There's really no evidence of Racial equality, for example we know that there's sweeping disparities between races in general, and that there's strong genetic components behind such.

LOL! You're an idiot.

 

[koshergrl]

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

Not sure how that changes that Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe?

You're saying it wasn't a primitive shithole prior to his arrival?

That salute is cultural appropriation! I demand reparations!

You benefit most from affirmative action.

I demand reparations for the cultural appropriation..and for the damage done to my people by AIDS...a disease that originated with black people.

 

[impuretrash]

You might not be, but the South Africans will starve. The same thing happened when your buddy mugabe stole all the white farms in zimbabwe. That country was once the bread basket of Africa, now it can't even feed itself.

I doubt that anyone will starve. And really whites need to shut up about Mugabe. For 887 years Zimbabwe was doing quite fine. Whites decided to colonize a fully functioning nation and ruined it.

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

I doubt that. Besides I don't think any European policy made the natives have more sex.

There's no shortage of reasons to criticize colonialism but there's no need to deny reality. Europeans started urban infrastructure projects and introduced advanced technology and farming techniques that just didn't exist in the colonies before they arrived. Wherever in the world European colonialism set up, a population boom soon followed.

 

[Asclepias]

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

Not sure how that changes that Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe?

You're saying it wasn't a primitive shithole prior to his arrival?

That salute is cultural appropriation! I demand reparations!

Youre a white girl. You got your reparations when affirmative action was instituted.

 

[Asclepias]

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

Not sure how that changes that Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe?

You're saying it wasn't a primitive shithole prior to his arrival?

That salute is cultural appropriation! I demand reparations!

You benefit most from affirmative action.

I demand reparations for the cultural appropriation..and for the damage done to my people by AIDS...a disease that originated with black people.

Whites started AIDs by having sex with sheep in europe.

 

[Asclepias]

I doubt that anyone will starve. And really whites need to shut up about Mugabe. For 887 years Zimbabwe was doing quite fine. Whites decided to colonize a fully functioning nation and ruined it.

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

I doubt that. Besides I don't think any European policy made the natives have more sex.

There's no shortage of reasons to criticize colonialism but there's no need to deny reality. Europeans started urban infrastructure projects and introduced advanced technology and farming techniques that just didn't exist in the colonies before they arrived. Wherever in the world European colonialism set up, a population boom soon followed.

Nobody asked them to start anything. Pretty sure no one said please invade our country.

 

[impuretrash]

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

I doubt that. Besides I don't think any European policy made the natives have more sex.

There's no shortage of reasons to criticize colonialism but there's no need to deny reality. Europeans started urban infrastructure projects and introduced advanced technology and farming techniques that just didn't exist in the colonies before they arrived. Wherever in the world European colonialism set up, a population boom soon followed.

Nobody asked them to start anything. Pretty sure no one said please invade our country.

African colonies started out as trading outposts which gradually grew into cities which attracted settlers, there were no invasions. Even before white people arrived, African tribes frequently went to war with one another over territory and resources just like humans have done all throughout history all over the world.

 

[Asclepias]

Sorry buddy but that ****** Rhodes fucked up Zimbabwe.

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

I doubt that. Besides I don't think any European policy made the natives have more sex.

There's no shortage of reasons to criticize colonialism but there's no need to deny reality. Europeans started urban infrastructure projects and introduced advanced technology and farming techniques that just didn't exist in the colonies before they arrived. Wherever in the world European colonialism set up, a population boom soon followed.

Nobody asked them to start anything. Pretty sure no one said please invade our country.

African colonies started out as trading outposts which gradually grew into cities which attracted settlers, there were no invasions. Even before white people arrived, African tribes frequently went to war with one another over territory and resources just like humans have done all throughout history all over the world.

Bullshit. They were invaded no matter how many white historians claim Africans sent people to europe begging for europeans to colonize them. Brothers fight all the time. Not getting why you think that means someone from outside the house can come in and take up residence?

 

[impuretrash]

The native population skyrocketed under european rule.

I doubt that. Besides I don't think any European policy made the natives have more sex.

There's no shortage of reasons to criticize colonialism but there's no need to deny reality. Europeans started urban infrastructure projects and introduced advanced technology and farming techniques that just didn't exist in the colonies before they arrived. Wherever in the world European colonialism set up, a population boom soon followed.

Nobody asked them to start anything. Pretty sure no one said please invade our country.

African colonies started out as trading outposts which gradually grew into cities which attracted settlers, there were no invasions. Even before white people arrived, African tribes frequently went to war with one another over territory and resources just like humans have done all throughout history all over the world.

Bullshit. They were invaded no matter how many white historians claim Africans sent people to europe begging for europeans to colonize them. Brothers fight all the time. Not getting why you think that means someone from outside the house can come in and take up residence?

South African colonization started way back in the 17th century. A lot has changed since then. Kinda silly to hold those centuries dead people to the same moral standards of today's modern society. The big difference between Europeans and Africans was the disparity of technological advancement. If the roles had been reversed then Africans would have done the same things in the lands they discovered.

 

[Asclepias]

I doubt that. Besides I don't think any European policy made the natives have more sex.

There's no shortage of reasons to criticize colonialism but there's no need to deny reality. Europeans started urban infrastructure projects and introduced advanced technology and farming techniques that just didn't exist in the colonies before they arrived. Wherever in the world European colonialism set up, a population boom soon followed.

Nobody asked them to start anything. Pretty sure no one said please invade our country.

African colonies started out as trading outposts which gradually grew into cities which attracted settlers, there were no invasions. Even before white people arrived, African tribes frequently went to war with one another over territory and resources just like humans have done all throughout history all over the world.

Bullshit. They were invaded no matter how many white historians claim Africans sent people to europe begging for europeans to colonize them. Brothers fight all the time. Not getting why you think that means someone from outside the house can come in and take up residence?

South African colonization started way back in the 17th century. A lot has changed since then. Kinda silly to hold those centuries dead people to the same moral standards of today's modern society. The big difference between Europeans and Africans was the disparity of technological advancement. If the roles had been reversed then Africans would have done the same things in the lands they discovered.

Bullshit. When Africans went into europe they educated the europeans, showed them how to build castles, do math, take baths, etc and then left without torturing or enslaving anyone. So we have history that shows us what Black people do when they technological superiority.

 

[impuretrash]

There's no shortage of reasons to criticize colonialism but there's no need to deny reality. Europeans started urban infrastructure projects and introduced advanced technology and farming techniques that just didn't exist in the colonies before they arrived. Wherever in the world European colonialism set up, a population boom soon followed.

Nobody asked them to start anything. Pretty sure no one said please invade our country.

African colonies started out as trading outposts which gradually grew into cities which attracted settlers, there were no invasions. Even before white people arrived, African tribes frequently went to war with one another over territory and resources just like humans have done all throughout history all over the world.

Bullshit. They were invaded no matter how many white historians claim Africans sent people to europe begging for europeans to colonize them. Brothers fight all the time. Not getting why you think that means someone from outside the house can come in and take up residence?

South African colonization started way back in the 17th century. A lot has changed since then. Kinda silly to hold those centuries dead people to the same moral standards of today's modern society. The big difference between Europeans and Africans was the disparity of technological advancement. If the roles had been reversed then Africans would have done the same things in the lands they discovered.

Bullshit. When Africans went into europe they educated the europeans, showed them how to build castles, do math, take baths, etc and then left without torturing or enslaving anyone. So we have history that shows us what Black people do when they technological superiority.

Sub Saharan Africans never invaded Europe or taught them anything. There were many battles and cultural exchanges between Europe and North Africa though. Big difference between ancient north africa and sub saharan.

 

[Asclepias]

Nobody asked them to start anything. Pretty sure no one said please invade our country.

African colonies started out as trading outposts which gradually grew into cities which attracted settlers, there were no invasions. Even before white people arrived, African tribes frequently went to war with one another over territory and resources just like humans have done all throughout history all over the world.

Bullshit. They were invaded no matter how many white historians claim Africans sent people to europe begging for europeans to colonize them. Brothers fight all the time. Not getting why you think that means someone from outside the house can come in and take up residence?

South African colonization started way back in the 17th century. A lot has changed since then. Kinda silly to hold those centuries dead people to the same moral standards of today's modern society. The big difference between Europeans and Africans was the disparity of technological advancement. If the roles had been reversed then Africans would have done the same things in the lands they discovered.

Bullshit. When Africans went into europe they educated the europeans, showed them how to build castles, do math, take baths, etc and then left without torturing or enslaving anyone. So we have history that shows us what Black people do when they technological superiority.

Sub Saharan Africans never invaded Europe or taught them anything. There were many battles and cultural exchanges between Europe and North Africa though. Big difference between ancient north africa and sub saharan.

Wrong on both counts. First of all Blacks werent limited to being below the Sahara. I dont get why you white boys continue to believe in that obvious lie. Must make you feel better or something. They were called the Moors for a reason. It means Black.

 

[impuretrash]

African colonies started out as trading outposts which gradually grew into cities which attracted settlers, there were no invasions. Even before white people arrived, African tribes frequently went to war with one another over territory and resources just like humans have done all throughout history all over the world.

Bullshit. They were invaded no matter how many white historians claim Africans sent people to europe begging for europeans to colonize them. Brothers fight all the time. Not getting why you think that means someone from outside the house can come in and take up residence?

South African colonization started way back in the 17th century. A lot has changed since then. Kinda silly to hold those centuries dead people to the same moral standards of today's modern society. The big difference between Europeans and Africans was the disparity of technological advancement. If the roles had been reversed then Africans would have done the same things in the lands they discovered.

Bullshit. When Africans went into europe they educated the europeans, showed them how to build castles, do math, take baths, etc and then left without torturing or enslaving anyone. So we have history that shows us what Black people do when they technological superiority.

Sub Saharan Africans never invaded Europe or taught them anything. There were many battles and cultural exchanges between Europe and North Africa though. Big difference between ancient north africa and sub saharan.

Wrong on both counts. First of all Blacks werent limited to being below the Sahara. I dont get why you white boys continue to believe in that obvious lie. Must make you feel better or something. They were called the Moors for a reason. It means Black.

Moor does not mean black. It's what medieval Europeans called muslims. And while I'm sure there were some pretty dark skinned moors, most of them were arab. And they certainly didnt just show up in spain and kindly distribute knowledge then leave. They conquered the territory, oppressed the people and were eventually driven out.