Let get the truth about South Africa

Bullshit. They were invaded no matter how many white historians claim Africans sent people to europe begging for europeans to colonize them. Brothers fight all the time. Not getting why you think that means someone from outside the house can come in and take up residence?

South African colonization started way back in the 17th century. A lot has changed since then. Kinda silly to hold those centuries dead people to the same moral standards of today's modern society. The big difference between Europeans and Africans was the disparity of technological advancement. If the roles had been reversed then Africans would have done the same things in the lands they discovered.
Bullshit. When Africans went into europe they educated the europeans, showed them how to build castles, do math, take baths, etc and then left without torturing or enslaving anyone. So we have history that shows us what Black people do when they technological superiority.

Sub Saharan Africans never invaded Europe or taught them anything. There were many battles and cultural exchanges between Europe and North Africa though. Big difference between ancient north africa and sub saharan.
Wrong on both counts. First of all Blacks werent limited to being below the Sahara. I dont get why you white boys continue to believe in that obvious lie. Must make you feel better or something. They were called the Moors for a reason. It means Black.

painting1.jpg

Moor does not mean black. It's what medieval Europeans called muslims. And while I'm sure there were some pretty dark skinned moors, most of them were arab. And they certainly didnt just show up in spain and kindly distribute knowledge then leave. They conquered the territory, oppressed the people and were eventually driven out.
Well I have been to europe and I saw the statues of Black Africans just like that painting and they were called Moors. No Moor doesnt mean muslim you idiot and it never did.

The Moors: Moor Etymology, Moors Truth, Real Moors, Moor Origins, Moorish History, True Moors, Africans in Europe
 
South African colonization started way back in the 17th century. A lot has changed since then. Kinda silly to hold those centuries dead people to the same moral standards of today's modern society. The big difference between Europeans and Africans was the disparity of technological advancement. If the roles had been reversed then Africans would have done the same things in the lands they discovered.
Bullshit. When Africans went into europe they educated the europeans, showed them how to build castles, do math, take baths, etc and then left without torturing or enslaving anyone. So we have history that shows us what Black people do when they technological superiority.

Sub Saharan Africans never invaded Europe or taught them anything. There were many battles and cultural exchanges between Europe and North Africa though. Big difference between ancient north africa and sub saharan.
Wrong on both counts. First of all Blacks werent limited to being below the Sahara. I dont get why you white boys continue to believe in that obvious lie. Must make you feel better or something. They were called the Moors for a reason. It means Black.

painting1.jpg

Moor does not mean black. It's what medieval Europeans called muslims. And while I'm sure there were some pretty dark skinned moors, most of them were arab. And they certainly didnt just show up in spain and kindly distribute knowledge then leave. They conquered the territory, oppressed the people and were eventually driven out.
Well I have been to europe and I saw the statues of Black Africans just like that painting and they were called Moors. No Moor doesnt mean muslim you idiot and it never did.

The Moors: Moor Etymology, Moors Truth, Real Moors, Moor Origins, Moorish History, True Moors, Africans in Europe


thanks for the afrocentric revisionist history website, I'll make sure to show it to my friends for a laugh.
 
This is how medieval Europeans depicted the moors:
14._moroccan_army_of_caliph_umar_al-murtada_routing_the_army_of_emir_abu_yusuf_at_marrakesh.webp



This is how medieval Moroccan moors depicted themselves:
Yahyâ_ibn_Mahmûd_al-Wâsitî_006.webp
 
Bullshit. When Africans went into europe they educated the europeans, showed them how to build castles, do math, take baths, etc and then left without torturing or enslaving anyone. So we have history that shows us what Black people do when they technological superiority.

Sub Saharan Africans never invaded Europe or taught them anything. There were many battles and cultural exchanges between Europe and North Africa though. Big difference between ancient north africa and sub saharan.
Wrong on both counts. First of all Blacks werent limited to being below the Sahara. I dont get why you white boys continue to believe in that obvious lie. Must make you feel better or something. They were called the Moors for a reason. It means Black.

painting1.jpg

Moor does not mean black. It's what medieval Europeans called muslims. And while I'm sure there were some pretty dark skinned moors, most of them were arab. And they certainly didnt just show up in spain and kindly distribute knowledge then leave. They conquered the territory, oppressed the people and were eventually driven out.
Well I have been to europe and I saw the statues of Black Africans just like that painting and they were called Moors. No Moor doesnt mean muslim you idiot and it never did.

The Moors: Moor Etymology, Moors Truth, Real Moors, Moor Origins, Moorish History, True Moors, Africans in Europe


thanks for the afrocentric revisionist history website, I'll make sure to show it to my friends for a laugh.
You didnt really think I was going to show you a eurocentric revisionist history website did you? This site jibes with what I saw in Germany with my own two eyes. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
If you like the shit South Africa is pulling on its' long-term citizens then you'll love it when some future Democrat regime confiscates your home to give it to somebody with skin darker than yours. Being a mere shade of tan will not be enough to exempt you.
 
This is how medieval Europeans depicted the moors:
View attachment 184146


This is how medieval Moroccan moors depicted themselves:
View attachment 184147
Not all Moors came from Morocco you moron. :rolleyes:

Here is a picture white europeans drew of Moses defeating the Moors.

SS2583569.jpg


That image is medieval propaganda of a mythical battle that never took place, meant to convince Christians that it is God's will that Spain be liberated from the Muslims.
 
This is how medieval Europeans depicted the moors:
View attachment 184146


This is how medieval Moroccan moors depicted themselves:
View attachment 184147
Not all Moors came from Morocco you moron. :rolleyes:

Here is a picture white europeans drew of Moses defeating the Moors.

SS2583569.jpg


That image is medieval propaganda of a mythical battle that never took place, meant to convince Christians that it is God's will that Spain be liberated from the Muslims.
I think you missed the point in your attempt to deflect. Those are Black Africans.
 
This is how medieval Europeans depicted the moors:
View attachment 184146


This is how medieval Moroccan moors depicted themselves:
View attachment 184147
Not all Moors came from Morocco you moron. :rolleyes:

Here is a picture white europeans drew of Moses defeating the Moors.

SS2583569.jpg


That image is medieval propaganda of a mythical battle that never took place, meant to convince Christians that it is God's will that Spain be liberated from the Muslims.
I think you missed the point in your attempt to deflect. Those are Black Africans.

Do you really think the monk who painted that picture had ever actually SEEN one of the muslims ruling spain?
 
This is how medieval Europeans depicted the moors:
View attachment 184146


This is how medieval Moroccan moors depicted themselves:
View attachment 184147
Not all Moors came from Morocco you moron. :rolleyes:

Here is a picture white europeans drew of Moses defeating the Moors.

SS2583569.jpg
First of all, that story is fabricated.

Second, that castle is pink/purple.

So I'm not surprised a dumbass like you would treat that as a historically accurate representation of someone's race/skin color.
 
This is how medieval Europeans depicted the moors:
View attachment 184146


This is how medieval Moroccan moors depicted themselves:
View attachment 184147
Not all Moors came from Morocco you moron. :rolleyes:

Here is a picture white europeans drew of Moses defeating the Moors.

SS2583569.jpg


That image is medieval propaganda of a mythical battle that never took place, meant to convince Christians that it is God's will that Spain be liberated from the Muslims.
I think you missed the point in your attempt to deflect. Those are Black Africans.
No, you missed the point. They're figments of someone's imagination.
 
Who invented the modern conception of human rights? Who wrote the laws abolishing slavery? What about US civil rights legislation? That's right.

Not ******.

:lol:

Is that so..?

Human rights isn't a modern concept. Whites wrote laws creating legalized slavery. Whites wrote laws denying civil rights. So then all whites have done is try to correct their **** ups.

And exactly what have blacks done? In your case: You said "Gibs me dat."

And we said "No, boy."

Then you said: "But we's Bettah, we deserve it."

And we said: "You didn't earn it and can **** off."
 
Last edited:
This is how medieval Europeans depicted the moors:
View attachment 184146


This is how medieval Moroccan moors depicted themselves:
View attachment 184147
Not all Moors came from Morocco you moron. :rolleyes:

Here is a picture white europeans drew of Moses defeating the Moors.

SS2583569.jpg


That image is medieval propaganda of a mythical battle that never took place, meant to convince Christians that it is God's will that Spain be liberated from the Muslims.
I think you missed the point in your attempt to deflect. Those are Black Africans.

Do you really think the monk who painted that picture had ever actually SEEN one of the muslims ruling spain?
Who told you a monk painted that picture and why did you believe them? The artist is unknown.
 
This is how medieval Europeans depicted the moors:
View attachment 184146


This is how medieval Moroccan moors depicted themselves:
View attachment 184147
Not all Moors came from Morocco you moron. :rolleyes:

Here is a picture white europeans drew of Moses defeating the Moors.

SS2583569.jpg


That image is medieval propaganda of a mythical battle that never took place, meant to convince Christians that it is God's will that Spain be liberated from the Muslims.
I think you missed the point in your attempt to deflect. Those are Black Africans.

Do you really think the monk who painted that picture had ever actually SEEN one of the muslims ruling spain?
Who told you a monk painted that picture and why did you believe them? The artist is unknown.

call it an educated guess based on the fact that the image is religious in nature and that most texts in medieval Europe was penned by monks.
Moses Defeating the Moors (Getty Museum)
 
Not all Moors came from Morocco you moron. :rolleyes:

Here is a picture white europeans drew of Moses defeating the Moors.

SS2583569.jpg


That image is medieval propaganda of a mythical battle that never took place, meant to convince Christians that it is God's will that Spain be liberated from the Muslims.
I think you missed the point in your attempt to deflect. Those are Black Africans.

Do you really think the monk who painted that picture had ever actually SEEN one of the muslims ruling spain?
Who told you a monk painted that picture and why did you believe them? The artist is unknown.

call it an educated guess based on the fact that the image is religious in nature and that most texts in medieval Europe was penned by monks.
Moses Defeating the Moors (Getty Museum)
I cant call it an educated guess when its based in mind numbing ignorance. For all you know it could have been someone commissioned by a king to use as propaganda. However the point still remains. Why would they use Black Africans to represent Moors if the Moors werent Black?
 
That image is medieval propaganda of a mythical battle that never took place, meant to convince Christians that it is God's will that Spain be liberated from the Muslims.
I think you missed the point in your attempt to deflect. Those are Black Africans.

Do you really think the monk who painted that picture had ever actually SEEN one of the muslims ruling spain?
Who told you a monk painted that picture and why did you believe them? The artist is unknown.

call it an educated guess based on the fact that the image is religious in nature and that most texts in medieval Europe was penned by monks.
Moses Defeating the Moors (Getty Museum)
I cant call it an educated guess when its based in mind numbing ignorance. For all you know it could have been someone commissioned by a king to use as propaganda. However the point still remains. Why would they use Black Africans to represent Moors if the Moors werent Black?

probably for the same reason the artist painted the moorish king on the banner with a comically huge nose.
 
15th post
I think you missed the point in your attempt to deflect. Those are Black Africans.

Do you really think the monk who painted that picture had ever actually SEEN one of the muslims ruling spain?
Who told you a monk painted that picture and why did you believe them? The artist is unknown.

call it an educated guess based on the fact that the image is religious in nature and that most texts in medieval Europe was penned by monks.
Moses Defeating the Moors (Getty Museum)
I cant call it an educated guess when its based in mind numbing ignorance. For all you know it could have been someone commissioned by a king to use as propaganda. However the point still remains. Why would they use Black Africans to represent Moors if the Moors werent Black?

probably for the same reason the artist painted the moorish king on the banner with a comically huge nose.
It was a coat of arms. They werent trying to be funny. The reason they painted and sculpted Black Africans as Moors is because thats what the Moors were. Your assumption that they made them Black men for any other reason pretty much defies rational logic.
 
Do you really think the monk who painted that picture had ever actually SEEN one of the muslims ruling spain?
Who told you a monk painted that picture and why did you believe them? The artist is unknown.

call it an educated guess based on the fact that the image is religious in nature and that most texts in medieval Europe was penned by monks.
Moses Defeating the Moors (Getty Museum)
I cant call it an educated guess when its based in mind numbing ignorance. For all you know it could have been someone commissioned by a king to use as propaganda. However the point still remains. Why would they use Black Africans to represent Moors if the Moors werent Black?

probably for the same reason the artist painted the moorish king on the banner with a comically huge nose.
It was a coat of arms. They werent trying to be funny. The reason they painted and sculpted Black Africans as Moors is because thats what the Moors were. Your assumption that they made them Black men for any other reason pretty much defies rational logic.

Medieval depiction of devils:
feat_demons.webp


This was supposed to be frightening.
 
Who told you a monk painted that picture and why did you believe them? The artist is unknown.

call it an educated guess based on the fact that the image is religious in nature and that most texts in medieval Europe was penned by monks.
Moses Defeating the Moors (Getty Museum)
I cant call it an educated guess when its based in mind numbing ignorance. For all you know it could have been someone commissioned by a king to use as propaganda. However the point still remains. Why would they use Black Africans to represent Moors if the Moors werent Black?

probably for the same reason the artist painted the moorish king on the banner with a comically huge nose.
It was a coat of arms. They werent trying to be funny. The reason they painted and sculpted Black Africans as Moors is because thats what the Moors were. Your assumption that they made them Black men for any other reason pretty much defies rational logic.

Medieval depiction of devils:
View attachment 184166

This was supposed to be frightening.
He denies modern DNA testing of numerous mummies and relies on medieval caricatures by unknown artists.
 
Who told you a monk painted that picture and why did you believe them? The artist is unknown.

call it an educated guess based on the fact that the image is religious in nature and that most texts in medieval Europe was penned by monks.
Moses Defeating the Moors (Getty Museum)
I cant call it an educated guess when its based in mind numbing ignorance. For all you know it could have been someone commissioned by a king to use as propaganda. However the point still remains. Why would they use Black Africans to represent Moors if the Moors werent Black?

probably for the same reason the artist painted the moorish king on the banner with a comically huge nose.
It was a coat of arms. They werent trying to be funny. The reason they painted and sculpted Black Africans as Moors is because thats what the Moors were. Your assumption that they made them Black men for any other reason pretty much defies rational logic.

Medieval depiction of devils:
View attachment 184166

This was supposed to be frightening.
Thats mildly interesting but what does it have to do with my point? If you were attempting to explain why they were Black Africans you were felled by your own logic. The painting would have had demons not Black Africans in that case right?
 
Back
Top Bottom