Lesbian Teacher: How I convince kids to accept "gay marriage" starting at 4

[HereWeGoAgain]

Good for her.

All I can say is **** off....

You should have stayed in school longer. An adult vocabulary is very useful.

More education at this point in my life would be useless.
As it is I had enough to retire at 46...

 

[frigidweirdo]

Lesbian teacher: How I convince kids to accept gay ‘marriage’, starting at 4 years old

Disgusting *****. So glad I am very involved in my kids schooling....this shit would have been stopped before it started.

Yeah, teaching tolerance, disgusting. She should be teaching them how to kill gay people, and learn to say "n*gger" every five minutes too.

Teaching tolerance is really not the same thing as trumpeting that you are pushing your agenda on primary school children IN SCHOOL where this really does not belong.

Do you know how much I knew about my teachers 'family' in the beginning of school? Nothing at all - it does not belong. Gay, straight or otherwise - that time is supposed to be used actually instructing children in the curriculum.

I knew about my teachers. I knew who was married, the secretary got married and we had to all do something. Did they mention sex? No they did not. They just said they were getting married.

So, if she says to kids that women can marry kids, it's not an agenda, it's just the truth of the society we live in. Or should kids be hidden from the fact that women can marry woman but not hidden from the fact men can marry women?

Both usually end up involving sex. But in neither situation do we talk about sex. So.... what's the problem.

Basically you're trying to pretend one is bad and the other is good when they're the same thing.

The woman might have an agenda, most teachers have agendas, like "teach the kids", should this not be allowed simply because it's an "agenda"?

I am not pretending anything. I am stating simple fact - this kind of bullshit agenda does not belong in the schools. She is not talking about the kids knowing that she is a lesbian - she is talking about trying to get them to accept her views on the matter - pushing an agenda that is not her business or job to be pushing.

I also didn't say squat about hiding anything. You are trying to project an argument that I am not making on me. It is blatantly simple - this kind of activism should be resoundingly rejected. It is pathetic as hell that you or anyone does not see what is obvious.

Perhaps we should be just fine with a teacher pronouncing loudly at a christian conference on how she uses the classroom for children to accept Jesus Christ into their hearts. Would that be fine with you? Perhaps another can proclaim at an NRA meeting how they use the classroom to get children to accept how wonderful it is to own and fire guns? Is that fine with you? Maybe, we can have a pro-life rally featuring a teacher who talks about how wonderful it is to explain to 4 year old children how life begins at conception. That seem like a wonderful idea?

No, in this case you and others accept it because THEY AGREE WITH THE SENTIMENT. That is the core problem here - I also agree with the sentiment but that does not mean that I am going to suddenly accept teachers using the classroom (and having the brass balls in bragging about it) to push my political agenda on children. It is flat out wrong. that is not what the classroom is for.

How is it bullshit?

Is it bullshit to say "mommy and daddy"?

School is about learning the skills needed to live life as an adult. Adults need to read and write. They also need to respect those people around them.

When the kids are adults they'll have to deal with women marrying women. They'll also have to deal with men marrying women.

Kids are trying to make sense of the world. If they see two women holding hands and kissing, as happens, and the kids have been hidden from the fact that this can happen, then what?

You see things as obvious, but it's not obvious.

If you read the article, it first came out when one kid called another kid "gay". Four years olds are using a term they might not understand. Surely learning to use words correctly, and learning not to insult others in the classroom are essential skills for life.
I don't know of many teachers who accept insults in their classroom.

Then she did a story called "King and King." and they got married. One kid said “They can’t do that! They can’t get married. They’re two boys.”

Well, clearly they can. The teacher didn't bring this up, one of the kids brought this up. Sure, the teacher chose the book. But 4 year olds understand the concept of marriage, they see married people, they understand what it means to be married to a certain point.

"“And I said: ‘It happens in real life too. I am married to a woman. I am gay. And I am in love with my wife.”"

Notice she didn't say sex? She merely spoke about her life. She used a word "gay" that had already been brought to the classroom by another kid as a slur. She used the word "love" many kids are told by their parents that they love them. Kids understand love, they understand marriage.

"“I said, you know, we take our kids to the park. I swing them on swings,”"

This is what she said she does with her family. Normal stuff.

"Strong said that at that point, the boy who had used the word ‘gay’ looked and her and said: “Well, you’re a family.”"

Kids learn the world around them. They're not afraid of the world around them. They can accept. It's adults who teach their intolerance to kids.

So, should teachers reinforce intolerance, or should they engage kids about what kids more or less understand, but maybe understand incorrectly because they've never had an open discussion about things.

Notice, the word "SEX" has not been brought up once in her dealings with kids.

She's talking family, emotions like love, and kids accept this. Why shouldn't they? Why shouldn't they accept that woman can marry woman? There's nothing wrong with it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I knew about my teachers. I knew who was married, the secretary got married and we had to all do something. Did they mention sex? No they did not. They just said they were getting married.

So, if she says to kids that women can marry kids, it's not an agenda, it's just the truth of the society we live in. Or should kids be hidden from the fact that women can marry woman but not hidden from the fact men can marry women?

Both usually end up involving sex. But in neither situation do we talk about sex. So.... what's the problem.

Basically you're trying to pretend one is bad and the other is good when they're the same thing.

The woman might have an agenda, most teachers have agendas, like "teach the kids", should this not be allowed simply because it's an "agenda"?

You are a pervert.........nothing more needs to be said. Homosexuality is nothing grade school kids should EVER be subjected to.....do you get it now????

No, I don't get it.

You seem to think that kids that age should not be told one thing that concerns sex, but should be told another thing that is basically the same that concerns sex.

It doesn't make any sense.

Also, I don't get why you feel the need to try and insult people instead of making an argument.

I think grade school is to teach kids how to read, write and cipher. It isn't for political indoctrination.

Kids learn so much at school, more than just simple stuff. They learn about life.

They learn how to use scissors, is that political indoctrination?

No, it's only political indoctrination when you're opposed to something.

Somehow it's political indoctrination to say "mommy and mommy".... really? To give kids a label for something.

Therefore it must be political indoctrination to say "mommy and daddy" yet, for some reason, you haven't complained about this.

Scissors is not a political issue - this is.

Why not try and construct an analogy that at least makes sense.

It's only a political issue because you choose to make it political.

Tolerating black people is an issue. Should teachers not make kids aware of other races and try and make them respect each other? Should they reinforce racism simply because adults talk about this politically?

 

[hazlnut]

Lesbian teacher: How I convince kids to accept gay ‘marriage’, starting at 4 years old

Disgusting *****. So glad I am very involved in my kids schooling....this shit would have been stopped before it started.

You homophobes and bigots are feces to be flushed down the toilet.

Buh-bye.

Hillary will be the next President and nominate next 3 judges. America moves forward.

 

[hazlnut]

Same-sex marriage is so two years ago. Now the frontier is people claiming they are neither male or female, who want restrooms for themselves, or to share with helpless little girls.

See above -- the homophobe tries to equate transexual with pedophile.

You people are the sick ones. So afraid of your own penis. So filled with hate.


Sick America = far-right Christian evangelicals.

Moderate evangelicals need to call these people out as the Taliban that they are.

 

[hazlnut]

Seems preferable to your teachers, who apparently taught hatred, intolerance and bigotry. Or was that your parents who instilled those American Christian values in you?
May God help your kids to reject your teachings.

Its called common sense which you obviously lack. Oh and I am not a christian ya idiot.Oh and no my kids have common sense and find 2 guys kissing absolutely disgusting Like I said common sense. They know like ALL people with common sense do that NORMAL is 1 man and 1 woman.

You sound like a closet homosexual.

Afraid of your own sexual desires.

Why else would two people kissing disgust you?

 

[PK1]

Teachers have always taught FICTION....

---
True ... in parochial schools.
.

.

 

[Silhouette]

Yeah, teaching tolerance, disgusting. She should be teaching them how to kill gay people, and learn to say "n*gger" every five minutes too.

What does racism have to do with deviant sex behaviors?

 

[whitehall]

Why would it be important for the sodomite/freakazoid community that grammar school kids "accept" their lifestyle? Maybe to increase the pedophile playing field?

 

[PK1]

INTERESTING thread topic, i must admit.
It challenges us to view human rights as "equal rights" in ways we are not used to and are uncomfortable with (90% of us).
A similar social issue had been a discussion about inter-racial marriage.

And then only 62 years ago, racial segregation in American schools was a big deal; was outlawed then. It must have been real tough for the first black student in a Southern school, like Jackie Robinson's first year playing in MLB (1947).
And then consider the backlash against strong women joining a fire department, or police force!

We have come a long way.
.

 

[bodecea]

Good for her.

What does a democrat lesbian do after she licks a bald *****? puts the diaper back on.......

Oh. listen to the expert.

 

[bodecea]

Lesbian teacher: How I convince kids to accept gay ‘marriage’, starting at 4 years old

Disgusting *****. So glad I am very involved in my kids schooling....this shit would have been stopped before it started.

Yeah, teaching tolerance, disgusting. She should be teaching them how to kill gay people, and learn to say "n*gger" every five minutes too.

Children at that age do not EVEN need to enter the realm of sexuality, gay, straight or otherwise....want to teach them how to play with their private parts as well? Good God, you are a friggin' perverted piece of filth. It is NOT the responsibility of public education to indoctrinate little children about morality...their job is to teach them how to read, write, add and subtract and they do a piss poor job at that. It is a good thing that my kids are out of school because if they were subjected to this kind of filth? I would be yanking them out and kicking the ass of the administrators that signed off on this perverted agenda....and you can bet your ass on that.

The point I made in another post is that kids grow up with "mommy and daddy" and don't think "mommy and daddy ****". So, when it's "mommy and mommy" do you suppose that 4 year olds can learn this without "mommy and mommy ****"????

It's the same thing. However some people on the right see lesbianism as just *******, and then project this onto 4 year olds, but don't do the same with heterosexual couples.

As for your ridiculous claim that i'd a "friggin' perverted piece of filth", no, I'm not. The fact that you're resorting to insults suggests something else, maybe that your argument isn't very good.

Exactly. What I have found most on this message board is that those against gays and gay marriage mentally default to the gay sex act every single time. I wonder if they mentally default to the sex act when they think of straight couples. Is that normal? Cuz I sure don't do that.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

You have to admire those cretins...... Insisting folks stay out of the bedroom whilest insisting on public indoctrination and accomodation with every mindless breath........ Lmfao

 

[rightwinger]

Good for her.

Of course scum like you would think brainwashing 4 year old's against their parents wishes is good.

You are still free to teach your kids any hate you want

 

[bodecea]

I am not really opposed to lesbians as long as they are hot, look like girls, and not at all gross. It's those militant dykes that bug me.

I'm not really opposed to straight men as long as they are hot, look like body builders or athletes, and not at all gross. It's those fat, pot bellied, bad toothed in-bred good ole' boys that bug me.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Good for her.

What does a democrat lesbian do after she licks a bald *****? puts the diaper back on.......

That was really gross & distasteful

 

[bodecea]

Why would it be important for the sodomite/freakazoid community that grammar school kids "accept" their lifestyle? Maybe to increase the pedophile playing field?

Sounds like you are accusing gay people such as myself of being pedophiles.

 

[bodecea]

You have to admire those cretins...... Insisting folks stay out of the bedroom whilest insisting on public indoctrination and accomodation with every mindless breath........ Lmfao

It would be very nice if you DID stay out of our bedrooms. It's rather creepy when we present ourselves as married couples that people like you automatically think about what we are doing for sex. Very creepy.

 

[Dale Smith]

Then stop pushing your perverted LGBT agenda on grade school aged kids....deal?

 

[LogikAndReazon]

You have to admire those cretins...... Insisting folks stay out of the bedroom whilest insisting on public indoctrination and accomodation with every mindless breath........ Lmfao

It would be very nice if you DID stay out of our bedrooms. It's rather creepy when we present ourselves as married couples that people like you automatically think about what we are doing for sex. Very creepy.

Homosexual "marriage" ??? Lol
A laughable leftist contrivance......