JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,524
- 2,165
- Banned
- #1
Yes, it does.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, it does.
Yes, it does.
You start out well, but then use a drawing that alludes to one of the biggest lies out there regarding this whole issue.
‘Hands up, don’t shoot’ was built on a lie
When you allude to a known falsehood, you ruin any attempt at trying to make your point come across as valid.
It's the same as the 71% women/men wage gap crap, and the 1 in 5 sexual assault on campus #.
Running with bad information because it fits your narrative sullies your position.
Yes, it does.
You start out well, but then use a drawing that alludes to one of the biggest lies out there regarding this whole issue.
‘Hands up, don’t shoot’ was built on a lie
When you allude to a known falsehood, you ruin any attempt at trying to make your point come across as valid.
It's the same as the 71% women/men wage gap crap, and the 1 in 5 sexual assault on campus #.
Running with bad information because it fits your narrative sullies your position.
The image correctly portrays the issue.
The man in Tulsa had his hands up.
The man on the ground who was wounded had his hands in the air.
Your opinion of false hood is well know to be false.
No, he didn't. He was shot while his hands were not up in the surrender position.Yes, it does.
You start out well, but then use a drawing that alludes to one of the biggest lies out there regarding this whole issue.
‘Hands up, don’t shoot’ was built on a lie
When you allude to a known falsehood, you ruin any attempt at trying to make your point come across as valid.
It's the same as the 71% women/men wage gap crap, and the 1 in 5 sexual assault on campus #.
Running with bad information because it fits your narrative sullies your position.
The image correctly portrays the issue.
The man in Tulsa had his hands up.
The man on the ground who was wounded had his hands in the air.
Your opinion of false hood is well know to be false.
We know that the perp was running at the officer, while chanting you won't shoot, while his hands were up. After what had occurred just moments before, I would have shot him, too. But that does not remove the fact his hands were up.Yes, it does.
You start out well, but then use a drawing that alludes to one of the biggest lies out there regarding this whole issue.
‘Hands up, don’t shoot’ was built on a lie
When you allude to a known falsehood, you ruin any attempt at trying to make your point come across as valid.
It's the same as the 71% women/men wage gap crap, and the 1 in 5 sexual assault on campus #.
Running with bad information because it fits your narrative sullies your position.
The image correctly portrays the issue.
The man in Tulsa had his hands up.
The man on the ground who was wounded had his hands in the air.
Your opinion of false hood is well know to be false.
it alludes to "Hands up, Don't shoot" from Ferguson, and we all know that is crap.
The vids show clearly his hands were up.No, he didn't. He was shot while his hands were not up in the surrender position.Yes, it does.
You start out well, but then use a drawing that alludes to one of the biggest lies out there regarding this whole issue.
‘Hands up, don’t shoot’ was built on a lie
When you allude to a known falsehood, you ruin any attempt at trying to make your point come across as valid.
It's the same as the 71% women/men wage gap crap, and the 1 in 5 sexual assault on campus #.
Running with bad information because it fits your narrative sullies your position.
The image correctly portrays the issue.
The man in Tulsa had his hands up.
The man on the ground who was wounded had his hands in the air.
Your opinion of false hood is well know to be false.
No it doesn't. It shows that when he was already on the ground his hands are above his head, they weren't when he was shot. Watch it again:JakeStarkey 5360092 said:The vids show clearly his hands were up.No, he didn't. He was shot while his hands were not up in the surrender position.Yes, it does.
You start out well, but then use a drawing that alludes to one of the biggest lies out there regarding this whole issue.
‘Hands up, don’t shoot’ was built on a lie
When you allude to a known falsehood, you ruin any attempt at trying to make your point come across as valid.
It's the same as the 71% women/men wage gap crap, and the 1 in 5 sexual assault on campus #.
Running with bad information because it fits your narrative sullies your position.
The image correctly portrays the issue.
The man in Tulsa had his hands up.
The man on the ground who was wounded had his hands in the air.
Your opinion of false hood is well know to be false.
His hands were not up when he was shot. Never said I was the decider of whether it was legal or not, that's what you seem to be doing. And you are wrong, his hands were not up.His hands were up, OOM: you are not the decider of whether it was legal or not.
We know that the perp was running at the officer, while chanting you won't shoot, while his hands were up. After what had occurred just moments before, I would have shot him, too. But that does not remove the fact his hands were up.Yes, it does.
You start out well, but then use a drawing that alludes to one of the biggest lies out there regarding this whole issue.
‘Hands up, don’t shoot’ was built on a lie
When you allude to a known falsehood, you ruin any attempt at trying to make your point come across as valid.
It's the same as the 71% women/men wage gap crap, and the 1 in 5 sexual assault on campus #.
Running with bad information because it fits your narrative sullies your position.
The image correctly portrays the issue.
The man in Tulsa had his hands up.
The man on the ground who was wounded had his hands in the air.
Your opinion of false hood is well know to be false.
it alludes to "Hands up, Don't shoot" from Ferguson, and we all know that is crap.
I agree with Crixus up until the he had to be shot part. I don't have enough information to make that call.
My bad.I agree with Crixus up until the he had to be shot part. I don't have enough information to make that call.
I thought we were on the Ferguson guy. This one in Oklahoma looks bad though. And they charged the cop pretty quick.
I agree, but I would go further and say black men need to be reformed as well. They tend to kill eachother more then cops kill them.
Yes, they were up. You are wrong, as usual.His hands were not up when he was shot. Never said I was the decider of whether it was legal or not, that's what you seem to be doing. And you are wrong, his hands were not up.His hands were up, OOM: you are not the decider of whether it was legal or not.