GoneBezerk
Rookie
- May 14, 2011
- 7,603
- 493
- 0
- Banned
- #141
The Govt has already shown they oppose second hand tobacco smoke by forcing their users to special places in buildings or even far away from buildings outside.
The genie is out of the bottle with tobacco so it's hard to make it illegal now. Also, tobacco hasn't been linked to brain and nervous system damage like marijuana so it's a lesser drug.
If marijuana is sold alongside tobacco in stores, odds are most people will swap tobacco for marijuana unless there is some huge gap in price. Why smoke tobacco when marijuana gives you a bigger high with the feeling of sucking in the smoke?
The genie is out of the bottle with tobacco so it's hard to make it illegal now. Also, tobacco hasn't been linked to brain and nervous system damage like marijuana so it's a lesser drug.
If marijuana is sold alongside tobacco in stores, odds are most people will swap tobacco for marijuana unless there is some huge gap in price. Why smoke tobacco when marijuana gives you a bigger high with the feeling of sucking in the smoke?
If marijuana users would sign away their rights to use medical, social welfare and psychology services once they choose to use marijuana....then I would have no problem letting them ruin their lives smoking marijuana.
Just stay out of the hospital, welfare and psychology facility when you end up with the side effects/problems from using marijuana.
Also, if you harm or endanger others when high in public, then you should also go to jail for a long, long time. Like say you drive "high" around town and get caught. A decade or more in a jail would do the trick since you want to use an illegal drug and possibly hurt other people.
That would be our deal with you....
That all sounds good, but by that logic cigarette smokers then should be held accountable for deaths of non-smokers who died of lung cancer due to second hand smoke. Isn't that putting the public at risk as well? Should the government then make cigarettes illegal?
Last edited: