Leftist Squealing As America Re-Emerges!

[PoliticalChic]

1. Nearly a century has gone by under the thumb of those who hate the creation of America. In 1937, the bigot/racist who was President, nominateed KKKer Hugo Black to the Supreme Court, and he promplty inserted exactly what any Marxist 'prayed' for: the elimination of religion form the American scene.



2. And here is the source of Hugo Black’s use of the phrase ‘separation of church and state,’ his office in the Ku Klux Klan.
Hugo Black's anti-Catholic bias, which showed up in his actions on the Supreme Court:

"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"




3. There is nothing in our founding documents that indicates that, and, in fact, the Declaration of Independence there are four references to ‘Divine’ … 1)in first paragraph ‘Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,’
2) next paragraph ‘endowed by their Creator,”
3) Supreme Judge of the world, and
4) ‘divine’ Providence, last paragraph.
This is important because our historic documents memorialize a government based on individuals born with inalienable rights, by, in various references, by the Divine, or Nature’s God, or their Creator, or the Supreme Judge, or divine Providence.


4. The first amendment makes clear that religion should not, can not, be excluded from American life.





5. In its most recent decision, the Supreme Court has put religion back in American life.
"Sotomayor accuses supreme court conservatives of dismantling church-state separation
Liberal justice delivers warning after ruling that state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from tuition programme

The liberal justice Sonia Sotomayor has warned that the US supreme court is dismantling the wall between church and state, after the conservative majority ruled that the state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from a tuition programme.
In a dissent to the ruling in Carson v Makin, released on Tuesday, Sotomayor wrote: “This court continues to dismantle the wall of separation between church and state that the framers fought to build.

“… In just a few years, the court has upended constitutional doctrine, shifting from a rule that permits states to decline to fund religious organisations to one that requires states in many circumstances to subsidise religious indoctrination with taxpayer dollars.”
Progressives fear other rulings due this month, among them a case set to bring down Roe v Wade, the 1973 ruling which established the right to abortion, and a ruling on a New York law set to loosen gun regulations even after several horrific mass shootings."

Sotomayor accuses supreme court conservatives of dismantling church-state separation

Liberal justice delivers warning after ruling that state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from tuition programme

www.theguardian.com

 

[shoshi]

Is separation of church and state in your constitution or did it only come from Thomas Jefferson who wrote their should be wall of separation between the church and the state?

 

[Concerned American]

1. Nearly a century has gone by under the thumb of those who hate the creation of America. In 1937, the bigot/racist who was President, nominateed KKKer Hugo Black to the Supreme Court, and he promplty inserted exactly what any Marxist 'prayed' for: the elimination of religion form the American scene.



2. And here is the source of Hugo Black’s use of the phrase ‘separation of church and state,’ his office in the Ku Klux Klan.
Hugo Black's anti-Catholic bias, which showed up in his actions on the Supreme Court:

"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"




3. There is nothing in our founding documents that indicates that, and, in fact, the Declaration of Independence there are four references to ‘Divine’ … 1)in first paragraph ‘Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,’
2) next paragraph ‘endowed by their Creator,”
3) Supreme Judge of the world, and
4) ‘divine’ Providence, last paragraph.
This is important because our historic documents memorialize a government based on individuals born with inalienable rights, by, in various references, by the Divine, or Nature’s God, or their Creator, or the Supreme Judge, or divine Providence.


4. The first amendment makes clear that religion should not, can not, be excluded from American life.





5. In its most recent decision, the Supreme Court has put religion back in American life.
"Sotomayor accuses supreme court conservatives of dismantling church-state separation
Liberal justice delivers warning after ruling that state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from tuition programme

The liberal justice Sonia Sotomayor has warned that the US supreme court is dismantling the wall between church and state, after the conservative majority ruled that the state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from a tuition programme.
In a dissent to the ruling in Carson v Makin, released on Tuesday, Sotomayor wrote: “This court continues to dismantle the wall of separation between church and state that the framers fought to build.

“… In just a few years, the court has upended constitutional doctrine, shifting from a rule that permits states to decline to fund religious organisations to one that requires states in many circumstances to subsidise religious indoctrination with taxpayer dollars.”
Progressives fear other rulings due this month, among them a case set to bring down Roe v Wade, the 1973 ruling which established the right to abortion, and a ruling on a New York law set to loosen gun regulations even after several horrific mass shootings."

Sotomayor accuses supreme court conservatives of dismantling church-state separation

Liberal justice delivers warning after ruling that state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from tuition programme

www.theguardian.com

Sotomayor is a moron. She was also nominated on the basis of ethnicity and gender--not on qualifications. She has shown by her rulings that she is not guided by the constitution.

 

[bodecea]

1. Nearly a century has gone by under the thumb of those who hate the creation of America. In 1937, the bigot/racist who was President, nominateed KKKer Hugo Black to the Supreme Court, and he promplty inserted exactly what any Marxist 'prayed' for: the elimination of religion form the American scene.



2. And here is the source of Hugo Black’s use of the phrase ‘separation of church and state,’ his office in the Ku Klux Klan.
Hugo Black's anti-Catholic bias, which showed up in his actions on the Supreme Court:

"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"




3. There is nothing in our founding documents that indicates that, and, in fact, the Declaration of Independence there are four references to ‘Divine’ … 1)in first paragraph ‘Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,’
2) next paragraph ‘endowed by their Creator,”
3) Supreme Judge of the world, and
4) ‘divine’ Providence, last paragraph.
This is important because our historic documents memorialize a government based on individuals born with inalienable rights, by, in various references, by the Divine, or Nature’s God, or their Creator, or the Supreme Judge, or divine Providence.


4. The first amendment makes clear that religion should not, can not, be excluded from American life.





5. In its most recent decision, the Supreme Court has put religion back in American life.
"Sotomayor accuses supreme court conservatives of dismantling church-state separation
Liberal justice delivers warning after ruling that state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from tuition programme

The liberal justice Sonia Sotomayor has warned that the US supreme court is dismantling the wall between church and state, after the conservative majority ruled that the state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from a tuition programme.
In a dissent to the ruling in Carson v Makin, released on Tuesday, Sotomayor wrote: “This court continues to dismantle the wall of separation between church and state that the framers fought to build.

“… In just a few years, the court has upended constitutional doctrine, shifting from a rule that permits states to decline to fund religious organisations to one that requires states in many circumstances to subsidise religious indoctrination with taxpayer dollars.”
Progressives fear other rulings due this month, among them a case set to bring down Roe v Wade, the 1973 ruling which established the right to abortion, and a ruling on a New York law set to loosen gun regulations even after several horrific mass shootings."

Sotomayor accuses supreme court conservatives of dismantling church-state separation

Liberal justice delivers warning after ruling that state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from tuition programme

www.theguardian.com

America as home to thugs? Well, yes.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Is separation of church and state in your constitution or did it only come from Thomas Jefferson who wrote their should be wall of separation between the church and the state?

There is no such concept in any of Amerian founding documents, including the works of Jefferson.

Pay attention, as you have a totally wrong view:


As for the famous “separation of church and state,” the phrase appears in no federal document. In fact, at the time of ratification of the Constitution, ten of the thirteen colonies had some provision recognizing Christianity as either the official, or the recommended religion in their state constitutions.

From the 1790 Massachusetts Constitution, written by John Adams, includes: [the] good order and preservation of civil government essentially depend(s) upon piety, religion, and morality…by the institution of public worship of God and of the public instruction in piety, religion, and morality…”Constitution of Massachusetts - Wikipedia


North Carolina Constitution, article 32, 1776: “That no person who shall deny the being of God, or the truth of the Protestant religion, or the divine authority of either the Old or New Testaments, or who shall hold religious principles incompatible with the freedom and safety of the State, shall b e capable of holding any office, or place of trust or profit, in the civil department, within this State.”
Constitution of North Carolina, 1776



So, the Founders intention was to be sure that the federal government didn’t do the same, and mandate a national religion. And when Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptists in 1802, it was to reassure them the federal government could not interfere in their religious observations, i.e., there is “a wall of separation between church and state.”
A one-way wall that stops government but allow each the liberty of their religious belieffs.


He wasn’t speaking of religion contaminating the government, but of the government contaminating religious observance.




The emasculation of America’s history and heritage can be traced directly to the 32nd President, who wedded America to the world’s greatest homicidal psychopath, and made America comfortable to the neo-Marxism from which we suffer today.

More directly, Franklin Roosevelt made, as his first Supreme Court nominee, KKKer Hugo Black who is responsible for inserting the phrase ‘separation of church and state’ into our judicial protocol.




“…where does that phrase come from? It comes from one brief letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802.At the end of a very long sentence in which Jefferson affirms his conviction that religious belief should be a private matter, and that the government should not interfere with such matters, he uses the phrase “building a wall of separation between Church & State.” And that’s where the phrase lived, undisturbed—lost in Jefferson’s voluminous correspondence—for almost 150 years.”


For context, a Connecticut community of Baptists, admirers of Jefferson, wrote to him about their fear that a federal government would ban their form of worship. The Founders intention was to be sure that the federal government didn’t do that, and mandate a national religion. And when Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptists in 1802, it was to reassure them the federal government could not interfere in their religious observations, i.e., there is “a wall of separation between church and state.” That is a one-way wall: separating government from religion, but not religion from government.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sotomayor is a moron. She was also nominated on the basis of ethnicity and gender--not on qualifications. She has shown by her rulings that she is not guided by the constitution.

But, I must admit, it is heartening to find such angst among the Marxist Democrats.

An ode, to Sotomayor, from Hardy.

“Thou suffering thing,
Know that thy sorrow is my ecstasy,
That thy love's loss is my hate's profiting!”

 

[PoliticalChic]

America as home to thugs? Well, yes.

Speaking of thugs....

Did you see the latest, that Democrats had agents provocateurs leading the violence Jan 6?????


“Police Report Shows Undercover Cops Were Embedded With J6 Protestors”

Police Report Shows Undercover Cops Were Embedded With J6 Protestors

pjmedia.com

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

1. Nearly a century has gone by under the thumb of those who hate the creation of America. In 1937, the bigot/racist who was President, nominateed KKKer Hugo Black to the Supreme Court, and he promplty inserted exactly what any Marxist 'prayed' for: the elimination of religion form the American scene.



2. And here is the source of Hugo Black’s use of the phrase ‘separation of church and state,’ his office in the Ku Klux Klan.
Hugo Black's anti-Catholic bias, which showed up in his actions on the Supreme Court:

"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"




3. There is nothing in our founding documents that indicates that, and, in fact, the Declaration of Independence there are four references to ‘Divine’ … 1)in first paragraph ‘Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,’
2) next paragraph ‘endowed by their Creator,”
3) Supreme Judge of the world, and
4) ‘divine’ Providence, last paragraph.
This is important because our historic documents memorialize a government based on individuals born with inalienable rights, by, in various references, by the Divine, or Nature’s God, or their Creator, or the Supreme Judge, or divine Providence.


4. The first amendment makes clear that religion should not, can not, be excluded from American life.





5. In its most recent decision, the Supreme Court has put religion back in American life.
"Sotomayor accuses supreme court conservatives of dismantling church-state separation
Liberal justice delivers warning after ruling that state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from tuition programme

The liberal justice Sonia Sotomayor has warned that the US supreme court is dismantling the wall between church and state, after the conservative majority ruled that the state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from a tuition programme.
In a dissent to the ruling in Carson v Makin, released on Tuesday, Sotomayor wrote: “This court continues to dismantle the wall of separation between church and state that the framers fought to build.

“… In just a few years, the court has upended constitutional doctrine, shifting from a rule that permits states to decline to fund religious organisations to one that requires states in many circumstances to subsidise religious indoctrination with taxpayer dollars.”
Progressives fear other rulings due this month, among them a case set to bring down Roe v Wade, the 1973 ruling which established the right to abortion, and a ruling on a New York law set to loosen gun regulations even after several horrific mass shootings."

Sotomayor accuses supreme court conservatives of dismantling church-state separation

Liberal justice delivers warning after ruling that state of Maine cannot exclude religious schools from tuition programme

www.theguardian.com

We know the SC has always been largely a tool of conservatives to force their moral and religious beliefs on the majority. When the Republican party sold their platform out to the religious conservatives in the early 80's, they were essentially bent on ripping that traditional wall of separation down. It's also one of the biggest reasons the ideology of conservatism is an abject failure. Because it isn't based on sound policy or the rule of law. It is based on and rooted in the fundamental belief in a divine power.
Let's forget the fact that school vouchers are just a convenient way to defund and destroy public education...and a complete waste of time and money.

 

[PoliticalChic]

We know the SC has always been largely a tool of conservatives to force their moral and religious beliefs on the majority. When the Republican party sold their platform out to the religious conservatives in the early 80's, they were essentially bent on ripping that traditional wall of separation down. It's also one of the biggest reasons the ideology of conservatism is an abject failure. Because it isn't based on sound policy or the rule of law. It is based on and rooted in the fundamental belief in a divine power.
Let's forget the fact that school vouchers are just a convenient way to defund and destroy public education...and a complete waste of time and money.

"We know the SC has always been largely a tool of conservatives to force their moral and religious beliefs on the majority."


More proof that Democrats lie about everything.....although in this case, it might be because this one is as dumb as asphalt.


The very opposite is the case.


“The power to assert that the Constitution prohibits any policy choice of which they disapprove has enabled the justices to make themselves the final lawmakers on any public policy issue that they choose to remove from the ordinary political process and to assign for decision to themselves.

…the Court now performs in the American system of government a role similar to that performed by the Grand Council of Ayatollahs in the Iranian system: voting takes place and representatives of the people are elected as lawmakers, but the decisions they reach on basic issues of social policy are permitted to prevail only so long as they are not disallowed by the system’s highest authority. The major difference is that the ayatollahs act as a conservative force, while the effect of the Supreme Court’s interventions is almost always—as on every one of the issues just mentioned—to challenge, reverse, and overthrow traditional American practices and values.” Professor Lino Graglia https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/0817946020_1.pdf




In your face, you dunce.

 

[Pete7469]

Why do you think they have been snarling and foaming at the mouth ever since that criminal sociopath hag hitlary was prevented from nominating communist lunatics to the court?

The final icing on the cake was Trump replacing Ruth Badger Ginsburg with a woman who knows what a woman is and can actually spell "Constitution".

With Roe V. Wade now about to be sent back to state jurisdictions and the 10th Amendment about to grow teeth the moonbats have become feral. All we need to do now is overturn the GCA of 1986 and possibly the NFA of 1933 and we will have rolled back some of the most egregious usurpations of human freedom that began with the confederate democrook party gaining power and promoting an agenda of retribution. Ever since 1860 the democrook party has literally been the enemy of the COTUS. Almost everything they have done has been detrimental to prosperity, and actual human progress. EVERYTHING they have done was intended to undermine the COTUS and empower federal authorities and get revenge on those who opposed slavery.

Make no mistake about that.


.

 

[PoliticalChic]

We know the SC has always been largely a tool of conservatives to force their moral and religious beliefs on the majority. When the Republican party sold their platform out to the religious conservatives in the early 80's, they were essentially bent on ripping that traditional wall of separation down. It's also one of the biggest reasons the ideology of conservatism is an abject failure. Because it isn't based on sound policy or the rule of law. It is based on and rooted in the fundamental belief in a divine power.
Let's forget the fact that school vouchers are just a convenient way to defund and destroy public education...and a complete waste of time and money.

Despite the secular nature of our national government, there is one unambiguous reference to Christ in the Constitution. I bet you didn't know that......but, then, there are so very many things you don't know.


Government school grad, huh?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Despite the secular nature of our national government, there is one unambiguous reference to Christ in the Constitution. I bet you didn't know that......but, then, there are so very many things you don't know.


Government school grad, huh?

Then you should have no problems with the separation of church and state. We agree, it's for the best?

Psssstttt...the government doesn't run schools. Stop spreading manure.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why do you think they have been snarling and foaming at the mouth ever since that criminal sociopath hag hitlary was prevented from nominating communist lunatics to the court?

The final icing on the cake was Trump replacing Ruth Badger Ginsburg with a woman who knows what a woman is and can actually spell "Constitution".

With Roe V. Wade now about to be sent back to state jurisdictions and the 10th Amendment about to grow teeth the moonbats have become feral. All we need to do now is overturn the GCA of 1986 and possibly the NFA of 1933 and we will have rolled back some of the most egregious usurpations of human freedom that began with the confederate democrook party gaining power and promoting an agenda of retribution. Ever since 1860 the democrook party has literally been the enemy of the COTUS. Almost everything they have done has been detrimental to prosperity, and actual human progress. EVERYTHING they have done was intended to undermine the COTUS and empower federal authorities and get revenge on those who opposed slavery.

Make no mistake about that.


.

The law has never been a consideration for whomever the Democrats nomomate.
Everyone knows the qualifications for Democrat nominees: be a reliable vote, no integrity, no American values, no knowledge required.


Kagan has written that she doesn't believe in free speech.


Sotomayor stated that one's ethnicity makes one more able to read the clear English of the US Constitution.

So now we'll have a wokester on the court.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Then you should have no problems with the separation of church and state. We agree, it's for the best?

Psssstttt...the government doesn't run schools. Stop spreading manure.

Only if I serve the master you serve, Satan.


And serve well:


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

Now......which is your favorite?

 

[BS Filter]

There is no such thing as "separation of church and state". in the Constitution, nor is there any such thing as "settled law"

 

[BS Filter]

Then you should have no problems with the separation of church and state. We agree, it's for the best?

Psssstttt...the government doesn't run schools. Stop spreading manure.

The government doesn't run schools? Ever hear of the Department of Education?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Only if I serve the master you serve, Satan.


And serve well:


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

Now......which is your favorite?

My favorite is kicking your sorry ass all over the barely-in-touch-with-reality posts you make. You have a tenuous grasp of history and a selective memory.
You've gotten a little predictable and boring.

Time get some new material.

 

[BS Filter]

My favorite is kicking your sorry ass all over the barely-in-touch-with-reality posts you make. You have a tenuous grasp of history and a selective memory.
You've gotten a little predictable and boring.

Time get some new material.

Off topic.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Off topic.

Then don't respond. Didn't ask you to get involved anyway.

 

[BS Filter]

Then don't respond. Didn't ask you to get involved anyway.

Fuck you. Time for your nap.