Left-Wingers Enter New Depths of Rage Over Supreme Court's Nationwide Injunction Ruling

Not surprisingly, leftist Supreme court judges are infuriated by the majority ruling connected to district level judges issuing nationwide rulings which are beyond the scope of their jurisdiction.

Bad news for the left as this will limit their practice of "judge shopping" as they try to limit Trump's executive authority.



As RedState reported, the Trump administration scored a major victory on Friday after the Supreme Court ruled that district court-level nationwide injunctions exceeded judicial authority. That will throw a wrench into the left-wing strategy of seeking universal relief in a select few left-wing jurisdictions across the country and hopefully return some actual balance to the separation of powers within the U.S. government.
#Winning
 
Trump's deficits compared to the GNP were pretty darn good.
That's an empty argument.

It simply means we were making more so he could spend more.

His successive deficits went up and up and up. There is no excuse for that.

In fact, it is more damning. It's just a ratio someone puts up to sway a BS argument.

What blew it out of the water was the 2020 COVID epidemic when the Democrats wouldn't pass COVID relief until he allowed them to stuff the legislation with everything but the kitchen sink.
I'm not talking about that. As you say, it was the democrats essentially holding the American People hostage (in several ways).

I'm talking about his first three years.
Trump has never been blessed with a majority in Congress who shared his vision, goals, and agenda until now.
If you can demonstrate how he's reducing them, I will be tickled pink.

Right now, I am suspicious and his history does nothing to dissuade me from that POV.
 
Trump's deficits compared to the GNP were pretty darn good. What blew it out of the water was the 2020 COVID epidemic when the Democrats wouldn't pass COVID relief until he allowed them to stuff the legislation with everything but the kitchen sink.

Trump has never been blessed with a majority in Congress who shared his vision, goals, and agenda until now.
IF he does now. I'm all for Vance stepping in and getting these chuckleheads in line.
 
I just read some of SOTOMEYER's dissent.

WHAT A LOAD. She has strawman after strawman in there.

Barrett was clear...this does not address the basis of the case.

It's about telling the people of Florida they are no longer subject to the idiots in SF.
 
It doesn't matter if you don't like it, it's still the proper name for the things tRump is doing.
You made it useless, it’s the demofks thing
 
Justice Jackon gets ripped to shreds as an idiot. Justice Barrett basically calls the black justice a useless "C" word. :oops:

"We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself," Barrett wrote. "We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."
Oh man, I just made a post about this. I don’t believe they think much of Jackson’s legal skills.
 
I have fallen behind in the conversation, but from what I can tell, Trump does not mind large deficits either.

I voted for him....but this has always irritated me about him.


I would love to see data that supports that.

Believe me.....I want that.

I really do.

But Trump increased deficits his first three years in office. I don't see this as his strong suit.
Two trillion over ten years ain’t nothing, beats four trillion if no bill
 
15th post
Two trillion over ten years ain’t nothing, beats four trillion if no bill
Dems DOOM and GLOOM deficit predictions assume Trump's policies will have no positive revenue effects whatsoever which is f'ing retarded.
 
Two trillion over ten years ain’t nothing, beats four trillion if no bill
Please share that analysis.

I hope you are right.

Of course, all the depends on some things happening.

I agree that if you let the demos take it....we are screwed.

Have you heard of Sanders socalled Modern Monetary Theory?
 
Dems DOOM and GLOOM deficit predictions assume Trump's policies will have no positive revenue effects whatsoever which is f'ing retarded.
Well, they didn't have enough of an effect before.

I am just stating the facts.

His deficit in year 1 was about 550 billion.

In year 3 it was just at 1 Trillion.

We don't want that.
 
Back
Top Bottom