Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nice try, you idiot. Your original link did not have the breakdown. It only listed that a pregnant woman and her infant among others were killed.I found a link that broke it down for you since I know you are a Short Bus rider.
So, tell us how LIbtard KKKalifornia thinks a blob of cells is a person worthy of a murder charge if killed, Simp.
This should be a hoot.
So, tell us how LIbtard KKKalifornia thinks a blob of cells is a person worthy of a murder charge if killed, Simp.
Yep, how can a blob of cells be "killed", Simp?Nice try, you idiot. Your original link did not have the breakdown. It only listed that a pregnant woman and her infant among others were killed.
I challenged you to prove it from your original link. You had to go to another source. This proves my point. Your first link did not have what you alleged.
Next time, learn to post correctly. Get it now, retard? Let me know if you are still confused.
Yep, how can a blob of cells be "killed", Simp?
Oh wait, every abortion KILLS a "blob of cells", right Simp?
English, do you speak it?Even Roe v Wade + post-Roe v Wade decisions made space for 'viability', and at 8 months, that threshold standard was met. In any case, the dead mother clearly wanted the fetus/baby-in-waiting.
You don't have a point, do you?
English, do you speak it?
Not sure why you keep trying to throw Roe v Wade into this. It has nothing to do with this situation Simp.Again, look at Roe v Wade and related cases. How many of them said it's okay to abort at 8 months 'because reasons'? You're creating a fake, dishonest argument.
Not sure why you keep trying to throw Roe v Wade into this. It has nothing to do with this situation Simp.
Roe v Wade is history, Dumbass.
Sorry, don't speak dumbassery.
Prove it, retard. Quote the original link you posted where it says that the DA was bringing charges because of an unborn child. Go.Yep, how can a blob of cells be "killed", Simp?
Oh wait, every abortion KILLS a "blob of cells", right Simp?
Original link proved my point, and I brought an additional link to try to dumb it down to your Simp level, Simp.
Poor fella. Keep grasping at staws since you can't explain why Dimtard KKKalifornia is charging a woman with murder for "killing" a blob of cells.Prove it, retard. Quote the original link you posted where it says that the DA was bringing charges because of an unborn child. Go.
Either prove it or shut the fuck up.
Even Roe v Wade + post-Roe v Wade decisions made space for 'viability', and at 8 months, that threshold standard was met. In any case, the dead mother clearly wanted the fetus/baby-in-waiting.
You don't have a point, do you?
Once again, this isn't an abortion thread you raving lunatic.Because California's law, like all laws that permit abortions, was shaped by Roe v Wade.
Dumbass.
In other words, you couldn't prove it? Don't feel too bad. Retards as you can never can. Thanks for playing, retard.Poor fella. Keep grasping at staws since you can't explain why Dimtard KKKalifornia is charging a woman with murder for "killing" a blob of cells.
Sux to be you.
But by all means, if it makes you feel better, keep pissing your depends of the OP, Simp.
Um, it was proven in the OP AND my additional link, Simp.In other words, you couldn't prove it? Don't feel too bad. Retards as you can never can. Thanks for playing, retard.
It wasn't proven in the original, retard. No matter how many times you claim it is. But, hey, I have given you multiple chances to prove that your original article had what you alleged.Um, it was proven in the OP AND my additional link, Simp.
Now you tell us how KKKalifornia is charging a woman with murder for killing a blob of cells.
GO!
How did this woman get charged with murder of a blob of cells, Simp?It wasn't proven in the original, retard. No matter how many times you claim it is. But, hey, I have given you multiple chances to prove that your original article had what you alleged.
And yet, like a retard, all you can do is come back and whine. Must be a character flow with all trumptards.
Because that is the law on the books, retard.How did this woman get charged with murder of a blob of cells, Simp?
| California | Cal. Penal Code § 187 (a) defines murder as the unlawful killing of a human being or a fetus with malice aforethought. |
So you admit KKKalifornia says a fetus is in fact a human being.Because that is the law on the books, retard.
State Fetal Homicide Laws
Currently, at least 38 states have fetal homicide laws: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. At least 29 states have fetal homicide laws that apply to the earliest stages of pregnancy ("any state of gestation/development," "conception," "fertilization" or "post-fertilization"); these are indicated below with an asterisk (*).
California Cal. Penal Code § 187 (a) defines murder as the unlawful killing of a human being or a fetus with malice aforethought. Policy Research
NCSL’s experts are here to answer your questions and give you unbiased, comprehensive information as soon as you need it on issues facing state legislatures. We answer more than 20,000 requests for information a year.www.ncsl.org
It does not matter what the DA's beliefs are. He has to enforce the laws on the books. Next time, do some research before posting. Also, learn to read to understand what is and is not in your link. All of this will help you look less of a fool than you appear. Good luck.
