Leave the Golan Heights Israel, its not yours,

[Phoenall]

Originally posted by Boston1
Its obvious. Racism, bigotry, a fundamental flaw in their religious teachings. Its more than obvious. Hell they were on a Nazi rampage long before Israel was formed, why wouldn't they be on a Nazi rampage now ?

Originally posted by Roudy
The same reason that ISIS and other IslamoNazi groups go after non Muslims in other parts of the world. It isn't rocket science. Muslims are at war with everybody and everything, including themselves. Why should Palestinian Muslim be any different than their brethren elsewhere?

Originally posted by Shusha
What rights would those be?

The birthright, the natural right to move from Khan Yunis to Ashkelon where his parents lived without being arrested, shot in the leg or murdered by virtue of being an arab.

As long as he goes the long way round he can do so, that is is hamas allows him to leave. But what if his Father came from Yemen and his mother from Egypt as would be the case in most instances.

You don't have a natural right to cross another nation, and there is no law says you do. If he acts in an aggressive manner then he will be arrested, just as he would in the USA. Same if he was being violent to others he could be shot for not obeying a legal command. How about you prove that he would be murdered, show the time and date of the conspiracy to go out and kill any arab by the Israeli armed forces without justification. A failure to do so will just prove that you are not interested in a resolution just being able to demonise the Jews.

 

[Roudy]

Originally posted by Boston1
Its obvious. Racism, bigotry, a fundamental flaw in their religious teachings. Its more than obvious. Hell they were on a Nazi rampage long before Israel was formed, why wouldn't they be on a Nazi rampage now ?

Originally posted by Roudy
The same reason that ISIS and other IslamoNazi groups go after non Muslims in other parts of the world. It isn't rocket science. Muslims are at war with everybody and everything, including themselves. Why should Palestinian Muslim be any different than their brethren elsewhere?

Originally posted by Shusha
What rights would those be?

The birthright, the natural right to move from Khan Yunis to Ashkelon where his parents lived without being arrested, shot in the leg or murdered by virtue of being an arab.

Apparently Arab Muslims don't believe Jews and Christians have those same rights.

 

[Boston1]

Originally posted by Boston1
Its obvious. Racism, bigotry, a fundamental flaw in their religious teachings. Its more than obvious. Hell they were on a Nazi rampage long before Israel was formed, why wouldn't they be on a Nazi rampage now ?

Originally posted by Roudy
The same reason that ISIS and other IslamoNazi groups go after non Muslims in other parts of the world. It isn't rocket science. Muslims are at war with everybody and everything, including themselves. Why should Palestinian Muslim be any different than their brethren elsewhere?

Originally posted by Shusha
What rights would those be?

The birthright, the natural right to move from Khan Yunis to Ashkelon where his parents lived without being arrested, shot in the leg or murdered by virtue of being an arab.

The restrictions are in place because the Arab Muslims have earned them. If they want the restrictions lifted, they are going to have to earn that too.

So whats your problem ?

Its a lot like the Golan hights. The hights were lost because the country that had them couldn't responsibly hold the high ground. So Israel took the high ground and now responsibly holds it.

Same thing thats about to happen to the temple mount. The Arab Muslims in Israel simply aren't acting in a responsible manor to the privilege of being given access to the temple mount. Inevitably they will lose that privilege .

Case closed

 

[Juicin]

Originally posted by Boston1
Its obvious. Racism, bigotry, a fundamental flaw in their religious teachings. Its more than obvious. Hell they were on a Nazi rampage long before Israel was formed, why wouldn't they be on a Nazi rampage now ?

Originally posted by Roudy
The same reason that ISIS and other IslamoNazi groups go after non Muslims in other parts of the world. It isn't rocket science. Muslims are at war with everybody and everything, including themselves. Why should Palestinian Muslim be any different than their brethren elsewhere?

Originally posted by Shusha
What rights would those be?

The birthright, the natural right to move from Khan Yunis to Ashkelon where his parents lived without being arrested, shot in the leg or murdered by virtue of being an arab.

The restrictions are in place because the Arab Muslims have earned them. If they want the restrictions lifted, they are going to have to earn that too.

So whats your problem ?

Its a lot like the Golan hights. The hights were lost because the country that had them couldn't responsibly hold the high ground. So Israel took the high ground and now responsibly holds it.

Same thing thats about to happen to the temple mount. The Arab Muslims in Israel simply aren't acting in a responsible manor to the privilege of being given access to the temple mount. Inevitably they will lose that privilege .

Case closed

Earned them by doing what? Being the rightful owners to a land Jews covet? hahaha

UN pisses on Israeli claims weekly, what do you think is going to happen when the majority of Americans are brown? Almost none of them evangelicals? The Russians would love to see teh Israelis disappear

 

[Phoenall]

Originally posted by Boston1
Its obvious. Racism, bigotry, a fundamental flaw in their religious teachings. Its more than obvious. Hell they were on a Nazi rampage long before Israel was formed, why wouldn't they be on a Nazi rampage now ?

Originally posted by Roudy
The same reason that ISIS and other IslamoNazi groups go after non Muslims in other parts of the world. It isn't rocket science. Muslims are at war with everybody and everything, including themselves. Why should Palestinian Muslim be any different than their brethren elsewhere?

Originally posted by Shusha
What rights would those be?

The birthright, the natural right to move from Khan Yunis to Ashkelon where his parents lived without being arrested, shot in the leg or murdered by virtue of being an arab.

The restrictions are in place because the Arab Muslims have earned them. If they want the restrictions lifted, they are going to have to earn that too.

So whats your problem ?

Its a lot like the Golan hights. The hights were lost because the country that had them couldn't responsibly hold the high ground. So Israel took the high ground and now responsibly holds it.

Same thing thats about to happen to the temple mount. The Arab Muslims in Israel simply aren't acting in a responsible manor to the privilege of being given access to the temple mount. Inevitably they will lose that privilege .

Case closed

Earned them by doing what? Being the rightful owners to a land Jews covet? hahaha

UN pisses on Israeli claims weekly, what do you think is going to happen when the majority of Americans are brown? Almost none of them evangelicals? The Russians would love to see teh Israelis disappear

It was never their land to begin with, unless you have a signed treaty by the Ottomans giving them the land.None exists but there are ones that exist giving the land to the Jews signed by the LoN in 1923.

Then America will go the way of South Africa, or parts of it will while the rest will be white's only again and the browns will mass murder each other in their fight to be top dog.


Have you finished your racist rant now

 

[Juicin]

Originally posted by Boston1
Its obvious. Racism, bigotry, a fundamental flaw in their religious teachings. Its more than obvious. Hell they were on a Nazi rampage long before Israel was formed, why wouldn't they be on a Nazi rampage now ?

Originally posted by Roudy
The same reason that ISIS and other IslamoNazi groups go after non Muslims in other parts of the world. It isn't rocket science. Muslims are at war with everybody and everything, including themselves. Why should Palestinian Muslim be any different than their brethren elsewhere?

Originally posted by Shusha
What rights would those be?

The birthright, the natural right to move from Khan Yunis to Ashkelon where his parents lived without being arrested, shot in the leg or murdered by virtue of being an arab.

The restrictions are in place because the Arab Muslims have earned them. If they want the restrictions lifted, they are going to have to earn that too.

So whats your problem ?

Its a lot like the Golan hights. The hights were lost because the country that had them couldn't responsibly hold the high ground. So Israel took the high ground and now responsibly holds it.

Same thing thats about to happen to the temple mount. The Arab Muslims in Israel simply aren't acting in a responsible manor to the privilege of being given access to the temple mount. Inevitably they will lose that privilege .

Case closed

Earned them by doing what? Being the rightful owners to a land Jews covet? hahaha

UN pisses on Israeli claims weekly, what do you think is going to happen when the majority of Americans are brown? Almost none of them evangelicals? The Russians would love to see teh Israelis disappear

It was never their land to begin with, unless you have a signed treaty by the Ottomans giving them the land.None exists but there are ones that exist giving the land to the Jews signed by the LoN in 1923.

Then America will go the way of South Africa, or parts of it will while the rest will be white's only again and the browns will mass murder each other in their fight to be top dog.


Have you finished your racist rant now

Yes it is there land, they have the right of return. No Jew on the planet has the right of return to Israel, because they can't prove a claim to begin with

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Originally posted by Boston1
Its obvious. Racism, bigotry, a fundamental flaw in their religious teachings. Its more than obvious. Hell they were on a Nazi rampage long before Israel was formed, why wouldn't they be on a Nazi rampage now ?

Originally posted by Roudy
The same reason that ISIS and other IslamoNazi groups go after non Muslims in other parts of the world. It isn't rocket science. Muslims are at war with everybody and everything, including themselves. Why should Palestinian Muslim be any different than their brethren elsewhere?

Originally posted by Shusha
What rights would those be?

The birthright, the natural right to move from Khan Yunis to Ashkelon where his parents lived without being arrested, shot in the leg or murdered by virtue of being an arab.

The restrictions are in place because the Arab Muslims have earned them. If they want the restrictions lifted, they are going to have to earn that too.

So whats your problem ?

Its a lot like the Golan hights. The hights were lost because the country that had them couldn't responsibly hold the high ground. So Israel took the high ground and now responsibly holds it.

Same thing thats about to happen to the temple mount. The Arab Muslims in Israel simply aren't acting in a responsible manor to the privilege of being given access to the temple mount. Inevitably they will lose that privilege .

Case closed

Earned them by doing what? Being the rightful owners to a land Jews covet? hahaha

UN pisses on Israeli claims weekly, what do you think is going to happen when the majority of Americans are brown? Almost none of them evangelicals? The Russians would love to see teh Israelis disappear

It was never their land to begin with, unless you have a signed treaty by the Ottomans giving them the land.None exists but there are ones that exist giving the land to the Jews signed by the LoN in 1923.

Then America will go the way of South Africa, or parts of it will while the rest will be white's only again and the browns will mass murder each other in their fight to be top dog.


Have you finished your racist rant now

Yes it is there land, they have the right of return. No Jew on the planet has the right of return to Israel, because they can't prove a claim to begin with

Yes it is there land

Why?

they have the right of return.

Based on what?

 

[Juicin]

The birthright, the natural right to move from Khan Yunis to Ashkelon where his parents lived without being arrested, shot in the leg or murdered by virtue of being an arab.

The restrictions are in place because the Arab Muslims have earned them. If they want the restrictions lifted, they are going to have to earn that too.

So whats your problem ?

Its a lot like the Golan hights. The hights were lost because the country that had them couldn't responsibly hold the high ground. So Israel took the high ground and now responsibly holds it.

Same thing thats about to happen to the temple mount. The Arab Muslims in Israel simply aren't acting in a responsible manor to the privilege of being given access to the temple mount. Inevitably they will lose that privilege .

Case closed

Earned them by doing what? Being the rightful owners to a land Jews covet? hahaha

UN pisses on Israeli claims weekly, what do you think is going to happen when the majority of Americans are brown? Almost none of them evangelicals? The Russians would love to see teh Israelis disappear

It was never their land to begin with, unless you have a signed treaty by the Ottomans giving them the land.None exists but there are ones that exist giving the land to the Jews signed by the LoN in 1923.

Then America will go the way of South Africa, or parts of it will while the rest will be white's only again and the browns will mass murder each other in their fight to be top dog.


Have you finished your racist rant now

Yes it is there land, they have the right of return. No Jew on the planet has the right of return to Israel, because they can't prove a claim to begin with

Yes it is there land

Why?

they have the right of return.

Based on what?

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Jews have a right to that land based on what? Might? a proxy for the west? That right can be revoked by the west and America at any time. A few missiles and their state will collapse in on itself, same with a few sanctions.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The restrictions are in place because the Arab Muslims have earned them. If they want the restrictions lifted, they are going to have to earn that too.

So whats your problem ?

Its a lot like the Golan hights. The hights were lost because the country that had them couldn't responsibly hold the high ground. So Israel took the high ground and now responsibly holds it.

Same thing thats about to happen to the temple mount. The Arab Muslims in Israel simply aren't acting in a responsible manor to the privilege of being given access to the temple mount. Inevitably they will lose that privilege .

Case closed

Earned them by doing what? Being the rightful owners to a land Jews covet? hahaha

UN pisses on Israeli claims weekly, what do you think is going to happen when the majority of Americans are brown? Almost none of them evangelicals? The Russians would love to see teh Israelis disappear

It was never their land to begin with, unless you have a signed treaty by the Ottomans giving them the land.None exists but there are ones that exist giving the land to the Jews signed by the LoN in 1923.

Then America will go the way of South Africa, or parts of it will while the rest will be white's only again and the browns will mass murder each other in their fight to be top dog.


Have you finished your racist rant now

Yes it is there land, they have the right of return. No Jew on the planet has the right of return to Israel, because they can't prove a claim to begin with

Yes it is there land

Why?

they have the right of return.

Based on what?

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Jews have a right to that land based on what? Might? a proxy for the west? That right can be revoked by the west and America at any time. A few missiles and their state will collapse in on itself, same with a few sanctions.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Time immemorial? What about the ones who got there more recently?

Jews have a right to that land based on what?

Based on the League of Nations. Based on being there longer than Muslim invaders.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

Seriously? Who did the Romans find there?
Who did the Muslim invaders find there?

 

[Juicin]

Earned them by doing what? Being the rightful owners to a land Jews covet? hahaha

UN pisses on Israeli claims weekly, what do you think is going to happen when the majority of Americans are brown? Almost none of them evangelicals? The Russians would love to see teh Israelis disappear

It was never their land to begin with, unless you have a signed treaty by the Ottomans giving them the land.None exists but there are ones that exist giving the land to the Jews signed by the LoN in 1923.

Then America will go the way of South Africa, or parts of it will while the rest will be white's only again and the browns will mass murder each other in their fight to be top dog.


Have you finished your racist rant now

Yes it is there land, they have the right of return. No Jew on the planet has the right of return to Israel, because they can't prove a claim to begin with

Yes it is there land

Why?

they have the right of return.

Based on what?

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Jews have a right to that land based on what? Might? a proxy for the west? That right can be revoked by the west and America at any time. A few missiles and their state will collapse in on itself, same with a few sanctions.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Time immemorial? What about the ones who got there more recently?

Jews have a right to that land based on what?

Based on the League of Nations. Based on being there longer than Muslim invaders.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

Seriously? Who did the Romans find there?
Who did the Muslim invaders find there?

lol what about which "ones"?

Might is right, israel is a pitiably small nation. This only ends one way

 

[montelatici]

Earned them by doing what? Being the rightful owners to a land Jews covet? hahaha

UN pisses on Israeli claims weekly, what do you think is going to happen when the majority of Americans are brown? Almost none of them evangelicals? The Russians would love to see teh Israelis disappear

It was never their land to begin with, unless you have a signed treaty by the Ottomans giving them the land.None exists but there are ones that exist giving the land to the Jews signed by the LoN in 1923.

Then America will go the way of South Africa, or parts of it will while the rest will be white's only again and the browns will mass murder each other in their fight to be top dog.


Have you finished your racist rant now

Yes it is there land, they have the right of return. No Jew on the planet has the right of return to Israel, because they can't prove a claim to begin with

Yes it is there land

Why?

they have the right of return.

Based on what?

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Jews have a right to that land based on what? Might? a proxy for the west? That right can be revoked by the west and America at any time. A few missiles and their state will collapse in on itself, same with a few sanctions.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Time immemorial? What about the ones who got there more recently?

Jews have a right to that land based on what?

Based on the League of Nations. Based on being there longer than Muslim invaders.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

Seriously? Who did the Romans find there?
Who did the Muslim invaders find there?

The native Christian and Muslim Palestinians are descendants of the people that have lived in the area since time immemorial. The invaders came as rulers, Romans, Persians, Arabians, the Crusaders, the Mamluks, Ottomans etc. They were not colonial settlers, they were rulers.

The native people adopted the religions and aspects of the cultures of the rulers over the centuries. Most recently they converted from Christianity to Islam.

The Zionists were from Europe .

 

[Juicin]

It was never their land to begin with, unless you have a signed treaty by the Ottomans giving them the land.None exists but there are ones that exist giving the land to the Jews signed by the LoN in 1923.

Then America will go the way of South Africa, or parts of it will while the rest will be white's only again and the browns will mass murder each other in their fight to be top dog.


Have you finished your racist rant now

Yes it is there land, they have the right of return. No Jew on the planet has the right of return to Israel, because they can't prove a claim to begin with

Yes it is there land

Why?

they have the right of return.

Based on what?

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Jews have a right to that land based on what? Might? a proxy for the west? That right can be revoked by the west and America at any time. A few missiles and their state will collapse in on itself, same with a few sanctions.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Time immemorial? What about the ones who got there more recently?

Jews have a right to that land based on what?

Based on the League of Nations. Based on being there longer than Muslim invaders.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

Seriously? Who did the Romans find there?
Who did the Muslim invaders find there?

The native Christian and Muslim Palestinians are descendants of the people that have lived in the area since time immemorial. The invaders came as rulers, Romans, Persians, Arabians, the Crusaders, the Mamluks, Ottomans etc. They were not colonial settlers, they were rulers.

The native people adopted the religions and aspects of the cultures of the rulers over the centuries. Most recently they converted from Christianity to Islam.

The Zionists were from Europe .

Preaching to the choir

It's amazing how only Palestinians have lost their right to the land in their world view. No one says this about Germans, Indians, or Egyptians

 

[Hollie]

It was never their land to begin with, unless you have a signed treaty by the Ottomans giving them the land.None exists but there are ones that exist giving the land to the Jews signed by the LoN in 1923.

Then America will go the way of South Africa, or parts of it will while the rest will be white's only again and the browns will mass murder each other in their fight to be top dog.


Have you finished your racist rant now

Yes it is there land, they have the right of return. No Jew on the planet has the right of return to Israel, because they can't prove a claim to begin with

Yes it is there land

Why?

they have the right of return.

Based on what?

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Jews have a right to that land based on what? Might? a proxy for the west? That right can be revoked by the west and America at any time. A few missiles and their state will collapse in on itself, same with a few sanctions.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Time immemorial? What about the ones who got there more recently?

Jews have a right to that land based on what?

Based on the League of Nations. Based on being there longer than Muslim invaders.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

Seriously? Who did the Romans find there?
Who did the Muslim invaders find there?

The native Christian and Muslim Palestinians are descendants of the people that have lived in the area since time immemorial. The invaders came as rulers, Romans, Persians, Arabians, the Crusaders, the Mamluks, Ottomans etc. They were not colonial settlers, they were rulers.

The native people adopted the religions and aspects of the cultures of the rulers over the centuries. Most recently they converted from Christianity to Islam.

The Zionists were from Europe .

Well that's odd. The area was invaded and colonized by muhammedan hordes in 636. That contradicts your time in memorial™ nonsense.

The invading / colonizing Turks came later.

Your silly time in memorial™ nonsense is just that: nonsense.

 

[Juicin]

Yes it is there land, they have the right of return. No Jew on the planet has the right of return to Israel, because they can't prove a claim to begin with

Yes it is there land

Why?

they have the right of return.

Based on what?

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Jews have a right to that land based on what? Might? a proxy for the west? That right can be revoked by the west and America at any time. A few missiles and their state will collapse in on itself, same with a few sanctions.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Time immemorial? What about the ones who got there more recently?

Jews have a right to that land based on what?

Based on the League of Nations. Based on being there longer than Muslim invaders.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

Seriously? Who did the Romans find there?
Who did the Muslim invaders find there?

The native Christian and Muslim Palestinians are descendants of the people that have lived in the area since time immemorial. The invaders came as rulers, Romans, Persians, Arabians, the Crusaders, the Mamluks, Ottomans etc. They were not colonial settlers, they were rulers.

The native people adopted the religions and aspects of the cultures of the rulers over the centuries. Most recently they converted from Christianity to Islam.

The Zionists were from Europe .

Well that's odd. The area was invaded and colonized by muhammedan hordes in 636. That contradicts your time in memorial™ nonsense.

The invading / colonizing Turks came later.

Your silly time in memorial™ nonsense is just that: nonsense.

colonized? there was no ethnic cleansing, intermarrying negates their right to the land? Do you hear yourself?

And before you say it, no Romans didn't ethnically cleanse Palestine. They levied taxes not destroyed peoples. They even made a special tax for the Jews because they didn't want to pray to the emperor

 

[montelatici]

Yes it is there land, they have the right of return. No Jew on the planet has the right of return to Israel, because they can't prove a claim to begin with

Yes it is there land

Why?

they have the right of return.

Based on what?

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Jews have a right to that land based on what? Might? a proxy for the west? That right can be revoked by the west and America at any time. A few missiles and their state will collapse in on itself, same with a few sanctions.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Time immemorial? What about the ones who got there more recently?

Jews have a right to that land based on what?

Based on the League of Nations. Based on being there longer than Muslim invaders.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

Seriously? Who did the Romans find there?
Who did the Muslim invaders find there?

The native Christian and Muslim Palestinians are descendants of the people that have lived in the area since time immemorial. The invaders came as rulers, Romans, Persians, Arabians, the Crusaders, the Mamluks, Ottomans etc. They were not colonial settlers, they were rulers.

The native people adopted the religions and aspects of the cultures of the rulers over the centuries. Most recently they converted from Christianity to Islam.

The Zionists were from Europe .

Well that's odd. The area was invaded and colonized by muhammedan hordes in 636. That contradicts your time in memorial™ nonsense.

The invading / colonizing Turks came later.

Your silly time in memorial™ nonsense is just that: nonsense.

The Arabian army that defeated the Romans at Yarmuk had less than 40,000 soldiers, and most were recent non-Arabian converts. There was no settler colonization of Palestine, they came as rulers.

After the Arabians, the Christians invaded and captured Palestine in 1099. The Ottomans became rulers much later.

You don't have much of a grasp on history. LOL

 

[Hollie]

Yes it is there land

Why?

they have the right of return.

Based on what?

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Jews have a right to that land based on what? Might? a proxy for the west? That right can be revoked by the west and America at any time. A few missiles and their state will collapse in on itself, same with a few sanctions.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

International law and their ancestors living there since time immemorial?

Time immemorial? What about the ones who got there more recently?

Jews have a right to that land based on what?

Based on the League of Nations. Based on being there longer than Muslim invaders.

Jews have no ancestors that can trace their line back to palestine

Seriously? Who did the Romans find there?
Who did the Muslim invaders find there?

The native Christian and Muslim Palestinians are descendants of the people that have lived in the area since time immemorial. The invaders came as rulers, Romans, Persians, Arabians, the Crusaders, the Mamluks, Ottomans etc. They were not colonial settlers, they were rulers.

The native people adopted the religions and aspects of the cultures of the rulers over the centuries. Most recently they converted from Christianity to Islam.

The Zionists were from Europe .

Well that's odd. The area was invaded and colonized by muhammedan hordes in 636. That contradicts your time in memorial™ nonsense.

The invading / colonizing Turks came later.

Your silly time in memorial™ nonsense is just that: nonsense.

The Arabian army that defeated the Romans at Yarmuk had less than 40,000 soldiers, and most were recent non-Arabian converts. There was no settler colonization of Palestine, they came as rulers.

After the Arabians, the Christians invaded and captured Palestine in 1099. The Ottomans became rulers much later.

You don't have much of a grasp on history. LOL

The battle of Yarmuk in 636 was only four years after the death of Muhammud (swish) and was very early in the wave of wars that were to be waged by the muhammedan hordes.

You really are deficient in your history lessons. LOL

 

[montelatici]

The Battle of Yarmuk is what allowed the Arabians to begin the siege of Jerusalem in 637 which fell in 638.

Why do you insist on making a fool of yourself. When you do not know much about a subject you shouldn't debate someone who has forgotten more than you will ever learn about the subject.

 

[Hollie]

The Battle of Yarmuk is what allowed the Arabians to begin the siege of Jerusalem in 637 which fell in 638.

Why do you insist on making a fool of yourself. When you do not know much about a subject you shouldn't debate someone who has forgotten more than you will ever learn about the subject.

Your having forgotten more than you know gives no one confidence that you should be stuttering and mumbling around these forums.

Why do you insist on refuting your own posts?

Yarmuk was an early success for the muhammedan hordes and emboldened their gee-had.

 

[montelatici]

The Battle of Yarmuk is what allowed the Arabians to begin the siege of Jerusalem in 637 which fell in 638.

Why do you insist on making a fool of yourself. When you do not know much about a subject you shouldn't debate someone who has forgotten more than you will ever learn about the subject.

Your having forgotten more than you know gives no one confidence that you should be stuttering and mumbling around these forums.

Why do you insist on refuting your own posts?

Yarmuk was an early success for the muhammedan hordes and emboldened their gee-had.

None of my posts have been refuted. It is you that is having a problem understanding historical fact. The only stuttering is displayed by your disjointed use of the English language.

 

[Hollie]

The Battle of Yarmuk is what allowed the Arabians to begin the siege of Jerusalem in 637 which fell in 638.

Why do you insist on making a fool of yourself. When you do not know much about a subject you shouldn't debate someone who has forgotten more than you will ever learn about the subject.

Your having forgotten more than you know gives no one confidence that you should be stuttering and mumbling around these forums.

Why do you insist on refuting your own posts?

Yarmuk was an early success for the muhammedan hordes and emboldened their gee-had.

None of my posts have been refuted. It is you that is having a problem understanding historical fact. The only stuttering is displayed by your disjointed use of the English language.

Um. sorry, but your stuttering and mumbling has really not managed to assemble words into coherent sentences.

I'd be glad to define some history for you in connection with the wars of conquest, rapine and colonization that followed the death of Muhammud (swish). However, your allegiance to the weird and islamo-fashioned narrative of history you view, slack-jawed and bewildered as you look at the pretty pictures, leaves you at a disadvantage.

But then, you're accustomed to that.