Lauren Boebert had two abortions and worked for an escort service.

[Uncensored2008]

So, when you are done bleeding from your wherever...

Should we ask them, under oath, if they asked for pardons? I would say yes.

Do you know what a woman is?

Quid Pro puts people on the highest court in the land who don't.

Stupid and evil, it's the way of the fascist democrats.

 

[Lesh]

Says the leftist rioter. ^^^

I'm a "rioter" in spite of the fact that not only have I never taken part in a riot ...I never defended those who did

And this said by a creep who routinely threatens violence

 

[Uncensored2008]

Will have to wait to see if it's slander.

There is actual evidence of traitor Swallowswell giving oral pleasure to Chinese spies. Nothing but desperate smear in the case of Boebert.

You Nazi vermin did all you could to queer the primary - you failed - you're impotent.

Jezebel is a web site designed for up and coming school shooters. Sleazy bullshit for the most sick in society, those like Buff Knobpolisher, to jack off to. No one but the mentally ill pay any attention to them.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'm a "rioter" in spite of the fact that not only have I never taken part in a riot ...I never defended those who did

And this said by a creep who routinely threatens violence

You cheered on the Kristallnacht, Leech.

 

[Zincwarrior]

She sues for willful defamation and you're saying she has to prove she DIDN'T do as she was accused? Where did you get your JD? She probably won't be able to win a judgment for punitive damages because it's damned near impossible for a "public personality" to win one of these cases BUT, discovery cuts BOTH WAYS. Scum like this needs to be exposed and put on notice that there are other "remedies" that can be "extrajudicial".

Public Figures and Officials

To promote First Amendment freedom of speech, libel plaintiffs who are public figures or officials must show a publisher acted with actual malice to collect damages.

www.mtsu.edu

In libel cases, plaintiffs who are public figures or officials have to meet a more stringent standard (actual malice) than do private citizens (negligence) if they are to collect damages. Thus, the status of a defamation plaintiff often affects the outcome of cases, as the courts balance the right of free press against an individual’s reputation.

Public figures and officials must show actual malice​

When it comes to printed defamation (libel), courts have ruled that public figures, including government officials, have the burden of proving that defendants libeled them with actual malice.

In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), a case involving an Alabama official’s attempt to collect for false statements published in a 1960 civil rights advertisement, the Supreme Court reversed the libel award because the plaintiff had not established that “actual malice” motivated the inaccurate descriptions.

With this standard, a public official must show that the defendant made a libelous statement with “knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.”

 

[Uncensored2008]

Public Figures and Officials

To promote First Amendment freedom of speech, libel plaintiffs who are public figures or officials must show a publisher acted with actual malice to collect damages.

www.mtsu.edu

In libel cases, plaintiffs who are public figures or officials have to meet a more stringent standard (actual malice) than do private citizens (negligence) if they are to collect damages. Thus, the status of a defamation plaintiff often affects the outcome of cases, as the courts balance the right of free press against an individual’s reputation.

Public figures and officials must show actual malice​

When it comes to printed defamation (libel), courts have ruled that public figures, including government officials, have the burden of proving that defendants libeled them with actual malice.

In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), a case involving an Alabama official’s attempt to collect for false statements published in a 1960 civil rights advertisement, the Supreme Court reversed the libel award because the plaintiff had not established that “actual malice” motivated the inaccurate descriptions.

With this standard, a public official must show that the defendant made a libelous statement with “knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.”

There is clearly malice here.

But Boebert is more than a public figure, she's a Republican. So that means that the courts are closed to her.

 

[Zincwarrior]

It means she has to prove her case against a difficult standard. It also means Discovery goes both ways. If she is innocent then more power to her. Otherwise politicians get slammed all the time, and thats just on this board. Thats what you get if you want the big bucks.

 

[easyt65]

That is one helluva story to just make up.

DEMOCRATS' depravity and shamelessness knows no bounds.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It’s not cool. Just not illegal. Most people thought it was fake. I certainly did. However the GOP is so crazy now I see how it snares some gullible folks.

We're an Archduke of Ferdinand away from a genuine, long overdue Civil War in the USA and you Progs think it's funny. Had you actually whacked Kavanaugh and tried to replace him with another lunatic like Ketanji...game over

 

[Likkmee]

Does that mean she's a murdering baby killing Republican?

I don't GAF. Does she accept Discovery ?

 

[Chillicothe]

We're an Archduke of Ferdinand away from a genuine, long overdue Civil War in the USA

What an interesting thought.
Not the 'Archduke' stuff......but the "Civil War" stuff.

How do you think it would go, poster Frank?
Geographical sides? North vs South? or East vs West?
Urban-suburban vs Rural?
Coasts vs Fly Over?
Well educated vs not so?
Haves vs Have Nots?
WhiteyTighties vs Folks of Color?
Good Humored vs Humorless?
Independents vs Democrats?
Independents vs Republicans?
Proud Boys, Oathkeepers, Nazis vs the rest of us?

Tell us, how you see the sides lining up?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What an interesting thought.
Not the 'Archduke' stuff......but the "Civil War" stuff.

How do you think it would go, poster Frank?
Geographical sides? North vs South? or East vs West?
Urban-suburban vs Rural?
Coasts vs Fly Over?
Well educated vs not so?
Haves vs Have Nots?
WhiteyTighties vs Folks of Color?
Good Humored vs Humorless?
Independents vs Democrats?
Independents vs Republicans?
Proud Boys, Oathkeepers, Nazis vs the rest of us?

Tell us, how you see the sides lining up?

No comment.

But you won't like it

 

[Meister]

Evolve into a retard?
WTF was she before?

Wow!
You just wasted bandwidth.

 

[okfine]

I don't GAF. Does she accept Discovery ?

Cash only, sorry.

 

[citygator]

We're an Archduke of Ferdinand away from a genuine, long overdue Civil War in the USA and you Progs think it's funny. Had you actually whacked Kavanaugh and tried to replace him with another lunatic like Ketanji...game over

You’re crazy. No one tried to whack Kavanaugh.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

There is actual evidence of traitor Swallowswell giving oral pleasure to Chinese spies. Nothing but desperate smear in the case of Boebert.

You Nazi vermin did all you could to queer the primary - you failed - you're impotent.

Jezebel is a web site designed for up and coming school shooters. Sleazy bullshit for the most sick in society, those like Buff Knobpolisher, to jack off to. No one but the mentally ill pay any attention to them.

Your dumbass wouldn't know a damn Nazi if one walked up and kicked you in your ass.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

DEMOCRATS' depravity and shamelessness knows no bounds.

No lower than Republicans.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[basquebromance]

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Apparently that idiot thinks being a public figure means you can libel them without legal consequences.

Only problem: gotta prove at least negligence, and demonstrate harm.