Laura Loomer Files $3 BILLION Lawsuit Against Facebook for Defamation

[Rustic]

Lol
Facebook is owned and run by progressives,

I do not give a **** who owns and runs a company, I will still favor them over the government...you on the other hand run to the government for everything.

You defend Facebook every chance you get. Sometimes you whine about your government obsession. Then you come across private action and you whine about that.
You are paralyzed without the government b

We're not defending FaceBook, we're telling you people that you cannot consistently promote hate and harm to others on any platform and expect to get away with it. And that those who do should be banned. I would also say that those who deliberate lie and post "fake news" should also be banned, but that's just me.

It used to be that newspapers, magazines and other media had standards regarding truth in journalism. Now anyone can publish anything, true or not, and there's a lot of "not" getting published and tweeted and then reposted without fact checking. And we have lots of publishers like Breitbartm, who are privately owned by billionaires who are pushing an agenda that is not in the public's interest.

People simply don't know what to believe any more.

Lol
Political correctness is hate....

Political correctness is good manner, and treating others with respect. Foreign concepts to Russian trolls.

 

[westwall]

They have to prove their affirmative defense that the statements were true, that she is a terrorist, murderer or person inciting violence.

No they don't. What an absurd pile of madeup crap.

You dont even know what their statement was.

From the complaint:

Under Florida Law, “it is established…that an oral communication is actionable per se - that is, without a showing of special damage - if it imputes to another (a) a criminal offense amounting to a felony, or (b) a presently existing venereal or other loathsome and communicable disease, or (c) conduct, characteristics or a condition incompatible with the proper exercise of his lawful business, trade, profession or office, or (d) the other being a woman, acts of unchastity.” Wolfson v. Kirk, 273 So. 2d 774, 777 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

It is your contention that Facebook did NOT accuse Loomers of being a "dangerous individual"?

I seem to have completely missed the part of where they accuse her of committing a felony. Nor did they publically make accusations against her. She's the person who made their reasons for banning her public, not FaceBook.

The more I learn about the case, the more I realize that she is fucked and her case will be tossed.

Nick Sandmann had a better case than this stupid *****.

You seem to miss a lot. Hers is merely going to be the first, of many that will see facebook taken down.

 

[westwall]

Lol
Facebook is owned and run by progressives,

I do not give a **** who owns and runs a company, I will still favor them over the government...you on the other hand run to the government for everything.

You defend Facebook every chance you get. Sometimes you whine about your government obsession. Then you come across private action and you whine about that.
You are paralyzed without the government b

We're not defending FaceBook, we're telling you people that you cannot consistently promote hate and harm to others on any platform and expect to get away with it. And that those who do should be banned. I would also say that those who deliberate lie and post "fake news" should also be banned, but that's just me.

It used to be that newspapers, magazines and other media had standards regarding truth in journalism. Now anyone can publish anything, true or not, and there's a lot of "not" getting published and tweeted and then reposted without fact checking. And we have lots of publishers like Breitbartm, who are privately owned by billionaires who are pushing an agenda that is not in the public's interest.

People simply don't know what to believe any more.

Lol
Political correctness is hate....

Political correctness is good manner, and treating others with respect. Foreign concepts to Russian trolls.

Political correctness is fascism in sheeps clothing. Color me unsurprised that you're a fascist.

 

[Rustic]

I do not give a **** who owns and runs a company, I will still favor them over the government...you on the other hand run to the government for everything.

You defend Facebook every chance you get. Sometimes you whine about your government obsession. Then you come across private action and you whine about that.
You are paralyzed without the government b

We're not defending FaceBook, we're telling you people that you cannot consistently promote hate and harm to others on any platform and expect to get away with it. And that those who do should be banned. I would also say that those who deliberate lie and post "fake news" should also be banned, but that's just me.

It used to be that newspapers, magazines and other media had standards regarding truth in journalism. Now anyone can publish anything, true or not, and there's a lot of "not" getting published and tweeted and then reposted without fact checking. And we have lots of publishers like Breitbartm, who are privately owned by billionaires who are pushing an agenda that is not in the public's interest.

People simply don't know what to believe any more.

Lol
Political correctness is hate....

Political correctness is good manner, and treating others with respect. Foreign concepts to Russian trolls.

Political correctness is fascism in sheeps clothing. Color me unsurprised that you're a fascist.

Socialist... fascist same difference.
That being fucked in the head

 

[bripat9643]

They have to prove their affirmative defense that the statements were true, that she is a terrorist, murderer or person inciting violence.

No they don't. What an absurd pile of madeup crap.

You dont even know what their statement was.

From the complaint:

Under Florida Law, “it is established…that an oral communication is actionable per se - that is, without a showing of special damage - if it imputes to another (a) a criminal offense amounting to a felony, or (b) a presently existing venereal or other loathsome and communicable disease, or (c) conduct, characteristics or a condition incompatible with the proper exercise of his lawful business, trade, profession or office, or (d) the other being a woman, acts of unchastity.” Wolfson v. Kirk, 273 So. 2d 774, 777 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

It is your contention that Facebook did NOT accuse Loomers of being a "dangerous individual"?

I seem to have completely missed the part of where they accuse her of committing a felony. Nor did they publically make accusations against her. She's the person who made their reasons for banning her public, not FaceBook.

The more I learn about the case, the more I realize that she is fucked and her case will be tossed.

Nick Sandmann had a better case than this stupid *****.

Facebook's definition of a "dangerous individual:"

“organizations or individuals involved in the following: Terrorist activity, Organized hate, Mass or serial murder, Human trafficking, [or] Organized violence or criminal activity.”
​

How can you be so wrong about everything? I really do believe you are senile.

 

[Rustic]

You defend Facebook every chance you get. Sometimes you whine about your government obsession. Then you come across private action and you whine about that.
You are paralyzed without the government b

We're not defending FaceBook, we're telling you people that you cannot consistently promote hate and harm to others on any platform and expect to get away with it. And that those who do should be banned. I would also say that those who deliberate lie and post "fake news" should also be banned, but that's just me.

It used to be that newspapers, magazines and other media had standards regarding truth in journalism. Now anyone can publish anything, true or not, and there's a lot of "not" getting published and tweeted and then reposted without fact checking. And we have lots of publishers like Breitbartm, who are privately owned by billionaires who are pushing an agenda that is not in the public's interest.

People simply don't know what to believe any more.

Lol
Political correctness is hate....

Political correctness is good manner, and treating others with respect. Foreign concepts to Russian trolls.

Political correctness is fascism in sheeps clothing. Color me unsurprised that you're a fascist.

Socialist... fascist same difference.
That being fucked in the head

 

[Dragonlady]

So you invite me into you house to discuss things but then tell me what I can say. Does not sound like a discussion but rather a safe space snowflake back patting session.

I invite you into my house to discuss things with all of my other guests. I don't tell you what you can say, but if you insult my other guests, treat them disrespectfully, and threaten them, I'm going to throw your ass out the door, because you cannot insult, berate and disrespect the rest of the people who are there, and start fights with them

 

[bripat9643]

So you invite me into you house to discuss things but then tell me what I can say. Does not sound like a discussion but rather a safe space snowflake back patting session.

I invite you into my house to discuss things with all of my other guests. I don't tell you what you can say, but if you insult my other guests, treat them disrespectfully, and threaten them, I'm going to throw your ass out the door, because you cannot insult, berate and disrespect the rest of the people who are there, and start fights with them

So you have rules about what I can say, you just wont tell me what they are. Of course, Facebook isn't anyone's home.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

They have to prove their affirmative defense that the statements were true, that she is a terrorist, murderer or person inciting violence.

No they don't. What an absurd pile of madeup crap.

You dont even know what their statement was.

From the complaint:

Under Florida Law, “it is established…that an oral communication is actionable per se - that is, without a showing of special damage - if it imputes to another (a) a criminal offense amounting to a felony, or (b) a presently existing venereal or other loathsome and communicable disease, or (c) conduct, characteristics or a condition incompatible with the proper exercise of his lawful business, trade, profession or office, or (d) the other being a woman, acts of unchastity.” Wolfson v. Kirk, 273 So. 2d 774, 777 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

It is your contention that Facebook did NOT accuse Loomers of being a "dangerous individual"?

I seem to have completely missed the part of where they accuse her of committing a felony. Nor did they publically make accusations against her. She's the person who made their reasons for banning her public, not FaceBook.

The more I learn about the case, the more I realize that she is fucked and her case will be tossed.

Nick Sandmann had a better case than this stupid *****.

You missed that, ehh?

Is the bet still on?

:

You don't even understand the elements of defamation.

.

 

[bodecea]

Good! **** social media liberals that hate free speech

Another CRC type that has no idea what the 1st Amendment says.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This attention seeking crackpot belongs on the same shelf as Alex Jones and O'Keefe:

Woman Posts Pics Of Her ‘Slashed Tire’ On Twitter, But Someone Quickly Proves She’s Lying And It’s Hilarious

 

[WEATHER53]

So you invite me into you house to discuss things but then tell me what I can say. Does not sound like a discussion but rather a safe space snowflake back patting session.

I invite you into my house to discuss things with all of my other guests. I don't tell you what you can say, but if you insult my other guests, treat them disrespectfully, and threaten them, I'm going to throw your ass out the door, because you cannot insult, berate and disrespect the rest of the people who are there, and start fights with them

But I can make assertions counter to theirs and that is all that happened but you libbies cannot handle nor refute dissent so you label it in order to legitimize casting it off.

 

[Terri4Trump]

The tech giants are about to get what they deserve. If they want to behave like publishers, then they can be subject to the same laws that publishers face. For instance, you can't go around labeling people as "haters, dangerous individual and white supremacists" without facing legal consequences.

Laura Loomer Files $3 BILLION Lawsuit Against Facebook for Defamation - Laura Loomer Official

On Tuesday, Larry Klayman, the founder of Freedom Watch and a former federal prosecutor announced the filing of a defamation lawsuit by conservative investigative journalist Laura Loomer against Facebook. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 9:19-cv-80893), alleges that Facebook and its wholly owned sister company Instagram, in banning Ms. Loomer from the social media sites, maliciously defamed her by publishing that she is a “dangerous individual” and a domestic Jewish terrorist.​

I pray she wins. She deserves it.

 

[Dragonlady]

So you invite me into you house to discuss things but then tell me what I can say. Does not sound like a discussion but rather a safe space snowflake back patting session.

I invite you into my house to discuss things with all of my other guests. I don't tell you what you can say, but if you insult my other guests, treat them disrespectfully, and threaten them, I'm going to throw your ass out the door, because you cannot insult, berate and disrespect the rest of the people who are there, and start fights with them

But I can make assertions counter to theirs and that is all that happened but you libbies cannot handle nor refute dissent so you label it in order to legitimize casting it off.

No, that is not what is happening at all. You're being wilfully blind to the provocations, false information and outright lies and hate these people are promoting. The Sandy Hook families have been subjected to death threats and forced to move because of harassment by Alex Jones followers. Hate crimes are up 500%, since Trump started his anti-immigrant campaign, and 50 people were murdered by right wing extremists incited by right wing hate speech, in 2018.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Hers is merely going to be the first, of many that will see facebook taken down.

Or just another in a series of losing, attention seeking lawsuits.

 

[WEATHER53]

So you invite me into you house to discuss things but then tell me what I can say. Does not sound like a discussion but rather a safe space snowflake back patting session.

I invite you into my house to discuss things with all of my other guests. I don't tell you what you can say, but if you insult my other guests, treat them disrespectfully, and threaten them, I'm going to throw your ass out the door, because you cannot insult, berate and disrespect the rest of the people who are there, and start fights with them

But I can make assertions counter to theirs and that is all that happened but you libbies cannot handle nor refute dissent so you label it in order to legitimize casting it off.

No, that is not what is happening at all. You're being wilfully blind to the provocations, false information and outright lies and hate these people are promoting. The Sandy Hook families have been subjected to death threats and forced to move because of harassment by Alex Jones followers. Hate crimes are up 500%, since Trump started his anti-immigrant campaign, and 50 people were murdered by right wing extremists incited by right wing hate speech, in 2018.

Emotional agitation does not equal validity. You need to learn that in order to separate fact from feelings and fiction.

 

[Jitss617]

This attention seeking crackpot belongs on the same shelf as Alex Jones and O'Keefe:

Woman Posts Pics Of Her ‘Slashed Tire’ On Twitter, But Someone Quickly Proves She’s Lying And It’s Hilarious

Why do you hate free speech?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This attention seeking crackpot belongs on the same shelf as Alex Jones and O'Keefe:

Woman Posts Pics Of Her ‘Slashed Tire’ On Twitter, But Someone Quickly Proves She’s Lying And It’s Hilarious

Why do you hate free speech?

Why do you watch tranny porn?

 

[Lysistrata]

The tech giants are about to get what they deserve. If they want to behave like publishers, then they can be subject to the same laws that publishers face. For instance, you can't go around labeling people as "haters, dangerous individual and white supremacists" without facing legal consequences.

Laura Loomer Files $3 BILLION Lawsuit Against Facebook for Defamation - Laura Loomer Official

On Tuesday, Larry Klayman, the founder of Freedom Watch and a former federal prosecutor announced the filing of a defamation lawsuit by conservative investigative journalist Laura Loomer against Facebook. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 9:19-cv-80893), alleges that Facebook and its wholly owned sister company Instagram, in banning Ms. Loomer from the social media sites, maliciously defamed her by publishing that she is a “dangerous individual” and a domestic Jewish terrorist.​

I only learned her name recently. Isn't Loomer that trash woman trying to spread hatred around the world?

 

[Jitss617]

This attention seeking crackpot belongs on the same shelf as Alex Jones and O'Keefe:

Woman Posts Pics Of Her ‘Slashed Tire’ On Twitter, But Someone Quickly Proves She’s Lying And It’s Hilarious

Why do you hate free speech?

Why do you watch tranny porn?

Answer the question