Latest Released E-Mails / Texts Show FBI 'Broken', 'Partisan', 'Un-Trustworthy'

[depotoo]

It has been said that Strzok was involved it getting the fisa warrant, as well, using the fake dossier as evidence. It needs to be fully, transparently investigated.

Still unknown is if Strzok's mistress signed the warrants he got. FBI is saying "no comment".

 

[bendog]

It has been said that Strzok was involved it getting the fisa warrant, as well, using the fake dossier as evidence. It needs to be fully, transparently investigated.

Still unknown is if Strzok's mistress signed the warrants he got. FBI is saying "no comment".

The dossier is not fake. It's proven correct in Team Trump meeting with the Russians.

 

[radical right]

There is also inherent bias when one believes their candidate can do no wrong, even when evidence presents itself.

Even prosecutors must behave based on the legal theory of "innocent until proven guilty" Only if somebody believes somebody is guilty, before it is proved is their participation fatally biased.

Do you think prosecutors should believe in the persons guilt before they get any evidence?

 

[Faun]

He wasn’t thrown off the Clinton investigation when he had an obvious bias.

No, he wasn’t fired, he was reassigned.

Didn’t Mueller fire the culprits back in August? I know right wing hero Trey Gowdy, got taken to school on that claim during the House Hesring with Rod Rosenstein today.

They were fired from Mueller's special counsel.

__________________

Kicked off Mueller's Team for gross bias? Or kicked off because the gross bias could be proven, i.e the Dumb-Ass Turd left a phone text trail, and so he had to go....and yet the Mueller Team hid the fact of why he had to go....right up till the time they were all about to be held in contempt for hiding it.

AND

And, the horny little Turd was NEVER kicked off the Hillary Investigation...he was a integral part of it....possibly the key figure in it....and the Turd's comments show bias just as egregious in her favor as they do against Trump.

Obviously, the Clinton E-Mail Investigation has to be re-opened.

So what? When his anti-trump bias became known and he was thrown off the team. That a plus for Mueller as it demonstrates bias against Trump is not tolerated.

Your deflection about Clinton is noted and discarded.

 

[g5000]

There is also inherent bias when one believes their candidate can do no wrong, even when evidence presents itself.

Even prosecutors must behave based on the legal theory of "innocent until proven guilty" Only if somebody believes somebody is guilty, before it is proved is their participation fatally biased.

Do you think prosecutors should believe in the persons guilt before they get any evidence?

That's what every prosecutor does, dumbass. It's their job.

And it appears Mueller is gathering evidence of money laundering. That's what has Trump triggered, and that's why he has all his gullible minions trying to discredit the investigation.

 

[radical right]

Trump fired Comey it set in motion the obstruction of justice thing

he's allowed to fire him. BTW, you do know that Comey testified under oath that he wasn't investigating Trump, right?

You need to get out of your dream world.

It's not what was done, but how it was done, and why ti was done.

Parents are allowed to hit their children, like hitting them when they tried to eat rat poison or drink bleach.

But they're not allowed to hit their kids because they had a bad day at work.

 

[depotoo]

They had oversight. Period.

And you keep wanting to change the subject to Muellers investigation instead of discussing his work, not under Mueller, but on the Clinton investigation. His hands were all over it. But go on, with your evident bias. I know you have no reasoning skills when it comes to your own inherent bias.

There was a three judge panel adminstering that investigation, not just Ken Starr.

It’s time you dealt with the fact he was involved in the Clinton investigation. This is not just about his time under Mueller.

One was removed. Quit saying fired. He is still with the fbi. And he lead the Clinton investigation at the fbi, before the special counsel on Russia.

They were fired from Mueller’s special counsel. It’s time you dealt with that.

So what?

Again, Ken Starr was a Republican who contributed to a brief filed for the prosecution on the Paula Jones case against Clinton.

Where was this rightard protest then? You can’t have it both ways.

Starr was heading the investigation. The 3 judge panel was for oversight. And by oversight, I mean when Starr wanted to expand his investigation beyond his jurisdiction, he needed their approval, which, headed by a staunch Republican, they eagerly gave every time; which was how Starr was allowed to go from Whitewater to TravelGate to FileGate to CattleGate to VinceFosterGate to LewinskiGate.

Look at how twisted the rights’ collective panties are over this .... imagine if instead of Mueller, a Democrat was the Special Counsrl. And imagine the rights’ outrage if that Democrat Special Counsel has contributed to a brief filed for the plaintiffs in the case against Trump for his Trump University fraud case.

Now go back to whining because the Republican SC threw an anti-trump individual off his team.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

As much as I believe that the majority of accusations against the Special Investigation is bulloney, they need to ask Strzok what in hell he was talking about and ask him FAST before the conspiracy fairies completely take off for Wonderland.

Strzok (or however jis name is spelled) was wrong and biased ....of that there is no doubt and Mueller correctly got rid of him..........

HOWEVER, the attempts to mix this guy's wrong doings with the CRIMINAL acts of Flynn, Manafort and Gates is a LAME attempt to smear the upcoming storm that's about to hit the Trump administration......

Trump cultists can ***** and moan all they want.........the storm cannot be avoided.

Yep, any day now... tick tick tick...

 

[Faun]

We swear. Really.
Part 1,675,846

“Trump Should Go F Himself” – Texts Leak From FBI Agents On Russia Probe, Hillary Emails Investigation.

Mueller's focus on Trump being a suspected money launderer must have touched a nerve. Trump is now employing the tactics of someone who has something to hide. He's looking for an excuse to fire the man who can put him in jail.

In short, Trump is shitting bricks.

I've been hearing impeachment any day for 11 months now. And not a shred of evidence of any crime yet.
How many years for the witch hunt?

Mueller only recently began focusing on the money laundering.

Time takes time. Thorough investigations take time. Mueller will not move until he has an ironclad case.

In the meantime, Trump is sweating and trying to discredit the investigation. That's what Trump does whenever anyone exposes the truth about him.

Mueller must be onto something significant to provoke this reaction.

So you agree, it is a witch hunt. There was no Russia collusion to throw the election and now we are onto the next lie.

It’s adorable watching rightards squirm over their own playbook used against them.

 

[g5000]

They had oversight. Period.

And you keep wanting to change the subject to Muellers investigation instead of discussing his work, not under Mueller, but on the Clinton investigation.

You have it exactly backwards.

Trump is trying to divert attention away from the money laundering investigation. It is Trump who is trying to change the conversation.

Mueller must be onto something significant.

 

[depotoo]

Seriously?! You guys have truly lost it. You ignore the evidence of why he was let go, as well as ignore he could replace anyone within his cabinet he wanted to, for no reason at all!
Before he exonerated Hillary you all admitted your hate of him, then suddenly he walked on water.

Trump fired Comey it set in motion the obstruction of justice thing

he's allowed to fire him. BTW, you do know that Comey testified under oath that he wasn't investigating Trump, right?

You need to get out of your dream world.

It's not what was done, but how it was done, and why ti was done.

Parents are allowed to hit their children, like hitting them when they tried to eat rat poison or drink bleach.

But they're not allowed to hit their kids because they had a bad day at work.

 

[g5000]

Trump reminds me of when a mob boss claims he is being persecuted because the DA doesn't like Italian-Americans.

"I'm a legitimate businessman!"

 

[depotoo]

And you know there is a money laundering investigation into him, how?Innunedo is just that.

They had oversight. Period.

And you keep wanting to change the subject to Muellers investigation instead of discussing his work, not under Mueller, but on the Clinton investigation.

You have it exactly backwards.

Trump is trying to divert attention away from the money laundering investigation. It is Trump who is trying to change the conversation.

Mueller must be onto something significant.

 

[radical right]

And you keep wanting to change the subject to Muellers investigation instead of discussing his work, not under Mueller, but on the Clinton investigation.

Since he's not part of the Mueller investigation, who gives a shit?

 

[Faun]

They had oversight. Period.

And you keep wanting to change the subject to Muellers investigation instead of discussing his work, not under Mueller, but on the Clinton investigation. His hands were all over it. But go on, with your evident bias. I know you have no reasoning skills when it comes to your own inherent bias.

There was a three judge panel adminstering that investigation, not just Ken Starr.

It’s time you dealt with the fact he was involved in the Clinton investigation. This is not just about his time under Mueller.

They were fired from Mueller’s special counsel. It’s time you dealt with that.

So what?

Again, Ken Starr was a Republican who contributed to a brief filed for the prosecution on the Paula Jones case against Clinton.

Where was this rightard protest then? You can’t have it both ways.

Starr was heading the investigation. The 3 judge panel was for oversight. And by oversight, I mean when Starr wanted to expand his investigation beyond his jurisdiction, he needed their approval, which, headed by a staunch Republican, they eagerly gave every time; which was how Starr was allowed to go from Whitewater to TravelGate to FileGate to CattleGate to VinceFosterGate to LewinskiGate.

Look at how twisted the rights’ collective panties are over this .... imagine if instead of Mueller, a Democrat was the Special Counsrl. And imagine the rights’ outrage if that Democrat Special Counsel has contributed to a brief filed for the plaintiffs in the case against Trump for his Trump University fraud case.

Now go back to whining because the Republican SC threw an anti-trump individual off his team.

A Republican-led panel which gave a Republican Independent Counsel everything he wanted in investigating a Democrat is a RWNJ’s definition of oversight.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Is it more partisan than all those Benghazi investigations?

 

[g5000]

And you know there is a money laundering investigation into him, how?

Have you been living in a Fox News cave?

 

[nat4900]

Yep, any day now... tick tick tick...

patience, my son, patience.....Mueller has only had 7 months to "drain the [Trump] swamp".......LOL

 

[iceberg]

Give it up, Queasy.......

Your ilk is scared shitless of Mueller's investigation.....

Mueller fired the FBI agents........everyone has biases (judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys)......but NO ONE has "manufactured" any false evidence......The Trump entourage **** ups are ALL THEIR OWN DOING.

As much as I believe that the majority of accusations against the Special Investigation is bulloney, they need to ask Strzok what in hell he was talking about and ask him FAST before the conspiracy fairies completely take off for Wonderland.

From my understanding, the comments and texts took place A YEAR EARLIER, when Trump was a candidate....the time when both Republicans and Democrats were all saying the same thing about candidate Trump.

well since he's saying they have an insurance policy IN CASE HE WINS of course this is pre-election.

but what is an insurance policy, EXACTLY?

 

[Faun]

And you keep wanting to change the subject to Muellers investigation instead of discussing his work, not under Mueller, but on the Clinton investigation.

Since he's not part of the Mueller investigation, who gives a shit?

The nutty right would only be happy with an investigation by an all Republican team that leads nowhere.