Latest FBI Doc Release Shows They Knew Dossier Paid for By Hillary

[playtime]

Of which they even testified they never did verify, they went on the word of Steele. Lol

The Dossier seems to be some kind of fixation for you folks.

Too bad it only relates to Carter Page who was not even a member of the Trump campaign when the FISA warrant was issued.

Too bad also that it wasn't even the main evidence used to obtain that FISA warrant

& there are stringent guidelines that FISA warrant renewals have to prove are necessary before they are granted.

it has to go before a FISA court to get approved & then for each & every subsequent renewal. which is every 90-180 days.

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was established in 1978 when Congress enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is codified, as amended, at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1885c. The Court sits in Washington D.C., and is composed of eleven federal district court judges who are designated by the Chief Justice of the United States. Each judge serves for a maximum of seven years and their terms are staggered to ensure continuity on the Court. By statute, the judges must be drawn from at least seven of the United States judicial circuits, and three of the judges must reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia. Judges typically sit for one week at a time, on a rotating basis.

Pursuant to FISA, the Court entertains applications submitted by the United States Government for approval of electronic surveillance, physical search, and other investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes. Most of the Court’s work is conducted ex parte as required by statute, and due to the need to protect classified national security information.

• Additional information concerning the operation of the Court can be found at:
  Letter to Chairman Leahy, Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate July 29, 2013
  
• The Judges who have served on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Revew can be found at:
  FISC FISCR JUDGES May 2018

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | United States

so that means there must have been a sufficient amt of new intel to renew. again. & again.

dolt.

 

[playtime]

Yeah, we tend to fixate on rogue government officials who violate the Constitutional rights of the opposition party candidate.

The FISA warrant allowed the Obama administration to review every phone call made by everybody in the Trump campaign. Your ignorance of the capabilities of NSA phone and email monitoring isn't a convincing argument.

The Steele "dossier" was the main evidence. That's been demonstrated repeatedly.

All you proved is that you're a dumbass that is only capable of mindlessly repeating DNC propaganda.

Obviously that's bullshit since the FISA warrant concerned only Page

And no...the infamous Nunes Memo showed that it was Papadopoulos that was the reason that the investigation of Russian involvement into the Trump campaign began.

Stop lying

& papadopoulos confirmed some intel that the FBI was already investigating... from the dossier.

 

[LoneLaugher]

You assholes should listen to Dan Abrams on Sirius XM. He has laid out the legal matter surrounding the dossier and the FISA warrants with clarity and credibility.

You freaks are wrong about what went down and how. You've been lied to. If you don't make an effort to grasp the facts, you will go.on being ignorant morons.

You, my dear, have been had, just as they wanted you to be. All one has to do is read the testimony (actual documents, oig reports, etc.), to see that is not the case.

If you want to call me "dear" you'd better be prepared to give me a reach around, big boy.

You haven't read shit.

 

[playtime]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

So, opposition research is legal,
but, if you use the dirt that was dug up, it's illegal?

What's the point of opposition research then?

What makes fresh dirt collusion,
and old dirt politics?

Whether its fresh or old,
the dirt serves the same purpose...
influence voters!

oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is.

Then why did Obama let it happen, after he said a foriegn power couldn't affect the out come of our election? I guess he lied again.

obama didn't 'let' anything happen... i think he was talking about actual votes because all 50 states have their own method of vote calculations as determined by all 50 states' secretary of state. it would be extremely hard - but people can be manipulated into doing things when they are swayed by emotion. there have been some lookseys into voting software that might have been hacked & then there is the stupid states that have no paper trail & votes - once cast - go straight to cyberia. trump WAS apprised by 'obama' before he was installed & knew about flynn & other possible threats coming from russia.

 

[depotoo]

The dolt is the one that doesn’t read the testimony stating that is not what was done. And not knowing they have been reprimanded before for just that-

The document that will surely capture the lion’s share of the public’s attention---and rightly so---is the October 3, 2011 FISC opinion by Judge John D. Bates, then the presiding judge of the FISC. This 81-page opinion, along with its accompanying order, finds certain aspects of NSA’s collection under Section 702 to be “deficient on statutory and constitutional grounds.” Judge Bates also expresses concern about the accuracy of a series of government representations to the court.


Court Criticizes Obama Admin for Illegal Spying on U.S. Citizens | Breitbart
New Surveillance Court Orders Show That Even Judges Have Difficulty Understanding and Limiting Government Spying
Another Batch Of FISA Court Docs Confirms The NSA Frequently Abuses Its Collection Powers

DOJ releases FISA docs that formed basis for surveillance of ex-Trump adviser Carter Page
Based on what is visible, the dossier is not described to the FISA court as a political document, as the Democrats have asserted; in fact, the FBI speculates to the FISA court that it was

Of which they even testified they never did verify, they went on the word of Steele. Lol

The Dossier seems to be some kind of fixation for you folks.

Too bad it only relates to Carter Page who was not even a member of the Trump campaign when the FISA warrant was issued.

Too bad also that it wasn't even the main evidence used to obtain that FISA warrant

& there are stringent guidelines that FISA warrant renewals have to prove are necessary before they are granted.

it has to go before a FISA court to get approved & then for each & every subsequent renewal. which is every 90-180 days.

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was established in 1978 when Congress enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is codified, as amended, at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1885c. The Court sits in Washington D.C., and is composed of eleven federal district court judges who are designated by the Chief Justice of the United States. Each judge serves for a maximum of seven years and their terms are staggered to ensure continuity on the Court. By statute, the judges must be drawn from at least seven of the United States judicial circuits, and three of the judges must reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia. Judges typically sit for one week at a time, on a rotating basis.

Pursuant to FISA, the Court entertains applications submitted by the United States Government for approval of electronic surveillance, physical search, and other investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes. Most of the Court’s work is conducted ex parte as required by statute, and due to the need to protect classified national security information.

• Additional information concerning the operation of the Court can be found at:
  Letter to Chairman Leahy, Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate July 29, 2013
  
• The Judges who have served on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Revew can be found at:
  FISC FISCR JUDGES May 2018

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | United States

so that means there must have been a sufficient amt of new intel to renew. again. & again.

dolt.

 

[playtime]

The dolt is the one that doesn’t read the testimony stating that is not what was done. And not knowing they have been reprimanded before for just that-

The document that will surely capture the lion’s share of the public’s attention---and rightly so---is the October 3, 2011 FISC opinion by Judge John D. Bates, then the presiding judge of the FISC. This 81-page opinion, along with its accompanying order, finds certain aspects of NSA’s collection under Section 702 to be “deficient on statutory and constitutional grounds.” Judge Bates also expresses concern about the accuracy of a series of government representations to the court.


Court Criticizes Obama Admin for Illegal Spying on U.S. Citizens | Breitbart
New Surveillance Court Orders Show That Even Judges Have Difficulty Understanding and Limiting Government Spying
Another Batch Of FISA Court Docs Confirms The NSA Frequently Abuses Its Collection Powers

DOJ releases FISA docs that formed basis for surveillance of ex-Trump adviser Carter Page
Based on what is visible, the dossier is not described to the FISA court as a political document, as the Democrats have asserted; in fact, the FBI speculates to the FISA court that it was

Of which they even testified they never did verify, they went on the word of Steele. Lol

The Dossier seems to be some kind of fixation for you folks.

Too bad it only relates to Carter Page who was not even a member of the Trump campaign when the FISA warrant was issued.

Too bad also that it wasn't even the main evidence used to obtain that FISA warrant

& there are stringent guidelines that FISA warrant renewals have to prove are necessary before they are granted.

it has to go before a FISA court to get approved & then for each & every subsequent renewal. which is every 90-180 days.

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was established in 1978 when Congress enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is codified, as amended, at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1885c. The Court sits in Washington D.C., and is composed of eleven federal district court judges who are designated by the Chief Justice of the United States. Each judge serves for a maximum of seven years and their terms are staggered to ensure continuity on the Court. By statute, the judges must be drawn from at least seven of the United States judicial circuits, and three of the judges must reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia. Judges typically sit for one week at a time, on a rotating basis.

Pursuant to FISA, the Court entertains applications submitted by the United States Government for approval of electronic surveillance, physical search, and other investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes. Most of the Court’s work is conducted ex parte as required by statute, and due to the need to protect classified national security information.

• Additional information concerning the operation of the Court can be found at:
  Letter to Chairman Leahy, Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate July 29, 2013
  
• The Judges who have served on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Revew can be found at:
  FISC FISCR JUDGES May 2018

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | United States

so that means there must have been a sufficient amt of new intel to renew. again. & again.

dolt.

i gave you a link straight from the gov'ment. you give me breitbart & other rw spin rag mags?

 

[depotoo]

No, I gave you Judges reprimands. See the date in read and opinion.

Silence of 'the lambs': The deafening quietude of the FISA court and John Roberts

The dolt is the one that doesn’t read the testimony stating that is not what was done. And not knowing they have been reprimanded before for just that-

The document that will surely capture the lion’s share of the public’s attention---and rightly so---is the October 3, 2011 FISC opinion by Judge John D. Bates, then the presiding judge of the FISC. This 81-page opinion, along with its accompanying order, finds certain aspects of NSA’s collection under Section 702 to be “deficient on statutory and constitutional grounds.” Judge Bates also expresses concern about the accuracy of a series of government representations to the court.


Court Criticizes Obama Admin for Illegal Spying on U.S. Citizens | Breitbart
New Surveillance Court Orders Show That Even Judges Have Difficulty Understanding and Limiting Government Spying
Another Batch Of FISA Court Docs Confirms The NSA Frequently Abuses Its Collection Powers

DOJ releases FISA docs that formed basis for surveillance of ex-Trump adviser Carter Page
Based on what is visible, the dossier is not described to the FISA court as a political document, as the Democrats have asserted; in fact, the FBI speculates to the FISA court that it was

Of which they even testified they never did verify, they went on the word of Steele. Lol

The Dossier seems to be some kind of fixation for you folks.

Too bad it only relates to Carter Page who was not even a member of the Trump campaign when the FISA warrant was issued.

Too bad also that it wasn't even the main evidence used to obtain that FISA warrant

& there are stringent guidelines that FISA warrant renewals have to prove are necessary before they are granted.

it has to go before a FISA court to get approved & then for each & every subsequent renewal. which is every 90-180 days.

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was established in 1978 when Congress enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is codified, as amended, at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1885c. The Court sits in Washington D.C., and is composed of eleven federal district court judges who are designated by the Chief Justice of the United States. Each judge serves for a maximum of seven years and their terms are staggered to ensure continuity on the Court. By statute, the judges must be drawn from at least seven of the United States judicial circuits, and three of the judges must reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia. Judges typically sit for one week at a time, on a rotating basis.

Pursuant to FISA, the Court entertains applications submitted by the United States Government for approval of electronic surveillance, physical search, and other investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes. Most of the Court’s work is conducted ex parte as required by statute, and due to the need to protect classified national security information.

• Additional information concerning the operation of the Court can be found at:
  Letter to Chairman Leahy, Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate July 29, 2013
  
• The Judges who have served on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Revew can be found at:
  FISC FISCR JUDGES May 2018

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | United States

so that means there must have been a sufficient amt of new intel to renew. again. & again.

dolt.

i gave you a link straight from the gov'ment. you give me breitbart & other rw spin rag mags?

 

[playtime]

No, I gave you Judges reprimands. See the date in read and opinion.

Silence of 'the lambs': The deafening quietude of the FISA court and John Roberts

The dolt is the one that doesn’t read the testimony stating that is not what was done. And not knowing they have been reprimanded before for just that-

The document that will surely capture the lion’s share of the public’s attention---and rightly so---is the October 3, 2011 FISC opinion by Judge John D. Bates, then the presiding judge of the FISC. This 81-page opinion, along with its accompanying order, finds certain aspects of NSA’s collection under Section 702 to be “deficient on statutory and constitutional grounds.” Judge Bates also expresses concern about the accuracy of a series of government representations to the court.


Court Criticizes Obama Admin for Illegal Spying on U.S. Citizens | Breitbart
New Surveillance Court Orders Show That Even Judges Have Difficulty Understanding and Limiting Government Spying
Another Batch Of FISA Court Docs Confirms The NSA Frequently Abuses Its Collection Powers

DOJ releases FISA docs that formed basis for surveillance of ex-Trump adviser Carter Page
Based on what is visible, the dossier is not described to the FISA court as a political document, as the Democrats have asserted; in fact, the FBI speculates to the FISA court that it was

Of which they even testified they never did verify, they went on the word of Steele. Lol

& there are stringent guidelines that FISA warrant renewals have to prove are necessary before they are granted.

it has to go before a FISA court to get approved & then for each & every subsequent renewal. which is every 90-180 days.

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was established in 1978 when Congress enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is codified, as amended, at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1885c. The Court sits in Washington D.C., and is composed of eleven federal district court judges who are designated by the Chief Justice of the United States. Each judge serves for a maximum of seven years and their terms are staggered to ensure continuity on the Court. By statute, the judges must be drawn from at least seven of the United States judicial circuits, and three of the judges must reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia. Judges typically sit for one week at a time, on a rotating basis.

Pursuant to FISA, the Court entertains applications submitted by the United States Government for approval of electronic surveillance, physical search, and other investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes. Most of the Court’s work is conducted ex parte as required by statute, and due to the need to protect classified national security information.

• Additional information concerning the operation of the Court can be found at:
  Letter to Chairman Leahy, Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate July 29, 2013
  
• The Judges who have served on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Revew can be found at:
  FISC FISCR JUDGES May 2018

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | United States

so that means there must have been a sufficient amt of new intel to renew. again. & again.

dolt.

i gave you a link straight from the gov'ment. you give me breitbart & other rw spin rag mags?

you just gave me an opinion piece.

 

[bripat9643]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

So, opposition research is legal,
but, if you use the dirt that was dug up, it's illegal?

What's the point of opposition research then?

What makes fresh dirt collusion,
and old dirt politics?

Whether its fresh or old,
the dirt serves the same purpose...
influence voters!

oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is.

Paying Russian spies to manufacture dirt on a candidate in an American election definitely isn't legal. The Trump campaign received no goods or services from a foreign hostile adversarial government as the Hillary campaign did.

simply anticipating that one will receive dirt on hillary is a crime. whether they got ripped off matters not. you not understanding that is expected from a poorly educated deplorable that trump loves long time.

Wrong, asshole. It's not illegal for people to tell you things. That's called "freedom of speech." If it was illegal, then Hillary would be in the slammer for receiving dirt from all those gold digging bimbos who made accusations against Trump.

All you snowflake schemes rely on legal theories that are patently absurd. The only possible result will be an ocean of snowflake tears.

what's funny is that some things in the dossier have not been proven, & some the feds already knew about... BUT NOTHING in the dossier has been proven to be untrue... there is no foreign hostile government agent responsible for the dossier AND the individual in that dossier that went to prague most likely already told mueller about the dirty deeds he performed there for his boss. oopsie... real first person collaboration would go a looooooooooong way in proving trump's treason.

Once again, nothing in the "dossier" has been proven that isn't public knowledge. At least one thing has been categorically disproven and that's the claim that Michael Cohen met some Russians in Prague. The rest is so absurd that it reads like a sitcom plot.

You keep muttering this claim like a mantra because you have no facts on your side. All you have is lies and delusions.

 

[bripat9643]

Of which they even testified they never did verify, they went on the word of Steele. Lol

The Dossier seems to be some kind of fixation for you folks.

Too bad it only relates to Carter Page who was not even a member of the Trump campaign when the FISA warrant was issued.

Too bad also that it wasn't even the main evidence used to obtain that FISA warrant

& there are stringent guidelines that FISA warrant renewals have to prove are necessary before they are granted.

it has to go before a FISA court to get approved & then for each & every subsequent renewal. which is every 90-180 days.

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was established in 1978 when Congress enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is codified, as amended, at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1885c. The Court sits in Washington D.C., and is composed of eleven federal district court judges who are designated by the Chief Justice of the United States. Each judge serves for a maximum of seven years and their terms are staggered to ensure continuity on the Court. By statute, the judges must be drawn from at least seven of the United States judicial circuits, and three of the judges must reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia. Judges typically sit for one week at a time, on a rotating basis.

Pursuant to FISA, the Court entertains applications submitted by the United States Government for approval of electronic surveillance, physical search, and other investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes. Most of the Court’s work is conducted ex parte as required by statute, and due to the need to protect classified national security information.

• Additional information concerning the operation of the Court can be found at:
  Letter to Chairman Leahy, Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate July 29, 2013
  
• The Judges who have served on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Revew can be found at:
  FISC FISCR JUDGES May 2018

About the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | United States

so that means there must have been a sufficient amt of new intel to renew. again. & again.

dolt.

It would mean that if the agents requesting the warrant were committing perjury.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

Just think your man child Obama let it happen. The only good thing that faggot did for America.

Obama knew about it, and did nothing. I guess he should be prosecuted.

Yea...ya ought impeach Obama then huh? Fool

And no..we will NOT let you ignore what you posted. You think the Russians picking our President is a good thing.

You can NOT escape that

If Putin wanted to pick our president, he would want Hillary dumbass.

This is no small point when you consider the successes that Putin had during the Obama/Clinton administration. Consider, Russia annexed Crimea, invaded eastern Ukraine, intervened in Syria, and possibly hacked the Clinton campaign and the DNC all while Obama sat back and did nothing. This of course after the embarrassing 'reset' with Russian relations. Why would Putin want anything but a continuation of policies he knew he could exploit to his advantage?

 

[Lesh]

Regardless of your OPINION as to what happened and what if anything was done or could have been done

Putin HATED Clinton and made his feelings and actions known in Helsinki

 

[Lesh]

And I'm sure you've heard of the Magnitsky Act...and I'm sure you have heard about the "illegals" thrown out of the country and "safe houses" closed and seized...right?

 

[keepitreal]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

So, opposition research is legal,
but, if you use the dirt that was dug up, it's illegal?

What's the point of opposition research then?

What makes fresh dirt collusion,
and old dirt politics?

Whether its fresh or old,
the dirt serves the same purpose...
influence voters!

oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is.

Oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is

So, the real problem is, what country provides the dirt?

That's like saying....
it's ok for a close friend to tell you, your husband is cheating
but, not ok for his mistress to tell you about the ongoing affair

Since you consider information, goods,
and the messenger, a service...answer me this...

In regards to the leaked emails....

Why is it not acceptable to learn the truth
if it is coming from an adversary,
and intended to influence an election

But, acceptable for the people running our country
to surpress the truth, so it doesn't affect voters,
and adversely, influence an election...effecting the outcome?

Furthermore, how is it that, using damaging information,
about a politician or party, which could influence an election,
that comes from a foreign, hostile, adversarial government,

Is worse than, allowing the very same,
foreign, hostile, adversarial government,
to take ownership of Uranium mines, within the U.S.,
without any opposition, whatsoever

Further still, how is it that, using damaging information,
about a politician or party, which could influence an election,
that comes from a foreign, hostile, adversarial government,

Is not acceptable, but, it is perfectly acceptable, to not only,
fund the technological advancements of that same country,
but to assist and cooperate with that same country,
by providing our own scientists, engineers and experts,
and arranging the collaboration of U.S. tech giants,
such as Microsoft, Google and Cisco, to climb on board?

Surely you know what I am referring to...
The Skolkovo Foundation project...Russia's Silicon valley

You know, it wasn't just the majority of people here,
that didn't think Trump had a chance in hell to win,

If anything, Russia did what they thought we did,
but, not with the notion that it could help Trump win.

In 2012, 3 years after the Obama administration
initiated the Russian 'reset', which Hillary headed,
Russia told USAID to discontinue work in their country,
based on the belief that, the United States created,
the political crisis they were having to deal with

Given the fact that China and Chinese companies,
are now keeping Russia's version of Silicon valley afloat,
would suggest that the Russian 'reset' was a failure

Nothing Russia did, effected the election outcome.
What was contained in those leaked emails...
I couldn't tell you

Facebook and Twitter ads....Never saw them,
I don't have a Facebook or Twitter account

The only place I post is here,
and the topics discussed here
are no different than when I first joined.

If there were a Russian national posting,
I wouldn't know the difference... Would you?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

This was all reported to the FISA judges when applying for the warrants. Widely reported and nothing new.

Liar.

It was reported 10 months ago

The central argument in the Nunes memo may have just been debunked

 

[keepitreal]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

So, opposition research is legal,
but, if you use the dirt that was dug up, it's illegal?

What's the point of opposition research then?

What makes fresh dirt collusion,
and old dirt politics?

Whether its fresh or old,
the dirt serves the same purpose...
influence voters!

oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is.

Then why did Obama let it happen, after he said a foriegn power couldn't affect the out come of our election? I guess he lied again.

obama didn't 'let' anything happen... i think he was talking about actual votes because all 50 states have their own method of vote calculations as determined by all 50 states' secretary of state. it would be extremely hard - but people can be manipulated into doing things when they are swayed by emotion. there have been some lookseys into voting software that might have been hacked & then there is the stupid states that have no paper trail & votes - once cast - go straight to cyberia. trump WAS apprised by 'obama' before he was installed & knew about flynn & other possible threats coming from russia.

Obama didn't 'let' anything happen... i think he was talking about actual votes

....trump WAS apprised by 'obama' before he was installed & knew about flynn & other possible threats coming from russia

Um, the Obama administration initiated the Russian 'reset'
and collaborated with Russia, by funding and assisting,
their technological advancements and capabilities....

 

[Lesh]

At least one thing has been categorically disproven and that's the claim that Michael Cohen met some Russians in Prague

Absolutely false. The one passport Cohen has shown publicly shows Cohen in Italy in July. Travel to the Czech Republican from there would not show up on a passport.

There are also reports that he was in Germany in August or September using a second passport (which is entirely possible. You CAN have multiple passports).

So no dimwit. It has NOT been "categorically disproven" and that is the ONLY point in the Dossier which is even close to being disproved

 

[playtime]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

So, opposition research is legal,
but, if you use the dirt that was dug up, it's illegal?

What's the point of opposition research then?

What makes fresh dirt collusion,
and old dirt politics?

Whether its fresh or old,
the dirt serves the same purpose...
influence voters!

oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is.

Paying Russian spies to manufacture dirt on a candidate in an American election definitely isn't legal. The Trump campaign received no goods or services from a foreign hostile adversarial government as the Hillary campaign did.

simply anticipating that one will receive dirt on hillary is a crime. whether they got ripped off matters not. you not understanding that is expected from a poorly educated deplorable that trump loves long time.

Wrong, asshole. It's not illegal for people to tell you things. That's called "freedom of speech." If it was illegal, then Hillary would be in the slammer for receiving dirt from all those gold digging bimbos who made accusations against Trump.

All you snowflake schemes rely on legal theories that are patently absurd. The only possible result will be an ocean of snowflake tears.

what's funny is that some things in the dossier have not been proven, & some the feds already knew about... BUT NOTHING in the dossier has been proven to be untrue... there is no foreign hostile government agent responsible for the dossier AND the individual in that dossier that went to prague most likely already told mueller about the dirty deeds he performed there for his boss. oopsie... real first person collaboration would go a looooooooooong way in proving trump's treason.

Once again, nothing in the "dossier" has been proven that isn't public knowledge. At least one thing has been categorically disproven and that's the claim that Michael Cohen met some Russians in Prague. The rest is so absurd that it reads like a sitcom plot.

You keep muttering this claim like a mantra because you have no facts on your side. All you have is lies and delusions.

cohen is quite chatty these days.... when the (D) intel & judiciary committees get together in jan, they are gonna talk to the fixer along with whatever mueller has. not to mention AMI's pecker & weisellburg....

 

[playtime]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

So, opposition research is legal,
but, if you use the dirt that was dug up, it's illegal?

What's the point of opposition research then?

What makes fresh dirt collusion,
and old dirt politics?

Whether its fresh or old,
the dirt serves the same purpose...
influence voters!

oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is.

Oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is

So, the real problem is, what country provides the dirt?

That's like saying....
it's ok for a close friend to tell you, your husband is cheating
but, not ok for his mistress to tell you about the ongoing affair

Since you consider information, goods,
and the messenger, a service...answer me this...

In regards to the leaked emails....

Why is it not acceptable to learn the truth
if it is coming from an adversary,
and intended to influence an election

But, acceptable for the people running our country
to surpress the truth, so it doesn't affect voters,
and adversely, influence an election...effecting the outcome?

Furthermore, how is it that, using damaging information,
about a politician or party, which could influence an election,
that comes from a foreign, hostile, adversarial government,

Is worse than, allowing the very same,
foreign, hostile, adversarial government,
to take ownership of Uranium mines, within the U.S.,
without any opposition, whatsoever

Further still, how is it that, using damaging information,
about a politician or party, which could influence an election,
that comes from a foreign, hostile, adversarial government,

Is not acceptable, but, it is perfectly acceptable, to not only,
fund the technological advancements of that same country,
but to assist and cooperate with that same country,
by providing our own scientists, engineers and experts,
and arranging the collaboration of U.S. tech giants,
such as Microsoft, Google and Cisco, to climb on board?

Surely you know what I am referring to...
The Skolkovo Foundation project...Russia's Silicon valley

You know, it wasn't just the majority of people here,
that didn't think Trump had a chance in hell to win,

If anything, Russia did what they thought we did,
but, not with the notion that it could help Trump win.

In 2012, 3 years after the Obama administration
initiated the Russian 'reset', which Hillary headed,
Russia told USAID to discontinue work in their country,
based on the belief that, the United States created,
the political crisis they were having to deal with

Given the fact that China and Chinese companies,
are now keeping Russia's version of Silicon valley afloat,
would suggest that the Russian 'reset' was a failure

Nothing Russia did, effected the election outcome.
What was contained in those leaked emails...
I couldn't tell you

Facebook and Twitter ads....Never saw them,
I don't have a Facebook or Twitter account

The only place I post is here,
and the topics discussed here
are no different than when I first joined.

If there were a Russian national posting,
I wouldn't know the difference... Would you?

New report on Russian disinformation, prepared for the Senate, shows the operation’s scale and sweep

 

[playtime]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

So, opposition research is legal,
but, if you use the dirt that was dug up, it's illegal?

What's the point of opposition research then?

What makes fresh dirt collusion,
and old dirt politics?

Whether its fresh or old,
the dirt serves the same purpose...
influence voters!

oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is.

Then why did Obama let it happen, after he said a foriegn power couldn't affect the out come of our election? I guess he lied again.

obama didn't 'let' anything happen... i think he was talking about actual votes because all 50 states have their own method of vote calculations as determined by all 50 states' secretary of state. it would be extremely hard - but people can be manipulated into doing things when they are swayed by emotion. there have been some lookseys into voting software that might have been hacked & then there is the stupid states that have no paper trail & votes - once cast - go straight to cyberia. trump WAS apprised by 'obama' before he was installed & knew about flynn & other possible threats coming from russia.

Obama didn't 'let' anything happen... i think he was talking about actual votes

....trump WAS apprised by 'obama' before he was installed & knew about flynn & other possible threats coming from russia

Um, the Obama administration initiated the Russian 'reset'
and collaborated with Russia, by funding and assisting,
their technological advancements and capabilities....

in the very lengthy indictment doc that rosenstein released in july, there was great detail how the roooskies funded alot of their infiltration into our social media plateforms & that was thru ID theft & access to american bank accounts.