Late 1960s and Early 1970s All Over Again

[pknopp]

I assume you are speaking about the Tuft case? Wasn't there already violence going on at schools like Harvard, UCLA, and Columbia when she woke the op-ed? How did moving to revoke her visa start that?

Was there some sort of flux capacitor used to go back in time?

Writing an Op-Ed is Not Grounds for Deportation | ACLU

www.aclu.org

 

[22lcidw]

It is certainly what Trump wants. He is inciting it. Encouraging Jack booted thugs to round up people at random and call it “alaw enforcement”.

It’s what the angry old right wing wants too.

They have been trying to relitigate 1968 since 1968.

They want their segregation and white supremacy secured.

And they hide behind a cross and call it “christian nationalism”

You will kill the Christians when empowered enough. Progressive politicians have mocked Christians in comfort in recent years. We see the false Christians whether right or left. And frankly most of those who are Christians have their flaws. Christianity is in the way of your Progressive global hegemony though. When wealth is removed you will be murderers as genocide will occur.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Yes, thats the argument. Trump arrested someone over an op-ed he didn't like to stir up violence.

I am unaware of the event you are referring to. Is this similar to when Obama and Hillary threw a Coptic Christian in jail to claim him for Benghazi because he made a video here in the US?

I don’t recall people in support of the jailed film maker creating violence in the streets aimed at law enforcement and innocents

Blamed for Benghazi: Filmmaker jailed after attack now lives in poverty, fear

Four Americans died in the 2012 terror attack in Benghazi, and those who survived saw their stories of heroism told in a Hollywood movie, but the filmmaker whose work was wrongly blamed for touching off the event lives in obscurity, poverty and fear, FoxNews.com has learned.

www.foxnews.com

 

[LeftofLeft]

It is certainly what Trump wants. He is inciting it. Encouraging Jack booted thugs to round up people at random and call it “alaw enforcement”.

It’s what the angry old right wing wants too.

They have been trying to relitigate 1968 since 1968.

They want their segregation and white supremacy secured.

And they hide behind a cross and call it “christian nationalism”

Who and how many people who are not illegals engaged in rape, murder, drug and sex trafficking are being rounded up?

 

[pknopp]

I am unaware of the event you are referring to.

no you arent.

Is this similar to when Obama and Hillary threw a Coptic Christian in jail to claim him for Benghazi because he made a video here in the US?

Yes. Scum bags the both of them.

(it was never about the video to start with)

I don’t recall people in support of the jailed film maker creating violence in the streets aimed at law enforcement and innocents

Blamed for Benghazi: Filmmaker jailed after attack now lives in poverty, fear

Four Americans died in the 2012 terror attack in Benghazi, and those who survived saw their stories of heroism told in a Hollywood movie, but the filmmaker whose work was wrongly blamed for touching off the event lives in obscurity, poverty and fear, FoxNews.com has learned.

www.foxnews.com

Why not? You are arguing that Democrats are hypocrites. I have long made that argument. My question would be why you want to be one also?

 

[Godboy]

It is only a crime when the left does it. When the right does it, it is witch hunt worthy of pardons.

When the left riots, they dont need pardons because, they arent even charged with a crime.

 

[LeftofLeft]

no you arent.



Yes. Scum bags the both of them.

(it was never about the video to start with)



Why not? You are arguing that Democrats are hypocrites. I have long made that argument. My question would be why you want to be one also?

I have never been for violent unrest in America. I call out hypocrisy among Democrats because they seem to love it until someone fights or fires back such as Kyle Rittenhouse or the J6 protestors. Democrats want it both ways…. They want the license to create civil and violent or unrest against innocents when it suits them and then they call it tyranny when their violence is met violence.

 

[LeftofLeft]

no you arent.



Yes. Scum bags the both of them.

(it was never about the video to start with)



Why not? You are arguing that Democrats are hypocrites. I have long made that argument. My question would be why you want to be one also?

You say I am aware of something I sincerely said I was unaware and then you say I am a hypocrite. You need to be more specific or explicit if you are to make that claim.

 

[struth]

Writing an Op-Ed is Not Grounds for Deportation | ACLU

www.aclu.org

Weird op-ed from the ACLU that’s misrepresenting the issue

Writing an op-ed certainly can be grounds, if that op-Ed undermines our national security or national interest

So says the federal code. They can certainly challenge if this one does or doesn’t, and she’ll have her hearing date.

 

[pknopp]

I have never been for violent unrest in America. I call out hypocrisy among Democrats because they seem to love it until someone fights or fires back such as Kyle Rittenhouse or the J6 protestors. Democrats want it both ways…. They want the license to create civil and violent or unrest against innocents when it suits them and then they call it tyranny when their violence is met violence.

I am not interested in your rants about Democrats.

 

[pknopp]

Weird op-ed from the ACLU that’s misrepresenting the issue

Writing an op-ed certainly can be grounds, if that op-Ed undermines our national security or national interest

So says the federal code. They can certainly challenge if this one does or doesn’t, and she’ll have her hearing date.

Nothing there undermined our security unless you are arguing basic human rights undermine our security.

 

[Correll]

Nothing there undermined our security unless you are arguing basic human rights undermine our security.

The dems have ordered the city and state cops to NOT maintain order to protect feds, from the violent mexcian rioters.

Calling in the national guard is very much called for.


The rioters flying mexican flags is a statement of their emnity to AMERICA and AMERICANS.

 

[pknopp]

The dems...........

I'm not interested. Address what i said or take your rants out on someone else.

 

[struth]

Nothing there undermined our security unless you are arguing basic human rights undermine our security.

Or National interest. The govt seems to think that promoting Hamas and violence against Jewish students is an issue. I get you don’t

And she doesn’t

But she’ll have her hearing date

 

[LeftofLeft]

I am not interested in your rants about Democrats.

Stay uninterested. The subject doesn’t need your interest or acknowledgment because they’ve been exposed time and time again.

 

[Correll]

I'm not interested. Address what i said or take your rants out on someone else.

I did address it. Dems ordering the police to stand down, is a real threat to our security.

We as a society need to respond.

 

[Zincwarrior]

We were warning early on that trying to grab 1MM to 10MM people was going to be a problem.

 

[pknopp]

Or National interest. The govt seems to think that promoting Hamas and violence against Jewish students is an issue. I get you don’t

And she doesn’t

But she’ll have her hearing date

Saying the women and children of Palestine have basic human rights is not propping up Hamas outside of those with warped thinking.

 

[Correll]

We were warning early on that trying to grab 1MM to 10MM people was going to be a problem.

We understood your threats. It was clear your intentions.


Grow the problem so that solving it will be hard.

Then when solving it is hard, whine about how hard it is, and blame the people solving the problem.


This is an attempt to change America, against America's will.


Very... anti-American move by our political class.


Such a vile tactic justifies strong action.

 

[pknopp]

I did address it. Dems ordering the police to stand down, is a real threat to our security.

We as a society need to respond.

Irrelevant to what was being discussed.