Las Vegas Shooter's Criminal Past---Buh, Buh, BUh, He's Got RIGHTS!

[M14 Shooter]

you wish... it was ask and answered ..

I accept your concession of the point.

then you are accepting nothing..

says he who cannot answer a simple question.

 

[Sallow]

No one is claiming anyone has the right to shoot kids in the face or "settle scores".

We are arguing we have the natural and Constitutional right to defend ourselves from harm. We have the right to protect ourselves.

Ironically, you just conceded that.

You don't.

It's not there.

Another lie.

Find it in the United States Constitution and post it here.

 

[depotoo]

And if it jams? Tell that to those that live in the country. The below post is from another forum. The link is to another story-

I live in black bear country in the Ozarks -- a friend just killed a 300 pounder with a bow. I have had bear in my back yard.My experience (backed up by friends with the same experience) is that black bear attacks are rare -- and usually food-related. Campers who fail to keep a clean camp and food out of reach may have problems, but otherwise blackies will leave you alone.Ernie Pagette killed a blackie with a .357 after two 165-grain Sierra boattail softpoints from a .308 failed (both bullets broke up on the shoulders). The bear did not attack him, but crawled into a laurel hell.If I was hunting bear with a handgun, I'd rely on that handgun -- and hardcast bullets for good penetration. With a rifle, I'd go with Nosler Partition Jackets, to avoid a repetition of Ernie's problem.
Robber?s gun jams, gets him killed | Metro, News, The Philippine Star | philstar.com

nice rationalization. but it's bullshit...
besides you cannot shoot more than one at a time.

dude you are reaching sure sign of desperation.
if you live in the woods then you should expect bears and other wildlife

If you truly were around guns you would know one size does not fit allnsituations, and even well maintained guns can jam.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You had to cut off my post because you cannot defend your ridiculous and patently zealous gun nut position.

Not only will a strict reading of the second amendment support what I post, but other parts of the Constitution do as well.

You really should sit down and read it.

I note that you did not even try to show that you did not lie.
Good to see you've accepted that sad fact.

I didn't lie.

You did. At the top of your voice.

 

[daws101]

I accept your concession of the point.

then you are accepting nothing..

says he who cannot answer a simple question.

it was self explanatory. or are you too simple to understand that?
btw you never did answer this question " can an individual use more the one firearm at a time with reasonable accuracy ?

 

[M14 Shooter]

No... the fact is that you cannot, and you know it.

Actually..the fact REMAINS, that of course I can.

Prove it. Support your position that Case law corrupted original intent.

Still waiting.

 

[depotoo]

And this guy did not obtain his gun legally. He was a felon. Black market, doesn't give a damn, and no law would have prevented.

 

[M14 Shooter]

then you are accepting nothing..

says he who cannot answer a simple question.

it was self explanatory. or are you too simple to understand that?

If that's the case, you should have no problem answering the question.
Please proceed.

btw you never did answer this question " can an individual use more the one firearm at a time with reasonable accuracy ?

I negated your point; you have yet to respond.

 

[daws101]

And if it jams? Tell that to those that live in the country. The below post is from another forum. The link is to another story-

I live in black bear country in the Ozarks -- a friend just killed a 300 pounder with a bow. I have had bear in my back yard.My experience (backed up by friends with the same experience) is that black bear attacks are rare -- and usually food-related. Campers who fail to keep a clean camp and food out of reach may have problems, but otherwise blackies will leave you alone.Ernie Pagette killed a blackie with a .357 after two 165-grain Sierra boattail softpoints from a .308 failed (both bullets broke up on the shoulders). The bear did not attack him, but crawled into a laurel hell.If I was hunting bear with a handgun, I'd rely on that handgun -- and hardcast bullets for good penetration. With a rifle, I'd go with Nosler Partition Jackets, to avoid a repetition of Ernie's problem.
Robber?s gun jams, gets him killed | Metro, News, The Philippine Star | philstar.com

dude you are reaching sure sign of desperation.
if you live in the woods then you should expect bears and other wildlife

If you truly were around guns you would know one size does not fit allnsituations, and even well maintained guns can jam.

that's rationalizing. it's extremely rare for a well maintained quality firearm to jam...
can jam and do jam enough to be unreliable are two separate arguments.

 

[Sallow]

Actually..the fact REMAINS, that of course I can.

Prove it. Support your position that Case law corrupted original intent.

Still waiting.

Still waiting for what?

It's pretty obvious.

A strict reading of the Constitution doesn't have the expansion of the right to bear arms, that case law allows for..

And here?

I can stick to the Strict Constitutionalist, EXACT WORDS stance that Judges like Scalia take on Social Issues.

 

[daws101]

says he who cannot answer a simple question.

it was self explanatory. or are you too simple to understand that?

If that's the case, you should have no problem answering the question.
Please proceed.

btw you never did answer this question " can an individual use more the one firearm at a time with reasonable accuracy ?

I negated your point; you have yet to respond.

ok, asked and answered..

 

[M14 Shooter]

it was self explanatory. or are you too simple to understand that?

If that's the case, you should have no problem answering the question.
Please proceed.

btw you never did answer this question " can an individual use more the one firearm at a time with reasonable accuracy ?

I negated your point; you have yet to respond.

ok, asked and answered..

And your point, remains negated.

 

[Sallow]

I note that you did not even try to show that you did not lie.
Good to see you've accepted that sad fact.

I didn't lie.

You did. At the top of your voice.

Well, I have thrown down a very simple challenge.

And you should be able to prove I lied.

Find what I challenged you to find in the United States Constitution.

Otherwise?

You are the liar.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Prove it. Support your position that Case law corrupted original intent.

Still waiting.

Still waiting for what?

For you to support your lie...er...position that that Case law corrupted original intent.

Please begin.

Of course, we both know you cannot, as your next post will prove.

 

[daws101]

And this guy did not obtain his gun legally. He was a felon. Black market, doesn't give a damn, and no law would have prevented.

is there any evidence that this "guy" did not buy his weapons from a gun shop? under the table so to speak or did he buy them from a friend who shares the same ideology?

 

[daws101]

If that's the case, you should have no problem answering the question.
Please proceed.


I negated your point; you have yet to respond.

ok, asked and answered..

And your point, remains negated.

false you not answering is not the same as negation...great dodge though...

 

[M14 Shooter]

I didn't lie.

You did. At the top of your voice.

Well, I have thrown down a very simple challenge.

Apparently you do not understand that stating that you lied is a challenge, one that you have done nothing to respond to.
See, its up to you to prove that you are right - something you know you cannot do.

 

[M14 Shooter]

ok, asked and answered..

And your point, remains negated.

false you not answering is not the same as negation...great dodge though...

You apparently missed my post.

You claim that your question is central to your point.

You have a right, protected by the constitution, to own a gun for any and every traditionally legal use you might have for one.

Your "point" falls flat in the face of that fact - and so, there's no need to address your question.

 

[depotoo]

dude you are reaching sure sign of desperation.
if you live in the woods then you should expect bears and other wildlife

If you truly were around guns you would know one size does not fit allnsituations, and even well maintained guns can jam.

that's rationalizing. it's extremely rare for a well maintained quality firearm to jam...
can jam and do jam enough to be unreliable are two separate arguments.

Only because you want it to be. Fact. And I know you will never concede to the Fact criminals wouldn't hold to this requirement. Fact.
Nor will you concede to the fact one type gun does not work in all situations. Fact.

 

[Yurt]

90% of American polled in 2012 wanted background checks, but the NRA got it's way and the infantile, stupid righties support this.


"""A CRIMINAL PAST

Jerad Dwain Miller had a lengthy criminal history dating back at least to 2000 that saw him in and out of jail on felony and misdemeanor charges in both Washington state and in his home state of Indiana.

In 2010 and 2007 he was convicted of drug dealing and possession charges related to marijuana.

Jerad Miller was arrested by Tippecanoe County, Ind., police on a battery charge in 2009 but later found not guilty.

In February 2011, he was arrested on a strangulation battery charge in Dearborn County, Ind., though the result of that case is unclear.

He married Amanda Woodruff in September 2012, according to court records in Lafayette, Ind.

Jerad Miller also was no stranger to police in Benton County, Wash. District Court records there show he was convicted of obstructing a public officer and DUI in August 2002.

In April of that year he was found guilty of assault with intent to cause injury, and also had earlier convictions for third-degree malicious mischief, third-degree theft, harassment and taking a motor vehicle without permission."""""

Shooters carried arsenal, supplies into Sunday rampage | Las Vegas Review-Journal

90 percent of Americans want expanded background checks on guns. Why isn?t this a political slam dunk?

FBI ? Gun Checks/NICS