Las Vegas Shooter's Criminal Past---Buh, Buh, BUh, He's Got RIGHTS!

Many areas in the US with tough Gun laws don't work because there're state or local laws, not national. A short trip across the state, city, or county line and you have access to plenty of guns with few restrictions. Hawaii which is isolated has some the toughest gun laws in the country and sports one the lowest murder rates. Other countries with strict gun laws confirm the fact that strict national gun laws lowers the murder rate.

Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding!

Now if you can put 2 and 2 together...

Guns + Guns = Lots of dead people.

Yep..easy equation.

One which you have no solution to, so what's your point?

And you're clueless believing that when you have criminals and nut jobs that even if you could get rid of the guns that would solve the problem.
 
An that's why your argument fails. It's based on the assumption that gun laws can't be enforced. The truth is gun laws can work and do work.

Do they? You mean like in Columbine, The Washington Navy Yard, Aurora, Newtown, ...

All gun free zones. Yeah, gun laws work, they maximize the carnage. If that's your goal, they work just fine.
Many areas in the US with tough Gun laws don't work because there're state or local laws, not national. A short trip across the state, city, or county line and you have access to plenty of guns with few restrictions.
Laughable.
A gun that's illegal in state X is still illegal in state X if you buy it in state Y.
 
Stop cutting my ******* posts in half.
Sorry. As a thnking person, I can only take so much of your dishonesty before I gag.

I fully explained to you how and why the amendment was and is corrupted.
This is a lie; you have doine no such thing, at least not to the intellectual level necessary to -prove- your position.

You have done nothing but lie, and you know it.

Disagree?
- illustrate the original intent of the 2nd
- describe how 2A jurisprudence corrupts it.

So far, my cat can support your argument better than you have - and he has brain cancer.

First off I've explained it all.
You have done nothing but lie, and you know it.

Disagree?
Provide a citation of where you
- illustrated the original intent of the 2nd
- described how 2A jurisprudence corrupts it.

We both you you cannot, and you will prove it in your response.
 
Do they? You mean like in Columbine, The Washington Navy Yard, Aurora, Newtown, ...

All gun free zones. Yeah, gun laws work, they maximize the carnage. If that's your goal, they work just fine.
Many areas in the US with tough Gun laws don't work because there're state or local laws, not national. A short trip across the state, city, or county line and you have access to plenty of guns with few restrictions.
Laughable.
A gun that's illegal in state X is still illegal in state X if you buy it in state Y.

Not to mention the country and the world are full of guns and we can't even keep pot away from high schoolers. If you have no gun zones, criminals bring them in from outside the zone, if you have no gun States, people bring them in from out of States. If you have no gun country, they bring them in from Mexico and other places. And that doesn't even count the guns that are already here and how simple they are to manufacture and all the other weapons criminals can and do use.

Liberals are simpletons.
 
Many areas in the US with tough Gun laws don't work because there're state or local laws, not national. A short trip across the state, city, or county line and you have access to plenty of guns with few restrictions.
Laughable.
A gun that's illegal in state X is still illegal in state X if you buy it in state Y.

Not to mention the country and the world are full of guns and we can't even keep pot away from high schoolers. If you have no gun zones, criminals bring them in from outside the zone, if you have no gun States, people bring them in from out of States. If you have no gun country, they bring them in from Mexico and other places. And that doesn't even count the guns that are already here and how simple they are to manufacture and all the other weapons criminals can and do use.

Liberals are simpletons.
They fail to realize that you cannot enact a law that will prevent people from breaking the law - some of them fail to realize this out of ignorance, some out of dishonesty.
 
Laughable.
A gun that's illegal in state X is still illegal in state X if you buy it in state Y.

Not to mention the country and the world are full of guns and we can't even keep pot away from high schoolers. If you have no gun zones, criminals bring them in from outside the zone, if you have no gun States, people bring them in from out of States. If you have no gun country, they bring them in from Mexico and other places. And that doesn't even count the guns that are already here and how simple they are to manufacture and all the other weapons criminals can and do use.

Liberals are simpletons.
They fail to realize that you cannot enact a law that will prevent people from breaking the law - some of them fail to realize this out of ignorance, some out of dishonesty.

They are an all caring group, and because they are, always expect a pat on the back and an at-a-boy. There motto is and has been they are the only ones who care, anyone, and they mean anyone, disagrees with their care belief are evil and uncaring.

The fact is, their care is dangerous and injects more harm than any good they could ever do. They are proud to help the unfortunate, because they care, yet those unforunate are still unfortunate forty years later. It's a stich to listen to and read their care packages. Yet, they understand zilch how society works. But hey, they feel good about themselves and that's really all that matters.

See a gun law makes them feel good. They are trying to protect someone, the unfortunate, yet, where is all the crime? Near and in the unfortunate zones. Totally blowing their care belief away. So they make unfortunate's victims and keep them victims so the unfortunate's come back to them to help them what?.......well I don't know.

It is unfortunate! They all should be ashamed of themselves. But alas, they love themselves too much to be ashamed. All one needs is to not have a conscience to be one of them.

Also, ask them for their definition of fair, and you will get no answer. They don't know what fair is.
 
Last edited:
Do they? You mean like in Columbine, The Washington Navy Yard, Aurora, Newtown, ...

All gun free zones. Yeah, gun laws work, they maximize the carnage. If that's your goal, they work just fine.
Many areas in the US with tough Gun laws don't work because there're state or local laws, not national. A short trip across the state, city, or county line and you have access to plenty of guns with few restrictions. Hawaii which is isolated has some the toughest gun laws in the country and sports one the lowest murder rates. Other countries with strict gun laws confirm the fact that strict national gun laws lowers the murder rate.

Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding!

Now if you can put 2 and 2 together...
he already did, you, not so much.
 
Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding!

Now if you can put 2 and 2 together...

Guns + Guns = Lots of dead people.

Yep..easy equation.

One which you have no solution to, so what's your point?

And you're clueless believing that when you have criminals and nut jobs that even if you could get rid of the guns that would solve the problem.
false it would make the killing harder for the aforementioned nut job's and criminals
 
Guns + Guns = Lots of dead people.

Yep..easy equation.

One which you have no solution to, so what's your point?

And you're clueless believing that when you have criminals and nut jobs that even if you could get rid of the guns that would solve the problem.
false it would make the killing harder for the aforementioned nut job's and criminals
It would be easier and less expensive - in every context - to get rid of the nutjobs and criminals.
 
One which you have no solution to, so what's your point?

And you're clueless believing that when you have criminals and nut jobs that even if you could get rid of the guns that would solve the problem.
false it would make the killing harder for the aforementioned nut job's and criminals
It would be easier and less expensive - in every context - to get rid of the nutjobs and criminals.
you get no disagreement from me....
the rub is how.
my guess is the tea party minions would go for the shower and ovens option...
 
I wonder if they're doing background checks on the millions of illegal criminals that are currently flooding our borders?

I wonder if those guys will be armed at any point in the future? Ya think?
 
false it would make the killing harder for the aforementioned nut job's and criminals
It would be easier and less expensive - in every context - to get rid of the nutjobs and criminals.
you get no disagreement from me....
the rub is how.
my guess is the tea party minions would go for the shower and ovens option...

No, that's pure progressivism.

They're doing it now to the the immigrant children. Fence them up, give them showers, shots, then turn them loose to be preyed upon by the criminals they keep setting loose.

Awesome!
 
I wonder if they're doing background checks on the millions of illegal criminals that are currently flooding our borders?

I wonder if those guys will be armed at any point in the future? Ya think?
as always you are talking out your ass
The Decline in Illegal Immigration From Mexico-Becker



Net illegal immigration from Mexico to the United States has been essentially zero and perhaps even negative, during the past few years. Is this entirely due to depressed labor markets in the US and tougher border policing, or have longer run forces also been at work? The answer is that fundamental changes in Mexico have contributed to the immigration slowdown, and these changes will continue into the future. As a result, the highly controversial American political issue of what to do about illegal immigration should become much less important in the future.
The Decline in Illegal Immigration From Mexico-Becker - The Becker-Posner Blog


wondered when kosher hag would rear here hideous head.
 
It would be easier and less expensive - in every context - to get rid of the nutjobs and criminals.
you get no disagreement from me....
the rub is how.
my guess is the tea party minions would go for the shower and ovens option...

No, that's pure progressivism.

They're doing it now to the the immigrant children. Fence them up, give them showers, shots, then turn them loose to be preyed upon by the criminals they keep setting loose.

Awesome!
of course they are in your kiddie porn ridden imagination..
 
you get no disagreement from me....
the rub is how.
my guess is the tea party minions would go for the shower and ovens option...

No, that's pure progressivism.

They're doing it now to the the immigrant children. Fence them up, give them showers, shots, then turn them loose to be preyed upon by the criminals they keep setting loose.

Awesome!
of course they are in your kiddie porn ridden imagination..

You don't see the potential problem here:

"....children from Central America spent the weekend in an unused warehouse in Nogales, Arizona, which the border patrol agency has turned into a temporary “way-station” for the children, a state official said.

"The improvised shelter is one of the by-products of a jump in illegal immigration from Central America this year, including 47,000 children who entered the country on their own – almost double the number from the year before."
"The Nogales warehouse was expected to receive several hundred more children over the weekend, however some of those arrivals were delayed. "A consular official from Honduras who visited the site last week described appalling conditions, including children sleeping in plastic containers without having showered in 10 days. "

US struggles with surge in illegal immigrant children - FT.com
 
15th post
false it would make the killing harder for the aforementioned nut job's and criminals
It would be easier and less expensive - in every context - to get rid of the nutjobs and criminals.
you get no disagreement from me....
the rub is how.
my guess is the tea party minions would go for the shower and ovens option...
Of course that's your mindless, bigoted, partisan guess.
:roll:
 
false it would make the killing harder for the aforementioned nut job's and criminals
It would be easier and less expensive - in every context - to get rid of the nutjobs and criminals.
you get no disagreement from me....
the rub is how.
my guess is the tea party minions would go for the shower and ovens option...

No, you''re confused. Those are the options ACORN employees would opt for.
 
Guns + Guns = Lots of dead people.

Yep..easy equation.

One which you have no solution to, so what's your point?

And you're clueless believing that when you have criminals and nut jobs that even if you could get rid of the guns that would solve the problem.
false it would make the killing harder for the aforementioned nut job's and criminals

So your thought is they're going to say crap, I had to work a little harder to get a gun. Screw it, I'm not going to go on that shooting spree now, too much work.

You're a simpleton.

Also, they like your plan that no one's shooting back, that works for them.
 
No, that's pure progressivism.

They're doing it now to the the immigrant children. Fence them up, give them showers, shots, then turn them loose to be preyed upon by the criminals they keep setting loose.

Awesome!
of course they are in your kiddie porn ridden imagination..

You don't see the potential problem here:

"....children from Central America spent the weekend in an unused warehouse in Nogales, Arizona, which the border patrol agency has turned into a temporary “way-station” for the children, a state official said.

"The improvised shelter is one of the by-products of a jump in illegal immigration from Central America this year, including 47,000 children who entered the country on their own – almost double the number from the year before."
"The Nogales warehouse was expected to receive several hundred more children over the weekend, however some of those arrivals were delayed. "A consular official from Honduras who visited the site last week described appalling conditions, including children sleeping in plastic containers without having showered in 10 days. "

US struggles with surge in illegal immigrant children - FT.com
sorry, but you just wish I didn't .
the point is it has **** all to do with this discussion...
 
Back
Top Bottom