The democrat is pretty tolerant of extremist views if they can turn them into votes. FDR nominated a (former) KKK member to the supreme court when the KKK was the democrat party's strong arm to keep upity Blacks in line. What if they said there were two different KKK's, would anybody believe them?
Bullshit.
Actually there
were two different KKKs, the original one from 1865 that lasted less than a decade, and the re-started one from 1915, which is the one that by far had the most members and influence. It was anti-black, anti-Jew, anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant and anti-labor union, which were all
constituents of the Democrat
ic (not 'democrat') Party. It never seems to occur to you moron mythologists that entities don't create "strong arms" to keep their own
supporters down. Dumbass.
What if the judicial La Raza uses the other La Raza as their local enforcement strong arms to keep Blacks and Anglos in line and keep them voting for democrats? If the judicial La Raza raises money to promote Hispanic agendas they wouldn't allow some street gang to use the same name so they have to be affiliated.
Even more moronic. "They have the same name, therefore they must be affiliated".
This car was made by Mitsubishi. They called it "Lancer".
This car was made by Dodge. They called it "Lancer".
Hey, same name. Must be the same car.