Kyle Rittenhouse is doing well

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

The fact the court screwed up

There is no such “fact,” retard

doesn't make Rittenhouse innocent

The evidence in the case proves his innocence beyond any doubt. You are irrational and stupid.

 

[Zincwarrior]

A person has to be pretty much under the influence of some pretty hard drugs to be arguing guilt this long after the verdict. It's over. Verdict given. Not guilty, all counts.

What happened to all those lawsuits that was going to be filed against Rittenhouse? Weren't they dead bang winners? The statutes are done now.

Good for you Kyle Rittenhouse. You are a hero to the people.

He's not a hero. He's a loser who killed two people. It was legal but he was still an idiot and no hero.

 

[Hollie]

The fact the court screwed up doesn't make Rittenhouse innocent. Most murderers are never convicted.

What did the court screw up? Tell us the specific details.

Obviously you can't. You babble on with nonsense claims you can't defend.

You can't identify a single flaw in the court proceedings or jury verdict.

What a laughable joke.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He was under age to have a firearm at all, except at a range, hunting, or in the military.
He knew carrying a rifle would deliberately be provocative.
In effect, he was trying to intimidate the entire protest.
So he had violated his "self defense" rights.
He deliberately caused the situation to happen, and it was totally predictable that people would try to disarm him.

{...
Rittenhouse fired an AR-15-style weapon eight times in all during the unrest: four shots at Rosenbaum, who was unarmed; two shots at an unarmed unknown individual who kicked Rittenhouse; one fatal shot at Anthony Huber, who hit Rittenhouse with a skateboard; and one shot at Gaige Grosskreutz, who was holding a gun, according to prosecutors.
...}

Clearly there was no deadly threat that warranted any shots by Rittenhouse, and obviously 8 shots in a crowd like that is incredibly irresponsible.
It is obvious in the video that Grosskreutz had a MedTech uniform on, and was pointing his pistol up in the air when shot.
Rittenhouse's bullet went perpendicular to Grosskreutz's forearm, which can only happen when pointed up.

All wrong and proven lies

There was no protest it was a riot.

He had every right to carry a weapon and the people he shot caused the problem

No one gives up the right to self defense just by carrying a gun and he had every right to shoot them.


Grosskreutz was NOT shot in the forearm you stupid fool nor was he wearing a uniform

 

[Soupnazi630]

The fact the court screwed up doesn't make Rittenhouse innocent. Most murderers are never convicted.

They did not screw up and he murdered no one despite your racist lies

 

[EvilCat Breath]

He's not a hero. He's a loser who killed two people. It was legal but he was still an idiot and no hero.


Sorry for you but to the majority of Americans Kyle Rittenhouse is a hero. Clint Eastwood should make a movie about his bravery.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

He's not a hero. He's a loser who killed two people. It was legal but he was still an idiot and no hero.

Not people.

Criminals.

The difference matters a great deal.

 

[JoeB131]

The evidence in the case proves his innocence beyond any doubt. You are irrational and stupid.

Uh, no, the evidence is that he killed two people. Unfortunately, the judge excluded key evidence like prior bad acts.

What did the court screw up? Tell us the specific details.

Short list.

1) Not allowing the prosecution to call the people he killed "victims".
2) Not allowing video of Kyle wishing he could murder a black man into evidence
3) Not allowing video of Kyle beating up a 14 year old girl
4) Not allowing evidence of his association with the racist Proud Boys
5) Telling the jury to applaud a defense witness because he was a veteran
6) Dismissing the charge of violating curfew

Not to worry, the Civil case will take care of Shooty McFlopsweat.

Not people.

Criminals.

The difference matters a great deal.

Bob is a hate crime looking for a place to happen.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Uh, no, the evidence is that he killed two people.

Who deserved to die. Good for him.

Not allowing the prosecution to call the people he killed "victims".

They weren't victims, and that's incredibly prejudicial to call them that as a matter of fact.

Yeah... you're a fucktard alright.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Uh, no, the evidence is that he killed two people. Unfortunately, the judge excluded key evidence like prior bad acts.



Short list.

1) Not allowing the prosecution to call the people he killed "victims".
2) Not allowing video of Kyle wishing he could murder a black man into evidence
3) Not allowing video of Kyle beating up a 14 year old girl
4) Not allowing evidence of his association with the racist Proud Boys
5) Telling the jury to applaud a defense witness because he was a veteran
6) Dismissing the charge of violating curfew

Not to worry, the Civil case will take care of Shooty McFlopsweat.





Bob is a hate crime looking for a place to happen.

There was no key evidence omitted.


Once again it is irrelevant if he is a racist as racists have gthe same rights as everyone else. Any racist opinions expressed by Rittenhouse would be completely immaterial to the case the facts are that he was attacked with lethal force and intent and therefore he had every right to defend himself

The Jury's decision was righteous and correct

 

[braalian]

Why is this thread in the Health and Lifestyle section?

 

[JoeB131]

They weren't victims, and that's incredibly prejudicial to call them that as a matter of fact.

Yeah... you're a fucktard alright.

Every other murder trial, they call the people who were killed victims.

Once again it is irrelevant if he is a racist as racists have gthe same rights as everyone else. Any racist opinions expressed by Rittenhouse would be completely immaterial to the case the facts are that he was attacked with lethal force and intent and therefore he had every right to defend himself

The Jury's decision was righteous and correct

Actually, that's exactly the point. If he was a racist who was just out looking to shoot him some black people, and that's why he crossed state lines where a race riot was happening and got a gun was to shoot some darkies, then it shows a pre-disposition to violence. That blows the whole, "I was just there minding my own business scrubbing graffiti off the walls" defense right out of the water.

Why is this thread in the Health and Lifestyle section?

I think because they wanted to show Kyle with the hooker he hired.

 

[Hollie]

Uh, no, the evidence is that he killed two people. Unfortunately, the judge excluded key evidence like prior bad acts.



Short list.

1) Not allowing the prosecution to call the people he killed "victims".
2) Not allowing video of Kyle wishing he could murder a black man into evidence
3) Not allowing video of Kyle beating up a 14 year old girl
4) Not allowing evidence of his association with the racist Proud Boys
5) Telling the jury to applaud a defense witness because he was a veteran
6) Dismissing the charge of violating curfew

Not to worry, the Civil case will take care of Shooty McFlopsweat.





Bob is a hate crime looking for a place to happen.

Short llst for the goofy leftist riding the short bus.

1. ''The term “victim” denotes a person’s legal status and defines the level and extent of participation that the individual is entitled to in the criminal case.''

Here in the land where goofy leftist's hurt feelings are the subject of pointing and laughing, we have jury trials to decide legal status.

2. Not in any way materially relevant to the case. Do you have any clue as to the actual charges against Rittenhouse? Obviously you don't. Do you have any clue as to how facts related to material circumstances of the case determine what is presented in court? Obviously you don't.

3. Nothing to do with the material facts of the case.

4. See 2. and 3. above.

5. "Nov 11, 2021 · After a chaotic day in court on Wednesday, the judge in Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial encouraged the courtroom, including the jury, to applaud for a defense witness because he was a veteran.''

''After.....''

Not a part of testimony.

6. See 4. above.

There's a reason why goofy leftists who know nothing of the legal process, you know, know nothing of the legal process.

What civil case? When was that filed?

 

[JoeB131]

Short llst for the goofy leftist riding the short bus.

1. ''The term “victim” denotes a person’s legal status and defines the level and extent of participation that the individual is entitled to in the criminal case.''

Here in the land where goofy leftist's hurt feelings are the subject of pointing and laughing, we have jury trials to decide legal status.

Um, no, stopping the prosecution from calling them victims (which they were) was a big boost to the defense. And most of Judge Senile's rulings were in this vein.

2. Not in any way materially relevant to the case. Do you have any clue as to the actual charges against Rittenhouse? Obviously you don't. Do you have any clue as to how facts related to material circumstances of the case determine what is presented in court? Obviously you don't.

Actually, they have EVERYTHING to do with the case. Rittenhouse was portrayed by the defense as just this sweet kid who was going up to Kenosha to clean up some grafitti, when the mean old homeless man screamed at him and he wet his little pants. And then those meanies in the crowd were trying to beat him up (you know, instead of holding him for the cops who couldn't be bothered). So he had to randomly fire into the crowd.

But tapes of him hanging with Nazis and wishing he could shoot a black man who was running out of a CVS (why was he running? Did he just rob the place or was he just in a hurry?) blow a hole in that theory. The video of him beating the snot out of a 14 year old girl shows he was a violent shit from the start.

5. "Nov 11, 2021 · After a chaotic day in court on Wednesday, the judge in Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial encouraged the courtroom, including the jury, to applaud for a defense witness because he was a veteran.''

In short, the judge gave that witness more credibility that he really didn't merit.

 

[Hollie]

Um, no, stopping the prosecution from calling them victims (which they were) was a big boost to the defense. And most of Judge Senile's rulings were in this vein.



Actually, they have EVERYTHING to do with the case. Rittenhouse was portrayed by the defense as just this sweet kid who was going up to Kenosha to clean up some grafitti, when the mean old homeless man screamed at him and he wet his little pants. And then those meanies in the crowd were trying to beat him up (you know, instead of holding him for the cops who couldn't be bothered). So he had to randomly fire into the crowd.

But tapes of him hanging with Nazis and wishing he could shoot a black man who was running out of a CVS (why was he running? Did he just rob the place or was he just in a hurry?) blow a hole in that theory. The video of him beating the snot out of a 14 year old girl shows he was a violent shit from the start.



In short, the judge gave that witness more credibility that he really didn't merit.

Um, no. You can wail and moan all you wish to assuage your hurt feelings but ''hurt feelings'' aren't a legal argument.

All of your newest whining above, intended to assuage your hurt feelings, is not materially relevant to the case that was decided by jury in favor of Rittenhouse.

Unfortunately for leftists, juries are presented material facts of a case. Screeching, wailing leftists and their hurt feelings are not materially relevant.

You could email the UN and see if they have a sympathetic ear for your screeching and wailing.

Be sure to cc us on your email.

 

[JoeB131]

Um, no. You can wail and moan all you wish to assuage your hurt feelings but ''hurt feelings'' aren't a legal argument.

All of your newest whining above, intended to assuage your hurt feelings, is not materially relevant to the case that was decided by jury in favor of Rittenhouse.

After they had key information withheld from them by the judge...

Never trust your fate to twelve people too stupid to get out of jury duty.

 

[Hollie]

After they had key information withheld from them by the judge...

Never trust your fate to twelve people too stupid to get out of jury duty.

There was no ''key information'' withheld.

Um, unfortunately for you, the legal system doesn't function on your feelings. You want to impose your regressive ideology into matters of fact and testimony which are the relevant elements to a trial.

All of your whining has everything to do with an emotional attachment to leftist ideology and nothing to do with material facts of the case.

Never trust a whiny leftist who knows nothing of the facts but presumes his entitlement to ignorance will be taken seriously.

 

[JoeB131]

There was no ''key information'' withheld.

Then why not allow it? Because maybe if they heard what a racist little shit Kyle is, they might have come back with a different decision?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Every other murder trial, they call the people who were killed victims.



Actually, that's exactly the point. If he was a racist who was just out looking to shoot him some black people, and that's why he crossed state lines where a race riot was happening and got a gun was to shoot some darkies, then it shows a pre-disposition to violence. That blows the whole, "I was just there minding my own business scrubbing graffiti off the walls" defense right out of the water.


I think because they wanted to show Kyle with the hooker he hired.

Wrong

Racism had nothing to do with any of it. He only shot white people. It is irrelevant if he wanted to shoot someone or not as the people he shot ATTACKED him with lethal intent.

You are willfully lying and ignoring fact. Even a viuiloante has the right to self defense.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Then why not allow it? Because maybe if they heard what a racist little shit Kyle is, they might have come back with a different decision?

Because racism had nothing tyo do with it you fool

Racists have the same rights as everyone else

In your stupid world view courts exist to convict racists of any accusation because they are racists but that is not reality

Grow a brain and grow the fuck up