Kyle Rittenhouse is doing well

[Billo_Really]

Sorry you are a pussy who cant right with or without one

I am not sorry you proved me correct when I said you are a treasonous bastard who shits on the constitution WHICH YOU DID

How old are you, troll?

 

[Billo_Really]

since you are a liberal you know there is no difference between a man and woman

There are differences. No man should be married than 4 days a week.

 

[JoeB131]

See, hanging with the Proud Boys doesn't impact this trial, which was concerned solely with whether Kyle was acting in self-defense or committing murder when he shot the people either violently trying to take his means of protection or trying to kill him.

If he was a racist, and went to a racial demonstration with a gun looking for someone to shoot, then, yes, the fact he was a racist is pretty relevant to whether or not he was predisposed to go in shooting.

See, here's where the wheels fall off your tricycle. Racism didn't enter into this at all. A white guy shot some white guys. Again, racism didn't enter into it. You don't care about evidence, you don't care about proof, you only want blood, no matter how it's gotten.

Except he didn't shoot some white people at a mall or a theater or preschool like other mass shooters (and that's what he is). He went to a place where they were protesting racial injustice, after expressing his desire to shoot a black person.

So, we have your current conspiracy theory that goes along the lines of the judge suppressing evidence (irrelevant evidence), that you feel should have been introduced at trial.

Your latest conspiracy theory is that the judge was determined to get Rittenhouse acquitted.

Again, it ain't a conspiracy

In Scrutinized Kyle Rittenhouse Trial, It’s the Judge Commanding Attention (Published 2021)

Judge Bruce Schroeder, who has presided over Mr. Rittenhouse’s homicide trial, has drawn notice for sparring with prosecutors and offering historical commentary.

www.nytimes.com

One more time dipshit racists have the right to self defense. You may hate him for being a racist but he still has rights and his views on race were not relevant

It's not self defense if you leave your house with a gun looking for a fight.

You might as well argue Adam Lanza shot those preschoolers in self-defense.

As it should have been.
Not well versed in criminal jurisprudence are you?

Uh, no, his excluding that evidence has been widely criticized, as have all his other goofy decisions. Also, the guy is 75 years old, what the fuck is he still doing on the bench.

 

[Hollie]

If he was a racist, and went to a racial demonstration with a gun looking for someone to shoot, then, yes, the fact he was a racist is pretty relevant to whether or not he was predisposed to go in shooting.



Except he didn't shoot some white people at a mall or a theater or preschool like other mass shooters (and that's what he is). He went to a place where they were protesting racial injustice, after expressing his desire to shoot a black person.



Again, it ain't a conspiracy

In Scrutinized Kyle Rittenhouse Trial, It’s the Judge Commanding Attention (Published 2021)

Judge Bruce Schroeder, who has presided over Mr. Rittenhouse’s homicide trial, has drawn notice for sparring with prosecutors and offering historical commentary.

www.nytimes.com

It's not self defense if you leave your house with a gun looking for a fight.

You might as well argue Adam Lanza shot those preschoolers in self-defense.



Uh, no, his excluding that evidence has been widely criticized, as have all his other goofy decisions. Also, the guy is 75 years old, what the fuck is he still doing on the bench.

Again. Your conspiracy theories aren’t supported by facts. That’s why they’re called conspiracy theories.

“NY Slimes”? Really?

Post your credit card data so I can get past the pay wall.

 

[hadit]

If he was a racist, and went to a racial demonstration with a gun looking for someone to shoot, then, yes, the fact he was a racist is pretty relevant to whether or not he was predisposed to go in shooting.

That's stupid. Racism doesn't mean violence. And, as I will point out twice in this post, you don't have evidence that Kyle went looking for someone to shoot. In fact, his actions clearly belie that assertion, as he shot no one that wasn't a threat to him.

Except he didn't shoot some white people at a mall or a theater or preschool like other mass shooters (and that's what he is). He went to a place where they were protesting racial injustice, after expressing his desire to shoot a black person.

You just argued against your own point in a single sentence. You first complain he didn't act like a mass shooter, then claim he's a mass shooter. Pick a horse and stay on it. The bottom line has been and still is that he didn't shoot anyone who wasn't a threat to him. If he went looking for targets, he wouldn't have been walking in the crowd in the first place.

Now, you still haven't (and won't) prove that Kyle stated he wanted to shoot a black person. All you have is a video produced by an anonymous person that has an anonymous person stating that they wished they had their gun as a thief was running out of a store. Someone told you it's Kyle saying it, and you believe it. Now you insist it should have been entered as evidence. Did you ever stop to think that the prosecution looked at the video, figured out they couldn't prove it was Kyle, and decided it would just get thrown out as irrelevant anyway, so didn't bother? Or are you going with the old, "I have evidence the prosecution should have had but didn't send it to them" excuse?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

If he was a racist, and went to a racial demonstration with a gun looking for someone to shoot, then, yes, the fact he was a racist is pretty relevant to whether or not he was predisposed to go in shooting.

If pigs had wings, could they fly?

That's an awful lot of unsupported “if he…” that you are trying to treat as if any of it constitutes any sort of actual evidence of anything.

 

[Soupnazi630]

If he was a racist, and went to a racial demonstration with a gun looking for someone to shoot, then, yes, the fact he was a racist is pretty relevant to whether or not he was predisposed to go in shooting.



Except he didn't shoot some white people at a mall or a theater or preschool like other mass shooters (and that's what he is). He went to a place where they were protesting racial injustice, after expressing his desire to shoot a black person.



Again, it ain't a conspiracy

In Scrutinized Kyle Rittenhouse Trial, It’s the Judge Commanding Attention (Published 2021)

Judge Bruce Schroeder, who has presided over Mr. Rittenhouse’s homicide trial, has drawn notice for sparring with prosecutors and offering historical commentary.

www.nytimes.com

It's not self defense if you leave your house with a gun looking for a fight.

You might as well argue Adam Lanza shot those preschoolers in self-defense.



Uh, no, his excluding that evidence has been widely criticized, as have all his other goofy decisions. Also, the guy is 75 years old, what the fuck is he still doing on the bench.

It is irrelevant.

There never was a raciual demonstration it was from start to finish a mindless riot over a justified shooting.


It is self defense whther in your house or not you moron


There wass no escluded evidence as has been proven

No one was protesting racial injustice

He was not a mass shooter and you are a liar

Your every argument has been torn apart and disproven and you know it

 

[Flash]

If he was a racist, and went to a racial demonstration with a gun looking for someone to shoot, then, yes, the fact he was a racist is pretty relevant to whether or not he was predisposed to go in shooting.



Except he didn't shoot some white people at a mall or a theater or preschool like other mass shooters (and that's what he is). He went to a place where they were protesting racial injustice, after expressing his desire to shoot a black person.



Again, it ain't a conspiracy

In Scrutinized Kyle Rittenhouse Trial, It’s the Judge Commanding Attention (Published 2021)

Judge Bruce Schroeder, who has presided over Mr. Rittenhouse’s homicide trial, has drawn notice for sparring with prosecutors and offering historical commentary.

www.nytimes.com

It's not self defense if you leave your house with a gun looking for a fight.

You might as well argue Adam Lanza shot those preschoolers in self-defense.



Uh, no, his excluding that evidence has been widely criticized, as have all his other goofy decisions. Also, the guy is 75 years old, what the fuck is he still doing on the bench.

 

[JoeB131]

“NY Slimes”? Really?

Wow, yes, you guys hate objective reality and journalism. We get that.

That's stupid. Racism doesn't mean violence.

It does when it's a racist mass shooter, Wet Fart.

You just argued against your own point in a single sentence. You first complain he didn't act like a mass shooter, then claim he's a mass shooter.

I said OTHER mass shooters, Wet Fart.

It is irrelevant.

There never was a raciual demonstration it was from start to finish a mindless riot over a justified shooting.

Dude, learn to spell.
Uh, yes, it was a racial demonstration because a white cop shot a black man in the back seven times.

If pigs had wings, could they fly?

That's an awful lot of unsupported “if he…” that you are trying to treat as if any of it constitutes any sort of actual evidence of anything.

Um, that's how MOST crime is investigated, Mormon Bob. We determine a motive.

Since the jury didn't hear about his racism, didn't even get to hear the people he murdered called "victims", because Judge Senile didn't allow it, then that created an implicit bias.

If all accused people got that kind of consideration, we could empty out the jails, and we know how much you'd love that.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wow, yes, you guys hate objective reality and journalism. We get that.

It does when it's a racist mass shooter, Wet Fart.

I said OTHER mass shooters, Wet Fart.


Dude, learn to spell.
Uh, yes, it was a racial demonstration because a white cop shot a black man in the back seven times.



Um, that's how MOST crime is investigated, Mormon Bob. We determine a motive.

Since the jury didn't hear about his racism, didn't even get to hear the people he murdered called "victims", because Judge Senile didn't allow it, then that created an implicit bias.

If all accused people got that kind of consideration, we could empty out the jails, and we know how much you'd love that.

It was not a racial demonstration. It was a riot and that shooting was morally and legally justified.

There was no mass shooter, Racism is legal and was no motive here. It was self defense and he murdered no one

There was no bias and you know it

 

[JoeB131]

It was not a racial demonstration. It was a riot and that shooting was morally and legally justified.

Actually, the only violence that night was committed by Rittenhouse.

The first amendment says you have a right to demonstrate. Sorry.

If he was going there to shoot him someone because he hated black people, then yes, that goes to motive

 

[Soupnazi630]

Actually, the only violence that night was committed by Rittenhouse.

The first amendment says you have a right to demonstrate. Sorry.

If he was going there to shoot him someone because he hated black people, then yes, that goes to motive

That is a bald faced lie

Many aqcts of violence were ciommited by the rioters long before they attacked him,

The three men who attacked him were commiting acts of violence which he had to defend against.

This was a riot not a demonstration.

No it does not go to motive because none of the ppeople he shot in self defense were black

You are a failure and every point you make is based on fallacy

 

[JoeB131]

Your spelling gets worse as you get angrier... take a breath.. call down. Your fat pinup boy is a murderer.. and ruined his own life.

That is a bald faced lie

Many aqcts of violence were ciommited by the rioters long before they attacked him,

The three men who attacked him were commiting acts of violence which he had to defend against.

This was a riot not a demonstration.

No it does not go to motive because none of the ppeople he shot in self defense were black

The first man was a homeless guy who was dislodged by the demonstration. He was unarmed and half Rittenhouse's size.

The other two were trying to apprehend him for the police.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Your spelling gets worse as you get angrier... take a breath.. call down. Your fat pinup boy is a murderer.. and ruined his own life.



The first man was a homeless guy who was dislodged by the demonstration. He was unarmed and half Rittenhouse's size.

The other two were trying to apprehend him for the police.

There was no murder and you are a liar

It was a riot from start to finish it was based on a lie and unjistified.

Being homeless is irrelevant as a hgomeless person can kill you as easily as a homeowner. Rosenbaum was not half rittenhouse size. YOUR CLAIM IS A LIE. He did however violently attack rittenhouse and threatened his life THAT IS an ACT OF VIOLENCE and justifies lethal force in self defense.

The other two were NOt trying to apprehend anyone they were attempting to urder him

Dont talk about spelling boy'

You go in circles because your every claim is proven false so you try again with other lies

The facts prove you are a moron and liar

 

[JoeB131]

There was no murder and you are a liar

No, there were two murders.

It was a riot from start to finish it was based on a lie and unjistified.

Uh, there was no lie. We all watched the cops shoot Jacob Blake in the back.

Being homeless is irrelevant as a hgomeless person can kill you as easily as a homeowner. Rosenbaum was not half rittenhouse size. YOUR CLAIM IS A LIE. He did however violently attack rittenhouse and threatened his life THAT IS an ACT OF VIOLENCE and justifies lethal force in self defense.

He was a five foot two midget.. he was unarmed. He was not a threat.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No, there were two murders.



Uh, there was no lie. We all watched the cops shoot Jacob Blake in the back.


He was a five foot two midget.. he was unarmed. He was not a threat.

There were ZERO murders.

Yes as he threatened children with a knife which you lied about. It was a morally and legally jsutified shootign that is absolute fact

He was no midget. he was a threat because he attempted to take rittenhouse;s rifle away whichby definition is a lethal threat and justifies lethal force. Ity was proven and caught on film.

We saw the same thing in the Wilson Brown shooting which was also proven to be justified self defense.

Every claim you hsve made is based on lies and that is proven

 

[hadit]

It does when it's a racist mass shooter, Wet Fart.

Thank goodness we didn't have one of those in this case. They sound scary.

I said OTHER mass shooters, Wet Fart.

Right, you said he didn't act like a mass shooter.

Oh, and you might want to stop obsessing over your gas issues, it's unseemly in polite company.

 

[Hollie]

Wow, yes, you guys hate objective reality and journalism. We get that.

It does when it's a racist mass shooter, Wet Fart.

I said OTHER mass shooters, Wet Fart.


Dude, learn to spell.
Uh, yes, it was a racial demonstration because a white cop shot a black man in the back seven times.



Um, that's how MOST crime is investigated, Mormon Bob. We determine a motive.

Since the jury didn't hear about his racism, didn't even get to hear the people he murdered called "victims", because Judge Senile didn't allow it, then that created an implicit bias.

If all accused people got that kind of consideration, we could empty out the jails, and we know how much you'd love that.

There’s nothing objective about a leftist mouthpiece such as the NY Slimes.

Did you link to an opinion piece behind a paywall because you were afraid of ridicule for your conspiracy theories?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The first man was a homeless guy who was dislodged by the demonstration.

A childfucker. Not anything even close to human. Mr. Rittenhouse did the world a great service by putting down that vile creature.

 

[Hollie]

Your spelling gets worse as you get angrier... take a breath.. call down. Your fat pinup boy is a murderer.. and ruined his own life.



The first man was a homeless guy who was dislodged by the demonstration. He was unarmed and half Rittenhouse's size.

The other two were trying to apprehend him for the police.

Wait. Demonstration™ ?

Fire bombing city blocks, looting, assaults, property destruction, etc., are what normal people describe as riots.

Normal people, that is.