Good post. I know, Krugmanknows it, and; more importantly, the American people know it!!!
Good post. I know, Krugman
but as a typical liberal you lack the IQ to explain to us why you feel freedom and capitalism is bad and socialism is good?
Good post. I know, Krugman
but as a typical liberal you lack the IQ to explain to us why you feel freedom and capitalism is bad and socialism is good?
Ah so you're the guy responsible for teaching people to be stupid. Got it!
[/QUOTE]
EdwardBaiamonte doesn't have an high enough IQ to be posting in this thread
As to my OP, Krugman pwns Righties and their zany econ models for sport
If you bother to read what he said there are no reasonable Republicans, in spite of the bit of generalization he does. He's right, in that in spite of the Obama Administration offering to work with Republicans and being slapped in the face, the unprecedented obstruction, the squealing about Obama somehow being a socialist, and general antipathy towards the US by the GOP, you see that there aren't many reasonable Republicans left. Sure, there's a moment on an issue or two where some will be reasonable. But at the end of the day, they put their caucus in front of doing what's good for the nation in a way the Democrats could never have the discipline for, or notion to conceive.
The same ones who told everyone to bet the farm on high inflation the last six years? LOL! Yeah, listening to economists like them will get you broke and looking foolish. Their models couldn't withstand the economics of the real world. Krugman and other New Keynesians were able to predict the results of the policies taken, and not taken, and come out looking like prophets.
Look, when you compromise with insane people, like the GOP has become the last twenty or more years, the results are based in insanity. So, why compromise with unreasonable people for their unreasonable demands? Plus, the righties don't offer compromise to lessen their insanity.
Krugman was being tongue in cheek. You should read the blog posting one day. He used it as a way to make a point about how deficit spending in WWII ended the Great Depression. And because the GOP were complete dopes, they blocked recovery any way they could in the Great Recession.Ever since Larson stopped "The Far Side", Paul Krugman is the funniest thing in the newspaper.
Even funnier is the people who think he's serious....LOL War against Space Aliens to drive the economy!!! Woohooo!!
He had no communist parents, and even if he did, there's nothing suggesting him to be a communist. He's fairly conservative in his approach to the economy. Everyone who looks at the successes of single payer across the world, and in the US, knows it's a great watts help foster job growth in the private sector, by lowering healthcare costs.
You want to saddle the US with lower economic growth, higher deficits and see a bunch of far right nationalists end economic and personal liberty for some well heeled billionaires to control everything. You stand against everything Americans stand for. It's right wing nuts flying confederate flags and making fallacy arguments against the US Constitution and replaced with "states rights"
That guys reads as stupid as Thomas Sowell does.
Well, this is all irrelevant to American liberalism. Really, relying on Buckley, CSS Lewis and those guys will only make you look stupid, regurgitating their stupidity.
Ed simply posts conservative dogma from right wing bat shit crazy conservative web sites. He is totally incapable of rational thought or debate.He had no communist parents, and even if he did, there's nothing suggesting him to be a communist. He's fairly conservative in his approach to the economy. Everyone who looks at the successes of single payer across the world, and in the US, knows it's a great watts help foster job growth in the private sector, by lowering healthcare costs.
And his Senate votes were not especially liberal.
You want to saddle the US with lower economic growth, higher deficits and see a bunch of far right nationalists end economic and personal liberty for some well heeled billionaires to control everything. You stand against everything Americans stand for. It's right wing nuts flying confederate flags and making fallacy arguments against the US Constitution and replaced with "states rights"
Some effing traitor like you doesn't rate to question my commitment to take this country back to the America of my father and grandfathers. So listen up, Princess. If you can't debate the issues, then bow out with the last shred of your dignity.
That guys reads as stupid as Thomas Sowell does.
Well, this is all irrelevant to American liberalism. Really, relying on Buckley, CSS Lewis and those guys will only make you look stupid, regurgitating their stupidity.
Yup, just to prove you are a con tool (and a political hack), you provide a link to THE DAILY CALLER. If a progressive used a piece from MoveOn.org, you would rightly suggest that that person was a left wing tool, and not worth discussion with. Perhaps we should just have dueling right and left wing nut case web sites determining our points of view. Perfect.
So, the list of 500 is 500 divided by 15,000, or ONE IN THIRTY, OR ABOUT 3% OF ALL ECONOMISTS ARE ON THE LIST AS SUPPORTING ROMNEY You can be absolutely certain, of course, that at least 500 of those are bought and paid for by the far right. Should we assume that 97% of all economists, or something like 14,500 support Obama. Only if we are left wing nut cases with about the same integrity as someone who would use The Daily Caller as a source, like say Toro. Or, we could keep or integrity and admit that we have no clue and that sources like MoveOn or TheDailyCaller are of no rational value as sources of impartial information. You use them only to bolster those things that you may WANT to believe.
[MENTION=2926]Toro[/MENTION]
Making lite of his loss.
