Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #81
Multiple settlements by Sig Sauer say otherwise...I am not pretending to be an expert, but I know that a gun can't go off without someone pulling the trigger.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Multiple settlements by Sig Sauer say otherwise...I am not pretending to be an expert, but I know that a gun can't go off without someone pulling the trigger.
Oh I suppose in the rare situation there is some sort of manufactures defect....but that wouldn't be on the Sec.Multiple settlements by Sig Sauer say otherwise...
It shows she has no damn sense. Its basic stuff for someone who is supposedly a hunter.Oh I suppose in the rare situation there is some sort of manufactures defect....but that wouldn't be on the Sec.
She could always use the Alec Baldwin defense there, but in his case, he did pull the trigger, so she would be on even better footing in blaming someone else
To not point a gun at someone? The picture, and video really, clearly shows the barrel is not in line with his head.It shows she has no damn sense. Its basic stuff for someone who is supposedly a hunter.
Quite the opposite.To not point a gun at someone? The picture, and video really, clearly shows the barrel is not in line with his head.
Why is she posing with a rifle in the first place? She looks like Dukakis.Someone took a screen shot and in the 2-D world it appeared that way, they did that out of desperation because that's all the dembots have
No. It’s NOT the opposite, at all.Quite the opposite.
Different question. To the small extent that “optics” are the calculus, I agree that she’s better off not holding any weapon. But, either way, it is inconsequential.Why is she posing with a rifle in the first place? She looks like Dukakis.
Its looks like it is.No. It’s NOT the opposite, at all.
It’s clear the weapon isn’t aimed at his head.
Its an ID10T user error.Different question. To the small extent that “optics” are the calculus, I agree that she’s better off not holding any weapon. But, either way, it is inconsequential.
Its looks like it is.
Oh.Its an ID10T user error.
1) no the actual video shows what I saidQuite the opposite.
Why is she posing with a rifle in the first place? She looks like Dukakis.
You clearly know nothing about firearms.I am not pretending to be an expert, but I know that a gun can't go off without someone pulling the trigger.
The weapon is not aimed at anyone's head.Its looks like it is.
Its an ID10T user error.
Looks like it, with a mag in. What a dumbass.The weapon is not aimed at anyone's head.
No it doesn't. You want everyone to believe you instead of their own eyes.Looks like it, with a mag in. What a dumbass.
She is an idiot probably one in the chamber.No it doesn't. You want everyone to believe you instead of their own eyes.
Thanks for proving you're a flaming fool.She is an idiot probably one in the chamber.
You idiots pretend shit about Trump and whomever likes or works for him and it does not matter if you are wrong. That photo DOES NOT show Noem pointing that rifle at anyone. You got TDS eyes.You idiots will defend anything a MAGAturd does no matter that you know you’re wrong
Sad
only by the 21 percent that still approve of your Demafacsit party....nobody really cares about you all, hence why you all have to firebomb car dealerships to get any attention.