Krauthammer: Best GOP Field In 35 Years And We're Talking About This "Rodeo clown"

[gipper]

Not if we don't change. You are right; our ways have failed.

Change? We've changed plenty over the last 30 years, back and forth. It has not made a difference. McCain supported amnesty. Did he win the Hispanic vote?

Because the far right has not changed. They had a problem with you guys, not McCain.

Tell us again who is the far right?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Gipper is not far right. He thinks, although he is not, a libertarian.

 

[gipper]

Gipper is not far right. He thinks, although he is not, a libertarian.

Come on Jakey...tells us who is the far right.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Gipper is not far right. He thinks, although he is not, a libertarian.

Come on Jakey...tells us who is the far right.

You don't have a clue, so you won't believe me. So: you tell us. Enlighten us.

 

[gipper]

Gipper is not far right. He thinks, although he is not, a libertarian.

Come on Jakey...tells us who is the far right.

You don't have a clue, so you won't believe me. So: you tell us. Enlighten us.

define the far right for us Jakey... Cat got your keyboard?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Gipper is not far right. He thinks, although he is not, a libertarian.

Come on Jakey...tells us who is the far right.

You don't have a clue, so you won't believe me. So: you tell us. Enlighten us.

define the far right for us Jakey... Cat got your keyboard?

You can't do it, can you, gipper? Come on. Define the far right for us.

#100 is good reference for you.

 

[2aguy]

On FOX, George Will and Charles Krauthammer, both arch-Conservatives, came out swinging at Donald Trump, and hard:

Krauthammer on Trump We Have The Best Republican Field In 35 Years And We re Talking About This Rodeo Clown Video RealClearPolitics

(Video at the link, worth 3 minutes of your time)

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Well, he's tapping in, but he's essentially -- he's done it in a way that the word offensive is too weak. It's an insult. An entire immigrant group. He did not make a distinct between legal and illegal immigrants. That's his entire campaign. All our problems are from Mexico, from China, from Saudi Arabia, and Japan. He will make them pay. But that elevates him to a guy actually with ideas.

These are eruptions, barstool eruptions. And the pity is this. This is the strongest field of Republican candidates in 35 years. You could pick a dozen of them at random and have the strongest cabinet America's had in our lifetime and instead all of our time is spent discussing this rodeo clown...

Trump has decided that our problem is we need essentially an economic declaration of war on Mexico. And that's where all this is headed. Tapping in, yes, but that's not -- politics has to be slightly above tapping in. It's a way to tap in and respond responsibly. He says I'll build a wall and I'll make Mexico pay. I've been supporting building a wall for ten years, but the idea you're going to make Mexico pay is simply absurd, but he likes to tap in and to play on that. That's not serious politics.

George Will was just as hard on Trump over the Immigration stuff.

Your view?

We have given Republicans the power to stop obama…they have the house, with the "power of the purse" and the Senate, the power to confirm appointments as just two constitutional powers they have that could be used to stop obama……and they do nothing…..at all…..and then trump comes along and takes on the press and the establishment….normal republicans want a fighter….that is what Trump is above all else…..

 

[gipper]

Gipper is not far right. He thinks, although he is not, a libertarian.

Come on Jakey...tells us who is the far right.

You don't have a clue, so you won't believe me. So: you tell us. Enlighten us.

define the far right for us Jakey... Cat got your keyboard?

You can't do it, can you, gipper? Come on. Define the far right for us.

#100 is good reference for you.

Just ten names of people or organizations who comprise the far right...come on Jakey don't be a fakey.

 

[Correll]

Not if we don't change. You are right; our ways have failed.

Change? We've changed plenty over the last 30 years, back and forth. It has not made a difference. McCain supported amnesty. Did he win the Hispanic vote?

Because the far right has not changed. They had a problem with you guys, not McCain. Gipper will ask me to define the 'far right' because he does not know what else to do now.

McCain won. He was the nominee. Blaming the "far right" for his not winning the hispanic vote is just wishful thinking on your part.

You would be better served by blaming the media for lying to HIspanics about McCain being a racist.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Not if we don't change. You are right; our ways have failed.

Change? We've changed plenty over the last 30 years, back and forth. It has not made a difference. McCain supported amnesty. Did he win the Hispanic vote?

Because the far right has not changed. They had a problem with you guys, not McCain. Gipper will ask me to define the 'far right' because he does not know what else to do now.

McCain won. He was the nominee. Blaming the "far right" for his not winning the hispanic vote is just wishful thinking on your part. You would be better served by blaming the media for lying to HIspanics about McCain being a racist.

Blaming the media for being truthful about the far right's cultural McCarthyism will not help our candidates with Hispanics. You have to change your approach to getting their vote. The Hispanics overwhelming will not vote for candidates who want to send citizens to another country.

 

[Correll]

Not if we don't change. You are right; our ways have failed.

Change? We've changed plenty over the last 30 years, back and forth. It has not made a difference. McCain supported amnesty. Did he win the Hispanic vote?

Because the far right has not changed. They had a problem with you guys, not McCain. Gipper will ask me to define the 'far right' because he does not know what else to do now.

McCain won. He was the nominee. Blaming the "far right" for his not winning the hispanic vote is just wishful thinking on your part. You would be better served by blaming the media for lying to HIspanics about McCain being a racist.

Blaming the media for being truthful about the far right's cultural McCarthyism will not help our candidates with Hispanics. You have to change your approach to getting their vote. The Hispanics overwhelming will not vote for candidates who want to send citizens to another country.

THat was odd.

Was that a real honest mistake?

Because McCain was the candidate who did not win the HIspanic Vote and I suggested that the media lied about HIM being a racist.

I recall often defending McCain from accusations of racism from lefties online.

McCain was pro-amnesty and still lost the hispanic vote by more than two to one.

 

[gipper]

Not if we don't change. You are right; our ways have failed.

Change? We've changed plenty over the last 30 years, back and forth. It has not made a difference. McCain supported amnesty. Did he win the Hispanic vote?

Because the far right has not changed. They had a problem with you guys, not McCain. Gipper will ask me to define the 'far right' because he does not know what else to do now.

McCain won. He was the nominee. Blaming the "far right" for his not winning the hispanic vote is just wishful thinking on your part.

You would be better served by blaming the media for lying to HIspanics about McCain being a racist.

Fakey keeps posting about the boogie man (far right) that keeps him up at night...but he has yet to identify this nefarious force within America.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The cultural McCarthism and mccarthyites of the far right have been proven over and over to exist, so it is a nonsense comment by gipper a Com on, tell us the truth for once.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Come on, gipper, go ahead and prove you don't exist.

 

[Correll]

The cultural McCarthism and mccarthyites of the far right have been proven over and over to exist, so it is a nonsense comment by gipper a Com on, tell us the truth for once.

"Cultural McCarthism"?

That's kind of nonsensical.

McCain is a moderate. He won.

The media turned on him the moment he became a threat to their lib agenda instead of a help.

They slandered him the same way they slander the "Far Right".

Did you believe them when they slandered McCain?

 

[JakeStarkey]

The cultural McCarthism and mccarthyites of the far right have been proven over and over to exist, so it is a nonsense comment by gipper a Com on, tell us the truth for once.

"Cultural McCarthism"?

That's kind of nonsensical.

McCain is a moderate. He won.

The media turned on him the moment he became a threat to their lib agenda instead of a help.

They slandered him the same way they slander the "Far Right".

Did you believe them when they slandered McCain?

Cultural McCarthyism is as real as cultural Marxism.

The far right's nativist hatred of immigrants and "those not like us" certainly influenced the election; the media accurately reported it. Do you believe the media slandered McCain; if so, why?

 

[Correll]

The cultural McCarthism and mccarthyites of the far right have been proven over and over to exist, so it is a nonsense comment by gipper a Com on, tell us the truth for once.

"Cultural McCarthism"?

That's kind of nonsensical.

McCain is a moderate. He won.

The media turned on him the moment he became a threat to their lib agenda instead of a help.

They slandered him the same way they slander the "Far Right".

Did you believe them when they slandered McCain?

Cultural McCarthyism is as real as cultural Marxism.

The far right's nativist hatred of immigrants and "those not like us" certainly influenced the election; the media accurately reported it. Do you believe the media slandered McCain; if so, why?

"Nativist Hatred of immigrants" is nothing but spin. There are real and valid reasons to be against the current high level of immigration and calling someone a "nativist" is nothing but a cowardly intellectually dishonest dodge to avoid defending a policy based on it's merits.

I do believe the media slandered McCain.


Here is fine example.

"From the start, there have always been two separate but equal questions about race in this election. Is there still enough racism in America to prevent a black man from being elected president no matter what? And, will Republicans play the race card? The jury is out on the first question until Nov. 4. But we now have the unambiguous answer to the second: Yes."


THe whole column is a pile of slander and spin that minimizes any concerns about Obama and then assumes the reasons for making an issue of such "minor" issues must be racism.


McCain is as moderate as they come, and he lost the hispanic vote by more than two to one.

DO you believe McCain used the Race Card in 2007?

 

[JakeStarkey]

"Nativist Hatred of immigrants" is a fact of life in America since the Europeans came to the New World. Anyone who denies knows nothing of the American narrative.

 

[Correll]

"Nativist Hatred of immigrants" is a fact of life in America since the Europeans came to the New World. Anyone who denies knows nothing of the American narrative.

There are real and valid reasons to be against the current high level of immigration and calling someone a "nativist" is nothing but a cowardly intellectually dishonest dodge to avoid defending a policy based on it's merits.

And John McCain did not run a racist campaign and the lying libs in the media who said he did were lying scum and will do the same to any republicans, "far right" or moderate as hell.

 

[JakeStarkey]

"Nativist Hatred of immigrants" is a fact of life in America since the Europeans came to the New World. Anyone who denies knows nothing of the American narrative.

There are real and valid reasons to be against the current high level of immigration and calling someone a "nativist" is nothing but a cowardly intellectually dishonest dodge to avoid defending a policy based on it's merits.

And John McCain did not run a racist campaign and the lying libs in the media who said he did were lying scum and will do the same to any republicans, "far right" or moderate as hell.

Merely in your uninformed opinion.