Statistikhengst
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
Trump s Shameful Immigration Plan The American Spectator
American Spectator is about as far and hard to the Right as one can go without becoming an official fascist.
You know, when you lose the "American Spectator", which has had it's share of extreme RWNJ kooks and racists and lions and tigers and bears, oh my....
Discuss: first, do you understand where AS is going, here? Second, do you agree or disagree?
Oh, and any hope of getting those 72 virgins in the afterlife depends on spelling, punctuation and grammar within this thread...
American Spectator is about as far and hard to the Right as one can go without becoming an official fascist.
Lke most things Donald Trump says, his immigration proposal — only slightly more detailed than most of his superficial bombast — contains a few grains of rationality and a large helping of the sort of xenophobia and economic ignorance that appeals to a slice of the Republican base but which most Americans — including many Republicans — find distasteful and self-destructive...
...While the recognition of these problems is welcome — even for those of us who do not follow Mr. Trump further down his anti-immigration path — the rest of Trump’s “plan” is a bitter stew served up by a man pandering to Angry White People with ideas both fanciful and harmful.
On the fanciful side, Trump continues to beat the drum that he will “make Mexico pay for the wall.” Puhleeze. At least on this score, he offers what in Trump-world pass for details:
"Mexico must pay for the wall and, until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards — of which we issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports of entry to the United States from Mexico. [Tariffs and foreign aid cuts are also options.]"
Let’s look at these things with the brevity they deserve: How will the U.S. possibly know what remittance payments are derived from illegal wages? And even if a system were devised to determine that, don’t you think that clever people will find a way around it in less time than it takes you to read this sentence? How much money will the U.S. raise by increasing fees on temporary visas and don’t you think that Mexico would retaliate with higher fees on American tourists? (Maybe that’s how we make Mexico pay for the wall… they can take the money from Americans going to Cancun or Cabo and then send it back to us!) Also, wouldn’t raising the fee to cross the border legally simply push many of those people to cross illegally?
For each of the provisions relating to NAFTA and trade between the U.S. and Mexico, doesn’t Mr. Trump realize that the result of such policies would be to raise prices for American consumers? Tariffs are nothing more than mostly hidden taxes paid when you go to the store. If Trump’s plan to make Mexico pay for the wall were to come to pass, the big losers would be Americans.
You know, when you lose the "American Spectator", which has had it's share of extreme RWNJ kooks and racists and lions and tigers and bears, oh my....
Discuss: first, do you understand where AS is going, here? Second, do you agree or disagree?
Oh, and any hope of getting those 72 virgins in the afterlife depends on spelling, punctuation and grammar within this thread...