Has anyone managed to quote a reliable news outlet for this story yet?
So far this morning, not a sausage; I'm starting to think it's bollocks.
Kim Jong Un's executed uncle was eaten alive by 120 hungry dogs: report - World News
I started to look at this in greater detail and, the more I look, the more it looks like it's crap, based on a crap story in a crap newspaper.
Jang Song-taek Really Eaten By Dogs? - Business Insider
It turns out, this all started with a report in a wildly shite Hong Kong newspaper known for producing stories that are total bollocks.
No, Kim Jong Un probably didn?t feed his uncle to 120 hungry dogs
No, Kim Jong Un probably didnt feed his uncle to 120 hungry dogs
Basically, whilst it is very clear, the Kims are total twats, this story was invented and spewed out as truth for morons to believe without checking because they want to hate who they're told to hate.
Of course, this isn't a defence of North Korea's idiot leadership, just pointing out how stupid it is to believe any old shit.
How foolish do you feel now you know it was all a lie?