Kim Davis goes back to jail on which day? Place your bets.

[Skylar]

She was elected to rubber stamp county documents, file the copies and maintain them for future use.

lol, clerks don't just 'rubber stamp' documents, moron. They are held responsible for what they put their names on and she didn't want her name associated with the mockery of marriage by the poop pumping Fag Mafia.

She has no authority to deny those services to any eligible citizen. Nor to create religious 'tests' that eligible citizens must 'pass' in order to receive state services. Worse, her use of State power to force people to obey her religious beliefs is an obvious violation of the 1st amendment's prohibition against the government's establishment of religion.

She has no legal leg to stand on.

She has EVERY RIGHT to not sign something that she has a moral objection too.

Not when she's wielding state power. Again, she lacks the authority to invent religious tests for citizens to receive state services. If she does, she'll be checked. And should be.

And again, the judge offered her a perfectly reasonable compromise: let any of the 5 deputy clerks who were willing to issue marriage licenses for same sex couples to do so. Davis refused, insisting she would interfere with any attempt by any clerk to issue such a license.

She's using the State to force her religion on people. The public and the deputy clerks. And she doesn't have authority to do either.

Just like we hung a bunch of your fellow Nazi bastards at the end of WW2 for signing documents while 'just following orders', the law does not excuse the clerk that contributes to an evil system.

You may equate issuing a marriage license with the murder of millions. But no rational person would.

There's a reason your ilk lost this legal argument: your arguments are quite irrational.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Well we know she won't obey the law or the court so my bet is Saturday or Monday if she returns to work on Thursday. Saturday is a slow news day so that would be a good one. Any takers?

Why are you so frightened and threatened by an individual's beliefs and convictions?

Oh yeah- you're a Liberal piece of shit.

No one is frightened. Rational people understand issue's of this magnitude can not be decided by a county clerk with character issue's. She was elected to rubber stamp county documents, file the copies and maintain them for future use.

Exactly. She has no authority to invent a religious test that eligible citizens have to 'pass' in order to receive state services. She has no legal basis to deny those services or to impose her religious beliefs using the power of the State.

If she could, then I'd be concerned.

IF you could ever find yourself in agreement with someone exercising their conscience when it run against the libtard agenda I think you would shit yourself.

5 of the 6 deputy clerks were more than willing to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples. And the judge offered Davis a perfectly reasonable comprimise: let one of the other clerks issue the licenses.

Davis refused insisting she would do everything in her power to interfere with any clerk attempting to do so.

She's imposing her religion on her fellow clerks AND the general public. And she has no authority to do so. She can't make up religious tests that citizens must pass to receive state services. She can't use the State to force people to obey her religion.

Which is why she lost.

She was objecting to her name remaining on the licenses and the judge finally agreed to having her name removed from them.

She won, dumbass.

Not when she's exercising state power and using it to force people to obey her religion.

She wasn't forcing anyone to do anything. She was refusing to participate in a perversion of marriage. The fags could have gone to another county, but instead they were coming from across the state to try and force the woman to giving in and signing on to fag marriage.

No one was being forced other than her and all your bullshit spin is not going to work with anyone that is not a libtard like yourself.

That's the establishment of religion. And its explicitly forbidden.

It is not an establishment of religion, and your repeated ignorance does not make it so.

She lost for a reason. She lacks the authority to deny eligible same sex couples marriage licenses. She's not empowered to create religious tests or to use State power to force people to obey her religion.

She won for a reason, the state has no authority to force her to do something that violates her moral beliefs.

Nah, I just disagree with you. And so does every court to hear the case.

Get used to the idea. Neither is likely to change.

That is more bullshit, several courts disagreed and had they not it would never have gone to the SCOTUS.

Lol, you are so full of shyte and you have no clue.

 

[JimBowie1958]

She was elected to rubber stamp county documents, file the copies and maintain them for future use.

lol, clerks don't just 'rubber stamp' documents, moron. They are held responsible for what they put their names on and she didn't want her name associated with the mockery of marriage by the poop pumping Fag Mafia.

She has no authority to deny those services to any eligible citizen. Nor to create religious 'tests' that eligible citizens must 'pass' in order to receive state services. Worse, her use of State power to force people to obey her religious beliefs is an obvious violation of the 1st amendment's prohibition against the government's establishment of religion.

She has no legal leg to stand on.

She has EVERY RIGHT to not sign something that she has a moral objection too.

Not when she's wielding state power. Again, she lacks the authority to invent religious tests for citizens to receive state services. If she does, she'll be checked. And should be.

And again, the judge offered her a perfectly reasonable compromise: let any of the 5 deputy clerks who were willing to issue marriage licenses for same sex couples to do so. Davis refused, insisting she would interfere with any attempt by any clerk to issue such a license.

She's using the State to force her religion on people. The public and the deputy clerks. And she doesn't have authority to do either.

Just like we hung a bunch of your fellow Nazi bastards at the end of WW2 for signing documents while 'just following orders', the law does not excuse the clerk that contributes to an evil system.

You may equate issuing a marriage license with the murder of millions. But no rational person would.

There's a reason your ilk lost this legal argument: your arguments are quite irrational.

You keep saying she and other Christians lost, but she did not sign a fag marriage license and she is no longer in jail and no licenses have been issued to buttfucking queers with her name on it.

We won, idiot.

 

[Skylar]

Why are you so frightened and threatened by an individual's beliefs and convictions?

Oh yeah- you're a Liberal piece of shit.

No one is frightened. Rational people understand issue's of this magnitude can not be decided by a county clerk with character issue's. She was elected to rubber stamp county documents, file the copies and maintain them for future use.

Exactly. She has no authority to invent a religious test that eligible citizens have to 'pass' in order to receive state services. She has no legal basis to deny those services or to impose her religious beliefs using the power of the State.

If she could, then I'd be concerned.

IF you could ever find yourself in agreement with someone exercising their conscience when it run against the libtard agenda I think you would shit yourself.

5 of the 6 deputy clerks were more than willing to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples. And the judge offered Davis a perfectly reasonable comprimise: let one of the other clerks issue the licenses.

Davis refused insisting she would do everything in her power to interfere with any clerk attempting to do so.

She's imposing her religion on her fellow clerks AND the general public. And she has no authority to do so. She can't make up religious tests that citizens must pass to receive state services. She can't use the State to force people to obey her religion.

Which is why she lost.

She was objecting to her name remaining on the licenses and the judge finally agreed to having her name removed from them.

She won, dumbass.

Same sex couples can now get marriage licenses in Rowan county at will. Sounds like a win-win to me.

Davis is insisting that the licenses aren't valid without her name. And once again, she has no legal leg to stand on. Oh, and the judge didn't agree to take her name off the licenses. The deputies just altered the licenses to remove Davis' name. Davis could have ordered this at any time.

Instead, she tried to interfere with any deputy clerk issuing said license. Davis has apparently learned the error of her ways.

She wasn't forcing anyone to do anything.

When she was denying same sex couples marriage licenses, she was using her power as an elected official wielding state power to force people to pass a religious test she made up.

She lacks the authority to do this. As demonstrated by the jail time and the marriage licenses being issued without Davis' religious test.

Get used to the idea.

It is not an establishment of religion, and your repeated ignorance does not make it so.

Obviously it is. When she uses state power to force people to obey her religion, that's the state establishment of religion. She can hold any personal conviction she wishes. When she forces those religious beliefs on unwilling people using state power, she crosses a line.

And she was checked. And clearly should have been.

]

That is more bullshit, serval courts disagreed and had they not it would never have gone to the SCOTUS.

Name one that sided with Davis on this issue. Davis appealed because she lost. Not because she won. Her record of failure was perfect.

 

[Skylar]

She was elected to rubber stamp county documents, file the copies and maintain them for future use.

lol, clerks don't just 'rubber stamp' documents, moron. They are held responsible for what they put their names on and she didn't want her name associated with the mockery of marriage by the poop pumping Fag Mafia.

She has no authority to deny those services to any eligible citizen. Nor to create religious 'tests' that eligible citizens must 'pass' in order to receive state services. Worse, her use of State power to force people to obey her religious beliefs is an obvious violation of the 1st amendment's prohibition against the government's establishment of religion.

She has no legal leg to stand on.

She has EVERY RIGHT to not sign something that she has a moral objection too.

Not when she's wielding state power. Again, she lacks the authority to invent religious tests for citizens to receive state services. If she does, she'll be checked. And should be.

And again, the judge offered her a perfectly reasonable compromise: let any of the 5 deputy clerks who were willing to issue marriage licenses for same sex couples to do so. Davis refused, insisting she would interfere with any attempt by any clerk to issue such a license.

She's using the State to force her religion on people. The public and the deputy clerks. And she doesn't have authority to do either.

Just like we hung a bunch of your fellow Nazi bastards at the end of WW2 for signing documents while 'just following orders', the law does not excuse the clerk that contributes to an evil system.

You may equate issuing a marriage license with the murder of millions. But no rational person would.

There's a reason your ilk lost this legal argument: your arguments are quite irrational.

You keep saying she and other Christians lost, but she did not sign a fag marriage license and she is no longer in jail and no licenses have been issued to buttfucking queers with her name on it.

We won, idiot.

As long as same sex couples can get marriage licenses at will in Rowan county, you tell yourself whatever gets you through the day.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Same sex couples can now get marriage licenses in Rowan county at will. Sounds like a win-win to me.

Fags could marry anywhere in the state before that, and the only reason that they couldn't in Rowan was because the judge would not take Davis name from the licenses. Now that he has things are back to a better condition with the government being forced to respect freedom of conscience.

Davis is insisting that the licenses aren't valid without her name. And once again, she has no legal leg to stand on. Oh, and the judge didn't agree to take her name off the licenses. The deputies just altered the licenses to remove Davis' name. Davis could have ordered this at any time.

You are a bald faced liar. It is now well reported that the judge had finally agreed to Davis request to remove her name from the licenses. Your ignorance again proves nothing more than your ignorance.

When she was denying same sex couples marriage licenses, she was using her power as an elected official wielding state power to force people to pass a religious test she made up.

There was no test. Prove what test she had for them.

It is not an establishment of religion, and your repeated ignorance does not make it so.

Obviously it is. When she uses state power to force people to obey her religion, that's the state establishment of religion.

She did not force people to obey her religion as they could easily go elsewhere, thus no one was forced.

But your head is forced.....

That is more bullshit, serval courts disagreed and had they not it would never have gone to the SCOTUS.

Name one that sided with Davis on this issue. Davis appealed because she lost. Not because she won. Her record of failure was perfect.

The federal court in Puerto Rico for one. He struck down a fag marriage law, and though this is not a direct agreement with Davis, which I didn't say anyway, it does agree with her beliefs about fag marriage.

Bucking trend, federal judge upholds same-sex marriage ban in Puerto Rico, citing ‘procreative potential’

Ahhh, it is so sad to see liars like you frothing around in one lie after another in a day where anyone can query up anything that has happened on the internet, lol.

 

[JimBowie1958]

lol, clerks don't just 'rubber stamp' documents, moron. They are held responsible for what they put their names on and she didn't want her name associated with the mockery of marriage by the poop pumping Fag Mafia.

She has no authority to deny those services to any eligible citizen. Nor to create religious 'tests' that eligible citizens must 'pass' in order to receive state services. Worse, her use of State power to force people to obey her religious beliefs is an obvious violation of the 1st amendment's prohibition against the government's establishment of religion.

She has no legal leg to stand on.

She has EVERY RIGHT to not sign something that she has a moral objection too.

Not when she's wielding state power. Again, she lacks the authority to invent religious tests for citizens to receive state services. If she does, she'll be checked. And should be.

And again, the judge offered her a perfectly reasonable compromise: let any of the 5 deputy clerks who were willing to issue marriage licenses for same sex couples to do so. Davis refused, insisting she would interfere with any attempt by any clerk to issue such a license.

She's using the State to force her religion on people. The public and the deputy clerks. And she doesn't have authority to do either.

Just like we hung a bunch of your fellow Nazi bastards at the end of WW2 for signing documents while 'just following orders', the law does not excuse the clerk that contributes to an evil system.

You may equate issuing a marriage license with the murder of millions. But no rational person would.

There's a reason your ilk lost this legal argument: your arguments are quite irrational.

You keep saying she and other Christians lost, but she did not sign a fag marriage license and she is no longer in jail and no licenses have been issued to buttfucking queers with her name on it.

We won, idiot.

As long as same sex couples can get marriage licenses at will in Rowan county, you tell yourself whatever gets you through the day.

Why should I care about how many counties can now sanction buggery when the SCOTUS has established the right to redefine any word in the dictionary to mean any damned thing it wants it to? That is far more troubling, as the precedent will live longer than the publics tolerance for buggery.

 

[Skylar]

Same sex couples can now get marriage licenses in Rowan county at will. Sounds like a win-win to me.

Fags could marry anywhere in the state before that, and the only reason that they couldn't in Rowan was because the judge would not take Davis name from the licenses. Now that he has things are back to a better condition with the government being forced to respect freedom of conscience.

Again, the judge didn't take her name off the licenses. Her fellow deputies did that. They just altered the form. Davis is still insisting that the licenses aren't valid. The State of Kentucky says otherwise.

Davis loses again. And same sex couples win. Notice a pattern yet?

You are a bald faced liar. It is now well reported that the judge had finally agreed to Davis request to remove her name from the licenses. Your ignorance again proves nothing more than your ignorance.

Show me the judge agreeing to do this. You'll find you straight up imagined it. Remember Davis is still arguing that licenses aren't valid without her name. Kicking the stuffing out of your imaginary narrative that she was 'allowed' to take her name off the licenses.

Oh, and I'm still waiting for you to show me the 'several' court cases that Davis won regarding this issue. Like the judge allowing her to take her name off the licenses, you'll have to dig deep into your imagination yet again to find those cases.

There was no test. Prove what test she had for them.

The couples had to be compatible with her 'religious conviction'. Since they weren't, she denied state services.

She lacks the authority to make up such a test. No one has to abide her 'religious conviction' to receive state services. Her religious tests are legally invalid and gloriously irrelevant.

She did not force people to obey her religion as they could easily go elsewhere, thus no one was forced.

Of course she did. She forced the folks of Rowan county who came to County Clerk's office to abide her religion. And forced her fellow deputies to obey her religion.

She was rightly checked as she lacks the authority to do so. And still does.

 

[Skylar]

The federal court in Puerto Rico for one. He struck down a fag marriage law, and though this is not a direct agreement with Davis, which I didn't say anyway, it does agree with her beliefs about fag marriage.

The Federal Court in Puerto Rico didn't hear Davis' case. Probably because Davis doesn't live in Puerto Rico. And that federal court ruling was overturned by the Obergefell ruling.

Davis' perfect record of failure came *after* the Obergefell ruling. Every court to hear her case ruled against her. And rightly so. Her argument was quite awful.

 

[Skylar]

She has no authority to deny those services to any eligible citizen. Nor to create religious 'tests' that eligible citizens must 'pass' in order to receive state services. Worse, her use of State power to force people to obey her religious beliefs is an obvious violation of the 1st amendment's prohibition against the government's establishment of religion.

She has no legal leg to stand on.

She has EVERY RIGHT to not sign something that she has a moral objection too.

Not when she's wielding state power. Again, she lacks the authority to invent religious tests for citizens to receive state services. If she does, she'll be checked. And should be.

And again, the judge offered her a perfectly reasonable compromise: let any of the 5 deputy clerks who were willing to issue marriage licenses for same sex couples to do so. Davis refused, insisting she would interfere with any attempt by any clerk to issue such a license.

She's using the State to force her religion on people. The public and the deputy clerks. And she doesn't have authority to do either.

Just like we hung a bunch of your fellow Nazi bastards at the end of WW2 for signing documents while 'just following orders', the law does not excuse the clerk that contributes to an evil system.

You may equate issuing a marriage license with the murder of millions. But no rational person would.

There's a reason your ilk lost this legal argument: your arguments are quite irrational.

You keep saying she and other Christians lost, but she did not sign a fag marriage license and she is no longer in jail and no licenses have been issued to buttfucking queers with her name on it.

We won, idiot.

As long as same sex couples can get marriage licenses at will in Rowan county, you tell yourself whatever gets you through the day.

Why should I care about how many counties can now sanction buggery when the SCOTUS has established the right to redefine any word in the dictionary to mean any damned thing it wants it to? That is far more troubling, as the precedent will live longer than the publics tolerance for buggery.

Given that the public supports same sex marriage by pretty wide margins....

.... even your 'public tolerance' argument is meaningless clap trap. Say it with me.....'record high'.

 

[paperview]

The federal court in Puerto Rico for one. He struck down a fag marriage law, and though this is not a direct agreement with Davis, which I didn't say anyway, it does agree with her beliefs about fag marriage.

The Federal Court in Puerto Rico didn't hear Davis' case. Probably because Davis doesn't live in Puerto Rico. And that federal court ruling was overturned by the Obergefell ruling.

Davis' perfect record of failure came *after* the Obergefell ruling. Every court to hear her case ruled against her. And rightly so. Her argument was quite awful.

Skyler: Name one court that sided with Davis on this issue.

JB: Well, in Puerto Rico...

a year ago...

 

[Skylar]

The federal court in Puerto Rico for one. He struck down a fag marriage law, and though this is not a direct agreement with Davis, which I didn't say anyway, it does agree with her beliefs about fag marriage.

The Federal Court in Puerto Rico didn't hear Davis' case. Probably because Davis doesn't live in Puerto Rico. And that federal court ruling was overturned by the Obergefell ruling.

Davis' perfect record of failure came *after* the Obergefell ruling. Every court to hear her case ruled against her. And rightly so. Her argument was quite awful.

Skyler: Name one court that sided with Davis on this issue.

JB: Well, in Puerto Rico...

I'm sure to JB it feels true. If only reality worked that way.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The federal court in Puerto Rico for one. He struck down a fag marriage law, and though this is not a direct agreement with Davis, which I didn't say anyway, it does agree with her beliefs about fag marriage.

The Federal Court in Puerto Rico didn't hear Davis' case.

I didn't say that they did.

lol, I said that SCOTUS decision on Fag Marriage had courts go against Fag Marriage and I said nothing about Davis particular case other than that some courts agreed that Fag Marriage was not a Constitutional right.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The federal court in Puerto Rico for one. He struck down a fag marriage law, and though this is not a direct agreement with Davis, which I didn't say anyway, it does agree with her beliefs about fag marriage.

The Federal Court in Puerto Rico didn't hear Davis' case. Probably because Davis doesn't live in Puerto Rico. And that federal court ruling was overturned by the Obergefell ruling.

Davis' perfect record of failure came *after* the Obergefell ruling. Every court to hear her case ruled against her. And rightly so. Her argument was quite awful.

Skyler: Name one court that sided with Davis on this issue.

JB: Well, in Puerto Rico...

a year ago...

You think ho w long it has been since a decision has been granted is relevant?

Geesh, you are dumber than the rest! Congratulations, doofus.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The federal court in Puerto Rico for one. He struck down a fag marriage law, and though this is not a direct agreement with Davis, which I didn't say anyway, it does agree with her beliefs about fag marriage.

The Federal Court in Puerto Rico didn't hear Davis' case. Probably because Davis doesn't live in Puerto Rico. And that federal court ruling was overturned by the Obergefell ruling.

Davis' perfect record of failure came *after* the Obergefell ruling. Every court to hear her case ruled against her. And rightly so. Her argument was quite awful.

Skyler: Name one court that sided with Davis on this issue.

JB: Well, in Puerto Rico...

I'm sure to JB it feels true. If only reality worked that way.

What I said is true, but what you deliberately spun my statement into was never true and I never stated it was.

I guess you libtards have to celebrate what you can get these days.

 

[JimBowie1958]

.... even your 'public tolerance' argument is meaningless clap trap. Say it with me.....'record high'.

Lol bullshit stats on polls that change their question from 'Do you believe homosexual marriage does anything good or bad to society?' to 'Should gay marriage be given equal treatment under the law?' does not prove a damned thing.


The publics tolerance for faggot marriage is changing after the SCOTUS ruling as they see the consequences of that bullshit running full course. And it is going to only get worse till some crisis forces revision of the libtard laws.

Then I hope you enjoy your stay in the Fag Camp.

 

[bodecea]

She was elected to rubber stamp county documents, file the copies and maintain them for future use.

lol, clerks don't just 'rubber stamp' documents, moron. They are held responsible for what they put their names on and she didn't want her name associated with the mockery of marriage by the poop pumping Fag Mafia.

She has no authority to deny those services to any eligible citizen. Nor to create religious 'tests' that eligible citizens must 'pass' in order to receive state services. Worse, her use of State power to force people to obey her religious beliefs is an obvious violation of the 1st amendment's prohibition against the government's establishment of religion.

She has no legal leg to stand on.

She has EVERY RIGHT to not sign something that she has a moral objection too.

Not when she's wielding state power. Again, she lacks the authority to invent religious tests for citizens to receive state services. If she does, she'll be checked. And should be.

And again, the judge offered her a perfectly reasonable compromise: let any of the 5 deputy clerks who were willing to issue marriage licenses for same sex couples to do so. Davis refused, insisting she would interfere with any attempt by any clerk to issue such a license.

She's using the State to force her religion on people. The public and the deputy clerks. And she doesn't have authority to do either.

Just like we hung a bunch of your fellow Nazi bastards at the end of WW2 for signing documents while 'just following orders', the law does not excuse the clerk that contributes to an evil system.

You may equate issuing a marriage license with the murder of millions. But no rational person would.

There's a reason your ilk lost this legal argument: your arguments are quite irrational.

You keep saying she and other Christians lost, but she did not sign a fag marriage license and she is no longer in jail and no licenses have been issued to buttfucking queers with her name on it.

We won, idiot.

Nope...gay couples are getting their legal marriage licenses in that county....and that's as it should be.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Fags could marry anywhere in the state before that, and the only reason that they couldn't in Rowan was because the judge would not take Davis name from the licenses. Now that he has things are back to a better condition with the government being forced to respect freedom of conscience.

Again, the judge didn't take her name off the licenses. Her fellow deputies did that. They just altered the form.

The judge finally allowed it, which he didn't at the time he sent her to jail.

You are a bald faced liar. It is now well reported that the judge had finally agreed to Davis request to remove her name from the licenses. Your ignorance again proves nothing more than your ignorance.

Show me the judge agreeing to do this.

"Davis had refused to issue marriage licenses to any couples, gay or straight, since late June when the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage. She has said that same-sex marriage conflicts with her religious convictions and that she could not issue a license under her name to a same-sex couple.

Bunning ordered Davis to issue marriage licenses and jailed her for contempt on Thursday after she refused. He released Davis on Tuesday, however, saying that with deputy clerks issuing licenses, he was satisfied the office was fulfilling its obligation."

Read more here: Marriage licenses issued since Friday in Rowan County were altered to remove Kim Davis' name

The clerks had been issuing the licenses for days before the judge finally relented and let them issue them without Davis' name on them. A win for religious liberty.

Oh, and I'm still waiting for you to show me the 'several' court cases that Davis won regarding this issue. Like the judge allowing her to take her name off the licenses, you'll have to dig deep into your imagination yet again to find those cases.

I never said Davis did. I said some courts agreed with her conviction that Fag marriages were not valid.

There was no test. Prove what test she had for them.

The couples had to be compatible with her 'religious conviction'. Since they weren't, she denied state services.

That is not a religious test, idiot. It isn't even a test. A test asks the testee to do some action then judges pass or fail on that action. That never happened to any fagots that went to her for a marriage license. IT did happen to her.

Secularism is the new religion and it is part of our federal government now.

She did not force people to obey her religion as they could easily go elsewhere, thus no one was forced.

Of course she did. She forced the folks of Rowan county who came to County Clerk's office to abide her religion. And forced her fellow deputies to obey her religion..

She did not force them to do anything. That again is your failed narrative here that Davis was forcing her religion on anyone when she was the one sent to jail for trying to remain faithful to her religion.

roflmao, do you libtards ever get tired of lying? No, of course not, but do you get tired of trying to keep track of all your lies? That would appear to be a no as well.

 

[JimBowie1958]

lol, clerks don't just 'rubber stamp' documents, moron. They are held responsible for what they put their names on and she didn't want her name associated with the mockery of marriage by the poop pumping Fag Mafia.

She has no authority to deny those services to any eligible citizen. Nor to create religious 'tests' that eligible citizens must 'pass' in order to receive state services. Worse, her use of State power to force people to obey her religious beliefs is an obvious violation of the 1st amendment's prohibition against the government's establishment of religion.

She has no legal leg to stand on.

She has EVERY RIGHT to not sign something that she has a moral objection too.

Not when she's wielding state power. Again, she lacks the authority to invent religious tests for citizens to receive state services. If she does, she'll be checked. And should be.

And again, the judge offered her a perfectly reasonable compromise: let any of the 5 deputy clerks who were willing to issue marriage licenses for same sex couples to do so. Davis refused, insisting she would interfere with any attempt by any clerk to issue such a license.

She's using the State to force her religion on people. The public and the deputy clerks. And she doesn't have authority to do either.

Just like we hung a bunch of your fellow Nazi bastards at the end of WW2 for signing documents while 'just following orders', the law does not excuse the clerk that contributes to an evil system.

You may equate issuing a marriage license with the murder of millions. But no rational person would.

There's a reason your ilk lost this legal argument: your arguments are quite irrational.

You keep saying she and other Christians lost, but she did not sign a fag marriage license and she is no longer in jail and no licenses have been issued to buttfucking queers with her name on it.

We won, idiot.

Nope...gay couples are getting their legal marriage licenses in that county....and that's as it should be.

And not a single one of them has Kim Davis' signature on them.

lol, so sad you cant accept reality even when it bites you in the ass.

 

[Skylar]

The federal court in Puerto Rico for one. He struck down a fag marriage law, and though this is not a direct agreement with Davis, which I didn't say anyway, it does agree with her beliefs about fag marriage.

The Federal Court in Puerto Rico didn't hear Davis' case.

I didn't say that they did.

lol, I said that SCOTUS decision on Fag Marriage had courts go against Fag Marriage and I said nothing about Davis particular case other than that some courts agreed that Fag Marriage was not a Constitutional right.

'The case' we're talking about is Davis' case.

And even you've been forced to admit that her record of failure is perfect. That no court to hear the case has sided with her. Every single one has sided against her.

As well they should have. Her argument was quite awful. And, of course, still is.