Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deported to El Salvador, is on his way back to the U.S. to face criminal charges - human trafficking. He's been indicted

[excalibur]

You should do a bit of research before making such a fool of yourself.

AI Overview

Information related to Kilmar Abrego Garcia's deportation reveals that his right to
due process was violated.
Specifically, this meant that he was not given the opportunity to:

• Defend his rights in court: Despite having been granted legal status that protected him from removal, he was deported without a fair hearing where he could present his case.
• Challenge the accusations against him: The deportation took place without providing him the chance to see or contest the evidence used to justify his removal.

This violation of due process occurred despite:

• His legal status: Abrego Garcia had been granted "withholding of removal," a legal status that should have prevented his deportation to El Salvador.
• The government's acknowledgment of the error: The Trump administration later admitted that his deportation was an "administrative error".

The importance of due process in deportation cases is highlighted by legal precedents:

• The Fifth and 14th Amendments guarantee due process rights to all individuals within U.S. borders, regardless of immigration status.
• The Supreme Court has consistently affirmed that even non-citizens have the right to challenge their detention and removal through legal processes.

Therefore, in Abrego Garcia's case, the denial of due process stripped him of his fundamental right to a fair legal process before being deprived of his liberty through deportation.

He had an immigration court appearance and was ordered removed years ago.

He timely appealed to BIA and they upheld the removal order.

He waived any further appeal rights at that time, thus time-barred from any appeal of the order of removal.

The only question is could he be removed to El Salvador. That's it.

Now your buddy is facing 20+ years in prison because you and yours agitated to bring him back. Congratulations!

 

[Luckyone]

A denial of what he does not have does then in turn create more things the pitiful one is having “improperly administrated” upon him

The idea is the principle of the law, which in turn affects us all.

What he personally does has nothing to do with that. They are two completely different things, if in effect we are a country that believes in the Constitution.

If you think vigilantism is the way to go, move to another country (like Venezuela), where what one man says and does, is the law of the land.

 

[theHawk]

For fascists yes

It’s fascists to charge a human trafficker with human trafficking?

 

[konradv]

Yeah, like what?

"When you explain why you beat your wife, say "mi esposa," not, "la puta Americana?" Call the slaves you trafficked, "los Caballeros, no "pinche pollos?"

This is not a nuanced guy, but he'll take an interpreter if it's a free service.

Illegals come to the country for free stuff. That's why Biden's handlers were so sure they'd be loyal Democrat voters.

You’re a idiot!

 

[krichton]

It’s fascists to charge a human trafficker with human trafficking?

Was he ever charged with human trafficking? Was he indicted or convicted of human trafficking?

 

[krichton]

Because they are citizens
Different strokes for different folks

The constitution makes no such distinction. The law is the law.

 

[WEATHER53]

The constitution makes no such distinction. The law is the law.

It identifies persons of America with no reference to those of foreign lands

 

[pknopp]

pk...you are a great American !

I am pretty sure LEOs are well trained in the Human Traffic area and when the Grand Jury brings back a indictment...my $$$ is on a conviction.

Which will be fine if that is what a jury finds for.

 

[pknopp]

Did you all have that same stance when it was trump on trial?

Bugger off. I am one person, not a "you all".

 

[TimFitz]

Was he ever charged with human trafficking? Was he indicted or convicted of human trafficking?

Was there even a mention of any connection to trafficking before Friday last.

 

[Independent thinker]

So, this illegal alien that Democrats fought so hard over is now indicted on human trafficking charges.

The man some of you cried over, a human trafficker.

Aren't you proud of yourselves?

I say if he's found guilty, we should send him to El Salvador.

 

[Mack The Finger]

Which will be fine if that is what a jury finds for.

I forgot to add-FEDERAL to the grand jury jawn.

I have a friend who got life w/o by the FEDs for selling drugs.

He wrote me...the FEDs offered him a plea if gave up other people.

He is a old school Italian Philly gangster and wouldn't take it.

 

[Mack The Finger]

Bugger off. I am one person, not a "you all".

We say youse in Philly.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Bugger off. I am one person, not a "you all".

those generalizations usually are a thing with dems...so...Just doing as romans do...

 

[ThisIsMe]

??? what does one thing have to do with the other. Trump did Garcia an injustice. He harmed the man and harmed our laws.

In the case you provided (which I do not know the details of), common sense tells me that they did it to protect their legal lives but in doing so,

No, they didnt want brown people in their neighborhood. Illegals are ok until it happens to them. Basically NIMBY...

. They were just removed and sent elsewhere.

Why were they sent elsewhere? Why didnt the liberals allow them to stay in MV? What due process were those people given when they were evicted from one place and sent to another? What if they didn't want to leave? Maybe they liked it in MV..

Illegals do not have the same rights as Americans do, AS FAR as where they are to live and be taken care of.

Why not? They are apparently afforded every other right Americans get...except when they are put in places where rich liberals live, then they don't have the same rights?

No LEGAL rights were affected. In Garcia's case, his legal right was affected.

Sure they were. Their legal right to remain in MV was violated. Again, if they have the legal right to be here, why are people allowed to evict them from certain places? They have the freedom to move about the country, dont they?

 

[Seymour Flops]

You should do a bit of research before making such a fool of yourself.

AI Overview

Information related to Kilmar Abrego Garcia's deportation reveals that his right to
due process was violated.
Specifically, this meant that he was not given the opportunity to:

• Defend his rights in court: Despite having been granted legal status that protected him from removal, he was deported without a fair hearing where he could present his case.
• Challenge the accusations against him: The deportation took place without providing him the chance to see or contest the evidence used to justify his removal.

This violation of due process occurred despite:

• His legal status: Abrego Garcia had been granted "withholding of removal," a legal status that should have prevented his deportation to El Salvador.
• The government's acknowledgment of the error: The Trump administration later admitted that his deportation was an "administrative error".

The importance of due process in deportation cases is highlighted by legal precedents:

• The Fifth and 14th Amendments guarantee due process rights to all individuals within U.S. borders, regardless of immigration status.
• The Supreme Court has consistently affirmed that even non-citizens have the right to challenge their detention and removal through legal processes.

Therefore, in Abrego Garcia's case, the denial of due process stripped him of his fundamental right to a fair legal process before being deprived of his liberty through deportation.

A good example of why not to trust AI as a,source of facts.

AI knows only what it "learns" from the internet. This:

His legal status: Abrego Garcia had been granted "withholding of removal,"

is false, but repeated many times online. He had protection from bei g sentvto ElSalvador, not "witholdimg of removal.

Garbage in-garbage out.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Which will be fine if that is what a jury finds for.

What if a jury finds him not guilty. Can he legally be deported immediately?

 

[pknopp]

those generalizations usually are a thing with dems...so...Just doing as romans do...

Not a Dem either. You must be since you do as they do.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Not a Dem either. You must be since you do as they do.

yes...i am a democrat..........


........



You may not be a dem but you appear to take their side on a lot of issues.

 

[pknopp]

yes...i am a democrat..........


........



You may not be a dem but you appear to take their side on a lot of issues.

when I support 2nd Amendment issues?

When I support pro-life issues?

When I argue for a balanced budget?

When I support Constitutionally granted protections? That must be it. To you that makes me a (D). If so what does it make (R)'s?