Killing Ragheads for Jesus: American Sniper

[007]

Poor little progtard pajama boys... just gotta hate on the military because they're too pussy to be one of them.

 

[Osomir]

You morons do know that is was a Democrat controlled congress that authorized the war. You clowns are seriously stupid.

Once again basing their decision off of faulty information provided by a Republican administration. Did you guys even pay attention to the issue at all when it was going down?

You really should stop displaying your utter ignorance.

The October 2002, U.S. congress Iraq War Resolution cited many factors to justify the use of military force against Iraq:

• Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 ceasefire agreement, including interference with U.N. weapons inspectors.

• Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, and programs to develop such weapons, posed a "threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region."

• Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."

• Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people".

• Iraq's hostility towards the United States as demonstrated by the 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush and firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones following the 1991 Gulf War.

• Members of Al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.

• Iraq's "continuing to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations," including anti-United States terrorist organizations.

• Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.

• The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, including the September 11th, 2001 terrorists and those who aided or harbored them.

• The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.

• The governments in Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia feared Saddam and wanted him removed from power.

• Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.

Rationale for the Iraq War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

First point is hardly a justification for war otherwise we would be at war with Israel right now.

Second point turned out to be completely false, especially given the heavy emphasis placed on nuclear weapons and Niger yellow cake that turned out to be incredibly poor "intel"

Third point is true enough, but given what was going on at the time, not compelling. If we didn't intervene with the gassing of the Kurds, then their would be little enough in the way of justification to intervene when we did.

Fourth point True enough, but likewise not very timely, and thus not very compelling.

Fifth point: also not at all timely, nor compelling.

Sixth point coupled with the assertion that Iraq was supporting Al Qaeda was another one of the supposedly BIG issues and it also turned out to be completely fictitious.

Seventh point: you'll have to provide specific cases for me to address

Eighth point turned out to be completely false as well.

Ninth point is predicated on the other false point to be true and they weren't so this one turned out to be rather false as well

Tenth point: Not a compelling reason at all. "oh no country's have political rivals" is not a justification for war; otherwise we would currently be at war with most countries.

11th point also completely untimely and thus not compelling. It is an outdated casus belli from the 80s.

 

[CowboyTed]

Lets make it clear:

Chris Kyle would be alive today if the Republicans didn't lie to get the US in the war in the first place.

THE GOP KILLED CHRIS KYLE.

Prove it!

GOP falsified and misrepresented the reasons for war in numerous different areas.

No war, no Veterans, No PSTD.

No one killing Chris Kyle.

So facts are:
THE GOP KILLED CHRIS KYLE.

 

[007]

How does the left think they can get away with calling people, ragheads?

they do believe they are ABOVE everyone else and can just spew whatever they want.

It's their own personal brand of double standard. We see it here all the time, Steph.

But they think we don't notice. Poor little stupid progtard haters.

 

[Stephanie]

Lets make it clear:

Chris Kyle would be alive today if the Republicans didn't lie to get the US in the war in the first place.

THE GOP KILLED CHRIS KYLE.

Prove it!

GOP falsified and misrepresented the reasons for war in numerous different areas.

No war, no Veterans, No PSTD.

No one killing Chris Kyle.

So facts are:
THE GOP KILLED CHRIS KYLE.

You people would find another reason for PTSD. so sit down. You on the left don't like the military. we get it

 

[007]

Lets make it clear:

Chris Kyle would be alive today if the Republicans didn't lie to get the US in the war in the first place.

THE GOP KILLED CHRIS KYLE.

Prove it!

GOP falsified and misrepresented the reasons for war in numerous different areas.

No war, no Veterans, No PSTD.

No one killing Chris Kyle.

So facts are:
THE GOP KILLED CHRIS KYLE.

If it wasn't for lies and hyperbole, you wouldn't have anything at all.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

You morons do know that is was a Democrat controlled congress that authorized the war. You clowns are seriously stupid.

Once again basing their decision off of faulty information provided by a Republican administration. Did you guys even pay attention to the issue at all when it was going down?

You really should stop displaying your utter ignorance.

The October 2002, U.S. congress Iraq War Resolution cited many factors to justify the use of military force against Iraq:

• Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 ceasefire agreement, including interference with U.N. weapons inspectors.

• Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, and programs to develop such weapons, posed a "threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region."

• Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."

• Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people".

• Iraq's hostility towards the United States as demonstrated by the 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush and firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones following the 1991 Gulf War.

• Members of Al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.

• Iraq's "continuing to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations," including anti-United States terrorist organizations.

• Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.

• The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, including the September 11th, 2001 terrorists and those who aided or harbored them.

• The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.

• The governments in Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia feared Saddam and wanted him removed from power.

• Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.

Rationale for the Iraq War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

First point is hardly a justification for war otherwise we would be at war with Israel right now.

Second point turned out to be completely false, especially given the heavy emphasis placed on nuclear weapons and Niger yellow cake that turned out to be incredibly poor "intel"

Third point is true enough, but given what was going on at the time, not compelling. If we didn't intervene with the gassing of the Kurds, then their would be little enough in the way of justification to intervene when we did.

Fourth point True enough, but likewise not very timely, and thus not very compelling.

Fifth point: also not at all timely, nor compelling.

Sixth point coupled with the assertion that Iraq was supporting Al Qaeda was another one of the supposedly BIG issues and it also turned out to be completely fictitious.

Seventh point: you'll have to provide specific cases for me to address

Eighth point turned out to be completely false as well.

Ninth point is predicated on the other false point to be true and they weren't so this one turned out to be rather false as well

Tenth point: Not a compelling reason at all. "oh no country's have political rivals" is not a justification for war; otherwise we would currently be at war with most countries.

11th point also completely untimely and thus not compelling. It is an outdated casus belli from the 80s.

Your opinion of what you believe is compelling enough or not doesn't matter. The fact is, this was a Democrat controlled congress with access to the same intelligence Bush had and they believed it to be compelling enough for authorizing war.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Lets make it clear:

Chris Kyle would be alive today if the Republicans didn't lie to get the US in the war in the first place.

THE GOP KILLED CHRIS KYLE.

Prove it!

GOP falsified and misrepresented the reasons for war in numerous different areas.

No war, no Veterans, No PSTD.

No one killing Chris Kyle.

So facts are:
THE GOP KILLED CHRIS KYLE.

And your proof is?

 

[Osomir]

You morons do know that is was a Democrat controlled congress that authorized the war. You clowns are seriously stupid.

Once again basing their decision off of faulty information provided by a Republican administration. Did you guys even pay attention to the issue at all when it was going down?

You really should stop displaying your utter ignorance.

The October 2002, U.S. congress Iraq War Resolution cited many factors to justify the use of military force against Iraq:

• Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 ceasefire agreement, including interference with U.N. weapons inspectors.

• Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, and programs to develop such weapons, posed a "threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region."

• Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."

• Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people".

• Iraq's hostility towards the United States as demonstrated by the 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush and firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones following the 1991 Gulf War.

• Members of Al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.

• Iraq's "continuing to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations," including anti-United States terrorist organizations.

• Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.

• The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, including the September 11th, 2001 terrorists and those who aided or harbored them.

• The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.

• The governments in Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia feared Saddam and wanted him removed from power.

• Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.

Rationale for the Iraq War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

First point is hardly a justification for war otherwise we would be at war with Israel right now.

Second point turned out to be completely false, especially given the heavy emphasis placed on nuclear weapons and Niger yellow cake that turned out to be incredibly poor "intel"

Third point is true enough, but given what was going on at the time, not compelling. If we didn't intervene with the gassing of the Kurds, then their would be little enough in the way of justification to intervene when we did.

Fourth point True enough, but likewise not very timely, and thus not very compelling.

Fifth point: also not at all timely, nor compelling.

Sixth point coupled with the assertion that Iraq was supporting Al Qaeda was another one of the supposedly BIG issues and it also turned out to be completely fictitious.

Seventh point: you'll have to provide specific cases for me to address

Eighth point turned out to be completely false as well.

Ninth point is predicated on the other false point to be true and they weren't so this one turned out to be rather false as well

Tenth point: Not a compelling reason at all. "oh no country's have political rivals" is not a justification for war; otherwise we would currently be at war with most countries.

11th point also completely untimely and thus not compelling. It is an outdated casus belli from the 80s.

Your opinion of what you believe is compelling enough or not doesn't matter. The fact is, this was a Democrat controlled congress with access to the same intelligence Bush had and they believed it to be compelling enough for authorizing war.

And the fact of the matter is that the strongest reasons for the invasion of Iraq turned out to be lies.

 

[georgephillip]

Only the right is too cognitively dissonant to realize it is just socialism bailing out the wealthiest capitalists, with the (other) Peoples' tax monies.

You would think the Great Recession might have opened some eyes, but the right is nothing if not stubborn:
"Like scores of evangelists and hypocrites and moralists who spew and praise family values and pretend to be holier than thou and are then regularly caught cheating or found to be perverts, these Bush hypocrites who spewed for years the glory of unfettered Wild West laissez-faire jungle capitalism allowed the biggest debt bubble ever to fester without any control, and have caused the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression.

"They are are now forced to perform the biggest government intervention and nationalisations in the recent history of humanity, all for the benefit of the rich and the well connected.

"So Comrades Bush and Paulson and Bernanke will rightly pass to the history books as a troika of Bolsheviks who turned the USA into the USSRA.

"Zealots of any religion are always pests that cause havoc with their inflexible fanaticism – but they usually don't run the biggest economy in the world. These laissez faire voodoo-economics zealots in charge of the USA have now caused the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression and the nastiest economic crisis in decades."

Nouriel Roubini The US has invented socialism for the rich Comment is free The Guardian

 

[Stephanie]

snip:
Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

all of it here:
Democrat Quotes on WMD

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It wasn't the information his administration provided us

Clinton's information differed from Bush's in what substantive way?

The Niger yellow cake claim didn't stem from the Clinton Administration. The Office of Special Plans was also created by the Bush Administration and it was they who tried to link Saddam to Al Qaeda, not Clinton.

It also wasn't Clinton's decision to disband the Iraqi army and ban Baathists from government.

Now you're confused about the timeline?

Not at all, the Iraqi military was disbanded and the Baathists kicked from government after the invasion, which was under Bush not Clinton. Not sure why you would think that is confusing?

The Niger yellow cake claim didn't stem from the Clinton Administration.

So no major difference? Thanks.

Not at all, the Iraqi military was disbanded

You're whining about before the war, now you're whining about after?

 

[Osomir]

The Niger yellow cake claim didn't stem from the Clinton Administration.

So no major difference? Thanks.

Not at all, the Iraqi military was disbanded

You're whining about before the war, now you're whining about after?

1.) Yes, the major difference is that the Clinton administration didn't lie about what Iraq was doing and use that as a pretext to invade the country.

2.) I found both, the faulty justifications for the war and the amateurish nature of its execution to be deplorable.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

You morons do know that is was a Democrat controlled congress that authorized the war. You clowns are seriously stupid.

Once again basing their decision off of faulty information provided by a Republican administration. Did you guys even pay attention to the issue at all when it was going down?

You really should stop displaying your utter ignorance.

The October 2002, U.S. congress Iraq War Resolution cited many factors to justify the use of military force against Iraq:

• Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 ceasefire agreement, including interference with U.N. weapons inspectors.

• Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, and programs to develop such weapons, posed a "threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region."

• Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."

• Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people".

• Iraq's hostility towards the United States as demonstrated by the 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush and firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones following the 1991 Gulf War.

• Members of Al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.

• Iraq's "continuing to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations," including anti-United States terrorist organizations.

• Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.

• The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, including the September 11th, 2001 terrorists and those who aided or harbored them.

• The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.

• The governments in Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia feared Saddam and wanted him removed from power.

• Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.

Rationale for the Iraq War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

First point is hardly a justification for war otherwise we would be at war with Israel right now.

Second point turned out to be completely false, especially given the heavy emphasis placed on nuclear weapons and Niger yellow cake that turned out to be incredibly poor "intel"

Third point is true enough, but given what was going on at the time, not compelling. If we didn't intervene with the gassing of the Kurds, then their would be little enough in the way of justification to intervene when we did.

Fourth point True enough, but likewise not very timely, and thus not very compelling.

Fifth point: also not at all timely, nor compelling.

Sixth point coupled with the assertion that Iraq was supporting Al Qaeda was another one of the supposedly BIG issues and it also turned out to be completely fictitious.

Seventh point: you'll have to provide specific cases for me to address

Eighth point turned out to be completely false as well.

Ninth point is predicated on the other false point to be true and they weren't so this one turned out to be rather false as well

Tenth point: Not a compelling reason at all. "oh no country's have political rivals" is not a justification for war; otherwise we would currently be at war with most countries.

11th point also completely untimely and thus not compelling. It is an outdated casus belli from the 80s.

Your opinion of what you believe is compelling enough or not doesn't matter. The fact is, this was a Democrat controlled congress with access to the same intelligence Bush had and they believed it to be compelling enough for authorizing war.

And the fact of the matter is that the strongest reasons for the invasion of Iraq turned out to be lies.

None of those reasons were lies.

Look, I know your can't help yourself, your a retarded liberal. But trust me on this, they outlined their reasons and no matter how much you disagree with it, it doesn't change the fact that a Democrat controlled congress authorized war.

 

[Osomir]

Once again basing their decision off of faulty information provided by a Republican administration. Did you guys even pay attention to the issue at all when it was going down?

You really should stop displaying your utter ignorance.

The October 2002, U.S. congress Iraq War Resolution cited many factors to justify the use of military force against Iraq:

• Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 ceasefire agreement, including interference with U.N. weapons inspectors.

• Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, and programs to develop such weapons, posed a "threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region."

• Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."

• Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people".

• Iraq's hostility towards the United States as demonstrated by the 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush and firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones following the 1991 Gulf War.

• Members of Al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.

• Iraq's "continuing to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations," including anti-United States terrorist organizations.

• Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.

• The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, including the September 11th, 2001 terrorists and those who aided or harbored them.

• The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.

• The governments in Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia feared Saddam and wanted him removed from power.

• Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.

Rationale for the Iraq War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

First point is hardly a justification for war otherwise we would be at war with Israel right now.

Second point turned out to be completely false, especially given the heavy emphasis placed on nuclear weapons and Niger yellow cake that turned out to be incredibly poor "intel"

Third point is true enough, but given what was going on at the time, not compelling. If we didn't intervene with the gassing of the Kurds, then their would be little enough in the way of justification to intervene when we did.

Fourth point True enough, but likewise not very timely, and thus not very compelling.

Fifth point: also not at all timely, nor compelling.

Sixth point coupled with the assertion that Iraq was supporting Al Qaeda was another one of the supposedly BIG issues and it also turned out to be completely fictitious.

Seventh point: you'll have to provide specific cases for me to address

Eighth point turned out to be completely false as well.

Ninth point is predicated on the other false point to be true and they weren't so this one turned out to be rather false as well

Tenth point: Not a compelling reason at all. "oh no country's have political rivals" is not a justification for war; otherwise we would currently be at war with most countries.

11th point also completely untimely and thus not compelling. It is an outdated casus belli from the 80s.

Your opinion of what you believe is compelling enough or not doesn't matter. The fact is, this was a Democrat controlled congress with access to the same intelligence Bush had and they believed it to be compelling enough for authorizing war.

And the fact of the matter is that the strongest reasons for the invasion of Iraq turned out to be lies.

None of those reasons were lies.

Look, I know your can't help yourself, your a retarded liberal. But trust me on this, they outlined their reasons and no matter how much you disagree with it, it doesn't change the fact that a Democrat controlled congress authorized war.

1.) the notion that Iraq was buying yellow cake to develop nuclear weapons was false.

2.) The notion that Saddam was working with and supporting al Qaeda was a lie.

3.) Then notion that Saddam was involved with those who engaged in the 9/11 attacks was a lie.

Those were the primary and most timely reasons that the administration put forth to cite Iraq as an eminent threat which justified US invasion and occupation, and they all turned out to be untrue. You were wrong. Deal with it.

 

[georgephillip]

Then we'd have the double pleasure of Hate Kyle threads and even MORE Hate Fox threads

And we would have the pleasure of hearing Kyle defend racism and mass murder.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You really should stop displaying your utter ignorance.

The October 2002, U.S. congress Iraq War Resolution cited many factors to justify the use of military force against Iraq:

• Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 ceasefire agreement, including interference with U.N. weapons inspectors.

• Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, and programs to develop such weapons, posed a "threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region."

• Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."

• Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people".

• Iraq's hostility towards the United States as demonstrated by the 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush and firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones following the 1991 Gulf War.

• Members of Al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.

• Iraq's "continuing to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations," including anti-United States terrorist organizations.

• Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.

• The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, including the September 11th, 2001 terrorists and those who aided or harbored them.

• The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.

• The governments in Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia feared Saddam and wanted him removed from power.

• Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.

Rationale for the Iraq War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

First point is hardly a justification for war otherwise we would be at war with Israel right now.

Second point turned out to be completely false, especially given the heavy emphasis placed on nuclear weapons and Niger yellow cake that turned out to be incredibly poor "intel"

Third point is true enough, but given what was going on at the time, not compelling. If we didn't intervene with the gassing of the Kurds, then their would be little enough in the way of justification to intervene when we did.

Fourth point True enough, but likewise not very timely, and thus not very compelling.

Fifth point: also not at all timely, nor compelling.

Sixth point coupled with the assertion that Iraq was supporting Al Qaeda was another one of the supposedly BIG issues and it also turned out to be completely fictitious.

Seventh point: you'll have to provide specific cases for me to address

Eighth point turned out to be completely false as well.

Ninth point is predicated on the other false point to be true and they weren't so this one turned out to be rather false as well

Tenth point: Not a compelling reason at all. "oh no country's have political rivals" is not a justification for war; otherwise we would currently be at war with most countries.

11th point also completely untimely and thus not compelling. It is an outdated casus belli from the 80s.

Your opinion of what you believe is compelling enough or not doesn't matter. The fact is, this was a Democrat controlled congress with access to the same intelligence Bush had and they believed it to be compelling enough for authorizing war.

And the fact of the matter is that the strongest reasons for the invasion of Iraq turned out to be lies.

None of those reasons were lies.

Look, I know your can't help yourself, your a retarded liberal. But trust me on this, they outlined their reasons and no matter how much you disagree with it, it doesn't change the fact that a Democrat controlled congress authorized war.

1.) the notion that Iraq was buying yellow cake to develop nuclear weapons was false.

2.) The notion that Saddam was working with and supporting al Qaeda was a lie.

3.) Then notion that Saddam was involved with those who engaged in the 9/11 attacks was a lie.

Those were the primary and most timely reasons that the administration put forth to cite Iraq as an eminent threat which justified US invasion and occupation, and they all turned out to be untrue. You were wrong. Deal with it.

the notion that Iraq was buying yellow cake to develop nuclear weapons was false.

Why were they buying it?

The notion that Saddam was working with and supporting al Qaeda was a lie.

They worked with many terrorist groups.

 

[georgephillip]

omebody killed ragheads for Jesus?

OK... now gimme the bad news...

Bad news or bad karma, Yeppers?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Chris Hedges has covered war zones from central America to Bosnia to Palestine, and Iraq for most of his life. His take on Chris Kyle isn't flattering:

"Kyle was given the nickname 'Legend.'

"He got a tattoo of a Crusader cross on his arm. 'I wanted everyone to know I was a Christian.

"I had it put in red, for blood.

"I hated the damn savages I’d been fighting,' he wrote. 'I always will.'

"Following a day of sniping, after killing perhaps as many as six people, he would go back to his barracks to spent his time smoking Cuban Romeo y Julieta No. 3 cigars and 'playing video games, watching porn and working out.'

"On leave, something omitted in the movie, he was frequently arrested for drunken bar fights. He dismissed politicians, hated the press and disdained superior officers, exalting only the comradeship of warriors.

"His memoir glorifies white, 'Christian' supremacy and war.

"It is an angry tirade directed against anyone who questions the military’s elite, professional killers."

Chris Kyle: American psychopath.

Chris Hedges Killing Ragheads for Jesus - Chris Hedges -Truthdig

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

EXACTLY.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

omebody killed ragheads for Jesus?

OK... now gimme the bad news...

Bad news or bad karma, Yeppers?

Actually inside a military chat room I was listening in on a discussion ( a few days ago) that he was suspected of having been a recent convert to Islam. Notice the uneven beard he is growing? So if that is the truth - it makes sense they are claiming he was insane - it makes sense why his family was told not to speak to anyone due to the "sensitivity of the situation". It makes more and more sense when we consider that the top Muslim sniper in Iraq was taken out by Kyle and that there was a high bounty on Kyle's head. It makes sense that the Muslims would opt for using an American to shoot Kyle in the back because they didn't have anyone with the backbone to come face to face with him. Yes, it makes sense. I do pray the truth comes out one day.