Ketanji Brown Jackson's Shocking, Sickening Record in Child Porn Cases

[bodecea]

No, her record does not match those of other judges. Go read the transcripts. Or, first read the NY Post's detailed article on the transcripts, and then read the transcripts. Liberals lied through teeth about her sickening record on this issue.

Your link doesn't work.

 

[lantern2814]

Define Adult.

Define Female

Go **** yourself. Cry harder that you and regressive pervert don’t know what a woman is. Laughing at lenient sentences for pedos tells us all we need to know about you. Adult human female. Sad that a Xiden worshipper like you needs help knowing what a female is.

 

[bodecea]

So......has Matt Gaetz been indicted?

Has she? (since indictment is your measurement of record)

 

[bodecea]

Go **** yourself. Cry harder that you and regressive pervert don’t know what a woman is. Laughing at lenient sentences for pedos tells us all we need to know about you. Adult human female. Sad that a Xiden worshipper like you needs help knowing what a female is.

Oh my....that's a lot of pent up INCEL-like ranting there.

 

[lantern2814]

So you just don't care if she not only gave obscenely light sentences to pedophiles but expressed hostility toward anti-child porn laws? These were not just people who had viewed kiddy porn but people who had distributed it and in some cases had participated in it. You don't care about that? Wow, you're sick.

One prosecutor was disgusted by the the light sentence she gave one pedo, who then went out and started distributing disturbing images of children again. She even apologized to perps. And the left defends this. Sickening.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Define American made high quality products at a reasonable price.

No such thing exist!

 

[g5000]

The guy who started the tard herd on this talking point is none other than pro-insurrectionist Josh Hawley.

"In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders," Hawley tweeted Thursday, highlighting nine cases from her time as a federal District Court judge.

While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley's insinuation neglects critical context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

Federal appeals court Judges Joseph Bianco of the Second Circuit and Andrew Brasher of the Eleventh Circuit, both Trump appointees, had each previously sentenced defendants convicted of possessing child pornography to prison terms well below federal guidelines at the time they were confirmed with Hawley's support, an ABC review of court records found.

[snip]

"Federal judges nationwide typically sentence below the [child porn] guideline in roughly 2 out of 3
cases," Berman noted on his blog, and "when deciding to go below the [child porn] guideline, typically impose sentences around 54 months below the calculated guideline minimum."



Berman also points out that government prosecutors often request below-range sentences, including in most of the Jackson cases that Hawley cited.

Fact check: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson child porn sentences 'pretty mainstream'

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's sentences for child porn offenders are in line with many others handed down by GOP-appointed judges and deemed "mainstream" by experts.

abcnews.go.com

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Go **** yourself. Cry harder that you and regressive pervert don’t know what a woman is. Laughing at lenient sentences for pedos tells us all we need to know about you. Adult human female. Sad that a Xiden worshipper like you needs help knowing what a female is.

Weird you cannot do it.

Well not really.

 

[g5000]

Why is Josh Hawley soft on pedophiles!?!?

 

[lantern2814]

Oh my....that's a lot of pent up INCEL-like ranting there.

You were told to stay under your bridge fat troll. Pathetic deflection attempt. Your defense of a pedo lover is noted and not surprising. Normal people do get upset over children being abused. Assholes like you and Gator laugh about it. Hell has a special place for you.

 

[Lakhota]

Today Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court nomination was confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Last week investigators got the transcripts of Jackson's sentencing hearings in child porn cases. They show a pattern of shockingly light sentences and a sickening hostility toward anti-child porn laws. I'm not exaggerating one bit. The transcripts destroy the dishonest liberal "fact-checks" that white-washed her record as "pretty mainstream."

This lady has no business sitting on a traffic court, much less the U.S. Supreme Court. But, thanks to the Democrats, she's now a Supreme Court justice.

Exclusive | Ketanji Brown Jackson chose leniency even in baby sex torture cases

Over and over, the records reveal, Judge Jackson made excuses for sex fiends’ criminal behavior and cut them slack in defiance of investigators and prosecutors.

nypost.com

Other than the NaziCon rag New York Post - do you have any "credible" sources to back up your claims - with context?

 

[lennypartiv]

Question for the liberals, why do we have to pick judges based on race and gender?

For our first 150 years we saw no need to select women as judges. We saw no need to select blacks as judges. Yet during those first 150 years, we were the envy of the world. Doesn't that tell you something?

 

[toobfreak]

But, thanks to the Democrats, she's a Supreme Court justice.

No, thanks to republicans

MITT ROMNEY

SUSAN COLLINS

LISA MURKOWSKI

Just remember, republican Donald Trump was a bigger objection to republican Romney than is Judge Jackson Brown Pedo-Advocate, who will now spend the rest of her life on the court.

 

[Lakhota]

Question for the liberals, why do we have to pick judges based on race and gender?

For our first 150 years we saw no need to select women as judges. We saw no need to select blacks as judges. Yet during those first 150 years, we were the envy of the world. Doesn't that tell you something?

It's called "evolution". Remember how the founders referred to blacks and women in the Constitution?

 

[lantern2814]

Weird you cannot do it.

Well not really.

Weird that you can’t define adult or a female. Here asshole, the dictionary definition. Now go **** yourself retard.

Definition of ADULT

fully developed and mature : grown-up; of, relating to, intended for, or befitting adults; dealing in or with explicitly sexual material… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Definition of FEMALE

of, relating to, or being the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs; having or producing only pistils or pistillate flowers; having a gender identity that is the opposite of male… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

 

[gipper]

Question for the liberals, why do we have to pick judges based on race and gender?

For our first 150 years we saw no need to select women as judges. We saw no need to select blacks as judges. Yet during those first 150 years, we were the envy of the world. Doesn't that tell you something?

It doesn’t really matter. The SC exists to maintain the status quo, so the elite can do as they wish. It’s merely a rubber stamp for the oligarchy.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Weird that you can’t define adult or a female. Here asshole, the dictionary definition. Now go **** yourself retard.

Definition of ADULT

fully developed and mature : grown-up; of, relating to, intended for, or befitting adults; dealing in or with explicitly sexual material… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Definition of FEMALE

of, relating to, or being the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs; having or producing only pistils or pistillate flowers; having a gender identity that is the opposite of male… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

So, is a human an adult at 17?

So, is a human an adult at 18?

So, is a human an adult at 20?

So, is a human an adult at 21?

So, is a human an adult at 25?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No, thanks to republicans

MITT ROMNEY View attachment 627491

SUSAN COLLINS View attachment 627492

LISA MURKOWSKI View attachment 627495

Just remember, republican Donald Trump was a bigger objection to republican Romney than is Judge Jackson Brown Pedo-Advocate, who will now spend the rest of her life on the court.

She is only 51, so we are talking a good 30 years or more going by how long they choose to stay on the court

 

[22lcidw]

The guy who started the tard herd on this talking point is none other than pro-insurrectionist Josh Hawley.

"In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders," Hawley tweeted Thursday, highlighting nine cases from her time as a federal District Court judge.

While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley's insinuation neglects critical context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

Federal appeals court Judges Joseph Bianco of the Second Circuit and Andrew Brasher of the Eleventh Circuit, both Trump appointees, had each previously sentenced defendants convicted of possessing child pornography to prison terms well below federal guidelines at the time they were confirmed with Hawley's support, an ABC review of court records found.

[snip]

"Federal judges nationwide typically sentence below the [child porn] guideline in roughly 2 out of 3
cases," Berman noted on his blog, and "when deciding to go below the [child porn] guideline, typically impose sentences around 54 months below the calculated guideline minimum."



Berman also points out that government prosecutors often request below-range sentences, including in most of the Jackson cases that Hawley cited.

Fact check: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson child porn sentences 'pretty mainstream'

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's sentences for child porn offenders are in line with many others handed down by GOP-appointed judges and deemed "mainstream" by experts.

abcnews.go.com

The destroying of judge candidates has been a hallmark of Progs. The terrible thing is that Prog judges are not intellectuals although they sound like it. They back their agendas and go from there. We know already what this person is going to be. She will be far left and with the definition of woman a blur and her views on pedophile relationships, an even further left globalist tool.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

For our first 150 years we saw no need to select women as judges. We saw no need to select blacks as judges.

We also saw no need to allow them to vote...but no doubt you are against that as well.