Kerry's stance in debate immoral

[Avatar4321]

So says President of Poland

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1232996/posts

In the interview for a Polish channel TVN, President of Poland, Alexander Kwasniewski expressed his admiration and full support for President George Bush for his leadership in the war on terror. As a comment to the Bush-Kerry debate, President Kwasniewski said that “President Bush performed like a truly Texan gentleman who was able to notice and fully appreciate the presence and sacrifice of the Polish ally in the war on terror in Iraq. “

“I find it kind of sad that a senator with 20 year parliamentary experience is unable to notice the Polish presence in the anti-terror coalition.”, Kwasniewski commented John Kerry’s stance.

“I don’t think it’s an ignorance.”, said Kwasniewski. “Anti-terror coalition is larger than the USA, the UK and Australia. There are also Poland, Ukraine, and Bulgaria etc. which lost their soldiers there. It’s highly immoral not to see our strong commitment we have taken with a strong believe that we must fight against terror together, that we must show our strong international solidarity because Saddam Hussein was dangerous to the world.

“That’s why we are disappointed that our stance and ultimate sacrifice of our soldiers are so diminished”, President Kwasniewski commented Kerry’s speech during the debate.

“Perhaps Mr Kerry, continues Kwasniewski, thinks about the coalition with Germany and France, countries which disagreed with us on Iraq.

According to poll research centers, Poland is the only European country where President Bush would win the election. What’s more, it would be a landslide victory.

 

[TopUSMC]

Less than 60 days after 9/11, Germany and the Czech Republic committed Forces to support Combined Joint Task Force Consequence Management. Area of responsibility covered the entire CENTCOM AOR (27 nations). They were later joined by Romanians, Slovak, Ukrainian and Kuwaiti forces. Most coalition forces that joined CJTF-CM were prohibited from jointing hostilities against Iraq, they did authorize the forces to support non-hostile fuctions. The Romanians continue this effort, which assists US Forces re-deploying equipment back to CONUS, and frees up US Forces to support other missions. We are not talking about combat troops here, all these folks are Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defense Specialists. In Army speak "Chemical". I think that Kerry has already pissed off some of the coalition countries that helped in Iraq and even those that helped out in other non-combat ways. Not a good idea when its hard enough to ANY COUNTRY to stand up and take action when and where its necessary.
I also think that Russia has lots more problems than we do, don't agree with there methods or the associated colateral damage. They might work in Russia but not in the USA.

Please see this link to see how the Romanians are providing assistance:
http://www.defendamerica.mil/articles/jul2003/a072103e.html

Semper Fi,
The TOP

 

[no1tovote4]

So says President of Poland

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1232996/posts

This is the entire reason that I will not support John Kerry for any position in which there is Foreign relations necessary. He relies too heavily on France and Germany as our only "true" allies and insults the rest, regardless of the fact that France and Germany have repeatedly said that even with Kerry THEY WILL NOT GO .

Those "Global Test" remarks are frightening as well. There is no wonder most Americans still believe the President more than this guy.

I wan't to vote for somebody other than Bush, but this guy makes it so it would be irresponsible for me to do so. Kerry is one of the stupidest "smart" people that I have ever seen in my life.

 

[tnfzpaul]

Kerry had a stance in the debate? I must have missed something


Semperfi Top/MasterGuns!

 

[Avatar4321]

Kerry had a stance in the debate? I must have missed something


Semperfi Top/MasterGuns!

Yeah it was offer nuclear fuel to Iran if they promise not to make nuclear weapons.

 

[no1tovote4]

Yeah it was offer nuclear fuel to Iran if they promise not to make nuclear weapons.

And don't forget that he wants to cut China out of the talks with N. Korea showing that he has about no sense at all. Clinton did those Bilateral talks, they signed a treaty and accepted our payments to not build the weapons that they began to build immediately after the Bilateral Talks ended. WE FED THE PEOPLE THAT MADE THE WEAPONS. This is why China is vital to the talks, we need their leverage. We simply cannot accept another signed treaty from this country and move on.

The nuclear fuel thing really pissed me off. Those Russian reactors are made to create weapons grade material as a byproduct, two birds with one stone. They are not made to most efficiently create electricity, but to make the very material that we are supposed to keep from them. Why Bush didn't school him right there will be a mystery to me.

 

[tnfzpaul]

Yeah it was offer nuclear fuel to Iran if they promise not to make nuclear weapons.

Yer right! I forgot that, just like Slick Willie did with our buddies the North Koreans. :firing:

 

[Avatar4321]

And don't forget that he wants to cut China out of the talks with N. Korea showing that he has about no sense at all. Clinton did those Bilateral talks, they signed a treaty and accepted our payments to not build the weapons that they began to build immediately after the Bilateral Talks ended. WE FED THE PEOPLE THAT MADE THE WEAPONS. This is why China is vital to the talks, we need their leverage. We simply cannot accept another signed treaty from this country and move on.

The nuclear fuel thing really pissed me off. Those Russian reactors are made to create weapons grade material as a byproduct, two birds with one stone. They are not made to most efficiently create electricity, but to make the very material that we are supposed to keep from them. Why Bush didn't school him right there will be a mystery to me.

He problably didnt catch it. Kerry was making so many dumb statements. I know when i heard him say it i was like "WHAT?!??!" and now ive determined Kerry cannot with the Presidency. anyone who is dumb enough to think we can appease the Iranians doesnt deserve that office.

 

[tnfzpaul]

He problably didnt catch it. Kerry was making so many dumb statements. I know when i heard him say it i was like "WHAT?!??!" and now ive determined Kerry cannot with the Presidency. anyone who is dumb enough to think we can appease the Iranians doesnt deserve that office.

Hey, that was almost as good as Kerry saying that he will answer to no one else when it comes to the security of our nation, then saying that a decision like that had to pass the "global french" test.