Kennedy Assassination, no conspiracy when it’s documented

Chicken Noodle Soup claims to know the difference between fact vs opinion. But then this is his sig line:

"Everyone pause to acknowledge the fact that we are on land which was vastly improved and made better by european colonists who are the rightful owners." --Chicken Noodle


Claiming something is improved or made better is opinion, not fact.
 
Chicken Noodle Soup claims to know the difference between fact vs opinion. But then this is his sig line:

"Everyone pause to acknowledge the fact that we are on land which was vastly improved and made better by european colonists who are the rightful owners." --Chicken Noodle


Claiming something is improved or made better is opinion, not fact.
I never claimed that my sig line was opinion or fact so once again you are willfully and knowingly making a false accusation
 
Yes I did repeatedly
No, you said you read the Warren Report because you wanted to know what was in it. I asked you why you wanted to know what was in it. I also asked you the circumstances under which you read it. You refused to discuss.
 
No, you said you read the Warren Report because you wanted to know what was in it. I asked you why you wanted to know what was in it. I also asked you the circumstances under which you read it. You refused to discuss.


Liar

I described the conscumstaces. Wanting to know what is in a book needs no why or any justification

People read books ALL THE TIME just to see what is contained inside those books.
 
I never claimed that my sig line was opinion or fact so once again you are willfully and knowingly making a false accusation
You state an opinion in your sig line, but claim that sig line opinion is fact.

You claimed (in this thread) to know the difference between fact vs opinion. I read your sig line, and conclude you don't know the difference. If you do know the difference, then delete the sig line.
 
Liar
I described the conscumstaces. Wanting to know what is in a book needs no why or any justification
People read books ALL THE TIME just to see what is contained inside those books.
I am not asking you what. I am asking you why. Why did you read the Warren Report?
 
I'll go out on a limb and conclude that Chicken Noodle Soup Nazi did not read the Warren Report.
 
I'll go out on a limb and conclude that Chicken Noodle Soup Nazi did not read the Warren Report.
You fell off of that limb

You kack the intelligence and intellect to make a reasonable claim or argument so instead you focus on people hoping in vain to find something to attack with

I read it

That needs no explanation or justification
 
15th post
You fell off of that limb

You kack the intelligence and intellect to make a reasonable claim or argument so instead you focus on people hoping in vain to find something to attack with

I read it

That needs no explanation or justification
It's a simple question. I asked why you read the Warren Report. Again, it's not casual reading. It's not curling up with a good novel or best seller. What's the problem with answering it?
 
It's a simple question. I asked why you read the Warren Report. Again, it's not casual reading. It's not curling up with a good novel or best seller. What's the problem with answering it?
Yes it is casual reading

A book need not be a bestseller to be read casually

Again why are you a coward.

I asked you a question now answer
 
Why is Chicken Noodle Soup Nazi so desperate to defend his position on these theories?
 
Back
Top Bottom