Ken Starr You POS

[Sunsettommy]

As were the affidavits given to support claims of election fraud in 2020.

The difference is that federal judges got to read those claims, where the senate did not.

Why did you bring up the election stuff?

I have stated here many times that Trump failed to prove there was widespread election fraud and that he should have stopped complaining after the SCOTUS decision back in December.

Affidavit is a SWORN oath!

My Law Questions

"A sworn affidavit is a written statement made by a person who is under oath to tell the truth about the facts and information contained in the statement. Additionally, the person signing the affidavit, called the affiant, attests to his or her identity. Usually, the statement must be witnessed and signed by a person who is legally authorized to administer oaths, such as a notary public. The notary is generally required to place a notary seal on the document."

Tips over a phone or internet is normally called hearsay....

Man you are not very bright

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The evidence was in the hands of the FBI, and then transferred to the white house office of legal counsel. That's where it remained buried until Bidens office of legal counsel went through the files.

And you know this how? What "evidence" did the FBI transfer to the White House? Why didn't the leftist media collectively investigate these 4,500 claims? They had more resources than our FBI.

 

[meaner gene]

Your problem is that you have no idea what the FBI does or what they are about. Furthermore, for any agency to investigate 4,500 phony claims, it would have taken them past the election where the commies stood a chance at gaining leadership of the Senate. Do you think we are that stupid?

The FBI commonly goes through thousands of pieces of evidence. Like for the Boston bombing, or the 14,000 videos from January 6th.

That's what they do, if they're allowed to do it.

The problem is the white house prevented them from doing it.

 

[meaner gene]

Why did you bring up the election stuff?

Because they both involve the handling to thousands of allegations.

I'm just pointing out how different the investigation and review process was, and how hypocritical you are on judging the validity of each.

If they were allegations about Kavanaugh they're made up lies.

But if they were allegations about election fraud, they were absolute truth.

 

[Sunsettommy]

And you know this how? What "evidence" did the FBI transfer to the White House? Why didn't the leftist media collectively investigate these 4,500 claims? They had more resources than our FBI.

The idiot is ignoring Dr. Fords named witnesses statements, the ones where they ALL say it never happened under oath, even one of them was her long time friend who later said she was being pressured to lie about it.

He is trying hard to ignore that fact to pursue his delusions.

They have ignored it every time I bring that fact up in the thread.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The FBI commonly goes through thousands of pieces of evidence. Like for the Boston bombing, or the 14,000 videos from January 6th.

That's what they do, if they're allowed to do it.

The problem is the white house prevented them from doing it.

No, the problem is the first letter in the acronym FBI is FEDERAL. Do you know what that means? They are in charge of federal matters, not local matters.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The idiot is ignoring Dr. Fords named witnesses statements, the ones where they ALL say it never happened under oath, even one of them was her long time friend who later said she was being pressured to lie about it.

He is trying hard to ignore that fact to pursue his delusions.

They have ignored it every time I bring that fact up in the thread.

Not only did they say it never happened, but they can't remember of any such party to begin with.

 

[Sunsettommy]

No, the problem is the first letter in the acronym FBI is FEDERAL. Do you know what that means? They are in charge of federal matters, not local matters.

That's right, they are not going to investigate a 25 year old assault allegation in a home, that is what the local police is for.

 

[meaner gene]

"A sworn affidavit is a written statement made by a person who is under oath to tell the truth about the facts and information contained in the statement. Additionally, the person signing the affidavit, called the affiant, attests to his or her identity. Usually, the statement must be witnessed and signed by a person who is legally authorized to administer oaths, such as a notary public. The notary is generally required to place a notary seal on the document."

Tips over a phone or internet is normally called hearsay....

I'm pointing out how the process was interrupted. First comes a phone "tip" containing an allegation. That is turned over to an investigator, who reviews the "tip", interviews the person and puts their allegation in writing in an affidavit.

The FBI never interviewed the 4,5000 "tips".

Meanwhile the same when it came to election fraud allegations, were interviewed, and put into affidavits, that federal judges read before making a decision.

 

[meaner gene]

And you know this how? What "evidence" did the FBI transfer to the White House? Why didn't the leftist media collectively investigate these 4,500 claims? They had more resources than our FBI.

Read a newspaper.

You know that now that Biden is in charge, that they get to read through the files.

 

[Lakhota]

Several of the pious zealots who impeached President Clinton were adulterous hypocrites.

 

[Sunsettommy]

I'm pointing out how the process was interrupted. First comes a phone "tip" containing an allegation. That is turned over to an investigator, who reviews the "tip", interviews the person and puts their allegation in writing in an affidavit.

The FBI never interviewed the 4,5000 "tips".

Meanwhile the same when it came to election fraud allegations, were interviewed, and put into affidavits, that federal judges read before making a decision.

What about the 4 named witness Dr. Ford brought up, who all say under oath it never happened?

You have ignored that fact repeatedly, you that stupid?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Read a newspaper.

You know that now that Biden is in charge, that they get to read through the files.

Great, so what did they find in these six months he's been in office?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I'm pointing out how the process was interrupted. First comes a phone "tip" containing an allegation. That is turned over to an investigator, who reviews the "tip", interviews the person and puts their allegation in writing in an affidavit.

The FBI never interviewed the 4,5000 "tips".

Meanwhile the same when it came to election fraud allegations, were interviewed, and put into affidavits, that federal judges read before making a decision.

The FBI said they already did their investigation of Kavanaugh and will not do another. A 36-year-old case of two alcohol-imbibing teens without evidence cannot be probed, and, if it could be, which it can’t, it would be the police, not the FBI who would do it.

No, I Don't Believe Christine Blasey Ford, Here's Why

They're all leftists who are anti-Kavanaugh Only yesterday, we found out that the 'victim's' lawyer Debra Katz -- a major Democrat donor...

www.independentsentinel.com

 

[dudmuck]

And you know this how? What "evidence" did the FBI transfer to the White House? Why didn't the leftist media collectively investigate these 4,500 claims? They had more resources than our FBI.

if public media had access to the tips, then it would have been an illegal leak. Pepperidge farm remembers how steaming mad trumpists are about leaks.

 

[meaner gene]

What about the 4 named witness Dr. Ford brought up, who all say under oath it never happened?

Again you're posting fake titles.

They said they had no recollection of, not that it didn't happen.

 

[meaner gene]

Great, so what did they find in these six months he's been in office?

A lot of hanky panky, and shit that Trump tried to bury.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

if public media had access to the tips, then it would have been an illegal leak. Pepperidge farm remembers how steaming mad trumpists are about leaks.

What leaks? If somebody had a case that was not even recognized that they had positive evidence of, they can call any number of leftist news outlets and strike a deal. Even Fox would have paid for that.

This is why these attention whores make up these phony claims in the first place. They want the spotlight on them.

 

[meaner gene]

if public media had access to the tips, then it would have been an illegal leak. Pepperidge farm remembers how steaming mad trumpists are about leaks.

Republicans are such hypocrites.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

A lot of hanky panky, and shit that Trump tried to bury.

What hanky pankey? The Communists have had total control over our federal government for six months now, and all they've done is ruin the country. Surely if there was the least thing there, Dementia would have brought it to light. Remember, they're still trying to stop Trump from running in 2024. That's why our Capital looks like Afghanistan over six months after the attack. It's why they want to start this phony committee; to stretch it to 2022.