Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 82,640
- 41,324
- 2,615
Only partisan shitbags would try to pretend that's what they're talking about.
Look in any mirror and you'll find the partisan shitbag
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only partisan shitbags would try to pretend that's what they're talking about.
yes indeed, how many fking documents, 4000? how many spartacus moments? One. how many background checks, hmmm six and nothing? 65 woman came forward to say what exemplary character he had. yep, I'm good.Oh? Please tell me what federal crime was committed in any of this.
It's not about federal crimes. It's about the character of someone you want to give a lifetime appointment to one of the most powerful positions in the nation to..
We SHOULD be careful here
separate issues spanky. since when is a background check and an investigation the same? oh, since you need it to be.Why would she do that, knowing full well that this is not within the FBI's jurisdiction?Sure they do. This one just did.
It is within their jurisdiction, fool.
The FBI conducted his background check.
Trump simply needs to ask them to look into this new information as a part of that.
game over, man.
Grassley Says He Won't Delay Kavanaugh Hearing As Moderate Republicans Fall In Line
A background check is an investigation, fool.
It's exactly what Trump had the FBI do when allegations against Rob Porter were made.
And the fbi has said they don't need to do more
Sexual assault...is not "childhood antics"How do you investigate the possible antics of teenagers from 36 years ago?
Utterly ridiculous.
they can't that costs money. why would they on something that was a juvenile matter and there is no record of it? First Base again.Due process requires an investigation, fool.
Right now, there isn't enough information to justify an investigation.
Since President Trump isn't going to authorize the Taxpayers to pay for an investigation, why doesn't this broad ask Soros or some other deep pocketed liberal to fund this investigation instead?Right now, there isn't enough information to justify an investigation.
Sure there is. There has been an allegation of sexual assualt made. That alone requires further investigation.
The accuser is willing to work with the FBI. Why isn't Kavanaugh?
Lying to the FBI is a felony. Liars don't typically volunteer to talk to the FBI.
Nobody's going to waste a moment on an alleged event from 36 years prior when the accuser can't remember any details.
The accuser remembers quite a few details., dope. More than enough for the FBI to interview several people.
What's wrong with the local police or sheriff's office investigating this? Sexual Assault is a state crime
Why would she do that, knowing full well that this is not within the FBI's jurisdiction?Sure they do. This one just did.
It is within their jurisdiction, fool.
The FBI conducted his background check.
Trump simply needs to ask them to look into this new information as a part of that.
They conducted MANY background checks and found nothing.
When you actually come up with a point, post it. Remember, because you have the right to freely speak, it's often best not to when your speech makes you look idiotic.
Sure they conducted a background check, fool. Just not on this specific topic.
Kavanaugh already passed 6 FBI background checks, tissue?
What is Ms. Ford asking for? An FBI investigation. Essentially of the criminal variety.There is nothing to investigateWe do know. She's lying. That's as obvious as the sun rising in the East. You only help the barbarians by saying you don't know if she's lying.
So let the FBI investigate. Lying to the FBI is a felony.
No charges can be brought and this type of alleged crime is not the purview of the FBI
It's not a criminal investigation, dope.
It's a follow up to his background investigation.
Or have you been too busy reveling in this spectacle to pay any attention?
It can't be criminal, fool. Its not a federal crime and has long since been past the statute of limitations.
It would simply be a follow up to the background investigation focused on the allegation.
they can't that costs money. why would they on something that was a juvenile matter and there is no record of it? First Base again.Right now, there isn't enough information to justify an investigation.
Since President Trump isn't going to authorize the Taxpayers to pay for an investigation, why doesn't this broad ask Soros or some other deep pocketed liberal to fund this investigation instead?Right now, there isn't enough information to justify an investigation.
Sure there is. There has been an allegation of sexual assualt made. That alone requires further investigation.
The accuser is willing to work with the FBI. Why isn't Kavanaugh?
Lying to the FBI is a felony. Liars don't typically volunteer to talk to the FBI.
Nobody's going to waste a moment on an alleged event from 36 years prior when the accuser can't remember any details.
The accuser remembers quite a few details., dope. More than enough for the FBI to interview several people.
What's wrong with the local police or sheriff's office investigating this? Sexual Assault is a state crime
They don't care. They'd destroy their grandmother if it meant getting their agenda through. They're scum./----/ I'm sure you'd have no issue having your life destroyed on such flimsy "evidence"The accuser doesn't remember the date or place this traumatic event occurred. Idiot.Due process requires an investigation, fool.
Ummmm, no, no it doesn't
Sure it does. A single hearing with two witnesses does not get to any of the facts.
An investigation will.
What are you afraid of?
So what. The date and place is not as important as witnesses who can corroborate the allegation. There already is a therapist and her husband. There is also no doubt several others who knew at the time. All of whom could be inteviewed by the FBI.
/-----/They don't care. They'd destroy their grandmother if it meant getting their agenda through. They're scum./----/ I'm sure you'd have no issue having your life destroyed on such flimsy "evidence"The accuser doesn't remember the date or place this traumatic event occurred. Idiot.Ummmm, no, no it doesn't
Sure it does. A single hearing with two witnesses does not get to any of the facts.
An investigation will.
What are you afraid of?
So what. The date and place is not as important as witnesses who can corroborate the allegation. There already is a therapist and her husband. There is also no doubt several others who knew at the time. All of whom could be inteviewed by the FBI.
The FBI investigated Rob Porter.
What's the rush? Republicans kept what became the Gorsuch seat open for a full yearSexual assault...is not "childhood antics"How do you investigate the possible antics of teenagers from 36 years ago?
Utterly ridiculous.
I have no problem at all with a locally conducted investigation being done here.
The only problem I have is with a delay in the confirmation vote. Mr. Kavanaugh deserves a prompt up or down decision on this, find out if he's been tarred as a Chomo.
Why would she do that, knowing full well that this is not within the FBI's jurisdiction?Sure they do. This one just did.
It is within their jurisdiction, fool.
The FBI conducted his background check.
Trump simply needs to ask them to look into this new information as a part of that.
They conducted MANY background checks and found nothing.
When you actually come up with a point, post it. Remember, because you have the right to freely speak, it's often best not to when your speech makes you look idiotic.
Sure they conducted a background check, fool. Just not on this specific topic.
And once again. The background check would have caught some common character flaws (damn I get tired of posting this). Abusive males don't just turn on and turn off at the flip of a switch. They abuse females as a course of daily life. I know this from over 5 years of volunteering as a crime victim advocate, most of which were women from abusive relationships.
If, as thorough as an FBI screening is (likely involving psychological screening as well), didn't catch the flaw, it just isn't one he has.
Bullshit. The FBI has ALREADY done investigative work (vetting) on The Kav...and they could and should investigate this matter as well.Some of you are so stupid to believe that the FBI is, somehow, this all encompassing law enforcement organization that can investigate and prosecute any crime. That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works. They are a federal agency and as such can only prosecute federal crimes. It is unconstitutional for the FBI to get involved in criminal matters which the state can reasonably prosecute themselves.
Sigh, the cognitive dissonance is starting to make me angry. Hulk smash angry.
Correct, likely because it lacked even the tiniest shred of evidence. The only piece she had was notes from her therapist, which both she and her husband declared to be bogus.
Next?
So in this new system we face? Where notes written by the accuser are taken as evidence of accusations? Seems a little circular to me...and a lot evil.
Ms/Mrs/Comrade Ford do you have any corroborating evidence of your charges?
Yes Senator...I have notes I myself dictated to a therapist.
??
If we dont mercilessly put these people down now this degeneration towards Bolshevism will go too far.
So in this new system we face? Where notes written by the accuser are taken as evidence of accusations? Seems a little circular to me...and a lot evil.
They are positively freaking outThe trolls are scared and working overtime on this one.![]()
LOL
The complete lack of knowledge of how the legal system works is utterly astounding. Even Ford's "lawyers" know full well that such an accusation can only be tried in the state in which it occurred. Rape is not a federal crime, it never will be until appropriate legislation is passed to codify it into federal statutes. It is a state crime.
Are any of you liberal lemmings paying attention?
What's the rush? Republicans kept what became the Gorsuch seat open for a full yearSexual assault...is not "childhood antics"How do you investigate the possible antics of teenagers from 36 years ago?
Utterly ridiculous.
I have no problem at all with a locally conducted investigation being done here.
The only problem I have is with a delay in the confirmation vote. Mr. Kavanaugh deserves a prompt up or down decision on this, find out if he's been tarred as a Chomo.
He got onto the bench because your attempt to create doubt and suspicion rang true to no one, just like now. And he continues there with absolutely no "stench" whatsoever, except the stench of your leftist despair at your helplessness.