That's exactly why the FBI needs to re-engage... a good-faith due-diligence effort to get us sufficiently close to the truth, to assess.
They can't get any closer than we are now. Here's what I want you and your ilk to do: think of 5 questions you would ask anybody involved in this case. WTF could you ask? And I don't mean 5 anything questions, I mean 5 questions that could possibly bring us anywhere closer than we are now.
Which is exactly why the FBI needs to re-engage.
Only if teen house parties are a federal crime.
Au contraire... the FBI conducts the background investigations for SCOTUS nominees... including personal character attributions.
That makes it a Federal issue.
And that's what they did--6 times.
Nobody's looking to prosecute... merely to complete an extensive background investigation...
You know...the kind of thing that the FBI does all the time for prospective high government officials.
Yes they did, and again, 6 times. What you are asking for is an investigation, not a background check. The libs are using the term Background Check to launch an investigation.
A background check consists of looking at any criminal history (that's documented) seeing if you had any associations with terrorists and criminals, seeing if you involved in any criminal case of another, look into what clubs you joined in the past; what kind of organizations. That's a background check.
An investigation is when you go out and interrogate people. An investigation is to find evidence of a crime. That's what you're looking for. It's also why the FBI laughed at the suggestion.