Kash Patel Undermines His "Big Case" Against Wisconsin Judge

[gtopa1]

What a crock OP.

Of course the Government should not try their cases in the press. Nonetheless, the Government does have an obligation to inform the people of the actions it takes and the bases for those acts.

Doing so does not constitute anything along the lines of undermining the Government’s case.

Skrewball is dumber than a sack of AOC.

"Skrewball is dumber than a sack of AOC."

Classic!!!

Greg

 

[martybegan]

The fuck it does. The president can't change reality and the reality is that classified government documents aren't personal.

There's no coherent argument to claim that they are or ever could be.

Keep pretending that anything you type has any basis in reality, or that it fools anyone anymore.

 

[Marener]

Keep pretending that anything you type has any basis in reality, or that it fools anyone anymore.

You're fooling yourself, hack.

The PRA doesn't give the president the authority to wave a magic wand and turn classified government documents into "personal documents" anymore than it could give the president the authority to declare the sky to be green.

Even if it could, that doesn't permit a former president to lie to the government about responding to a court ordered subpoena.

 

[martybegan]

You're fooling yourself, hack.

The PRA doesn't give the president the authority to wave a magic wand and turn classified government documents into "personal documents" anymore than it could give the president the authority to declare the sky to be green.

Even if it could, that doesn't permit a former president to lie to the government about responding to a court ordered subpoena.

All of which were administrative matters until the Biden admin decided to try to torpedo another Trump Run.

Which failed. gloriously failed.

 

[Marener]

All of which were administrative matters until the Biden admin decided to try to torpedo another Trump Run.

Which failed. gloriously failed.

It could have been handled as an administrative matter, but Trump decided to play games and didn't leave the government any other choice.

If Trump had just handed the documents over when the archives requested it. If he had cooperated with law enforcement. None of this would have happened. He brought it on himself because of his behavior.

 

[struth]

False again.

In fact, Trump’s lawyers played his signature delay game in court.


I am not interested in relitigating your false claims.

This matter was adjudicated a long time ago.

The case was dismissed by a notoriously corrupt Trump judge on flimsy grounds.

Trump was never innocent.

oh no, it's very true, the Trump lawyers obviously raised the issue that the prosecution was illegal, and the Courts agreed. The Rule of Law once again got in the way of the demafacist abuse of power

 

[martybegan]

It could have been handled as an administrative matter, but Trump decided to play games and didn't leave the government any other choice.

If Trump had just handed the documents over when the archives requested it. If he had cooperated with law enforcement. None of this would have happened. He brought it on himself because of his behavior.

It should have bee handled as an administrative matter, but the Biden White house and their Hatchet man AG decided to get Teh Trumpz.

 

[Marener]

It should have bee handled as an administrative matter, but the Biden White house and their Hatchet man AG decided to get Teh Trumpz.

They tried to handle it as an administrative matter, but Trump refused.

Honestly, your persecution complex fails to take into account how Trump acts like a fucking asshole.

 

[martybegan]

They tried to handle it as an administrative matter, but Trump refused.

Honestly, your persecution complex fails to take into account how Trump acts like a fucking asshole.

They made unreasonable demands and then decided an armed raid on a former President was a good idea.

And it failed for them. Failed bad.

 

[Marener]

They made unreasonable demands and then decided an armed raid on a former President was a good idea.

And it failed for them. Failed bad.

What's unreasonable about asking a former president to return government documents to the government archives?

 

[martybegan]

What's unreasonable about asking a former president to return government documents to the government archives?

That they more than likely already had copies of?

This isn't the 1930's where you need an office pool to make duplicates, square.

 

[PeanutGallery]

Taking home classified documents isn't a paperwork fight. It's definitely a crime and people get prosecuted for it all the time.

Do you seriously not understand this?

If that's the case, then why didn't former VP Pence and then Sen. Biden NOT get prosecuted over taking home or away from a SCIF classified documents? Returning them after being caught with them may be a factor in sentencing, but it doesn't excuse them from the act itself.

 

[TimFitz]

It was never done because they realized they fucked up by starting the whole thing.

It blew up spectacularly in your face much like Kamala's squirting.

That is not true either.

Trump was dead to rights guilty by his own admission.

He delayed things past the election so he could not be tried while President. His court stooge dismissed the case accordingly.

 

[martybegan]

That is not true either.

Trump was dead to rights guilty by his own admission.

He delayed things past the election so he could not be tried while President. His court stooge dismissed the case accordingly.

Nope. Keep making shit up though, it's why no one takes you idiots seriously.

 

[Marener]

If that's the case, then why didn't former VP Pence and then Sen. Biden NOT get prosecuted over taking home or away from a SCIF classified documents? Returning them after being caught with them may be a factor in sentencing, but it doesn't excuse them from the act itself.

They'd have to prove they took the documents knowingly and willingly.

That's a lot easier for Trump given he was actively hiding them from investigators. If he had just turned everything over to the archives when they asked for it shortly after he left office, it would have been nearly impossible to prosecute him.

 

[Marener]

That they more than likely already had copies of?

This isn't the 1930's where you need an office pool to make duplicates, square.

How were they supposed to know unless they could look at them? Again, it's not unreasonable to ask the former president to turn over government documents he has no use for. It's definitely not unreasonable to tell him to return classified documents.

 

[martybegan]

How were they supposed to know unless they could look at them? Again, it's not unreasonable to ask the former president to turn over government documents he has no use for. It's definitely not unreasonable to tell him to return classified documents.

Or show up onsite and review them?

But no, they had to make a production over it. With a raid, and search, even though they knew where the stuff was as Trump TOLD THEM WHERE IT WAS KEPT during the whole argument.

 

[Marener]

Or show up onsite and review them?

But no, they had to make a production over it. With a raid, and search, even though they knew where the stuff was as Trump TOLD THEM WHERE IT WAS KEPT during the whole argument.

I must have missed where Trump invited the archivist to his house and asked them to search through his belongings looking for government documents. That’s because he didn’t and never would have allowed it voluntarily.

And when the FBI did come to take documents responsive to the subpoena, the visit where they swore that there wasn’t anything left, his lawyers explicitly forbade the FBI from looking at the boxes in the store room.

So Trump didn’t leave them any choice, did he?

 

[martybegan]

I must have missed where Trump invited the archivist to his house and asked them to search through his belongings looking for government documents. That’s because he didn’t and never would have allowed it voluntarily.

And when the FBI did come to take documents responsive to the subpoena, the visit where they swore that there wasn’t anything left, his lawyers explicitly forbade the FBI from looking at the boxes in the store room.

So Trump didn’t leave them any choice, did he?

All that time they were negotiating over the documents, you don't think it ever came up?

Again a legal matter about document control, not a criminal matter.

 

[Marener]

All that time they were negotiating over the documents, you don't think it ever came up?

Again a legal matter about document control, not a criminal matter.

You tell me. When did Trump invite the archivist to come to Mar a Lago and search the property.

It becomes a criminal matter when classified documents are involved.