Kash In

Go after his public enemies list.

That's extreme lawfare.
Show me from a credible source that he has an enemies list. So far I have only seen that accusation from leftist like you. But no evidence whatsoever that such a list exists.

This rumor comes from his book in which he names 60 members of the deep state. The looney left renamed that an 'enemies list.'

In his confirmation hearing he expressed President Trump's promise as his own: No enemies list and he won't seek retribution.


 
If she did, it must be from something else than the Jan 6th committee.

Here is a list of the Jan 6th committee------>https://www.npr.org/2021/07/27/1020...makers-investigating-the-jan-6-capitol-attack
You may be right. I can't find that he pardoned Pelosi. I was just sure that he had but I am probably wrong about that. Nevertheless don't look for Trump, Bondi or Patel to go after her in any way other than to call out her corruption. Trump wants to eliminate lawfare from government and therefore I can't imagine he'll engage in it himself.
 
You may be right. I can't find that he pardoned Pelosi. I was just sure that he had but I am probably wrong about that. Nevertheless don't look for Trump, Bondi or Patel to go after her in any way other than to call out her corruption. Trump wants to eliminate lawfare from government and therefore I can't imagine he'll engage in it himself.
Pelosi was the one behind the soft coup.
 
Pelosi was the one behind the soft coup.
I know that as most likely true and you know that. But to go after her will be broadly interpreted as political retaliation and I would prefer Trump and company to focus on cleaning house and restoring good government. It might feel good to us to see Pelosi get her comeuppance, and I hope she is credibly exposed for the corrupt person she is, but I see no good thing coming from prosecuting her.
 
You may be right. I can't find that he pardoned Pelosi. I was just sure that he had but I am probably wrong about that. Nevertheless don't look for Trump, Bondi or Patel to go after her in any way other than to call out her corruption. Trump wants to eliminate lawfare from government and therefore I can't imagine he'll engage in it himself.

I respectfully disagree. I do believe they will get one or two of them if they have a slam dunk case.

Why?

Because if they can get one or two, especially one or 2 on high and CONVICT THEM, it will prove what the Left did, and will destroy the Democratic Party for 8 to 10 years; not to mention it will decimate Democratic leadership going forward, if you can call what the Democrats have right now, leadership!

Expect a plea deal to satisfy BOTH of our positions-)
 
I know that as most likely true and you know that. But to go after her will be broadly interpreted as political retaliation and I would prefer Trump and company to focus on cleaning house and restoring good government. It might feel good to us to see Pelosi get her comeuppance, and I hope she is credibly exposed for the corrupt person she is, but I see no good thing coming from prosecuting her.
J6 investigation in the house. Remember questions over would Pelosi's phone records be subpoenaed.....which Lizzie said they would?

Never happened.

We need retaliation for sure. Too many denials over FBI involvement.

My feelings are this was another organized attempt to slime Trump to keep Him from running again and it got way out of hand.
 
J6 investigation in the house. Remember questions over would Pelosi's phone records be subpoenaed.....which Lizzie said they would?

Never happened.

We need retaliation for sure. Too many denials over FBI involvement.

My feelings are this was another organized attempt to slime Trump to keep Him from running again and it got way out of hand.
The J6 investigation was intended to take Trump down and they didn't care how dishonest or cruel or malicious or unlawful they were doing that. I have no problem with all bad actors in that being fully exposed for the truly evil people they were in that as well as any others in government (FBI) complicit in instigating a riot and making sure it would be blamed on Trump.
 
The J6 investigation was intended to take Trump down and they didn't care how dishonest or cruel or malicious or unlawful they were doing that. I have no problem with all bad actors in that being fully exposed for the truly evil people they were in that as well as any others in government (FBI) complicit in instigating a riot and making sure it would be blamed on Trump.
Isn't it a coincidence that most received 'preemptive pardons'?

That's another issue that should be challenged......the wording of the pardon section. I think it's vague in this case.
 
Show me from a credible source that he has an enemies list. So far I have only seen that accusation from leftist like you. But no evidence whatsoever that such a list exists.

This rumor comes from his book in which he names 60 members of the deep state. The looney left renamed that an 'enemies list.'

In his confirmation hearing he expressed President Trump's promise as his own: No enemies list and he won't seek retribution.


It's in his book stupid.
 
It's in his book stupid.
I read the book 'stupid' and it is NOT in his book just as I said in my post that you responded to. Still haven't taken that remedial reading comprehension course yet have you.
 
Isn't it a coincidence that most received 'preemptive pardons'?

That's another issue that should be challenged......the wording of the pardon section. I think it's vague in this case.
That they begged for, or worse ordered, those premptive pardons pretty much is an admission of guilt in itself.
 
I've already reached out to Kash, even advised him of the mystery laptop I received today.

All of this is very strange and I'm not letting the criminals off.
 

Kash is in. The Obama bots at FBI & DOJ are shitting their panties. :auiqs.jpg:

Kash will probably start a FBI RICO investigation of the Democrats' Lawfare cabal.
/—-/ Why aren’t democRATs celebrating Trump’s DEI hire for the FBI?
Democrats silent on Patel as first ā€˜person of color’ FBI director despite previous DEI emphasis
Democrats silent on Patel as first ā€˜person of color’ FBI director despite previous DEI emphasis
 
Back
Top Bottom