Zone1 Karine Jean-Pierre: Racial preferences are an ‘important constitutional right’.

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
96,199
Reaction score
69,221
Points
3,605
Location
Right coast, classified
The Racist Democrats are having a hard time accepting that everyone has the same Civil Rights.
They don't actually believe in Civil Rights if they refuse to accept that everyone has them.
But because of their complete inablity for introspection are unable to see their major fault.
 
The only reason her and Harris aren’t working at Burger King is the color of their skin.
Democrats hate Rev MLK.
And the US Constitution.
Their racist attitude of using skin color to determine worth goes back to the foundation of their party.
Actually the only reason they aren't picking cotton in georgia or south carolina is 500,000+ Americans gave their lives, so others could be free.
 
The Racist Democrats are having a hard time accepting that everyone has the same Civil Rights.
How can a black person have the same ability to get into Harvard, when Harvard uses "legacy" affirmative action for 70% of it's admissions.
That stinks of Jim Crow where only if your father voted, you could vote.
 
Karine and the Democrats think the American people are stupid, judging by the absurd shit they feel comfortable peddling to us. In reality, Karine and the Democrats are the stupid ones for underestimating the American people. It's impossible for Democrats to lead because they look at the American people as inferiors. MAGA
 
The Racist Democrats are having a hard time accepting that everyone has the same Civil Rights.
They don't actually believe in Civil Rights if they refuse to accept that everyone has them.
But because of their complete inablity for introspection are unable to see their major fault.
People should not be judged on skin color or religious beliefs.
 
How can a black person have the same ability to get into Harvard, when Harvard uses "legacy" affirmative action for 70% of it's admissions.
That stinks of Jim Crow where only if your father voted, you could vote.
Link, prove that. I think you are lying.
 
That simian fuckup fits in perfectly with the rest of the congenital liars from the party that likes to fuck kids.

Stolen elections have consequences.

karine ape 4.webp
 
Prove it.
Listen to them say they believe in Stare Decisis and that Roe was not just a precedent but Kavanaugh even called it a super precedent.

I'm not saying the court can't overturn previous decisions, but like they did with Plessy v Ferguson and Brown V Board of Ed. The original decision was by plurality, and overturned by 9-0 unanimous decision.
 
What does that have to do with the subject at hand.....or did you just post in the wrong thread?

Right thread. The site has shown to be extremely partisan even to the point of outright lying.
 
Compare to Roe v Wade decided 7-2 and overturned by Dobbs 6-3

They should at least have more votes to overturn a precedent, than the original decision.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom