Kari Lake: Whistleblowers Rejected A Staggering Amount of Bad Ballots Which Higher Ups Pushed Thru

[Skylar]

How can it be against the law? We have over site in this country and investigations. You are being ridiculous.

What does Maricopa have to hide?

Its against the law for Maricopa County to reveal sensitive voter data, including names and signatures, to anyone who isn't a Maricopa County official.

You're demanding that Maricopa County violate the law.

And then insisting that if Maricopa County follows the law, they must be 'hiding something'.

If so, why didn't the AZ Supreme Court order Maricopa County to do what you demand?

 

[Lastamender]

Its against the law for Maricopa County to reveal sensitive voter data, including names and signatures, to anyone who isn't a Maricopa County official.

You're demanding that Maricopa County violate the law.

And then insisting that if Maricopa County follows the law, they must be 'hiding something'.

If so, why didn't the AZ Supreme Court order Maricopa County to do what you demand?

It is not sensitive information. All it shows is who voted. The real reason is obvious, so stop the bullshit. If there was no fraud what is the difference? If Lake is never given the chance to prove fraud we will never know. What part of that do you not understand? People want answers and resolution.

What you want will accomplish nothing and people will not change their minds if there is tangible evidence like signatures withheld. Let's see them and restore election integrity.

 

[Skylar]

It is not sensitive information. All it shows is who voted.

Signatures and names are absolutely sensitive information.

Which is why the AZ Supreme Court ruled that Marcacopa county review the signatures and names. Not release them to the public.

The real reason is obvious so stop the bullshit. If there was no fraud what is the difference. If Lake is never given the chance to prove fraud we will never know. What part of that do you not understand? People want answers and resolution.

Says the guy that imagined millions of 'fake ballots' at 'democratic non-profits', backed with absolutely nothing.

 

[Lastamender]

Signatures and names are absolutely sensitive information.

Which is why the AZ Supreme Court ruled that Marcacopa county review the signatures and names. Not release them to the public.




Says the guy that imagined millions of 'fake ballots' at 'democratic non-profits', backed with absolutely nothing.

No one trusts Maricopa county, that is the whole point.

Also signature are commoplace and are not sensitive at all. You are paranoid. Knowing someones name does not harm them.

 

[Skylar]

No one trusts Maricopa county, that is the whole point.

No, you don't trust Maricopa County. You assume that everyone else is similarly afflicted with your conspiracy delusions.

They aren't.

 

[Lastamender]

No, you don't trust Maricopa County. You assume that everyone else is similarly afflicted with your conspiracy delusions.

They aren't.

After 2020 millions are. Did you forget that goldfish? They never gave up the routers. Why?

 

[Skylar]

After 2020 millions are. Did you forget that goldfish?

Millions who weren't going to accept any result that didn't end in Trump's second term.

Y'all's inability to accept losing doesn't create our electoral crisis.

Which might explain why your ilk have been laughed out of every court to ever hear your claims.

 

[Lastamender]

Millions who weren't going to accept any result that didn't end in Trump's second term.

Y'all's inability to accept losing doesn't create our electoral crisis.

Which might explain why your ilk have been laughed out of every court to ever hear your claims.

No one accepts lies. At least no one with a brain and one ounce of character. You lack both.

 

[Lastamender]

Millions who weren't going to accept any result that didn't end in Trump's second term.

Y'all's inability to accept losing doesn't create our electoral crisis.

Which might explain why your ilk have been laughed out of every court to ever hear your claims.

When are the courts going to realize they are the only ones that can keep elections honest by hearing evidence and requiring proof the job is being done correctly? Questions need answers not legal tricks that leave us only with the word of election officials. NOT GOOD ENOUGH.

 

[Skylar]

No one accepts lies. At least no one with a brain and one ounce of character. You lack both.

Your sour grapes don't make election results lies either.

And it takes neither brains nor character to make up one baseless conspiracy after another.

 

[Skylar]

When are the courts going to realize they are the only ones that can keep elections honest by hearing evidence and requiring proof the job is being done correctly? Questions need answers not legal tricks that leave us only with the word of election officials. NOT GOOD ENOUGH.

Rejecting your accusations backed by jackshit isn't 'legal tricks'. Its requiring evidence to back allegations.

As usual, your inane conspiracies about the courts and the law are just you not knowing how the law works.

 

[Lastamender]

Your sour grapes don't make election results lies either.

And it takes neither brains nor character to make up one baseless conspiracy after another.

They are not baseless. Look at the fucking signatures. Those votes should not have been not counted. We need to know how many went through like that.

 

[Skylar]

They are not baseless. Look at the fucking signatures. Those votes should not have been not counted. We need to know how many went through like that.

Then show us the evidence that democratic non-profits had hundreds of thousand of 'fake ballots'.

Its the cornerstone of your entire conspiracy. And you've got absolutely nothing to prove it.

 

[Lastamender]

Rejecting your accusations backed by jackshit isn't 'legal tricks'. Its requiring evidence to back allegations.

As usual, your inane conspiracies about the courts and the law are just you not knowing how the law works.

What about the evidence they will not release? Was there fraud and will it prove it? You bet it would.

 

[Skylar]

What about the evidence they will not release? Was there fraud and will it prove it? You bet it would.

You just making an accusation against someone doesn't obligate them to give you whatever you demand.

And you're demonstrating yet again that evidence isn't the basis of your conspiracy. You're STARTING with the accusation of fraud. And then scrambling for evidence to back up your claims.

That's not how any of this works.

 

[Lastamender]

Then show us the evidence that democratic non-profits had hundreds of thousand of 'fake ballots'.

Its the cornerstone of your entire conspiracy. And you've got absolutely nothing to prove it.

The digital evidence shows they had something the same people went back over and over to get. Coffee and donuts and since when are nonprofits open 24/7?

 

[Lastamender]

You just making an accusation against someone doesn't obligate them to give you whatever you demand.

And you're demonstrating yet again that evidence isn't the basis of your conspiracy. You're STARTING with the accusation of fraud. And then scrambling for evidence to back up your claims.

That's not how any of this works.

There is no scramble. The evidence is being withheld,

 

[Slade3200]

Notice that leftists here in the threads already made up their small minds while Lake could be destroyed if her claim fails which leftists doesn't realize that possibility.

Better to wait to see if her claim is valid or not.

How does Lake get destroyed if her claim fails? Her followers eat up the bullshit and she’s getting rich off of it.

 

[Skylar]

The digital evidence shows they had something the same people went back over and over to get. Coffee and donuts and since when are nonprofits open 24/7?

What digital evidence? Remember, True the Vote has never released a goddamn thing. They've refused to allow anyone access to their 'evidence'.

Second, the 'digital evidence' doesn't show a single 'fake ballot' anywhere. You've simply invented a conspiracy that relies on these fake ballots, despite zero evidence they exist.

This is why you lose in court. Your stories and inventions aren't evidence. They're an excuse for it.

 

[Skylar]

There is no scramble. The evidence is being withheld,

Then you admit, again, that evidence was never the basis of your claim.

As your claims of fraud came first. And now you're demanding people 'disprove' whatever you've made up.

That's not how the law or reality work. You need to prove your claims. Not make up stories and demand others disprove them.