Kari Lake Accused of Breaking Law by Proving Democrats Broke Law, and Having Gall to Legally Show Fraud Ballots with Bad Signature Matches

[Lastamender]

The failure of the machines was remedied and the people's votes were counted. The allegations of not having chain of custody were unsupported by evidence and Lake's witness had to admit that the forms to exist and she had no information that they were deficient. As for the officials, they have a duty to follow the law of the land. They don't get to do whatever they want. They have duties and obligations.

The failures lasted all day. Maricopa was caught in that lie by the machines themselves. Why are you perpetuating a lie? Worried?

 

[Faun]

The issue is the bar is set so high to "prove" voter fraud in this standard that no one will meet the merit standard.

Mighty convenient for the status quo.

You're an idiot, Nancy. You clearly didn't even bother to read up on that case. The bar was not at all set too high. The bar was... you're making claims in this court, show some evidence to support your claims. Reasonable and fair.

An example of their claims & evidence...

They claimed thousands of dead people voted in that election in Nevada. The evidence they provided were voter rolls with a couple of thousand names they claimed were dead and could prove they were dead. The judge asked if they had any evidence any votes were cast in any of those names... they had no such evidence at all.

Another claim in that suit was a list of names of people who had moved out of state but were still on Nevada's voter rolls. Same result. They didn't bring any evidence to court to show any of those folks voted in the 2020 general election.

They literally took their case to court, asking a judge to reject thousands of votes based on Nevada's voter rolls not being purged of ineligible voters.

The judge rightfully threw their case out due to lack of merit. So they appealed. ALL 6 appellate judges agreed with the first court. 7 judges in 2 courts all agreed there was no evidence to support their claims.

Then come along idiots like you, who don't even know squat about that case, who blindly make hollow blanket statements like, judges just didn't want to get involved.

It's why no one with a brain takes you yahoo's seriously when you try to deny the right lost every fraud case for reasons other than lack of merit, evidence or standing.

 

[martybegan]

If Lake didn't want people to cheat, why didn't she bring the lawsuit before the election? That way the procedures could have been fixed (if they truly were deficient as she said) and it could have been decided by the voters instead of a court after the fact.

Again, they would have dismissed due to lack of standing, because she couldn't show any harm.

 

[Lastamender]

The issue is the bar is set so high to "prove" voter fraud in this standard that no one will meet the merit standard.

Mighty convenient for the status quo.

You're an idiot, Nancy. You clearly didn't even bother to read up on that case. The bar was not at all set too high. The bar was... you're making claims in this court, show some evidence to support your claims. Reasonable and fair.

An example of their claims & evidence...

They claimed thousands of dead people voted in that election in Nevada. The evidence they provided were voter rolls with a couple of thousand names they claimed were dead and could prove they were dead. The judge asked if they had any evidence any votes were cast in any of those names... they had no such evidence at all.

Another claim in that suit was a list of names of people who had moved out of state but were still on Nevada's voter rolls. Same result. They didn't bring any evidence to court to show any of those folks voted in the 2020 general election.

They literally took their case to court, asking a judge to reject thousands of votes based on Nevada's voter rolls not being purged of ineligible voters.

The judge rightfully threw their case out due to lack of merit. So they appealed. ALL 6 appellate judges agreed with the first court. 7 judges in 2 courts all agreed there was no evidence to support their claims.

Then come along idiots like you, who don't even know squat about that case, who blindly make hollow blanket statements like, judges just didn't want to get involved.

It's why no one with a brain takes you yahoo's seriously when you try to deny the right lost every fraud case for reasons other than lack of merit, evidence or standing.
[/QUOTE]
Nobody believed it the first time you posted it. Fail.

 

[Faun]

I see the MSM let the country know over 60% of machines failed in Republican districts and wrong size ballots were printed. Did they also let people know about no chain of custody and the SOS Hobbs threatening county officials with jail if they did not certify?

Of course they did not because there would be an uproar and they know it. They omit and outright lie. They do not want Americans to hear the facts.

Chain-of-custody was not abandoned. Lake made that claim on court but when the rubber hit the road, she couldn't prove it.

 

[Marener]

The failures lasted all day. Maricopa was caught in that lie by the machines themselves. Why are you perpetuating a lie? Worried?

The technicians testified to how they fixed the problems. Half the time they just shook the toner cartridges and it fixed it.

There was no evidence that anyone was prevented from voting or having their vote counted.

 

[Lastamender]

Chain-of-custody was not abandoned. Lake made that claim on court but when the rubber hit the road, she couldn't prove it.

Neither could Maricopa. They said they did not have the documents. They were taking it for granted. That is blatantly wrong and any judge should have a huge problem with that. Why this one did not is obvious.

 

[Lastamender]

The technicians testified to how they fixed the problems. Half the time they just shook the toner cartridges and it fixed it.

There was no evidence that anyone was prevented from voting or having their vote counted.

More bullshit. Shaking cartridges does not change the ballot size, does it?

 

[Marener]

Again, they would have dismissed due to lack of standing, because she couldn't show any harm.

Injury in fact can be actual or imminent.

Lots of lawsuits occur before elections based on imminent harm.

 

[Marener]

More bullshit. Shking cartridges does not change the ballot size, does it?

There were numerous reasons ballots weren't able to be scanned. The wrong size ballots were still counted, just not right away. It didn't affect the result.

 

[Faun]

Shadow?

Wasn't it like 5 points or something?

Even if I believed you, which I don't.

Between 10-96 points above yours.

 

[Lastamender]

There were numerous reasons ballots weren't able to be scanned. The wrong size ballots were still counted, just not right away. It didn't affect the result.

That is what a very sloppy Maricopa county says. There is one reason the ballots were not scanned. They were the wrong ******* size and it only happened in Republican districts.

 

[Faun]

The failures lasted all day. Maricopa was caught in that lie by the machines themselves. Why are you perpetuating a lie? Worried?

Ballots rejected by tabulators were placed in a lockbox and counted later.

 

[martybegan]

Injury in fact can be actual or imminent.

Lots of lawsuits occur before elections based on imminent harm.

prove it.

 

[martybegan]

Between 10-96 points above yours.

Now I know you are lying.

Begone troll.

 

[Lastamender]

Ballots rejected by tabulators were placed in a lockbox and counted later.

That is what they say. They had time to change everyone of those ballots. That is another fact.

 

[Marener]

That is what a very sloppy Maricopa county says. There is one reason the ballots were not scanned. They were the wrong ******* size and it only happened in Republican districts.

The ballots were still counted. It didn't affect the results.

Kari Lake was asking the court to declare her the winner based on a problem that didn't affect the result. That's bullshit.

 

[Lastamender]

The ballots were still counted. It didn't affect the results.

Kari Lake was asking the court to declare her the winner based on a problem that didn't affect the result. That's bullshit.

Why did it take so long? There is no explanation for the time it took besides the ability to manipulate the results with that extra time.

 

[Faun]

Again, they would have dismissed due to lack of standing, because she couldn't show any harm.

She could have taken her "evidence" to the state legislature and they could have passed legislation to mitigate such issues in the future. Looks like she just sat on that in case it could help her flip the election in case she lost.

 

[Faun]

You're an idiot, Nancy. You clearly didn't even bother to read up on that case. The bar was not at all set too high. The bar was... you're making claims in this court, show some evidence to support your claims. Reasonable and fair.

An example of their claims & evidence...

They claimed thousands of dead people voted in that election in Nevada. The evidence they provided were voter rolls with a couple of thousand names they claimed were dead and could prove they were dead. The judge asked if they had any evidence any votes were cast in any of those names... they had no such evidence at all.

Another claim in that suit was a list of names of people who had moved out of state but were still on Nevada's voter rolls. Same result. They didn't bring any evidence to court to show any of those folks voted in the 2020 general election.

They literally took their case to court, asking a judge to reject thousands of votes based on Nevada's voter rolls not being purged of ineligible voters.

The judge rightfully threw their case out due to lack of merit. So they appealed. ALL 6 appellate judges agreed with the first court. 7 judges in 2 courts all agreed there was no evidence to support their claims.

Then come along idiots like you, who don't even know squat about that case, who blindly make hollow blanket statements like, judges just didn't want to get involved.

It's why no one with a brain takes you yahoo's seriously when you try to deny the right lost every fraud case for reasons other than lack of merit, evidence or standing.

Nobody believed it the first time you posted it. Fail.
[/QUOTE]

LOL

That's why I posted a link to the case.

You fail again because you're a failure.