*Karen Mead Killed That Cop And Walked Free*

[chesswarsnow]

You're a flat earther.

Sorry bout that,

1. I can identify a murderer.
2. Why do I belive a lie, that the earths flat?
3. Its noted many thousnadsof years ago, the earths round.
4. It is plain to see during an eclipse, when the shadow shines on the moon, didnt take a rocket scientist to discern the earths is indeed round.
5. Anyone with half a brain can figure that out.
6. You using that insult, "You're a flat earther.' shows just how limited you are, seeing how lame it is. lol
7. Might want to scrap that saying and move on to something more intelligent.
8. If you can.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[MarathonMike]

Sorry bout that,

1. There is no question, she did it.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

The roads were full of ice and snow. How does she get that huge SUV going fast enough in reverse to kill a 220 pound man? Why didn't he have any body contusions, just one arm and his face?

 

[Jarlaxle]

The roads were full of ice and snow. How does she get that huge SUV going fast enough in reverse to kill a 220 pound man? Why didn't he have any body contusions, just one arm and his face?

Arm was dog bites.

 

[chesswarsnow]

The roads were full of ice and snow. How does she get that huge SUV going fast enough in reverse to kill a 220 pound man? Why didn't he have any body contusions, just one arm and his face?

Sorry bout that,

1. Her SUV hit him straight on, he was directly behind her SUV, she ran over him, he wasn't side swiped, he took a major hit, very forceful, he went flying and bumped his head, was alive for awhile, then was covered by snow, and died.
2. She could of helped him, but she was so drunk, and so mad all she could do is call his phone ranting like a crazy person.
3. The impact of his arm is where he took to most force, standing basically right behind the SIV, looking towards the other side, with his back to the house.
4. The SUV came at him at an angle, catching him just right to do that damage to his arm, she did it, she said she did it, why is everyone not believeing her words???

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[chesswarsnow]

Arm was dog bites.

Sorry bout that,

1. No dog saliva present.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Sorry bout that,

1. Did you watch the trail, I did.
2. Your wrong, and i disagree with your conclusions, there was plenty of evidence,
3. All those ladies with pink shirts,and standing infront of Karen, and they hide her guilt.
4. I am sure that most of those Karens were Democrats.
5. They lie.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I wasn't. My trail cam is busted so I couldn't see any animals on the trail.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Sorry bout that,

1. There is no question, she did it.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

What evidence was there that proved she caused those injuries? The answer is "none".

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Sorry bout that,

1. No dog saliva present.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

In the snow and cold, why would there be if he was scratched with toenails? My dogs tear my ass up all the time accidentally. I can only imagine if they pissed off at me.

 

[MarathonMike]

Sorry bout that,

1. Her SUV hit him straight on, he was directly behind her SUV, she ran over him, he wasn't side swiped, he took a major hit, very forceful, he went flying and bumped his head, was alive for awhile, then was covered by snow, and died.
2. She could of helped him, but she was so drunk, and so mad all she could do is call his phone ranting like a crazy person.
3. The impact of his arm is where he took to most force, standing basically right behind the SIV, looking towards the other side, with his back to the house.
4. The SUV came at him at an angle, catching him just right to do that damage to his arm, she did it, she said she did it, why is everyone not believeing her words???

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I haven't followed the case, but all of the recent coverage I've seen of her mentions none of this story. Did she get amnesia? When did she recount all of this detail? Did you make it up?

 

[chesswarsnow]

I wasn't. My trail cam is busted so I couldn't see any animals on the trail.

Sorry bout that,

1. You are a spell Nazi, nice.
2. I bet your mother is so proud of you.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[chesswarsnow]

I haven't followed the case, but all of the recent coverage I've seen of her mentions none of this story. Did she get amnesia? When did she recount all of this detail? Did you make it up?

Sorry bout that,

1. Its what happened, she is a cop murderer.
2. Judge, Jury, Her Lawyers, Karen Read, Ladies In Pink Shirts, all wrong.
3. I stand agaisnt this injustice.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Rigby5]

In a liberal democrat controlled state by democrat prosecutors that are democrat political activists

Court proceedings have nothing at all to do with partisanship.
Prosecutors have no political party affiliation.

 

[Rigby5]

Sorry bout that,

1. All the evidence.
2. And there was a ton of it, shes guilty, she admitted it herself.
3. I hit him, i hit him, I hit him, came out of her mouth, then she asked a friend before he was discovered if they should go and pick up the shattered tail light lens.
4. So Mr Okeefe was hit by a car she admits to of been driving, that struck Mr. Okeefe.
5. He fell and busted his head, and died in the snow.
6. Theres nothing else needed.
7. She killed him, by hitting him with the car, and she knew it, perhaps he could of been saved if she helped him after she hit him, but no, she made like 50 calls , (wild rants to vm), to his phone during that cold night instaed of calling an ambulance.
8. There can be no just sentence for Karen Mead, just guilty.
9. I met OJ Simpson too, he said "I didnt do it, cops lied", he was guilty as hell.
10. If she would of tried to save or help, Okeefe and at least tried to do the right thing, then that would of been better, but no, she just got on here phone ranting at a injured mans phone, who may have of been saved if she tried to save him, she murdered, Okeefe; its a fact.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Wrong.
When she says "I hit him", she is accepting the claim by the police, which is not based on any fact.
The reality is that he was not killed by being stuck by a car at all.

 

[Rigby5]

Sorry bout that,

1. Her SUV hit him straight on, he was directly behind her SUV, she ran over him, he wasn't side swiped, he took a major hit, very forceful, he went flying and bumped his head, was alive for awhile, then was covered by snow, and died.
2. She could of helped him, but she was so drunk, and so mad all she could do is call his phone ranting like a crazy person.
3. The impact of his arm is where he took to most force, standing basically right behind the SIV, looking towards the other side, with his back to the house.
4. The SUV came at him at an angle, catching him just right to do that damage to his arm, she did it, she said she did it, why is everyone not believeing her words???

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Wrong.
Obviously she could not have gotten to the speed necessary from a dead stop, to do all that damage while backing up.
In fact, he would have been so close that no significant impact could have been possible.

She did NOT say she did it.
She is incredulously considering the claim by others that she did it, and obviously she could not possibly have done it.

 

[elektra]

Court proceedings have nothing at all to do with partisanship.
Prosecutors have no political party affiliation.

You are completely full of shit

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Sorry bout that,

1. You are a spell Nazi, nice.
2. I bet your mother is so proud of you.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

My mother is dead and yes, she was very proud of me because she only had a 7th grade education. You just should pay closer attention. I thought it was funny!

 

[Vastator]

His being a cop is irrelevant. The relevant context is their personal relationship; making your thread title cringeworthy click bait...

 

[Jarlaxle]

Sorry bout that,

1. No dog saliva present.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Was there any testing done for dog saliva? (Spoiler alert: no.)

What evidence was there that proved she caused those injuries? The answer is "none".

Indeed, there is substantial evidence she did NOT.

Court proceedings have nothing at all to do with partisanship.
Prosecutors have no political party affiliation.

BLESS YOUR HEART!

 

[chesswarsnow]

In the snow and cold, why would there be if he was scratched with toenails? My dogs tear my ass up all the time accidentally. I can only imagine if they pissed off at me.

Sorry bout that,

1. What is the nature of the dog attack, what set off the dog.
2. What and how did O'Keefe make them mad?
3. Just being outside walking in the snow, triggered the dog?
4. The dog narative was just smoke, create an alternative story line even if its without any basses, (no saliva).
5. This was kiddy court, and run by liberals, ladies in pink shirts demanded it, goofball lawyers, or they threatened they were going to do something, G-D knows what......, but they were going to do it like a Childs Tantrum.
6. Use your head for something, she cant be tried again, the jury let her off, they gave her the (GET OF OF JAIL) card.
7. But she did it, 100 % for sure, just like OJ.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. She could come out on TV, (Any Show), and admit she did it accidently, or on purpose, and she would never see the inside of a jail.
2. Shes got lifetime immunity, for this case.
3. Only way she goes to jail if she does something else, real bad, bad enough for a jury to actually do something.
4. Keep an eye on her Danno.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas