CaféAuLait;8647123 said:
I don't agree with this at all. I practice time outs and am considered middle of the road when it comes to politics. Time outs work, period. It takes more time than beating a child but they work. Time outs do not just mean you put the child on a chair and walk away, later time outs involve taking away items as well.
I don't understand this process which says its okay to beat a child but not an adult, its senseless IMO.
My point is "time outs" have been in the guide book for parenting forever. It used to be called a punishment, grounded, stand in the corner etc....
Time out is a watered down term to protect the silly frail egos of kids it's stupid. Like all things pc this term is relatively new. As if punishment is evil, but time out is loving.
Beating children children is a whole different issue.
I believe you are missing my point. Call it punishment, or what have you. I don't care. But to beat a child as proposed in the bill by the Kansas rep where it is allowed to leave bruises is outrageous. I do not agree with putting your hands on a child to beat them, hit them or whatever you want to call it.
I've seen arguments, that a child cant understand, as they are mentally incapable and hitting gets their attention, etc. "they don't understand words, but pain" If that is the case then why don't we beat adults that are mentally deficient? It is against the law to lay your hand on an adult but there are people proposing laws to do just that.