Kamala Harris to Accept Nomination Without Giving a Press Conference or Providing Many Policy Details

[Foxfyre]

I believe that the strategy the Democrats have come up with is to not give out any policies and just attack Trump.

You noticed that did you?

Seriously I think they've named Trump now hundreds of times and each time was accusing him of ridiculous things. They've mentioned the economy at best 10 times. They've mentioned rampant crime and the border crisis zero times. Policy positions are pretty much non existent.

It is supposed to be the 'new joy' but I haven't seen a lot of joy at the DNC convention. Mostly it is exaggerated yelling and angry people telling us how those who aren't them are terrible. We actually had a former first lady--she and Barack have a net worth of $70-$80 million!!!--tell us that people should not have/receive more than they need. If that isn't Marxist ideology I don't know how to explain it any more clearly. When the camera pans the crowd I don't see people enjoying themselves but see mostly sour or weary expressions of people seemingly enduring it until it will finally be over.

Kamala says everything will get fixed on Day 1. Day 1? Why not now? Why not in the last 3-1/2+ years?

 

[Billo_Really]

So where is it? Do we need an invitation to hear it?

It was in a speech two days ago.

 

[Lisa558]

As long as her methods are working so well for her, she has no reason to change it.

And too, she's causing Trump so much anguish by not giving him the opportunity to use his deceptive methods against her.

I wish Trump well in his use of other means to gain the win, but I think the traditional way at the ballot boxes has become impossible.

I don’t think her hiding will work much longer. Normal people (that excludes the radical left) do not like that she hides from the press, refuses to answer a question, and isn’t allowed to speak unless she is reading from notes prepared by someone else.

Her refusal to debate on Sept 6 also speaks volumes.

 

[Hollie]

As opposed to what? An orange spray tanned, cheeto dusted incompetent old man bent on revenge and caring nothing about actually being President?
I'll take the career politician please.

As opposed to the giggly, cackling career politician who is a total incompetent. You will take the career hack because you will take what you're told you will take.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

As opposed to the giggly, cackling career politician who is a total incompetent. You will take the career hack because you will take what you're told you will take.

She seems to have a much better grasp on policy than Trump ever has had. But he doesn't care about policy. He can't be bothered with it. Mostly because he doesn't understand it at a fundamental level. I will take the career politician over the person that tried to shred our Constitution and is only running to keep his worthless ass out of prison.

You will take the incompetent old man because for some reason, you firmly believe that he will bring back some form of America you remember wistfully and tearfully as a child. You know that isn't gonna happen?..right?

 

[toobfreak]

It was in a speech two days ago.

To who? You mean there is no online link to it? Was it that bad?

 

[Hollie]

She seems to have a much better grasp on policy than Trump ever has had. But he doesn't care about policy. He can't be bothered with it. Mostly because he doesn't understand it at a fundamental level. I will take the career politician over the person that tried to shred our Constitution and is only running to keep his worthless ass out of prison. policy

You will take the incompetent old man because for some reason, you firmly believe that he will bring back some form of America you remember wistfully and tearfully as a child. You know that isn't gonna happen?..right?

Harris has refused to explicitly announce any policy initiatives other than a few pending disasters. You will take the career hack because Harris is what you were given by the pelosi- Schumer politburo. Take your humiliation at not being given an opportunity to cast a primary vote as the princess was chosen for you.

 

[Donald H]

I don’t think her hiding will work much longer. Normal people (that excludes the radical left) do not like that she hides from the press, refuses to answer a question, and isn’t allowed to speak unless she is reading from notes prepared by someone else.

Her refusal to debate on Sept 6 also speaks volumes.

It's possible that she won't get away with her methods for much longer, but I think it will end when she and her handlers decide to change course.

She will know that Trump is capable of very effective debating tactics and she needs to be well armed with all the methods necessary to make light of them and perhaps mock them..

For instance, you will know by now the tactic she will turn to in order to defuse the border issue that's such a big part of Trump's campaign. If you don't know Lisa, just ask me.

 

[Billo_Really]

It was pointless because it was unsupported.

Not true.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Harris has refused to explicitly announce any policy initiatives other than a few pending disasters. You will take the career hack because Harris is what you were given by the pelosi- Schumer politburo. Take your humiliation at not being given an opportunity to cast a primary vote as the princess was chosen for you.

Move on. All done above board and all with the approval of the various state delegates. The only people I see right now making an issue out of it...are people like you. Because you went from on top of the mountain to just about screwed in the drop of a hat.

 

[Billo_Really]

Your "weird" slogan has been old news for a while now. Find some new, goofy slogan.

So you admit you are goofy?

 

[Billo_Really]

To who? You mean there is no online link to it? Was it that bad?

It was awesome!

 

[Rambunctious]

Unless she knows the election is rigged for her and doesn't NEED to care.

I don't think they can do that without it being obvious to everyone....

 

[jknowgood]

Ir was in a speech this past week! You didn't see it?

All she said was to regulate food prices.

 

[hadit]

Remember when we had to pass a bill to find out what's in it? Well now we have to elect a president to find out what she will do. You are a bunch of stupid bastards, but trust us cuz we know what's good for you more than you do.

And, of course, the usual suspects are thrilled to let her skate without once asking why we need to hire her to fix stuff when she's been in the White House for 4 years in a position to do something about it.

 

[Lisa558]

It's possible that she won't get away with her methods for much longer, but I think it will end when she and her handlers decide to change course.

She will know that Trump is capable of very effective debating tactics and she needs to be well armed with all the methods necessary to make light of them and perhaps mock them..

For instance, you will know by now the tactic she will turn to in order to defuse the border issue that's such a big part of Trump's campaign. If you don't know Lisa, just ask me.

Well of course the 10 million illegal aliens allowed in under Biden is a big issue - especially since her policies will continue to incentivize them, and make things much worse for Americans.

I say the two winning issues for Trump are:

1) the illegals causing all sorts of problems in the cities to which they’re bussed, costing taxpayers a fortune and using up resources needed for honest American citizens. It is especially harmful to the working class, as the illegals compete for goods and drive up prices.

2) the Marxist’s proposal to fix food prices, thereby resulting in food shortages and rations. Secondary to that is her redistribution scheme is making some people pay off the debts of others, including the debts of college graduates earning so much more than they.

if he stays focused on these, he wins.

 

[Donald H]

Well of course the 10 million illegal aliens allowed in under Biden is a big issue - especially since her policies will continue to incentivize them, and make things much worse for Americans.

She's going to say that there was an agreement waiting to be ratified by congress that was entirely acceptable to Republicans and Dems alike, that Trump destroyed.

I say the two winning issues for Trump are:

1) the illegals causing all sorts of problems in the cities to which they’re bussed, costing taxpayers a fortune and using up resources needed for honest American citizens. It is especially harmful to the working class, as the illegals compete for goods and drive up prices.

See my reply above.

2) the Marxist’s proposal to fix food prices, thereby resulting in food shortages and rations. Secondary to that is her redistribution scheme is making some people pay off the debts of others, including the debts of college graduates earning so much more than they.

It depends on her ability to defuse Trump's message, with a simpler message. Have Americans become amenable to the idea of needing to redistribute the wealth?

if he stays focused on these, he wins.

He needs to stay focused! We sure can agree on that!

Please take my answers as they are intended. That is, my hunches on how she needs to reply.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

She's running against the horrific damage inflicted on Americans by the current Administration!

Go, Kamala!

Go!

 

[Donald H]

View attachment 999616

I think it's an unspoken truth! But the Dems needed to keep it to the praising of Biden for pretty obvious reasons. Keep a close eye on her and you'll probably see her piss all over Biden and his failures.

Hasn't it been sickeningly sweet and worthy of puking! Biden stumbled out with no more remaining than the ability of a common garden slug!

 

[Lisa558]

She's going to say that there was an agreement waiting to be ratified by congress that was entirely acceptable to Republicans and Dems alike, that Trump destroyed.

Who says it was “entirely acceptable” to Republicans? A few submitted to the Left, but the majority of Republicans did not support a bill that essentially made it Ok for 5,000 illegals PER DAY to stream in.

The bill was a joke, essentially an “Illegal Immigrant Enabling Act.”

See my reply above.

It depends on her ability to defuse Trump's message, with a simpler message. Have Americans become amenable to the idea of needing to redistribute the wealth?

You mean have Americans been brainwashed to the point that they think it’s acceptable to take even MORE money from successful, productive members of society and give it to people who aren’t to the same degree? Or even “takers” entirely?

Let’s hope not! I posted earlier showing that the top 1% earn 26% of all income, but pay in 48% of all income taxes.

He needs to stay focused! We sure can agree on that!

Please take my answers as they are intended. That is, my hunches on how she needs to reply.